Prosecution Insights
Last updated: April 19, 2026
Application No. 18/170,059

Methods for Joining Composite Components to Form a Unitary Composite Component

Non-Final OA §103
Filed
Feb 16, 2023
Examiner
MILLER, DANIEL H
Art Unit
1783
Tech Center
1700 — Chemical & Materials Engineering
Assignee
General Electric Company
OA Round
3 (Non-Final)
53%
Grant Probability
Moderate
3-4
OA Rounds
4y 2m
To Grant
73%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 53% of resolved cases
53%
Career Allow Rate
367 granted / 687 resolved
-11.6% vs TC avg
Strong +19% interview lift
Without
With
+19.3%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
4y 2m
Avg Prosecution
30 currently pending
Career history
717
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§103
66.2%
+26.2% vs TC avg
§102
14.7%
-25.3% vs TC avg
§112
11.6%
-28.4% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 687 resolved cases

Office Action

§103
Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Continued Examination Under 37 CFR 1.114 A request for continued examination under 37 CFR 1.114, including the fee set forth in 37 CFR 1.17(e), was filed in this application after final rejection. Since this application is eligible for continued examination under 37 CFR 1.114, and the fee set forth in 37 CFR 1.17(e) has been timely paid, the finality of the previous Office action has been withdrawn pursuant to 37 CFR 1.114. Applicant's submission filed on 2/4/2026 has been entered. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 103 The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 103 which forms the basis for all obviousness rejections set forth in this Office action: A patent for a claimed invention may not be obtained, notwithstanding that the claimed invention is not identically disclosed as set forth in section 102, if the differences between the claimed invention and the prior art are such that the claimed invention as a whole would have been obvious before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to a person having ordinary skill in the art to which the claimed invention pertains. Patentability shall not be negated by the manner in which the invention was made. Claim(s) 1-20 is/are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over Grasso EP 3075531 in view of MEHR (CN 115215674). Grasso teaches an intermediate layer that bond two ceramic substrates with a fiber layer and infiltrating using a slurry and or CVD densification to bond the two layers (see figures and claims). Grasso may not teach all the limitations of the claims. MEHR (CN 115215674) teaches a method, comprising: forming a product comprising a first ceramic composite material substrate, a second ceramic composite material substrate, and a pre-sintered ceramic interface between the first ceramic composite material substrate and the second ceramic composite material substrate, wherein the pre-sintered ceramic (bonding) interface comprises a plurality of ceramic particles and a plurality of fibres; and sintering the portion of the pre-sintered ceramic interface to engage the first substrate and the second substrate by heating at least a portion of the pre-sintered ceramic interface to a sintering temperature of the ceramic interface using joule heating, wherein the sintering temperature is greater than about 1000 degrees centigrade (degrees centigrade) and densified (see claim 1 and translation). The pre-sintered product may be subject to a chemical process prior to or during sintering that provide and/or includes densification (see page 23 translation; ). Therefore, it would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art at the time of filing to provide densification of the ceramic body using infiltration or CVD method via a “chemical process” meeting the newly claim language. Plurality of Fiber layers that can be woven or non-woven including a agglomeration, web, bundles, and/or needling combinations of layers (see translation). The substrate may be a matrix of partially encapsulated fibers with high pressure impregnation (densification). The substrate 52 may also include a matrix material that at least partially encapsulates the ceramic fibres. one or more of the technology can be used in the base material into the porous preform, the plurality of techniques comprises chemical vapor deposition/chemical vapor permeation (CVD/CVI), resin transfer molding (RTM), vacuum/pressure permeation (VPI), high pressure impregnation/carbonization (PIC) and so on (see translation). The coating layer (56) can be silicon carbide (See translation and figures). In some embodiments the bonding layer can bond between the first substrate (62A) and second substrates (62A) through interface (64) (See figures, claims and translation). The interface (68) may comprise silicates that aid in adhesion (See translation figures). The (66) metal layer may impregnate into the substrate cracks or voids (See translation pages 30-31). Exemplary fibers in the interface layer (68) may include, but are not limited to, carbon/carbon fibers, silicon carbide fibers, and the like (see translation and figure). Regarding claims 8 and 9, to fibers that can be heated and removed leaving channels, voids or pores, the art teaches heating metal to move it and form metal carbides or leave voids or fluid channels (see translation). Therefore, it would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art at the time of filing to provide a fiber that leaves a voids in the same manner to form fluid channels and to allow the metal to fill in cracks or voids in the substrate. Response to Arguments Applicant's arguments filed 2/4/2026 have been fully considered but they are not persuasive. The interface (68) may comprise silicates that aid in adhesion (See translation figures). The (66) metal layer may impregnate into the substrate cracks or voids (See translation pages 30-31 and figures 4A-D). Exemplary fibers in the interface layer (68) may include, but are not limited to, carbon/carbon fibers, silicon carbide fibers, and the like (see translation and figure). Regarding claims 8 and 9, to fibers that can be heated and removed leaving channels, voids or pores, the art teaches heating metal to move it and form metal carbides or leave voids or fluid channels (see translation pages 30-31 and figures 4A-D). Rejection maintained. Conclusion Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to DANIEL H MILLER whose telephone number is (571)272-1534. The examiner can normally be reached M-TH 9-6. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Veronica Ewald can be reached at 571-272-8519. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /DANIEL H MILLER/Primary Examiner, Art Unit 1783
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Feb 16, 2023
Application Filed
Jun 13, 2025
Non-Final Rejection — §103
Sep 03, 2025
Applicant Interview (Telephonic)
Sep 04, 2025
Examiner Interview Summary
Sep 11, 2025
Response Filed
Nov 22, 2025
Final Rejection — §103
Jan 16, 2026
Response after Non-Final Action
Feb 04, 2026
Request for Continued Examination
Feb 09, 2026
Response after Non-Final Action
Mar 07, 2026
Non-Final Rejection — §103 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12594579
ENVIRONMENTAL BARRIER COATING AND METHOD OF REPAIRING THE SAME
2y 5m to grant Granted Apr 07, 2026
Patent 12577023
Recyclable paper packaging with high barrier to water vapor and oxygen
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 17, 2026
Patent 12571129
TWO-DIMENSIONAL VERTICAL COMPOSITE LAMINATE INCLUDING GRAPHENE AND HEXAGONAL BORON NITRIDE AND METHOD OF FABRICATING SAME
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 10, 2026
Patent 12540105
HIGH TEMPERATURE COATINGS
2y 5m to grant Granted Feb 03, 2026
Patent 12534639
MICHAEL ADDITION CURABLE COMPOSITION, COATING COMPOSITION CONTAINING THE SAME, AND COATED ARTICLE
2y 5m to grant Granted Jan 27, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

AI Strategy Recommendation

Get an AI-powered prosecution strategy using examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Powered by AI — typically takes 5-10 seconds

Prosecution Projections

3-4
Expected OA Rounds
53%
Grant Probability
73%
With Interview (+19.3%)
4y 2m
Median Time to Grant
High
PTA Risk
Based on 687 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allow rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month