Prosecution Insights
Last updated: July 17, 2026
Application No. 18/172,561

SEMICONDUCTOR MODULE

Non-Final OA §103
Filed
Feb 22, 2023
Priority
Apr 25, 2022 — JP 2022-071385
Examiner
NGUYEN, SOPHIA T
Art Unit
2893
Tech Center
2800 — Semiconductors & Electrical Systems
Assignee
Fuji Electric Co., Ltd.
OA Round
3 (Non-Final)
45%
Grant Probability
Moderate
3-4
OA Rounds
0m
Est. Remaining
58%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 45% of resolved cases
45%
Career Allowance Rate
233 granted / 519 resolved
-23.1% vs TC avg
Moderate +14% lift
Without
With
+13.6%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
2y 9m
Avg Prosecution
58 currently pending
Career history
606
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
0.1%
-39.9% vs TC avg
§103
89.9%
+49.9% vs TC avg
§102
3.2%
-36.8% vs TC avg
§112
6.1%
-33.9% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 519 resolved cases

Office Action

§103
DETAILED ACTION Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Continued Examination Under 37 CFR 1.114 A request for continued examination under 37 CFR 1.114, including the fee set forth in 37 CFR 1.17(e), was filed in this application after final rejection. Since this application is eligible for continued examination under 37 CFR 1.114, and the fee set forth in 37 CFR 1.17(e) has been timely paid, the finality of the previous Office action has been withdrawn pursuant to 37 CFR 1.114. Applicant's submission filed on 03/10/2026 has been entered. Response to Amendment Applicant’s amendment dated 03/10/2026, in which claim 1 was amended, claim 7 was cancelled, claims 8-9 were added, has been entered. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 103 The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 103 which forms the basis for all obviousness rejections set forth in this Office action: A patent for a claimed invention may not be obtained, notwithstanding that the claimed invention is not identically disclosed as set forth in section 102, if the differences between the claimed invention and the prior art are such that the claimed invention as a whole would have been obvious before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to a person having ordinary skill in the art to which the claimed invention pertains. Patentability shall not be negated by the manner in which the invention was made. Claims 1-5 and 8 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over Nishida et al. (US Pub. 20150371931) in view of Kim et al. (US Pat. 10304788), Shirasawa et al. (US Pub. 20050199999) and Koyanagi (US Pub. 20190164858). Regarding claims 1, 4-5, and 8, Nishida et al. discloses in Fig. 1b, paragraph [0057]-[0068] a semiconductor module comprising: a mounting substrate [12]; a semiconductor element [11] mounted on the mounting substrate [12]; a housing [7] configured to house the semiconductor element [11]; a sealing member [8] filled in a space inside the housing [7] to seal the semiconductor element [1]; a wiring member [13] electrically connected to the semiconductor element [11], wherein the wiring member [3] includes: a first portion; a second portion; wherein: the wiring member [13] with a first end and a second end opposite to the first end includes: the first portion and the second portion; and a third portion, the first portion includes the first end of the wiring member [13], the third portion includes the second end of the wiring member [13], the second portion is a portion between the first portion and the third portion, PNG media_image1.png 399 812 media_image1.png Greyscale Nishida et al. fails to disclose a first sealing layer filled in a space inside the housing to seal the semiconductor element; a second sealing layer of a resin material softer than the first sealing layer and layered on the first sealing layer; and wherein the wiring member includes the first portion covered with the first sealing layer; and the second portion covered with the second sealing layer the first portion and the third portion are covered with the first sealing layer, and the second portion is covered with the second sealing layer; wherein a thickness of the first sealing layer is greater than a thickness of the second sealing layer; the sealing member comprising layers of the first sealing layer and the second sealing layer. Kim et al. discloses in Fig. 1, columns 4-7 a first sealing layer [110] filled in a space inside the housing [108] to seal the semiconductor element [104]; a second sealing layer [112] of a resin material softer than the first sealing layer [110] and layered on the first sealing layer [110]; and wherein the wiring member [114] includes: a first portion [116] covered with the first sealing layer [110]; and a second portion [114] covered with the second sealing layer [112]. the first portion [116] and the third portion [118] are covered with the first sealing layer [110], and the second portion [114] is covered with the second sealing layer [112]. wherein a thickness of the first sealing layer [110] is greater than a thickness of the second sealing layer [112]; the sealing member [110 and 112] comprising layers of the first sealing layer [110] and the second sealing layer [112]. It would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art before the effective filling date of the invention to incorporate the teachings of Kim et al. into the method of Nishida et al. to include a first sealing layer filled in a space inside the housing to seal the semiconductor element; a second sealing layer of a resin material softer than the first sealing layer and layered on the first sealing layer; and wherein the wiring member includes the first portion covered with the first sealing layer; and the second portion covered with the second sealing layer; the first portion and the third portion are covered with the first sealing layer, and the second portion is covered with the second sealing layer; wherein a thickness of the first sealing layer is greater than a thickness of the second sealing layer; the sealing member comprising layers of the first sealing layer and the second sealing layer. The ordinary artisan would have been motivated to modify Nishida et al. in the above manner for the purpose of improving the reliability and lifetime of the device modules while maintaining the endurance of the substrate under a short circuit condition [column 4, lines 1-12 of Kim et al.]. Further, it would have been obvious to try one of the known methods with a reasonable expectation of success. KSR International Co. v. Teleflex Inc., 82 USPQ2d 1385 (2007). Nishida et al. and Kim et al. fails to disclose an insulating protection member configured to cover a top surface of the second sealing layer; wherein the insulating protection member being bonded to the sealing member using the second sealing layer as an adhesive, and the second sealing layer is entirely interposed between the first sealing layer and the insulating protection member; wherein the insulating protection member is a plate-like member. Shirasawa et al. discloses in Fig. 1, paragraph [0029] a protection member [18] configured to cover a top surface of the second sealing layer [17]; wherein the protection member [18] being bonded to the sealing member [16 and 17] using the second sealing layer [17] as an adhesive, and the second sealing layer [17] is entirely interposed between the first sealing layer [16] and the protection member [18]; wherein the protection member [18] is a plate-like member. Koyanagi discloses in Fig. 1, paragraph [0016] a protection member [34] is an insulating protection member [“The material of the lid 34 …is engineering plastics such, for example, as PPS resin”]; wherein the insulating protection member [34] is a plate-like member. It would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art before the effective filling date of the invention to incorporate the teachings of Shirasawa et al. and Koyanagi into the method of Nishida et al. and Kim et al. to include an insulating protection member configured to cover a top surface of the second sealing layer; wherein the insulating protection member being bonded to the sealing member using the second sealing layer as an adhesive, and the second sealing layer is entirely interposed between the first sealing layer and the insulating protection member; wherein the insulating protection member is a plate-like member. The ordinary artisan would have been motivated to modify Nishida et al. and Kim et al. in the above manner for the purpose of preventing infiltration of moisture and other matter into the resin-sealed electronic control device and improving the reliability of the resin-sealed electronic control device. Further, it would have been obvious to try one of the known methods with a reasonable expectation of success. KSR International Co. v. Teleflex Inc., 82 USPQ2d 1385 (2007). Regarding claims 2-3, Nishida et al. discloses in Fig. 1b a connection terminal [15] mounted to the housing [7], wherein the wiring member [13] includes a first wiring member that electrically connects the semiconductor element [11] and the connection terminal [15]; wherein: the semiconductor element [11] includes a first semiconductor element [11 left] and a second semiconductor element [11 right], and the wiring member [13] includes a second wiring member configured to electrically connect the first semiconductor element [11 left] and the second semiconductor element [11 right]. PNG media_image2.png 402 816 media_image2.png Greyscale Claims 1-4, 6, 8 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over Nishida et al. (US Pub. 20150371931) in view of Hartung et al. (US Pub. 20180033711) Shirasawa et al. (US Pub. 20050199999) and Koyanagi (US Pub. 20190164858). Regarding claims 1, 4, 6, 8, Nishida et al. discloses in Fig. 1b, paragraph [0057]-[0068] a semiconductor module comprising: a mounting substrate [12]; a semiconductor