Prosecution Insights
Last updated: October 02, 2026
Application No. 18/170,908

CIRCUIT DEVICE AND ELECTRONIC APPARATUS

Final Rejection §103
Filed
Feb 17, 2023
Priority
Feb 22, 2022 — JP 2022-025180 +1 more
Examiner
JEPPSON, PAMELA J
Art Unit
2859
Tech Center
2800 — Semiconductors & Electrical Systems
Assignee
Seiko Epson Corporation
OA Round
2 (Final)
64%
Grant Probability
Moderate
3-4
OA Rounds
0m
Est. Remaining
89%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 64% of resolved cases
64%
Career Allowance Rate
75 granted / 117 resolved
-3.9% vs TC avg
Strong +25% interview lift
Without
With
+24.8%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
3y 5m
Avg Prosecution
45 currently pending
Career history
165
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
2.9%
-37.1% vs TC avg
§103
59.7%
+19.7% vs TC avg
§102
14.7%
-25.3% vs TC avg
§112
19.8%
-20.2% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 117 resolved cases

Office Action

§103
DETAILED ACTION Status of the Claims In the communication dated April 28, 2026, claims 1-2 and 4-9 are pending. Claims 1, 6 and 8 are amended and claim 3 is cancelled. Terminal Disclaimer The terminal disclaimer filed on 4/28/2026 disclaiming the terminal portion of any patent granted on this application which would extend beyond the expiration date of 18/455796 has been reviewed and is accepted. The terminal disclaimer has been recorded. Response to Arguments The applicant argues that Lu’s threshold operates on a differential between two simultaneous current measurements, not a single absolute current value, the dual-input differential structure is not found in amended claim 1 and claim 1 requires a single current value compared against fixed threshold to select a charging mode (see pages 9-10). In response to applicant's argument that the references fail to show certain features of the invention, it is noted that the features upon which applicant relies (i.e., a single current value compared against a fixed threshold to select a charging mode) are not recited in the rejected claim(s). Although the claims are interpreted in light of the specification, limitations from the specification are not read into the claims. See In re Van Geuns, 988 F.2d 1181, 26 USPQ2d 1057 (Fed. Cir. 1993). The claim language states “a threshold value” however does not specify that the threshold value is fixed. Further, the threshold value is fixed in the sense that the difference in the current between the first and second circuit does not exceed a threshold amount. Thus, the threshold is considered fixed. The single current is taught by Lu in the sense that the detected current of the first or second circuit is compared against the other in order to determine whether the current exceeds a certain amount. The applicant argues that Lu’s threshold is a spatial discrimination parameter, not a charging mode selector (see page 10 of applicant arguments). However, the threshold comparison is used to determine whether to charging in an active or passive charging. This is supported by ¶48-49 of Lu where when greater than the first threshold the accessory receives more energy from a first charging circuit than a second circuit but if less than the threshold less energy is receives from the first charging circuit than the second charging circuit. The applicant argues that Lu’s threshold produces a topological circuit reconfiguration, not a mode selection between defined charging operations (see page10 of the applicant arguments). However, the reference of Lu is not used to teach structural configuration of the claims, but rather is used to teach a control of the circuitry of Yoon. Thus, this argument is not persuasive. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 103 The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 103 which forms the basis for all obviousness rejections set forth in this Office action: A patent for a claimed invention may not be obtained, notwithstanding that the claimed invention is not identically disclosed as set forth in section 102, if the differences between the claimed invention and the prior art are such that the claimed invention as a whole would have been obvious before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to a person having ordinary skill in the art to which the claimed invention pertains. Patentability shall not be negated by the manner in which the invention was made. Claim 1, 2 and 9 is rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over Yoon et al. US20200044458A1 in view of Lu et al. US20220103014A1. Regarding claim 1. A circuit device (FIG. 4/7) comprising: a current source circuit (470/760); a first charging circuit (420/710) configured to supply a charging node (connecting to battery 430) with a first charging current which is a constant current (FIG. 7 – charger 760 includes an AC-DC converter, thus supplying the charging circuit with a constant current) as a charging current based on an output current of the current source circuit (¶50 – charging unit 420 charges battery 430 with power applied from the charger 470, which includes a current); a second charging circuit (421/720) configured to supply the charging node (connecting to battery 430) with a second charging current which is a constant current (FIG. 7 – charger 760 includes an AC-DC converter, thus supplying the charging circuit with a constant current) and is higher than the first charging current (¶58 – the first line has a maximum value of a current less than a maximum value of the current set for the second line) as the charging current based on the output current of the current source circuit (¶59); and a control circuit (711), wherein the control circuit performs control in a first current mode of making the first charging circuit supply the charging node with the first charging current (¶85-86 – controller 711 identifies whether to switch the battery charging scheme) when a current value of the charging current is determined as a current value in the first current mode (¶85 – identified whether to charge the battery with a low or current or at a high speed), and