Prosecution Insights
Last updated: April 19, 2026
Application No. 18/170,117

BATTERY MODULE INCLUDING TAPPING ELEMENT AND HOUSING CONNECTED IN FLUID-TIGHT MANNER

Non-Final OA §102§103§112
Filed
Feb 16, 2023
Examiner
CULLEN, SEAN P
Art Unit
1725
Tech Center
1700 — Chemical & Materials Engineering
Assignee
Robert Bosch GmbH
OA Round
3 (Non-Final)
69%
Grant Probability
Favorable
3-4
OA Rounds
3y 5m
To Grant
98%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 69% — above average
69%
Career Allow Rate
841 granted / 1222 resolved
+3.8% vs TC avg
Strong +29% interview lift
Without
With
+29.1%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
3y 5m
Avg Prosecution
49 currently pending
Career history
1271
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
0.3%
-39.7% vs TC avg
§103
35.5%
-4.5% vs TC avg
§102
21.8%
-18.2% vs TC avg
§112
37.1%
-2.9% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 1222 resolved cases

Office Action

§102 §103 §112
DETAILED ACTION Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Continued Examination Under 37 CFR 1.114 A request for continued examination under 37 CFR 1.114, including the fee set forth in 37 CFR 1.17(e), was filed in this application after final rejection. Since this application is eligible for continued examination under 37 CFR 1.114, and the fee set forth in 37 CFR 1.17(e) has been timely paid, the finality of the previous Office action has been withdrawn pursuant to 37 CFR 1.114. Applicant's submission filed on 02 February 2026 has been entered. Status of Claims and Other Notes Claims 1–11 are pending. In the event the determination of the status of the application as subject to AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103 (or as subject to pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103) is incorrect, any correction of the statutory basis (i.e., changing from AIA to pre-AIA ) for the rejection will not be considered a new ground of rejection if the prior art relied upon, and the rationale supporting the rejection, would be the same under either status. The text of those sections of Title 35, U.S. Code not included in this action can be found in a prior Office action. The paragraph numbers cited in this Office Action in reference to the instant application are referring to the paragraph numbering of the PG-Pub of the instant application. See US 2023/0268605 A1. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 112 Applicants' amendments have overcome the rejections of claims 1–11 under 35 U.S.C. 112(a) or 35 U.S.C. 112 (pre-AIA ), first paragraph. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 102 Claims 1, 3, and 10 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 102(a)(1) as being anticipated by Yoneda et al. (EP 2355206 A1, hereinafter Yoneda). Regarding claim 1, Yoneda discloses a battery module (FIG. 2, [0017]) comprising: a plurality of battery cells (1) which are received in an interior of a housing (2) of the battery module (FIG. 2, [0017]) and the plurality of battery cells (1) are electrically conductively connected to one another in series and/or in parallel (FIG. 2, [0017]), wherein the housing (2) comprises an opening (25B) which is designed to guide a voltage tap (31) of the battery module from the interior of the housing (2, [0066]), the opening (25B) defined within an exterior surface of the housing (2, [0065]), and the battery module further comprises a tapping element (5), which is designed to contact the voltage tap (31) of the battery module from an environment of the battery module (FIG. 19, [0066]), wherein the housing (2) and the tapping element (5) are connected to one another in a fluid-tight manner with respect to the environment (FIG. 19, [0063]), wherein a sealing element (25D) of the housing (2) extending directly from the exterior surface in a direction away from the interior of the housing (2) and surrounding an entire perimeter of the opening (25B). Regarding claim 3, Yoneda discloses all the claim limitations as set forth above and further discloses a battery module: wherein the housing (2) forms the sealing element (25D, [0063]). Regarding claim 10, Yoneda discloses all the claim limitations as set forth above and further discloses a battery module: wherein the plurality of battery cells (1), are lithium-ion battery cells (FIG. 3, [0027]). Claims 1 and 3 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 102(a)(1) as being anticipated by Wang et al. (US 2018/0083237 A1, hereinafter Wang). Regarding claim 1, Wang discloses a battery module (FIG. 1, [0032]) comprising: a plurality of battery cells which are received in an interior of a housing (11) of the battery module (see battery pack, [0032]) and the plurality of battery cells are electrically conductively connected to one another in series and/or in parallel (see battery pack, [0032]), wherein the housing (11) comprises an opening which is designed to guide a voltage tap (14) of the battery module