Prosecution Insights
Last updated: April 19, 2026
Application No. 18/174,579

BATTERY CHARGING CURRENT CONTROL DEVICE

Non-Final OA §102§103§112
Filed
Feb 24, 2023
Examiner
PELTON, NATHANIEL R
Art Unit
2859
Tech Center
2800 — Semiconductors & Electrical Systems
Assignee
Wenzhou Qiujie Technology Co. Ltd.
OA Round
1 (Non-Final)
75%
Grant Probability
Favorable
1-2
OA Rounds
2y 9m
To Grant
94%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 75% — above average
75%
Career Allow Rate
546 granted / 729 resolved
+6.9% vs TC avg
Strong +19% interview lift
Without
With
+18.7%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
2y 9m
Avg Prosecution
33 currently pending
Career history
762
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
1.1%
-38.9% vs TC avg
§103
53.5%
+13.5% vs TC avg
§102
23.5%
-16.5% vs TC avg
§112
13.0%
-27.0% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 729 resolved cases

Office Action

§102 §103 §112
DETAILED ACTION Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Priority Receipt is acknowledged of certified copies of papers required by 37 CFR 1.55. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 112 The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 112(b): (b) CONCLUSION.—The specification shall conclude with one or more claims particularly pointing out and distinctly claiming the subject matter which the inventor or a joint inventor regards as the invention. The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 112 (pre-AIA ), second paragraph: The specification shall conclude with one or more claims particularly pointing out and distinctly claiming the subject matter which the applicant regards as his invention. Claims 5 and 8 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 112(b) or 35 U.S.C. 112 (pre-AIA ), second paragraph, as being indefinite for failing to particularly point out and distinctly claim the subject matter which the inventor or a joint inventor (or for applications subject to pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 112, the applicant), regards as the invention. With respect to claim 5, line 4, “the direct-current” lacks antecedent basis. It appears the limitations should be changed to recite –a direct-current--. With respect to claim 8, all the instances of “the source electrode”, “the drain electrode”, and “the grid electrode” for each power tube lack antecedent bases. The first time an element is introduced for each element, it should be referred to as --a/an—and then thereafter can be referred back to with “the”. Appropriate correction is required. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 102 The following is a quotation of the appropriate paragraphs of 35 U.S.C. 102 that form the basis for the rejections under this section made in this Office action: A person shall be entitled to a patent unless – (a)(1) the claimed invention was patented, described in a printed publication, or in public use, on sale, or otherwise available to the public before the effective filing date of the claimed invention. Claim(s) 1, 4, and 6 is/are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 102(a)(1) as being anticipated by Tang et al. [US 2018/0351398]. With respect to claim 1, Tang discloses a battery charging current control device [Fig. 2], comprising: an H-bridge circuit [par. 0014], the H-bridge circuit being respectively connected with an external power supply and a battery [“battery” and “external power supply”] and used for transmitting current from the external power supply to the battery for supplying power for the battery [i.e. the “charging/discharging” operation]; a sampling circuit, the sampling circuit being connected with the H-bridge circuit and used for collecting an output current and an output voltage of the H-bridge circuit to obtain a current analog signal and a voltage analog signal [voltage and current “sampling circuit”]; a control circuit, the control circuit being connected with the sampling circuit and used for generating a control signal according to the current analog signal, the voltage analog signal and the capacity of the battery [“control chip”; further note that a battery voltage is equated to a battery capacity]; and a pulse width modulation circuit, the pulse width modulation circuit being respectively connected with the control circuit and the H-bridge circuit and used for performing pulse width modulation on the H-bridge circuit according to the control signal to control an output current of the H-bridge circuit [par. 0017; “pwm drive signal”, see also par. 0038-0044]. With respect to claim 4, Tang further discloses a power supply circuit, the power supply circuit being respectively connected with the external power supply, the sampling circuit, the control circuit and the pulse width modulation circuit and used for supplying power for the sampling circuit, the control circuit and the pulse width modulation circuit [as depicted in Fig. 2 the circuitry component are connected to the power supply/controller]. With respect to claim 6, Tang further discloses wherein the control circuit is further used for providing a reference voltage [i.e. ground/earth]; and the sampling circuit comprises: a current sampling sub-circuit, the current sampling sub-circuit being respectively connected with the negative electrode at the output end of the H-bridge circuit and the control circuit and used for collecting the output current of the H-bridge circuit and determining the current analog signal based on the reference voltage and the output current [see “current sampling circuit” which is connected to all the phases/wires]; and the voltage sampling sub-circuit, the voltage sampling sub-circuit being respectively connected with the positive electrode at the output end of the H-bridge circuit and the control circuit and used for collecting the output voltage of the H-bridge circuit to obtain the voltage analog signal [see either “voltage sampling circuit” connect to both the plus/minus leads]. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 103 The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 103 which forms the basis for all obviousness rejections set forth in this Office action: A patent for a claimed invention may not be obtained, notwithstanding that the claimed invention is not identically disclosed as set forth in section 102, if the differences between the claimed invention and the prior art are such that the claimed invention as a whole would have been obvious before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to a person having ordinary skill in the art to which the claimed invention pertains. Patentability shall not be negated by the manner in which the invention was made. Claim(s) 2-3 is/are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over Tang et al. [US 2018/0351398] as applied above, and further in view of Carroll [US 12,148,938]. With respect to claim 2, Tang further discloses wherein the control circuit is further used for converting the current analog signal into a current value and converting the voltage analog signal into a voltage value [i.e. via the sampling circuit] but fails to explicitly disclose a communication circuit, the communication circuit being connected with the control circuit and used for sending the current value and the voltage value to an upper computer to be displayed. However, displaying known data (i.e. measure current/voltage) is well-known in the art. For example, Carroll relates to power systems and teaches that output power, voltage, and currents are sent/communicated to a computer for display [Figs. 15a-c, see also col. 11 lines 20-45]. Therefore, it would have been obvious to a person having ordinary skill in the art before the effective filing date of the instant invention to communicate the signals to a display as taught by Carroll for the benefit allowing a user to quickly and easily ascertain the power levels of the battery/system. With respect to claim 3, Tang as applied above fails to explicitly disclose wherein the communication circuit is an MAX13487 chip. It would have been obvious to a person having ordinary skill in the art before filing date of the instant invention to modify Tang to use the MAX13487 chip since it has been held that replacing with a known component is within the level of ordinary skill in the art. For example, there are only a finite number of chips and using the known MAX13487 chip does not present undue experimentation and the specification fails to point out any unexpected outcomes from using that particular chip. The benefit would be to utilize a known economically available chip with safety features such as fail-safe receiving and thermal shutdown. Allowable Subject Matter Claims 5 and 7-10 are objected to as being dependent upon a rejected base claim, but would be allowable if canceled and incorporated into independent claim 1 including all of the limitations of the base claim and the intervening claims. Also the 112 issues above would have to be corrected. With respect to claim 5, the prior art of record does not suggest or disclose the claimed combination of elements or steps as recited, most particularly the claimed, “wherein the power supply circuit comprises: a rectifier filter sub-circuit, the rectifier filter sub-circuit being connected with the external power supply and used for rectifying and filtering the direct-current voltage of the external power supply to obtain a filter current; a square wave oscillation sub-circuit, the square wave oscillation sub-circuit being connected with the rectifier filter circuit and used for outputting a square wave signal according to the filter current; and a transformer voltage conversion sub-circuit, the transformer voltage conversion sub-circuit being respectively connected with the square wave oscillation sub-circuit, the sampling circuit, the control circuit and the pulse width modulation circuit and used for respectively supplying power for the sampling circuit, the control circuit and the pulse width modulation circuit based on the square wave signal.” With respect to claim 7, the prior art of record does not suggest or disclose the claimed combination of elements or steps as recited, most particularly the claimed, “wherein the current sampling sub-circuit comprises: a sampling resistor, one end of the sampling resistor being connected with the negative electrode at the output end of the H-bridge circuit and the other end of the sampling resistor being grounded, and the sampling resistor being used for collecting the output current of the H-bridge circuit; and an inverting amplifier, the inverting input end of the inverting amplifier being connected between the sampling resistor and the negative electrode at the output end of the H-bridge circuit, and the non-inverting input end and the non-inverting output end of the inverting amplifier being both connected with the control circuit, and the inverting amplifier being used for amplifying the voltage on the sampling resistor based on the reference voltage to obtain the current analog signal.” With respect to claim 8, the prior art of record does not suggest or disclose the claimed combination of elements or steps as recited, most particularly the claimed, “wherein the H-bridge circuit comprises a first power tube, a second power tube, a third power tube, a fourth power tube and an inductor; the inductor is respectively connected with the source electrode of the first power tube, the source electrode of the second power tube, the drain electrode of the third power tube and the drain electrode of the fourth power tube; the drain electrode of the first power tube, the drain electrode of the second power tube, the source electrode of the third power tube and the drain electrode of the fourth power tube are all connected with the external power supply; and the grid electrode of the first power tube, the grid electrode of the second power tube, the grid electrode of the third power tube and the grid electrode of the fourth power tube are all connected with the pulse width modulation circuit.” Claims 9-10 depend from claim 8 and are allowed for the same reasons. Conclusion Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to NATHANIEL R PELTON whose telephone number is (571)270-1761. The examiner can normally be reached M-F 9am to 5pm. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Julian Huffman can be reached at 571-272-2147. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /NATHANIEL R PELTON/Primary Examiner, Art Unit 2859 /JULIAN D HUFFMAN/Supervisory Patent Examiner, Art Unit 2859
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Feb 24, 2023
Application Filed
Feb 05, 2026
Non-Final Rejection — §102, §103, §112 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12603517
CHARGING CIRCUIT AND CHARGING CABLE
2y 5m to grant Granted Apr 14, 2026
Patent 12596153
VOLTAGE TRANSDUCER
2y 5m to grant Granted Apr 07, 2026
Patent 12597795
Systems and Methods for Adaptive USB Charging
2y 5m to grant Granted Apr 07, 2026
Patent 12580393
CONTROL METHOD OF BATTERY APPARATUS AND BATTERY APPARATUS, SYSTEM, AND MEDIUM
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 17, 2026
Patent 12573860
BATTERY CHARGING/DISCHARGING CONTROL SYSTEM AND ELECTRONIC DEVICE
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 10, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

AI Strategy Recommendation

Get an AI-powered prosecution strategy using examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Powered by AI — typically takes 5-10 seconds

Prosecution Projections

1-2
Expected OA Rounds
75%
Grant Probability
94%
With Interview (+18.7%)
2y 9m
Median Time to Grant
Low
PTA Risk
Based on 729 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allow rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month