control in a second current mode of making the second charging circuit supply the charging node with the second charging current (¶85-86 – controller 711 identifies whether to switch the battery charging scheme) when the current value of the charging current is determined as a current value in the second current mode higher than the current value in the first current mode (¶85 – identified whether to charge the battery with a low or current or at a high speed). Yoon teaches that the control circuit performs the control in the first current mode when the current value of the charging current is set to a current value lower than a threshold value (¶54-56 – threshold being the maximum value of the current set for a first line; ¶85 – controller identifies whether to charge the battery at a low current). Yoon does not explicitly teach that the control in the second current mode when the current value of the charging current is set to a current value no lower than the threshold value. Lu teaches the control in the second current mode (through second charging circuit 1011) when the current value of the charging current is set to a current value no lower than the threshold value (¶48 – current flowing through the second charging circuit 1012 is determined to be greater than a first threshold). It would be obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art to provide the threshold value as taught by Lu to the charging circuit of Yoon in order to improve the energy conservation during the charging process (¶84). Regarding claim 2. Yoon teaches that the control circuit (711) determines which one of the control in the first current mode and the control in the second current mode is to be performed based on a current setting signal configured to set the current value of the charging current (¶85 – controller determines whether to charge the battery by low or high current and sends request for adjustment to the charger, thus, the switching of the charging unit is determined based on the signal sent to the charger). Regarding claim 9. Yoon teaches an electronic apparatus (FIG. 4) comprising: the circuit device according to Claim 1 (see rejection of claim 1); and a battery (430) to be coupled to the charging node (FIG. 4). Claims 4 and 5 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over Yoon et al. US20200044458A1 in view of Lu et al. US20220103014A1 and further in view of Jiang et al. US20210359534A1. Regarding claim 4. Yoon discloses that the first charging circuit (420) is supplied with a first current as the output current from the current source circuit (470), the second charging circuit (421) is supplied with a second current as the output current from the current source circuit (470). Yoon does not explicitly teach that the first charging circuit amplifies the first current with a first gain in the first current mode to thereby supply the first charging current, the second charging circuit amplifies the second current with a second gain higher than the first gain in the second current mode to thereby supply the second charging current. Jiang discloses that the first charging circuit (CU1/COM1) amplifies the first current with a first gain in the first current mode to thereby supply the first charging current (¶32 – when the current is less than the fast charge threshold the voltage control amplifier COM1 takes effect and current increases from 0.5A-1A – i.e. first gain), the second charging circuit (CUN/COM2) amplifies the second current with a second gain higher than the first gain in the second current mode to thereby supply the second charging current (¶35 – equal to fast charge threshold current so current control amplifier COM2 takes effect boosting the charging from 1A to 2A which has a higher gain than the first). It would be obvious to one of ordinary skill to include the amplification of Jiang to the system of Yoon in order to adjust the charging voltage which improves charging efficiency (¶5). Regarding claim 5. Yoon does not explicitly disclose wherein the current source circuit includes a first current source circuit configured to supply the first current to the first charging circuit, and a second current source circuit configured to supply the second current to the second charging circuit. Lu discloses that the wherein the current source circuit (10113/10123) includes a first current source circuit (10113) configured to supply the first current to the first charging circuit (1011) (FIG. 1) , and a second current source circuit (10123) configured to supply the second current to the second charging circuit (1012) (FIG. 1). It would be obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art to provide the threshold value as taught by Lu to the charging circuit of Yoon in order to improve the energy conservation during the charging process (¶84). Claim 7 is rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over Yoon et al. US20200044458A1 in view of Lu et al. US20220103014A1 and Jiang et al. US20210359534A1 in further view of Ohashi US20200099236A1 Regarding claim 7. Yoon does not explicitly disclose that the current source circuit includes first through n-th current sources, and a switch circuit configured to supply the first charging circuit with a current from the first through n-th current sources as the first current in the first current mode, and supply the second charging circuit with a current from the first through n-th current sources as the second current in the second current mode. Ohashi discloses that the current source circuit (FIG. 1 – input to 18) includes first through n-th current sources (¶48; Vi1 and Vi2), and a switch circuit (18) configured to supply the first charging circuit (13) with a current (I0) from the first through n-th current sources (input of Vi1 and Vi2) as the first current in the first current mode (¶19), and supply the second charging circuit with a current from the first through n-th current sources (input of Vi1 and Vi2) as the second current in the second current mode (¶19). It would be obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art to provide the switch