from the interior of the housing (11, [0038]), the opening defined within an exterior surface of the housing (11, [0038]), and the battery module further comprises a tapping element (24), which is designed to contact the voltage tap (14) of the battery module from an environment of the battery module (FIG. 2, [0035]), wherein the housing (11) and the tapping element (24) are connected to one another in a fluid-tight manner with respect to the environment (FIG. 2, [0038]), wherein a sealing element (16) of the housing (11) extending directly from the exterior surface in a direction away from the interior of the housing (11) and surrounding an entire perimeter of the opening (FIG. 1, [0032]). Regarding claim 3, Wang discloses all the claim limitations as set forth above and further discloses a battery module: wherein the housing (11) forms the sealing element (16, [0032]). Claims 1 and 3–9 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 102(a)(1) as being anticipated by Qi (CN 109921235 A). Regarding claim 1, Qi discloses a battery module (FIG. 1, [0061]) comprising: a plurality of battery cells which are received in an interior of a housing (1) of the battery module (see battery pack, [0061]) and the plurality of battery cells are electrically conductively connected to one another in series and/or in parallel (see battery pack, [0061]), wherein the housing (1) comprises an opening (25) which is designed to guide a voltage tap (22) of the battery module from the interior of the housing (1, [0067]), the opening (25) defined within an exterior surface of the housing (1, [0067]), and the battery module further comprises a tapping element (7), which is designed to contact the voltage tap (22) of the battery module from an environment of the battery module (FIG. 1, [0067]), wherein the housing (1) and the tapping element (7) are connected to one another in a fluid-tight manner with respect to the environment (FIG.1, [0069]), wherein a sealing element (21) of the housing (1) extending directly from the exterior surface in a direction away from the interior of the housing (1) and surrounding an entire perimeter of the opening (25, [0069]). Regarding claim 3, Qi discloses all the claim limitations as set forth above and further discloses a battery module: wherein the housing (1) forms the sealing element (21, [0032]). Regarding claim 4, Qi discloses all the claim limitations as set forth above and further discloses a battery module: wherein the tapping element (7) and the housing (1) are connected to one another by a plurality of screw connections (31, [0063]), wherein the screw connections (31) each comprise a screw receptacle (32), in each of which a screw is received (see screw, [0063]), wherein a bearing surface (3) of the screw receptacle is raised relative to a second surface of the housing (1, [0061]), wherein the second surface is arranged so as to directly surround the screw receptacle (32, [0063]). Regarding claim 5, Qi discloses all the claim limitations as set forth above and further discloses a battery module: wherein the bearing surface (3) of the screw receptacle (32) and the tapping element (7) of the battery module are directly connected (FIG. 3, [0061]). Regarding claim 6, Qi discloses all the claim limitations as set forth above and further discloses a battery module: wherein the screw receptacles (32) are each designed as screw domes (FIG. 3, [0063]). Regarding claim 7, Qi discloses all the claim limitations as set forth above and further discloses a battery module: wherein a screw connection (31) and the sealing element (21) are arranged spaced apart from one another in such a way that capillary effects to the sealing element (21) are avoided (FIG. 3, [0069]). Regarding claim 8, Qi discloses all the claim limitations as set forth above and further discloses a battery module: wherein the surface of the housing (1) and/or the second surface (101) of the housing (1) are formed in a sloping manner in a direction pointing away from the sealing element (21, [0061]). Regarding claim 9, Qi discloses all the claim limitations as set forth above and further discloses a battery module: wherein the plurality of screw connections (31) is arranged outside of the sealing element (21, [0061]). Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 103 The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 103 which forms the basis for all obviousness rejections set forth in this Office action: A patent for a claimed invention may not be obtained, notwithstanding that the claimed invention is not identically disclosed as set forth in section 102, if the differences between the claimed invention and the prior art are such that the claimed invention as a whole would have been obvious before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to a person having ordinary skill in the art to which the claimed invention pertains. Patentability shall not be negated by the manner in which the invention was made. The factual inquiries for establishing a background for determining obviousness under 35 U.S.C. 103 are summarized as follows: 1. Determining the scope and contents of the prior art. 2. Ascertaining the differences between the prior art and the claims at issue. 