Prosecution Insights
Last updated: April 19, 2026
Application No. 18/170,442

METHODS AND SYSTEMS FOR REPORTING USER EQUIPMENT CAPABILITY

Non-Final OA §102§112
Filed
Feb 16, 2023
Examiner
KIM, CHONG G
Art Unit
2443
Tech Center
2400 — Computer Networks
Assignee
T-Mobile Usa Inc.
OA Round
2 (Non-Final)
83%
Grant Probability
Favorable
2-3
OA Rounds
2y 11m
To Grant
87%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 83% — above average
83%
Career Allow Rate
352 granted / 424 resolved
+25.0% vs TC avg
Minimal +4% lift
Without
With
+4.2%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
2y 11m
Avg Prosecution
44 currently pending
Career history
468
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
12.0%
-28.0% vs TC avg
§103
35.8%
-4.2% vs TC avg
§102
36.3%
-3.7% vs TC avg
§112
12.2%
-27.8% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 424 resolved cases

Office Action

§102 §112
DETAILED ACTION Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . The office action is non-final due to a new ground of rejection in response to Applicant’s arguments filed on 10/27/2025. Response to Amendment The Amendment filed on 10/27/2025 has been entered. Claims 1-7, 9-15 and 17-20 remain pending in the application. Applicant’s amendments to Claims have overcome each and every objection and 101 and 112(b) rejections previously set forth in the Non-Final Office Action mailed on 6/27/2025. Response to Arguments Applicant’s arguments on pages 9-11 with respect to claims 1, 9 and 17 have been considered but are moot upon a further consideration and a new ground of rejection made under 35 U.S.C. 102(a)(2) as being anticipated by Bai (US PGPub 2025/0192856). Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 112 The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 112(b): (b) CONCLUSION.—The specification shall conclude with one or more claims particularly pointing out and distinctly claiming the subject matter which the inventor or a joint inventor regards as the invention. The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 112 (pre-AIA ), second paragraph: The specification shall conclude with one or more claims particularly pointing out and distinctly claiming the subject matter which the applicant regards as his invention. Claims 1, 9 and 17 recite the limitation " wherein the request to update the UE capability indicates a time period for the change in the UE capability desired by the UE”. There is insufficient antecedent basis for these limitations in the claims. The term “the change” does not have a proper antecedent basis in the referenced claims 1, 9 and 17. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 102 The following is a quotation of the appropriate paragraphs of 35 U.S.C. 102 that form the basis for the rejections under this section made in this Office action: A person shall be entitled to a patent unless – (a)(2) the claimed invention was described in a patent issued under section 151, or in an application for patent published or deemed published under section 122(b), in which the patent or application, as the case may be, names another inventor and was effectively filed before the effective filing date of the claimed invention. Claims 1-7, 9-15 and 17-20 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 102(a)(2) as being anticipated by Bai (US PGPub 2025/0192856). Regarding claims 1, 9 and 17, Bai teaches a computer-implemented method (Bai, see abstract, Beam switch prediction and reporting) comprising: establishing, by a user equipment (UE), a communication path via a node B, the communication path enabling a communication between the UE and a packet data network (PDN) (Bai, see paragraphs 0076 and 0109, the UE 115-b may communicate with the network entity 105-b using a first communication beam. The core network 130 may provide user authentication, access authorization, tracking, Internet Protocol (IP) connectivity, and other access, routing, or mobility functions, which may include at least one user plane entity that routes packets or interconnects to external networks (e.g., a serving gateway (S-GW), a Packet Data Network (PDN) gateway (P-GW)); determining, by the UE, a preset condition is triggered during the communication (Bai, see paragraph 0109, the UE 115-b may determine movement of the UE 115-b, may determine movement of a nearby obstruction, or both. For example, the UE 115-a may determine that the UE 115-b is changing location (e.g., changing latitude, longitude, altitude), changing orientation (e.g., rotating), changing physical configuration (e.g., folding or unfolding), or any combination thereof); generating, by the UE, a request to update a UE capability (Bai, see paragraph 0112, the UE 115-b may transmit a first message to the network entity 105-b. The first message may indicate the changes to the one or more communication parameters, a time parameter that indicates a time for the UE 115-b to switch to the second communication beam (e.g., the beam switch time), or both), wherein the request to update the UE capability indicates a time period for the change in the UE capability desired by the UE (Bai, see paragraph 0112, a time parameter that indicates a time for the UE 115-b to switch to the second communication beam (e.g., the beam switch time)); and transmitting, by the UE, the request to the node B, causing the node B to update the UE capability used for the communication (Bai, see paragraph 0112, the UE 115-b may transmit a first message to the network entity 105-b). Regarding claims 2, 10 and 18, Bai teaches further comprising: transmitting, by the UE, the request to the node B without requesting for an enquiry from the node B (Bai, see paragraphs 0111-0112, At 325, the UE 115-b may determine a preferred communication beam for use by the network entity 105-b after the UE 115-b switches to the second communication beam. The UE 115-b may determine the preferred communication beam based on the second communication beam. At 330, the UE 115-b may transmit a first message to the network entity 105-b). Regarding claims 3, 11 and 19, Bai teaches further comprising: detecting a block error rate exceeds a preset threshold (Bai, see paragraph 