circuit of Ohashi to the system of the reference claims in order to control the supply of power to the system in order to reduce the number of times that charging is required (¶2). Allowable Subject Matter Claims 6 and 8 are objected to as being dependent upon a rejected base claim, but would be allowable if rewritten in independent form including all of the limitations of the base claim and any intervening claims. The following is a statement of reasons for the indication of allowable subject matter: Regarding claim 6, although the prior art discloses the subject matter of the intervening claims, the prior art does not explicitly disclose the subject matter of “wherein the control circuit outputs first through n-th bit signals of a current setting signal configured to set the current value of the charging current as corresponding first through n-th control bit signals of a current source control signal configured to control the first current source circuit and the second current source circuit, the first current source circuit includes m current sources configured to output m constant currents having binary-weighted current values, and outputs the constant current selected from the m constant currents based on the first through m-th control bit signals out of the first through n-th control bit signals as the first current, and the second current source circuit includes n current sources configured to output n constant currents having binary-weighted current values, and outputs the constant current selected from the n constant currents based on the corresponding first through n-th control bit signals as the second current, wherein n is an integer no smaller than 3, and m is an integer no smaller than 2 and no larger than n.”. Regarding claim 8, although the prior art discloses the subject matter of the intervening claims, the prior art does not explicitly disclose that subject matter of “wherein the control circuit outputs first through n-th bit signals of a current setting signal configured to set the current value of the charging current as corresponding first through n-th control bit signals of a current source control signal configured to control the current source circuit in the second current mode, and first through m-th bit signals out of the first through n-th bit signals as (i+1)-th through (i+m)-th control bit signals out of the first through n-th control bit signals in the first current mode, the first through n-th current sources output corresponding first through n-th constant currents having binary-weighted current values, and the switch circuit outputs the constant current selected from the first through n-th constant currents by the first through n-th control bit signals as the second current in the second current mode, and the constant current selected from (i+1)-th through (i+m)-th constant currents out of the first through n-th constant currents by the (i+1)-th through (i+m)-th control bit signals as the first current in the first current mode, wherein n is an integer no smaller than 3, m is an integer no smaller than 2 and no larger than n, and i is an integer which fulfills that i+1 is no smaller than 1 and i+m is no larger than n.”. Related Prior Art The prior art made of record and not relied upon is considered pertinent to applicant's disclosure. Ninomiya et al. US20240079898A1 (as cited in the IDS dated 7/9/2026): ¶32 discloses current setting value being less than or greater than a threshold activates different modes. Conclusion THIS ACTION IS MADE FINAL. Applicant is reminded of the extension of time policy as set forth in 37 CFR 1.136(a). A shortened statutory period for reply to this final action is set to expire THREE MONTHS from the mailing date of this action. In the event a first reply is filed within TWO MONTHS of the mailing date of this final action and the advisory action is not mailed until after the end of the THREE-MONTH shortened statutory period, then the shortened statutory period will expire on the date the advisory action is mailed, and any nonprovisional extension fee (37 CFR 1.17(a)) pursuant to 37 CFR 1.136(a) will be calculated from the mailing date of the advisory action. In no event, however, will the statutory period for reply expire later than SIX MONTHS from the mailing date of this final action. Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to PAMELA JEPPSON whose telephone number is (571)272-4094. The examiner can normally be reached Monday-Friday 7:30 AM - 5:00 PM.. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Drew Dunn can be reached at 571-272-2312. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /PAMELA J JEPPSON/Examiner, Art Unit 2859 /DREW A DUNN/Supervisory Patent Examiner, Art Unit 2859
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Feb 17, 2023
Application Filed
Feb 05, 2026
Non-Final Rejection mailed — §103
Apr 28, 2026
Response Filed
Jul 23, 2026
Final Rejection mailed — §103 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12689224
WIRELESS POWER ARCHITECTURE WITH SERIES-COUPLED POWER CONVERTERS
5y 0m to grant Granted Jul 21, 2026
Patent 12658819
METHOD TO MAINTAIN SYNCHRONOUS RECTIFICATION AT LIGHT LOADS
4y 7m to grant Granted Jun 16, 2026
Patent 12633824
VOLTAGE CONVERTER AND CHARGING DEVICE FOR LIMITING CHARGING CURRENT
4y 12m to grant Granted May 19, 2026
Patent 12623556
Roadway Coverplate
4y 7m to grant Granted May 12, 2026
Patent 12549019
SYSTEM AND METHOD FOR TRACKING AND ARCHIVING BATTERY PERFORMANCE DATA
4y 5m to grant Granted Feb 10, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

Strategy Recommendation AI-generated — please review before filing

Get a prosecution strategy drawn from examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Typically takes 5-10 seconds — AI-generated, attorney review required before filing

Prosecution Projections

3-4
Expected OA Rounds
64%
Grant Probability
89%
With Interview (+24.8%)
3y 5m (~0m remaining)
Median Time to Grant
Moderate
PTA Risk
Based on 117 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allowance rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month