Prosecution Insights
Last updated: October 02, 2026
Application No. 18/168,726

RESIN PARTICLES, TONER RESIN PARTICLES, TONER, METHOD OF PRODUCING RESIN PARTICLES, METHOD OF PRODUCING TONER, DEVELOPER, TONER STORAGE UNIT, AND IMAGE FORMING APPARATUS

Non-Final OA §103
Filed
Feb 14, 2023
Priority
Feb 18, 2022 — JP 2022-023553 +1 more
Examiner
KUIPERS, JENNA ANN
Art Unit
1734
Tech Center
1700 — Chemical & Materials Engineering
Assignee
Ricoh Company, Ltd.
OA Round
3 (Non-Final)
72%
Grant Probability
Favorable
3-4
OA Rounds
0m
Est. Remaining
66%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 72% — above average
72%
Career Allowance Rate
28 granted / 39 resolved
+6.8% vs TC avg
Minimal -6% lift
Without
With
+-6.1%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
3y 4m
Avg Prosecution
25 currently pending
Career history
69
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§103
66.5%
+26.5% vs TC avg
§102
18.2%
-21.8% vs TC avg
§112
11.5%
-28.5% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 39 resolved cases

Office Action

§103
DETAILED ACTION Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Response to Arguments Applicant’s arguments, see the Response, filed 3/13/2026, with respect to the rejection(s) of claim(s) 1-5, 7-8, and 11-18 under 35 U.S.C. 103 have been fully considered and are persuasive. Therefore, the rejection has been withdrawn. However, upon further consideration, a new ground(s) of rejection is made below. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 103 The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 103 which forms the basis for all obviousness rejections set forth in this Office action: A patent for a claimed invention may not be obtained, notwithstanding that the claimed invention is not identically disclosed as set forth in section 102, if the differences between the claimed invention and the prior art are such that the claimed invention as a whole would have been obvious before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to a person having ordinary skill in the art to which the claimed invention pertains. Patentability shall not be negated by the manner in which the invention was made. Claims 1-8, 11-17, and 19 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over Hideyuki (JP 2015-148668) in view of Sacripante (US PGP 2015-0111145). Hideyuki teaches a toner containing a non-crystalline polyester resin A, a non-crystalline polyester resin B, and a crystalline polyester resin C ([0015]). The non-crystalline polyester resin A is insoluble in THF ([0015]). The content of the THF insoluble matter with respect to the total amount of the toner is preferably 15% to 35% ([0114]). The THF insoluble matter has a glass transition temperature (Tg2nd) of -40°C to 30°C, a storage elastic modulus at 100°C, G’(100), of 1x105 to 1x107 Pa, and a ratio G’(40)/G’(100) of the storage elastic modulus at 40°C and 100°C of 3.5x10 or less ([0015]). The polyester resin A contains a diol that is preferably an aliphatic diol having 4 or more and 12 or less carbon atoms, 3-methyl-1,5-pentanediol being one of these exemplary compounds ([0026]). Exemplary Amorphous Polyester Resins A-1 and A-2 contain 3-methyl-1,5-pentanediol as the diol component ([0194], [0196]). The dicarboxylic acid component of this resin is preferably an aliphatic dicarboxylic acid having 4 or more and 12 or less carbon atoms, succinic acid and sebacic acid being exemplary compounds ([0027]). It would be obvious to select sebacic acid for the dicarboxylic acid component of the resin, as it is contained in a short list of reagents and therefore a person of ordinary skill in the art would expect to have the same results when substituting one acid for another. Amorphous Polyester Resin B-2 contains propylene glycol and adipic acid as components ([0207]). The Exemplary Crystalline Polyester Resin includes sebacic acid as the dicarboxylic acid component ([0211]). Hideyuki is silent regarding the distribution of components within the toner particle. However, the main components of the toner particles of Hideyuki are similar to those of the instant application, and the toners are prepared in a similar manner. Therefore, it would be expected that the abundance of crystalline resin in a region from an outermost surface of each of the toner particles to a depth of 150 nm from the outermost surface is 4% or less relative to an amount of the crystalline resin in an entire region of each of the toner particles. Both toners contain the same main components of a THF insoluble amorphous polyester resin, a second amorphous polyester resin, and a crystalline polyester resin. Amorphous resin A-1 of Hideyuki ([0194]) is similar to amorphous resin A-3 of the instant application, amorphous resin B-2 