3. Resolving the level of ordinary skill in the pertinent art. 4. Considering objective evidence present in the application indicating obviousness or nonobviousness. This application currently names joint inventors. In considering patentability of the claims the examiner presumes that the subject matter of the various claims was commonly owned as of the effective filing date of the claimed invention(s) absent any evidence to the contrary. Applicant is advised of the obligation under 37 CFR 1.56 to point out the inventor and effective filing dates of each claim that was not commonly owned as of the effective filing date of the later invention in order for the examiner to consider the applicability of 35 U.S.C. 102(b)(2)(C) for any potential 35 U.S.C. 102(a)(2) prior art against the later invention. Claims 2 and 11 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over Qi (CN 109921235 A) as applied to claim 1 above, and further in view of Sugeno et al. (US 2016/0149177 A1, hereinafter Sugeno). Regarding claims 2 and 11, Wang discloses all the claim limitations as set forth above and further discloses a battery module: wherein the housing is made of a metal material; and wherein the housing is made of aluminum, and wherein the housing of the battery module is designed as an aluminum die-cast housing. Sugeno discloses a battery module (1) comprising a housing (20) made of a metal material (see metal plate, [0092]); and wherein the housing (20) is made of aluminum (see metal plate, [0092]), and wherein the housing of the battery module is designed as an aluminum die-cast housing (see metal plate, [0092]) to improve the heat release properties of the housing (see outer casing, [0092]). Qi and Sugeno are analogous because they are directed to battery modules. Therefore, it would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art at the effective filing date of the invention to make the housing of Qi with aluminum as taught by Sugeno in order to improve the heat release properties of the housing. Response to Arguments Applicant’s arguments with respect to claims 1–11 have been considered but are moot because the new ground of rejection does not rely on any reference applied in the prior rejection of record for any teaching or matter specifically challenged in the argument. Conclusion Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to Sean P Cullen, Ph.D. whose telephone number is (571)270-1251. The examiner can normally be reached Monday to Thursday 6:00 am to 4:00 pm CT, Friday 6:00 am to 12:00 pm CT. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Basia A Ridley can be reached at (571)272-1453. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /Sean P Cullen, Ph.D./Primary Examiner, Art Unit 1725
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Feb 16, 2023
Application Filed
Aug 18, 2025
Non-Final Rejection — §102, §103, §112
Nov 03, 2025
Response Filed
Nov 13, 2025
Final Rejection — §102, §103, §112
Feb 02, 2026
Request for Continued Examination
Feb 05, 2026
Response after Non-Final Action
Feb 24, 2026
Non-Final Rejection — §102, §103, §112 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12603322
NONWOVEN FABRIC MADE OF THICK AND THIN FIBERS, AND SOLID ELECTROLYTE SHEET INCLUDING THE SAME
2y 5m to grant Granted Apr 14, 2026
Patent 12603342
BATTERY MODULE INCLUDING BUS BAR ASSEMBLY SLIDELY DISPOSED ON ELECTRODE TABS OF BATTERY CELLS AND MANUFACTURING METHOD THEREOF
2y 5m to grant Granted Apr 14, 2026
Patent 12586868
SEPARATOR INCLUDING INORGANIC POROUS COATING LAYER INCLUDING POLAR BINDER AND ACRYLIC BINDER WITH DIFFERENT GLASS TRANSITION TEMPERATURES, ELECTROCHEMICAL DEVICE, AND METHOD FOR MANUFACTURING THE SAME
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 24, 2026
Patent 12573683
BATTERY MODULE INCLUDING POUCH CELL MODULE WITH CELLS SEPARATED BY INSULATOR AND TABS EXTENDING ACROSS INSULATOR
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 10, 2026
Patent 12573660
LITHIUM-ION-CONDUCTING COMPOSITE MATERIAL CONTAINING POLYMER AND MONODISPERSE AND SPHERICAL LITHIUM-ION CONDUCTING PARTICLES AND PROCESS FOR PRODUCING THE SAME
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 10, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

AI Strategy Recommendation

Get an AI-powered prosecution strategy using examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Powered by AI — typically takes 5-10 seconds

Prosecution Projections

3-4
Expected OA Rounds
69%
Grant Probability
98%
With Interview (+29.1%)
3y 5m
Median Time to Grant
High
PTA Risk
Based on 1222 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allow rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month