Prosecution Insights
Last updated: April 19, 2026
Application No. 18/170,737

BREAST MILK EXTRACTION KIT COMPRISING A BREAST MILK PUMP AND A PUMPING DEVICE

Non-Final OA §102§103
Filed
Feb 17, 2023
Examiner
FREHE, WILLIAM R
Art Unit
3783
Tech Center
3700 — Mechanical Engineering & Manufacturing
Assignee
Annabella Tech Ltd.
OA Round
5 (Non-Final)
60%
Grant Probability
Moderate
5-6
OA Rounds
3y 11m
To Grant
99%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 60% of resolved cases
60%
Career Allow Rate
229 granted / 382 resolved
-10.1% vs TC avg
Strong +41% interview lift
Without
With
+41.4%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
3y 11m
Avg Prosecution
50 currently pending
Career history
432
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
0.4%
-39.6% vs TC avg
§103
51.2%
+11.2% vs TC avg
§102
19.6%
-20.4% vs TC avg
§112
23.4%
-16.6% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 382 resolved cases

Office Action

§102 §103
DETAILED ACTION Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Continued Examination Under 37 CFR 1.114 A request for continued examination under 37 CFR 1.114, including the fee set forth in 37 CFR 1.17(e), was filed in this application after final rejection. Since this application is eligible for continued examination under 37 CFR 1.114, and the fee set forth in 37 CFR 1.17(e) has been timely paid, the finality of the previous Office action has been withdrawn pursuant to 37 CFR 1.114. Applicant's submission filed on 07/07/2025 has been entered. Claim Objections Claim 1 is objected to because of the following informalities: Line 4 reading “the breast” should read --a breast--. Appropriate correction is required. Drawings The drawings are objected to under 37 CFR 1.83(a). The drawings must show every feature of the invention specified in the claims. Therefore, the “operational components” of Claim 27 must be shown or the feature(s) canceled from the claim(s). No new matter should be entered. Corrected drawing sheets in compliance with 37 CFR 1.121(d) are required in reply to the Office action to avoid abandonment of the application. Any amended replacement drawing sheet should include all of the figures appearing on the immediate prior version of the sheet, even if only one figure is being amended. The figure or figure number of an amended drawing should not be labeled as “amended.” If a drawing figure is to be canceled, the appropriate figure must be removed from the replacement sheet, and where necessary, the remaining figures must be renumbered and appropriate changes made to the brief description of the several views of the drawings for consistency. Additional replacement sheets may be necessary to show the renumbering of the remaining figures. Each drawing sheet submitted after the filing date of an application must be labeled in the top margin as either “Replacement Sheet” or “New Sheet” pursuant to 37 CFR 1.121(d). If the changes are not accepted by the examiner, the applicant will be notified and informed of any required corrective action in the next Office action. The objection to the drawings will not be held in abeyance. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 102 The following is a quotation of the appropriate paragraphs of 35 U.S.C. 102 that form the basis for the rejections under this section made in this Office action: A person shall be entitled to a patent unless – (a)(1) the claimed invention was patented, described in a printed publication, or in public use, on sale, or otherwise available to the public before the effective filing date of the claimed invention. Claims 1-3, 5, 15, 17-19 and 21-27 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 102(a)(1) as being anticipated by Edelman et al. (USPGPub 2020/0016307). Re Claim 1, Edelman teaches a body (20) for a breast milk pump (10) (as seen in Edelman Annotated Fig. 1C below), the breast milk pump (10) comprising a milk extraction assembly (28) (wherein element 28 of Edelman Annotated Fig. 1C is interpreted as the funnel 30 and tubular member extending therefrom) configured to be directly connected to a milk collection container to establish a milk flow path (Edelman Fig. 2A; ¶ 0021, 0067 - “funnel 30 also has a distal end 26 that resembles the baby's throat, and designed to be fluidly connected to a container for collecting the pumped breastmilk”), the breast milk pump comprising a proximal portion (20-6) configured to be positioned toward the breast of a user, a distal portion (20-7) configured to be positioned away from the breast, and a main axis extending between the proximal portion (20-6) and the distal portion (20-7) (as seen in Edelman Annotated Fig. 1C below), the body (20) comprising: a