of Hideyuki ([0207]) is similar to amorphous resin B-2 of the instant application, and crystalline resin C of Hideyuki ([0211]) is the same as crystalline resin C-1 of the instant application. The method of production of the particles is also very similar, wherein an oil phase and aqueous phase are emulsified to form the toner particle ([0222-227]). Similarly, the average major axis of the grains of the crystalline resin and the average aspect ratio of the grains of the crystalline resin would be expected to be similar to that of the instant application, as the makeup of the crystalline and surrounding resins are similar, and would fall in the range of 500 nm or less and 4.0 or greater, respectively. The volume average particle diameter of the toner is 3 to 7 µm, and a component having a volume average particle diameter of 2 µm or less is contained in an amount of 1% by number to 10% by number ([0109]). The toner may contain an external additive ([0088]). The toner may be used with a carrier to form a developer ([0159]). The image forming apparatus comprises an electrostatic latent image bearer, an electrostatic latent image forming unit that forms an electrostatic latent image on the image bearer, and a developing unit that develops the latent image ([0165]). The developing device accommodates the unit storing the toner ([0168]). Hideyuki is silent regarding a radiocarbon 14C content in the resin particles and the origin of the resin monomers. Sacripante teaches a sustainable toner (Abstract), wherein the toner contains bio-based materials ([0001]). The toner contains a wax to improve properties such as shape, charging, fusing characteristics, gloss, stripping, and offset properties ([0086]). The wax may include petroleum-based waxes and hydrocarbon waxes such as paraffin wax and microcrystalline waxes ([0088]). Petroleum based reagents may be replaced with plant-based materials to lessen the environmental impact of the toner ([0002-3]). Sacripante teaches that the toner has at least 70% sustainable content ([0012]). As the Biomass degree (%) = 14C content (pMC) / 107.5 x 100 (Applicant, Formula (1) Pg 8), a content of 70% sustainable material would have a 14C concentration of 75.25 pMC. The reagents for the polyester resins may include bio-based sebacic acid ([0057]). Therefore, it would have been obvious to a person of ordinary skill in the art before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to have modified the toner of Hideyuki to have a 14C concentration of at least 75.25 pMC, and to have used plant-based sebacic acid as taught by Sacripante in the amorphous polyester resin A of Hideyuki in order to have produced a toner that is more environmentally friendly. Conclusion Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to Jenna Kuipers whose telephone number is (571)272-0161. The examiner can normally be reached Monday - Friday 8:30 - 5:30 PT. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Jonathan Johnson can be reached at 571-272-1177. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /J.K./Examiner, Art Unit 1734 /PETER L VAJDA/Primary Examiner, Art Unit 1737 09/10/2026
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Feb 14, 2023
Application Filed
Aug 26, 2025
Non-Final Rejection mailed — §103
Oct 24, 2025
Response Filed
Jan 13, 2026
Final Rejection mailed — §103
Mar 13, 2026
Request for Continued Examination
Mar 17, 2026
Response after Non-Final Action
Sep 14, 2026
Non-Final Rejection mailed — §103 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12748357
TONER
3y 2m to grant Granted Sep 29, 2026
Patent 12704795
FINE PARTICLE CONTAINING SILICON AND TONER
3y 5m to grant Granted Aug 11, 2026
Patent 12681403
ELECTROSTATIC CHARGE IMAGE DEVELOPING TONER, ELECTROSTATIC CHARGE IMAGE DEVELOPER, TONER CARTRIDGE, PROCESS CARTRIDGE, AND IMAGE FORMING APPARATUS
3y 3m to grant Granted Jul 14, 2026
Patent 12675060
TONER
3y 2m to grant Granted Jul 07, 2026
Patent 12669760
SILICA PARTICLE, TONER FOR DEVELOPING ELECTROSTATIC CHARGE IMAGE, ELECTROSTATIC CHARGE IMAGE DEVELOPER, TONER CARTRIDGE, PROCESS CARTRIDGE, IMAGE FORMING APPARATUS, AND IMAGE FORMING METHOD
2y 9m to grant Granted Jun 30, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

Strategy Recommendation AI-generated — please review before filing

Get a prosecution strategy drawn from examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Typically takes 5-10 seconds — AI-generated, attorney review required before filing

Prosecution Projections

3-4
Expected OA Rounds
72%
Grant Probability
66%
With Interview (-6.1%)
3y 4m (~0m remaining)
Median Time to Grant
High
PTA Risk
Based on 39 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allowance rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month