element [11] mounted on the mounting substrate [12]; a housing [7] configured to house the semiconductor element [11]; a sealing member [8] filled in a space inside the housing [7] to seal the semiconductor element [1]; a wiring member [13] electrically connected to the semiconductor element [11], wherein the wiring member [3] includes: a first portion; a second portion; wherein: the wiring member [13] with a first end and a second end opposite to the first end includes: the first portion and the second portion; and a third portion, the first portion includes the first end of the wiring member [13], the third portion includes the second end of the wiring member [13], the second portion is a portion between the first portion and the third portion, PNG media_image1.png 399 812 media_image1.png Greyscale Nishida et al. fails to disclose a first sealing layer filled in a space inside the housing to seal the semiconductor element; a second sealing layer of a resin material softer than the first sealing layer and layered on the first sealing layer; and wherein the wiring member includes the first portion covered with the first sealing layer; and the second portion covered with the second sealing layer the first portion and the third portion are covered with the first sealing layer, and the second portion is covered with the second sealing layer; wherein a thickness of the first sealing layer is less than a thickness of the second sealing layer; the sealing member comprising layers of the first sealing layer and the second sealing layer. Hartung et al. discloses in Fig. 1C, paragraph [0012]-[0053] a first sealing layer [51] filled in a space inside the housing [6] to seal the semiconductor element [104]; a second sealing layer [52] of a resin material softer than the first sealing layer [51] and layered on the first sealing layer [51][paragraph [0049]]; and wherein the wiring member [3] includes: a first portion covered with the first sealing layer [51]; and a second portion covered with the second sealing layer [52]; the first portion and the third portion are covered with the first sealing layer [51], and the second portion is covered with the second sealing layer [52]; wherein a thickness of the first sealing layer [51] is less than a thickness of the second sealing layer [52]; the sealing member [51 and 52] comprising layers of the first sealing layer [51] and the second sealing layer [52]. It would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art before the effective filling date of the invention to incorporate the teachings of Hartung et al. into the method of Nishida et al. to include a first sealing layer filled in a space inside the housing to seal the semiconductor element; a second sealing layer of a resin material softer than the first sealing layer and layered on the first sealing layer; and wherein the wiring member includes the first portion covered with the first sealing layer; and the second portion covered with the second sealing layer; the first portion and the third portion are covered with the first sealing layer, and the second portion is covered with the second sealing layer; wherein a thickness of the first sealing layer is less than a thickness of the second sealing layer; the sealing member comprising layers of the first sealing layer and the second sealing layer. The ordinary artisan would have been motivated to modify Nishida et al. in the above manner for the purpose of maintaining high mechanical strength, good adhesion and high dielectric strength while dielectrically isolating and encapsulating the interior of the module housing above the power semiconductor chips [paragraph [0044]-[0049] of Hartung et al.]. Further, it would have been obvious to try one of the known methods with a reasonable expectation of success. KSR International Co. v. Teleflex Inc., 82 USPQ2d 1385 (2007). Nishida et al. and Hartung et al. fails to disclose an insulating protection member configured to cover a top surface of the second sealing layer; wherein the insulating protection member being bonded to the sealing member using the second sealing layer as an adhesive, and the second sealing layer is entirely interposed between the first sealing layer and the insulating protection member. wherein the insulating protection member is a plate-like member. Shirasawa et al. discloses in Fig. 1, paragraph [0029] a protection member [18] configured to cover a top surface of the second sealing layer [17]; wherein the protection member [18] being bonded to the sealing member [16 and 17] using the second sealing layer [17] as an adhesive, and the second sealing layer [17] is entirely interposed between the first sealing layer [16] and the protection member [18]; wherein the protection member [18] is a plate-like member. Koyanagi discloses in Fig. 1, paragraph [0016] a protection member [34] is an insulating protection member [“The material of the lid 34 …is engineering plastics such, for