component-accommodating portion (130) configured to accommodate one or more operational components (50) to be used in conjunction with the breast milk pump (10) (Edelman ¶ 0024); said component-accommodating portion (130) comprising a front component-accommodating portion (130-1), the front component-accommodating portion (130-1) having a stimulating mechanism (150-156) at least partially positioned within the component-accommodating portion (130) (Edelman ¶ 0036-0037; Fig. 4A), said stimulating mechanism (150-156) being configured to manipulate the milk extraction assembly (28) at least during operation of the breast milk pump (Edelman ¶ 0036-0037, 0065, 0068, 0087-0094). Edelman further teaches an interface portion (20-1) configured to be engaged with the milk extraction assembly (28) (Edelman Annotated Fig. 1C; ¶ 0008 - “said funnel 30 is designed to fit into said body 20” implies that body 20 has a through-passage), said interface portion (20-1) comprising a through-passage (20-2) extending along a direction transverse to the main axis of the breast milk pump (10) (as seen in Edelman Annotated Fig. 1C, when funnel 30 is removed, milk flow path is open to base 130), said through-passage (20-2) being physically separated from the front component-accommodating portion (130-1) and being configured to allow at least a part of the milk extraction assembly (28) to be received therein such that the milk extraction assembly (28) is detachably connectable to the milk collection container via the through-passage (20-2) (Edelman ¶ 0008, 0045, 0067 - “funnel 30 also has a distal end 26 that resembles the baby's throat, and designed to be fluidly connected to a container for collecting the pumped breastmilk”), while the through-passage at least partially embraces the connection of the milk extraction assembly (28) and the milk collection container and isolates said connection from the component-accommodating portion (130) (Edelman ¶ 0021). PNG media_image1.png 499 586 media_image1.png Greyscale Re Claim 2, Edelman teaches wherein the component-accommodating portion (130) is configured to at least partially engage the milk extraction assembly (28) to allow the one or more operational components (150-156) to be operated in conjunction with the milk extraction assembly (28) (Edelman ¶ 0036-0037, 0065, 0068, 0087-0094). Re Claim 3, Edelman teaches wherein the component-accommodating portion (130) comprises a rear component-accommodating portion (vacuum chamber as seen in Fig. 2A), the interface portion (20-1) being positioned between the front component-accommodating portion (130-1) and the rear component-accommodating portion (Edelman Fig. 2A and Annotated Fig. 1C above), said through-passage (20-2) being at least partially separated from the rear component-accommodating portion (as seen in Edelman Fig. 2A and Annotated Fig. 1C above). Re Claim 5, Edelman teaches wherein the milk extraction assembly (28) comprises a funnel (30), and wherein the stimulating mechanism (150-156) is configured to manipulate at least a flexible portion (32) of the funnel (30) (Edelman ¶ 0036-0037, 0065, 0068, 0087-0094). Re Claim 15, Edelman teaches wherein the body (20) further comprises a separating layer configured to isolate at least the stimulating mechanism (150-156) from the milk extraction assembly (28) (Edelman ¶ 0068; as seen in Figs. 6D and 6E, tongue area 32 is thickened part of funnel 30). Re Claim 17, Edelman teaches wherein the separating layer is flexible (Edelman ¶ 0068). Re Claim 18, Edelman teaches wherein the separating layer is detachably attachable to the body (20) (Edelman ¶ 0008 - “said funnel 30 is designed to fit into said body 20”). Re Claim 19, Edelman teaches wherein the body (20) is configured to be detachably connected to the milk extraction assembly (28) via said connection of the milk extraction assembly (28) and the milk collection container (Edelman Fig. 2A; ¶ 0021, 0067 - “funnel 30 also has a distal end 26 that resembles the baby's throat, and designed to be fluidly connected toa container for collecting the pumped breastmilk”). Re Claim 21, Edelman teaches wherein the through-passage (20-2) comprises a first through opening (20-3) configured to receive therethrough the milk extraction assembly (28) and a second through opening (20-4) configured to receive therethrough the milk collection container (Edelman Annotated Fig. 1C, Fig. 2A; ¶ 0021, 0067 - “funnel 30 also has a distal end 26 that resembles the baby's throat, and designed to be fluidly connected to a container for collecting the pumped breastmilk”). Re Claim 22, Edelman teaches wherein the first through opening (20-3) has a first rim (20-5) configured to engage the milk extraction assembly (28), and the second through opening (20-4) has a second rim configured to engage the milk collection container (as seen in Edelman Fig. 2A, the second through opening receives a milk collection container about a rim). Re Claim 23, Edelman teaches wherein the through-passage (20-2) is physically separated from at least the front component-accommodating portion (130-1) by a wall (20-8) that extends between the first through opening (20-3) and the second through opening (20-4) (as seen in Edelman Annotated Fig. 1C). Re Claim 24, Edelman teaches wherein the at least a part of the milk extraction assembly (28) which is received within the through-passage (20-2) comprises a cone member (30-1) connected to the funnel (30) (as seen in Edelman Annotated Fig. 1C). Re Claim 25, Edelman teaches wherein the wall (20-8) extends along at least a portion of the milk extraction assembly (28) when the milk extraction assembly (28) is received in the through-passage (20-2), the wall (20-8) being separate from the milk extraction assembly (28) (Edelman Annotated Fig. 1C; ¶ 0019 - teaching funnel being placed into the breastmilk pump 10). Re Claim 26, Edelman teaches wherein said at least a part of the milk extraction assembly (28) is received in the through-passage (20-2) along the direction transverse to the main axis of the breast milk pump (10) (Edelman ¶ 0036-0037, 0065, 0068, 0087-0094 - wherein roller segments 150-156 extend into through-passage). Re Claim 27, Edelman teaches breast milk pump (10) (as seen in Edelman Annotated Fig. 1C above) comprising: a proximal portion (20-6) configured to be positioned towards the breast of a user, a distal portion (20-7) configured to be positioned away from the breast, and a main axis extending between the proximal portion (20-6) and the distal portion (20-7) (as seen in Edelman Annotated Fig. 1C above); a milk collection container (as described at Edelman ¶ 0045); a milk extraction assembly (28) (wherein element 28 of Edelman Annotated Fig. 1C is interpreted as the funnel 30 and tubular member extending therefrom) configured to be directly connected to the milk collection container to establish a milk flow path (20-2) (Edelman ¶ 0008, 0045, 0067 - “funnel 30 also has a distal end 26 that resembles the baby's throat, and designed to be fluidly connected to a container for collecting the pumped breastmilk”); and a body (20) comprising: a component-accommodating portion (130) configured to accommodate one or more operational components (50) to be used in conjunction with the breast milk pump (10) (Edelman ¶ 0024). Edelman further teaches said component-accommodating portion (130) comprising a front component-accommodating portion (130-1), the front component-accommodating portion (130-1) having a stimulating mechanism (150-156) at least partially positioned therewithin (Edelman ¶ 0036-0037; Fig. 4A), said stimulating mechanism (150-156) being configured to manipulate the milk extraction assembly (28) at least during operation of the breast milk pump (10) (Edelman ¶ 0036-0037, 0065, 0068, 0087-0094); and an interface portion (20-1) configured to be engaged with the milk extraction assembly (28) (Edelman Annotated Fig. 1C; ¶ 0008 - “said funnel 30 is designed to fit into said body 20” implies that body 20 has a through-passage), said interface portion (20-1) comprising a through-passage (20-2) extending along a direction transverse to the main axis of the breast milk pump (10) (as seen in Edelman Annotated Fig. 1C, when funnel 30 is removed, milk flow path is open to base 130), said through-passage (20-2) being physically separated from the front component-accommodating portion (130-1) and being configured to allow at least a part of the milk extraction assembly (28) to be received therein such that the milk extraction assembly is detachably connectable to the milk collection container via the through-passage (20-2) (Edelman ¶ 0008, 0045, 0067 - “funnel 30 also has a distal end 26 that resembles the baby's throat, and designed to be fluidly connected to a container for collecting the pumped breastmilk”), while the through-passage (20-2) at least partially embraces the connection of the milk extraction assembly (28) and the milk collection container and isolates said connection from the component-accommodating portion (130) (Edelman ¶ 0021). Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 103 The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 103 which forms the basis for all obviousness rejections set forth in this Office action: A patent for a claimed invention may not be obtained, notwithstanding that the claimed invention is not identically disclosed as set forth in section 102, if the differences between the claimed invention and the prior art are such that the claimed invention as a whole would have been obvious before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to a person having ordinary skill in the art to which the claimed invention pertains. Patentability shall not be negated by the manner in which the invention was made. Claims 4 and 10-14 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over Edelman et al. (USPGPub 2020/0016307) in view of Liu (USPGPub 2018/0147331). Re Claim 4, Edelman teaches all of the limitations of Claim 3. Edelman further teaches wherein the stimulating mechanism (150-156) constitutes at least one of the operational components (50), said stimulating mechanism (150-156) comprising at least one electrically operable component (Edelman ¶ 0065, 0079). However, Edelman fails to teach wherein the rear component-accommodation portion comprises an electrical connection port configured to facilitate a connection of the breast milk pump with an electrical power source, and the interface portion being configured to at least partially accommodate an electrical connection extending from the electrical connection port to the at least one electrically operable component. Liu teaches a breast milk pump (1) (Liu Figs. 3-4) comprising a rear component- accommodation portion (11) and an interface portion (212), the rear component- accommodation portion (11) comprising an electrical connection port (2121) configured to facilitate a connection of the breast milk pump (1) with an electrical power source (Liu ¶ 0034), and the interface portion (212) being configured to at least partially accommodate an electrical connection extending from the electrical connection port (12, 111, 2121) to an electrically operable component (23) for reliable electrically wired power (Liu ¶ 0032-0034). Therefore, it would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to have configured the rear component- accommodation portion of Edelman to comprise an electrical connection port configured to facilitate a connection of the breast milk pump with an electrical power source, and the interface portion being configured to at least partially accommodate an electrical connection extending from the electrical connection port to the at least one electrically operable component, the embodiment as disclosed by Liu for reliable electrically wired power(Liu ¶ 0032-0034). Re Claim 10, Edelman in view of Liu teach all of the limitations of Claim 3. Edelman further teaches wherein the breast milk pump further comprises a vacuum assembly (as labeled in Edelman Fig. 2A), the rear component-accommodating portion (vacuum chamber as seen in Fig. 2A) being configured to accommodate the vacuum assembly and the interface portion (20-1) being configured to at least partially accommodate an air flow path extending between the vacuum assembly and the milk extraction assembly (28) (Edelman Annotated Fig. 1C above; Fig. 2A). Re Claim 11, Edelman in view of Liu teach all of the limitations of Claim 10. Edelman further teaches a chamber supporting wall (as seen in Edelman Fig. 6A, air inlet passes through funnel and wall of body 20) separating the interface portion (20-1) and the rear component- accommodating portion (vacuum chamber as seen in Fig. 2A), said chamber supporting wall comprising a chamber supporting wall opening (air inlet as seen in Edelman Fig. 6A) being configured to establish a communication between the interface portion (20-1) and the rear component-accommodating portion (vacuum chamber as seen in Fig. 2A) (Edelman ¶ 0067- 0068). Re Claim 12, Edelman in view of Liu teach all of the limitations of Claim 11. Edelman further teaches wherein the air flow path (28) extends through the chamber supporting wall opening (Edelman ¶ 0067-0068; Fig. 6A). Re Claim 13, Edelman in view of Liu teach all of the limitations of Claim 10. Edelman further teaches wherein the rear component-accommodating portion (vacuum chamber as seen in Fig. 2A) comprises an air flow connection port (as seen in Edelman Fig. 6A) configured to facilitate an air flow connection between the vacuum assembly and a pumping device (Edelman ¶ 0067). Re Claim 14, Edelman in view of Liu teach all of the limitations of Claim 13. Edelman further teaches wherein the rear component-accommodating portion (vacuum chamber as seen in Fig. 2A). However, Edelman fails to teach wherein the rear component-accommodating portion comprises an electrical connection port configured to facilitate a connection of the breast milk pump with an electrical power source, and wherein the electrical connection port and the air flow connection port constitute a hybrid connection port. Liu teaches a breast milk pump (1) (Liu