0109, the UE 115-b may determine movement of the UE 115-b, may determine movement of a nearby obstruction, or both. For example, the UE 115-a may determine that the UE 115-b is changing location (e.g., changing latitude, longitude, altitude), changing orientation (e.g., rotating), changing physical configuration (e.g., folding or unfolding), or any combination thereof), and determining that the preset condition is triggered based on the block error rate exceeding the preset threshold (Bai, see paragraph 0112, the UE 115-b may transmit a first message to the network entity 105-b. The first message may indicate the changes to the one or more communication parameters, a time parameter that indicates a time for the UE 115-b to switch to the second communication beam (e.g., the beam switch time), or both). Regarding claims 4 and 12, Bai teaches further comprising: detecting a packet loss rate exceeds a preset threshold (Bai, see paragraph 0109, the UE 115-b may determine movement of the UE 115-b, may determine movement of a nearby obstruction, or both. For example, the UE 115-a may determine that the UE 115-b is changing location (e.g., changing latitude, longitude, altitude), changing orientation (e.g., rotating), changing physical configuration (e.g., folding or unfolding), or any combination thereof), and determining that the preset condition is triggered based on the packet loss rate exceeding the preset threshold (Bai, see paragraph 0112, the UE 115-b may transmit a first message to the network entity 105-b. The first message may indicate the changes to the one or more communication parameters, a time parameter that indicates a time for the UE 115-b to switch to the second communication beam (e.g., the beam switch time), or both). Regarding claims 5 and 13, Bai teaches further comprising: detecting a change of radio access technology (RAT) (Bai, see paragraph 0109, the UE 115-b may determine movement of the UE 115-b, may determine movement of a nearby obstruction, or both. For example, the UE 115-a may determine that the UE 115-b is changing location (e.g., changing latitude, longitude, altitude), changing orientation (e.g., rotating), changing physical configuration (e.g., folding or unfolding), or any combination thereof), and determining that the preset condition is triggered based on the change of RAT (Bai, see paragraph 0112, the UE 115-b may transmit a first message to the network entity 105-b. The first message may indicate the changes to the one or more communication parameters, a time parameter that indicates a time for the UE 115-b to switch to the second communication beam (e.g., the beam switch time), or both). Regarding claims 6 and 14, Bai teaches further comprising: detecting a change of tracking area (Bai, see paragraph 0109, the UE 115-b may determine movement of the UE 115-b, may determine movement of a nearby obstruction, or both. For example, the UE 115-a may determine that the UE 115-b is changing location (e.g., changing latitude, longitude, altitude), changing orientation (e.g., rotating), changing physical configuration (e.g., folding or unfolding), or any combination thereof), and determining that the preset condition is triggered based on the change of tracking area (Bai, see paragraph 0112, the UE 115-b may transmit a first message to the network entity 105-b. The first message may indicate the changes to the one or more communication parameters, a time parameter that indicates a time for the UE 115-b to switch to the second communication beam (e.g., the beam switch time), or both). Regarding claims 7, 15 and 20, Bai teaches wherein the request to update the UE capability indicates a change in the capability desired by the UE including at least one of: a change of modulation scheme, a change of power class, a change of bandwidth in use, a change of antenna switching, a change of a granular for beamforming, or a change of downlink multiple input multiple output (MIMO) (Bai, see paragraphs 0111-0112, At 325, the UE 115-b may determine a preferred communication beam for use by the network entity 105-b after the UE 115-b switches to the second communication beam. The UE 115-b may determine the preferred communication beam based on the second communication beam. At 330, the UE 115-b may transmit a first message to the network entity 105-b). Conclusion Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to CHONG G KIM whose telephone number is (571)270-0619. The examiner can normally be reached Mon-Fri @ 9am - 5pm. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Nicholas R. Taylor can be reached at 571-272-3889. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /CHONG G KIM/Examiner, Art Unit 2443 /NICHOLAS R TAYLOR/Supervisory Patent Examiner, Art Unit 2443
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Feb 16, 2023
Application Filed
Jun 25, 2025
Non-Final Rejection — §102, §112
Oct 27, 2025
Response Filed
Jan 22, 2026
Non-Final Rejection — §102, §112 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12587409
A2B CABLE LENGTH DETECTION
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 24, 2026
Patent 12581318
NETWORK TOPOLOGY FOR EFFICIENT AND PERFORMANT VIRTUAL WANS
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 17, 2026
Patent 12574978
METHODS FOR CONNECTION ORIENTED DATA TRANSFER FOR ULTRA-WIDEBAND SYSTEMS AND APPARATUSES
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 10, 2026
Patent 12563428
METHOD FOR SHARING MEASUREMENT GAP
2y 5m to grant Granted Feb 24, 2026
Patent 12557167
METHODS AND APPARATUS FOR INACTIVE STATE INITIAL UPLINK TRANSMISSION USING PRE-CONFIGURED GRANT AT A BASE STATION IN WIRELESS COMMUNICATION
2y 5m to grant Granted Feb 17, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

AI Strategy Recommendation

Get an AI-powered prosecution strategy using examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Powered by AI — typically takes 5-10 seconds

Prosecution Projections

2-3
Expected OA Rounds
83%
Grant Probability
87%
With Interview (+4.2%)
2y 11m
Median Time to Grant
Moderate
PTA Risk
Based on 424 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allow rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month