example, as PPS resin”]; wherein the insulating protection member [34] is a plate-like member. It would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art before the effective filling date of the invention to incorporate the teachings of Shirasawa et al. and Koyanagi into the method of Nishida et al. and Hartung et al. to include an insulating protection member configured to cover a top surface of the second sealing layer; wherein the insulating protection member being bonded to the sealing member using the second sealing layer as an adhesive, and the second sealing layer is entirely interposed between the first sealing layer and the insulating protection member; wherein the insulating protection member is a plate-like member. The ordinary artisan would have been motivated to modify Nishida et al. and Hartung et al. in the above manner for the purpose of preventing infiltration of moisture and other matter into the resin-sealed electronic control device and improving the reliability of the resin-sealed electronic control device. Further, it would have been obvious to try one of the known methods with a reasonable expectation of success. KSR International Co. v. Teleflex Inc., 82 USPQ2d 1385 (2007). Regarding claims 2-3, Nishida et al. discloses in Fig. 1b a connection terminal [15] mounted to the housing [7], wherein the wiring member [13] includes a first wiring member that electrically connects the semiconductor element [11] and the connection terminal [15]; wherein: the semiconductor element [11] includes a first semiconductor element [11 left] and a second semiconductor element [11 right], and the wiring member [13] includes a second wiring member configured to electrically connect the first semiconductor element [11 left] and the second semiconductor element [11 right]. PNG media_image2.png 402 816 media_image2.png Greyscale Claims 1-3 and 9 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over Ota et al. (US Pub. 20130009298) in view of Shirasawa et al. (US Pub. 20050199999) and Koyanagi (US Pub. 20190164858) as evidenced by Kim et al. (US Pat. 10304788) Regarding claim 1, Ota et al. discloses in Fig. 3 a semiconductor module comprising: a mounting substrate [1]; a semiconductor element [3 or 4] mounted on the mounting substrate [1]; a housing [8] configured to house the semiconductor element [3 or 4]; a first sealing layer [7] filled in a space inside the housing [8] to seal the semiconductor element [3 or 4]; a second sealing layer [9] of a resin material softer than the first sealing layer [7] and layered on the first sealing layer [7][silicon gel of layer [9] is softer than epoxy resin of layer [7] as evidenced in column 5, lines 33-49 and column 6, lines 34-56 of Kim et al.]; a wiring member [41, 42] electrically connected to the semiconductor element [3 or 4]; and wherein the wiring member [41 , 42] includes: a first portion covered with the first sealing layer [7]; and a second portion covered with the second sealing layer [9], a sealing member comprising layers of the first sealing layer [7] and the second sealing layer [9]. Ota et al. fails to disclose an insulating protection member configured to cover a top surface of the second sealing layer; wherein the insulating protection member being bonded to the sealing member using the second sealing layer as an adhesive, and the second sealing layer is entirely interposed between the first sealing layer and the insulating protection member. wherein the insulating protection member is a plate-like member. Shirasawa et al. discloses in Fig. 1, paragraph [0029] a protection member [18] configured to cover a top surface of the second sealing layer [17]; wherein the protection member [18] being bonded to the sealing member [16 and 17] using the second sealing layer [17] as an adhesive, and the second sealing layer [17] is entirely interposed between the first sealing layer [16] and the protection member [18]; wherein the protection member [18] is a plate-like member. Koyanagi discloses in Fig. 1, paragraph [0016] a protection member [34] is an insulating protection member [“The material of the lid 34 …is engineering plastics such, for example, as PPS resin”]; wherein the insulating protection member [34] is a plate-like member. It would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art before the effective filling date of the invention to incorporate the teachings of Shirasawa et al. and Koyanagi into the method of Ota et al. to include an insulating protection member configured to cover a top surface of the second sealing layer; wherein the insulating protection member being bonded to the sealing member using the second sealing layer as an adhesive, and the second sealing layer is entirely interposed between the first sealing layer and the insulating protection member; wherein the insulating protection member is a plate-like member. The ordinary artisan would have been motivated to modify Ota et al. in the above