Figs. 3-4) comprising a rear component portion (11), an interface portion (212), and an air flow connection port (13, 112), the rear component portion (11) comprising an electrical connection port (12, 111, 2121) configured to facilitate a connection of the breast milk pump (1) with an electrical power source (Liu ¶ 0032), and wherein the electrical connection port (12, 111, 2121) and the air flow connection port (13, 112) constitute a hybrid connection port for reducing the number of conduits to a single conduit (Liu ¶ 0032-0034). Therefore, it would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to have configured the air flow connection port to include an electrical connection port configured to facilitate a connection of the breast milk pump with an electrical power source, and wherein the electrical connection port and the air flow connection port constitute a hybrid connection port as disclosed by Liu for reducing the number of conduits to a single conduit (Liu ¶ 0032-0034). Claims 7-9 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over Edelman et al. (USPG Pub 2020/0016307) in view of Hochstedler et al. (USPN 6,004,288). Re Claim 7, Edelman teaches all of the limitations of Claim 5. Edelman further teaches wherein the operational components (50) further comprise a position adjustment mechanism (40, 50) configured to adjust a position of the stimulating mechanism (150-156) with respect to the milk extraction assembly (28) (Edelman ¶ 0027, 0065, 0071), the front component- accommodating portion (130-1) being configured to accommodate at least a first adjustment component (Edelman ¶ 0065 - wherein “the body further 20 comprises control units/buttons for controlling the motor and for adjusting the location of the lower manipulating mechanism 50”) of the position adjustment mechanism (40, 50), the rear component portion (vacuum chamber as seen in Fig. 2A) being configured to accommodate at least a second adjustment component (40) of the position adjustment mechanism (40, 50) (Edelman Fig. 1C). However, Edelman fails to teach wherein the interface portion is configured to at least partially accommodate a connecting component of the position adjustment mechanism connecting the first adjustment component and the second adjustment component. Hochstedler teaches a beast milk pump (Hochstedler Figs. 1-2) comprising an interface portion (proximal end of housing 12) and a position adjustment mechanism (54, 56, 58) wherein the interface portion is configured to at least partially accommodate a connecting component (26) of the position adjustment mechanism (54, 56, 58) connecting the first adjustment component (24) and the second adjustment component (28) wherein the configuration reduces the distance between the first adjustment component (24) and the second adjustment component (28) (Hochstedler Col. 2 Line 57 to Col. 3 Line 2). Therefore, it would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to have configured the interface portion of Edelman to at least partially accommodate a connecting component of the position adjustment mechanism connecting the first adjustment component and the second adjustment component as disclosed by Hochstedler to reduce the distance between the first adjustment component and the second adjustment component thus adjusting the diameter of the breast pump funnel (Hochstedler Col. 2 Line 57 to Col. 3 Line 2). Re Claim 8, Edelman in view of Hochstedler teach all of the limitations of Claim 7. Edelman fails to teach wherein the connecting component is a lever member, the first adjustment component is a lever first portion, and the second adjustment component comprises an actuator articulated to a lever second portion. Hochstedler teaches wherein the connecting component (26) is a lever member, the first adjustment component (24) is a lever first portion, and the second adjustment component (28) comprises an actuator (54, 56) articulated to a lever second portion (Hochstedler Col. 2 Line 57 to Col. 3 Line 2) wherein the configuration reduces the distance between the first adjustment component (24) and the second adjustment component (28) thus adjusting the diameter of the breast pump funnel (Hochstedler Col. 2 Line 57 to Col. 3 Line 2). Therefore, it would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to have configured the connecting component of Edelman in view of Hochstedler to be a lever member, the first adjustment component is a lever first portion, and the second adjustment component comprises an actuator articulated to a lever second portion as disclosed by Hochstedler wherein the configuration reduces the distance between the first adjustment component and the second adjustment component