Prosecution Insights
Last updated: April 19, 2026
Application No. 18/169,849

VEHICLE BODY CONVEYANCE SYSTEM

Final Rejection §102
Filed
Feb 15, 2023
Examiner
HAGEMAN, MARK C
Art Unit
3652
Tech Center
3600 — Transportation & Electronic Commerce
Assignee
Honda Motor Co. Ltd.
OA Round
2 (Final)
74%
Grant Probability
Favorable
3-4
OA Rounds
2y 6m
To Grant
90%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 74% — above average
74%
Career Allow Rate
563 granted / 765 resolved
+21.6% vs TC avg
Strong +16% interview lift
Without
With
+16.0%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
2y 6m
Avg Prosecution
24 currently pending
Career history
789
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
0.6%
-39.4% vs TC avg
§103
35.1%
-4.9% vs TC avg
§102
29.0%
-11.0% vs TC avg
§112
29.8%
-10.2% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 765 resolved cases

Office Action

§102
DETAILED ACTION The response dated 7/28/2025 has been entered and is treated below. Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 102 In the event the determination of the status of the application as subject to AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103 (or as subject to pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103) is incorrect, any correction of the statutory basis (i.e., changing from AIA to pre-AIA ) for the rejection will not be considered a new ground of rejection if the prior art relied upon, and the rationale supporting the rejection, would be the same under either status. The following is a quotation of the appropriate paragraphs of 35 U.S.C. 102 that form the basis for the rejections under this section made in this Office action: A person shall be entitled to a patent unless – (a)(1) the claimed invention was patented, described in a printed publication, or in public use, on sale, or otherwise available to the public before the effective filing date of the claimed invention. Claim(s) 1-2 is/are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 102(a)(1) as being anticipated by US 4,937,929 to Nokajima. Regarding claim 1 Nokajima discloses a vehicle body conveyance system, comprising an unmanned carrier (see figure 1) conveying a vehicle body between a plurality of work stations, the vehicle body conveyance system comprising: positioning pins (73), standing on the work stations to be inserted through positioning holes formed in the vehicle body, wherein the unmanned carrier comprises: a driving part (17), driving the unmanned carrier; a pair of gripping rails (47 and associated elements), respectively gripping lower surfaces of a pair of side sills provided on left and right of the vehicle body (see e.g., figure 8); a left-right width adjusting mechanism, connected with each of the pair of gripping rails (see figures 8-9), a lifting part (7), lifting and lowering the gripping rails; and a control part, respectively controlling the driving part, left-right width adjusting mechanism, and the lifting part, wherein the control part is configured to: adjust a left-right width between the pair of gripping rial to fit a left-right width between the pair of side sills of the vehicle body (col. 8 lines 13-17) by controlling the left-right width adjusting mechanism, control the lifting part to lift up the vehicle body to separate the positioning hole of the vehicle body from the positioning pin (removing body from station), control the driving part to move the unmanned carrier to another one of the work stations (moving to another station), and control the lifting part to lower the vehicle body to insert the positioning hole through the positioning pin standing on the another work station (col. 9 lines 60-65). Regarding claim 2 Nokajima discloses the gripping rails has a front-rear length equal to a front-rear width between a pair of jack-up points provided at front and rear of the side sill, and in a case of conveying the vehicle body, when the vehicle body moves forward or rearward with respect to the gripping rails, the gripping rails contacts the jack-up point. See figure 2. It is noted that the vehicle body is not positively claimed and is the article being handled and therefore does not limit the apparatus. See MPEP 2115. Nokajima is capable of interacting with a vehicle body in the claimed manner and thus reads on the claim. See MPEP 2114 and 2115. Response to Arguments Applicant's arguments filed 7/28/2025 have been fully considered but they are not persuasive. Applicant argued that sliders 58 should be correlated to the claimed gripping rails as they are the features in Nokajima that move left and right. Examiner contends that Nokajima still reads on the claims. As can be seen in figure 8 the bottom of the side sill rests on 60 and 58 moves laterally to grip the sill from the inside. The claims do not require a specific shape of the rail or a particular movement that would preclude the combination of 58/60 from reading on the rail and the movement of 58 on the claimed width adjustment. Claiming more details of the rail itself (as shown in figure 4) would likely overcome this rejection, but as claimed Nokajima still reads on the claims. Conclusion Applicant's amendment necessitated the new ground(s) of rejection presented in this Office action. Accordingly, THIS ACTION IS MADE FINAL. See MPEP § 706.07(a). Applicant is reminded of the extension of time policy as set forth in 37 CFR 1.136(a). A shortened statutory period for reply to this final action is set to expire THREE MONTHS from the mailing date of this action. In the event a first reply is filed within TWO MONTHS of the mailing date of this final action and the advisory action is not mailed until after the end of the THREE-MONTH shortened statutory period, then the shortened statutory period will expire on the date the advisory action is mailed, and any nonprovisional extension fee (37 CFR 1.17(a)) pursuant to 37 CFR 1.136(a) will be calculated from the mailing date of the advisory action. In no event, however, will the statutory period for reply expire later than SIX MONTHS from the mailing date of this final action. Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to MARK C HAGEMAN whose telephone number is (571)272-5547. The examiner can normally be reached Mon-Fri 8:15-4:45 (PST). Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Saul Rodriguez can be reached at 571-272-7097. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /MARK C HAGEMAN/Primary Examiner, Art Unit 3652
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Feb 15, 2023
Application Filed
Apr 22, 2025
Non-Final Rejection — §102
Jul 28, 2025
Response Filed
Sep 17, 2025
Final Rejection — §102 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12595129
STATION FOR PRESENTING CONTAINERS
2y 5m to grant Granted Apr 07, 2026
Patent 12583673
AN ACCESS STATION FOR AN AUTOMATED STORAGE AND RETRIEVAL SYSTEM AND METHOD FOR USING SAME
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 24, 2026
Patent 12577088
INDUSTRIAL TRUCK COMPRISING A LOAD FRAME
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 17, 2026
Patent 12577046
A Load Handling Device
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 17, 2026
Patent 12576671
TIRE HANDLER HAVING TIRE LAY FLAT CAPABILITY
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 17, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

AI Strategy Recommendation

Get an AI-powered prosecution strategy using examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Powered by AI — typically takes 5-10 seconds

Prosecution Projections

3-4
Expected OA Rounds
74%
Grant Probability
90%
With Interview (+16.0%)
2y 6m
Median Time to Grant
Moderate
PTA Risk
Based on 765 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allow rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month