manner for the purpose of preventing infiltration of moisture and other matter into the resin-sealed electronic control device and improving the reliability of the resin-sealed electronic control device. Further, it would have been obvious to try one of the known methods with a reasonable expectation of success. KSR International Co. v. Teleflex Inc., 82 USPQ2d 1385 (2007). Regarding claim 2, Ota et al. discloses in Fig. 3 a connection terminal [51 or 52] mounted to the housing [8], wherein the wiring member [41, 42] includes a first wiring member that electrically connects the semiconductor element [3 and 4] and the connection terminal [51 or 52]. Regarding claim 3, Ota et al. discloses in Fig. 3 wherein: the semiconductor element [3 and 4] includes a first semiconductor element [4] and a second semiconductor element [3], Ota et al. further discloses a connection member [5] configured to electrically connect the first semiconductor element [3] and the second semiconductor element [4]. Ota et al. fails to disclose the wiring member includes a second wiring member configured to electrically connect the first semiconductor element and the second semiconductor element Shirasawa et al. discloses in Fig. 1 the wiring member [15] includes a second wiring member configured to electrically connect the first semiconductor element [40b] and the second semiconductor element [40a]. It would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art before the effective filling date of the invention to incorporate the teachings of Shirasawa et al. into the method of Ota et al. to include the wiring member includes a second wiring member configured to electrically connect the first semiconductor element and the second semiconductor element. The ordinary artisan would have been motivated to modify Ota et al. in the above manner for the purpose of providing suitable alternative method for electrically connect the first semiconductor element and the second semiconductor element. Further, it would have been obvious to try one of the known methods with a reasonable expectation of success. KSR International Co. v. Teleflex Inc., 82 USPQ2d 1385 (2007). Regarding claim 9, Ota et al. discloses in Fig. 3, paragraph [0024]-[0025] a connection terminal [51 or 52] mounted to the housing [8]; wherein the second portion of the wiring member [41 and 42] includes one end of the wiring member [41 and 42], and wherein the one end of the wiring member [41 and 42] is connected to the connection terminal [51 or 52]. Response to Arguments Applicant’s arguments with respect to claims 1-6, 8-9 have been considered but are moot because the new ground of rejection does not rely on any reference applied in the prior rejection of record for any teaching or matter specifically challenged in the argument. Overall, Applicant’s arguments are not persuasive. The claims stand rejected. Conclusion The prior art made of record and not relied upon is considered pertinent to applicant's disclosure. The cited art discloses similar materials, devices and methods. Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to SOPHIA T NGUYEN whose telephone number is (571)272-1686. The examiner can normally be reached 9:00am -5:00 pm, Monday-Friday. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, BRITT D HANLEY can be reached at (571)270-3042. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /SOPHIA T NGUYEN/ Primary Examiner, Art Unit 2893
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Feb 22, 2023
Application Filed
May 29, 2025
Non-Final Rejection mailed — §103
Aug 28, 2025
Response Filed
Sep 10, 2025
Final Rejection mailed — §103
Nov 26, 2025
Request for Continued Examination
Dec 04, 2025
Response after Non-Final Action
Mar 10, 2026
Response after Non-Final Action
Apr 21, 2026
Non-Final Rejection mailed — §103 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12677509
DISPLAY DEVICE INCLUDING INSULATING LAYER ON LIGHT-EMITTING ELEMENTS
4y 6m to grant Granted Jul 07, 2026
Patent 12676615
DIGITAL LOGIC COMPATIBLE INPUTS IN COMPOUND SEMICONDUCTOR CIRCUITS
4y 5m to grant Granted Jul 07, 2026
Patent 12677539
DISPLAY DEVICE
3y 5m to grant Granted Jul 07, 2026
Patent 12660223
CONTACT STRUCTURE FOR SEMICONDUCTOR DEVICE
4y 11m to grant Granted Jun 16, 2026
Patent 12660236
SEMICONDUCTOR STRUCTURE AND METHOD FOR FORMING THE SAME
3y 10m to grant Granted Jun 16, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

Strategy Recommendation AI-generated — please review before filing

Get a prosecution strategy drawn from examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Typically takes 5-10 seconds — AI-generated, attorney review required before filing

Prosecution Projections

3-4
Expected OA Rounds
45%
Grant Probability
58%
With Interview (+13.6%)
2y 9m (~0m remaining)
Median Time to Grant
High
PTA Risk
Based on 519 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allowance rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month