thus adjusting the diameter of the breast pump funnel(Hochstedler Col. 2 Line 57 to Col. 3 Line 2). Re Claim 9, Edelman in view of Hochstedler teach all of the limitations of Claim 8. Edelman fails to teach wherein the body comprises an access opening configured to allow access therethrough to the actuator. Hochstedler teaches a body (12) comprising an access opening (threaded orifice for adjustment knob 58) configured to allow access therethrough to the actuator (54, 56) wherein the configuration reduces the distance between the first adjustment component (24) and the second adjustment component (28) thus adjusting the diameter of the breast pump funnel (Hochstedler Col. 2 Line 57 to Col. 3 Line 2). Therefore, it would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to have configured the body of Edelman in view of Hochstedler to comprise an access opening configured to allow access therethrough to the actuator as disclosed by Hochstedler wherein the configuration reduces the distance between the first adjustment component and the second adjustment component thus adjusting the diameter of the breast pump funnel (Hochstedler Col. 2 Line 57 to Col. 3 Line 2). Response to Arguments Applicant’s arguments filed 07/07/2025 with respect to claim objection of Claims 1 and 5 and 112 indefinite rejection of Claims 1-5, 7-15, 17-19 and 21-24 have been fully considered and are persuasive. Examiner thanks applicant for clarifying amendments to Claims 1 and 5. The claim objections of Claims 1 and 5 and 112 indefinite rejection of Claims 1-5, 7-15, 17-19 and 21-24 are hereinafter withdrawn. Applicant's arguments filed 07/07/2025 have been fully considered but they are not persuasive. Applicant’s arguments with respect to 103 obviousness rejections begin at the bottom of Page 10. Applicant has amended Claim 1 (and included in new Claim 27) such that the through-passage now extends along a direction transverse to the main axis of the milk breast pump. Examiner has adjusted the annotated figure of Edelman Fig. 1C. This through-passage exists beneath the body when funnel 30 is removed such that the milk flow path is open to base 130. This would also make said through-passage 20-2 physically separate from the front component-accommodating portion 130-1. Be that as it may, applicant’s arguments with regard to this matter are directed to the previous Edelman annotated figure. It would appear the difference between the present case and prior art Edelman is where or what direction the through-passage extends. Conclusion Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to WILLIAM R FREHE whose telephone number is (571)272-8225. The examiner can normally be reached 10:30AM-7:30PM. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Kevin Sirmons can be reached at 571-272-4965. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /WILLIAM R FREHE/Examiner, Art Unit 3783 /KEVIN C SIRMONS/ Supervisory Patent Examiner, Art Unit 3783
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Feb 17, 2023
Application Filed
Jun 08, 2023
Non-Final Rejection — §102, §103
Sep 06, 2023
Applicant Interview (Telephonic)
Sep 06, 2023
Examiner Interview Summary
Sep 12, 2023
Response Filed
Sep 25, 2023
Final Rejection — §102, §103
Dec 27, 2023
Response after Non-Final Action
Feb 27, 2024
Request for Continued Examination
Mar 05, 2024
Response after Non-Final Action
Jun 12, 2024
Non-Final Rejection — §102, §103
Sep 20, 2024
Response Filed
Jan 07, 2025
Final Rejection — §102, §103
Apr 22, 2025
Response after Non-Final Action
Jul 07, 2025
Request for Continued Examination
Jul 11, 2025
Response after Non-Final Action
Nov 11, 2025
Non-Final Rejection — §102, §103 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12594378
PRESSURE RELIEF VALVE FOR DRUG DELIVERY DEVICE
2y 5m to grant Granted Apr 07, 2026
Patent 12551667
CATHETER, INFLATABLE BALLOON FOR A CATHETER
2y 5m to grant Granted Feb 17, 2026
Patent 12551618
SYSTEM AND METHOD FOR MITIGATING RISK IN AUTOMATED MEDICAMENT DOSING
2y 5m to grant Granted Feb 17, 2026
Patent 12551627
AUTO-INJECTOR
2y 5m to grant Granted Feb 17, 2026
Patent 12539123
METHODS AND DEVICES FOR BLOOD DISPLACEMENT-BASED LOCALIZED TREATMENT
2y 5m to grant Granted Feb 03, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

AI Strategy Recommendation

Get an AI-powered prosecution strategy using examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Powered by AI — typically takes 5-10 seconds

Prosecution Projections

5-6
Expected OA Rounds
60%
Grant Probability
99%
With Interview (+41.4%)
3y 11m
Median Time to Grant
High
PTA Risk
Based on 382 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allow rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month