Prosecution Insights
Last updated: April 18, 2026
Application No. 18/176,731

SEALING INTERFACES BETWEEN THERMAL BARRIER ASSEMBLIES AND ADJACENT STRUCTURES WITHIN TRACTION BATTERY PACKS

Non-Final OA §102
Filed
Mar 01, 2023
Examiner
DOMONE, CHRISTOPHER P
Art Unit
1725
Tech Center
1700 — Chemical & Materials Engineering
Assignee
Ford Global Technologies LLC
OA Round
1 (Non-Final)
84%
Grant Probability
Favorable
1-2
OA Rounds
2y 8m
To Grant
99%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 84% — above average
84%
Career Allow Rate
497 granted / 592 resolved
+19.0% vs TC avg
Strong +22% interview lift
Without
With
+21.7%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
2y 8m
Avg Prosecution
18 currently pending
Career history
610
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
1.6%
-38.4% vs TC avg
§103
50.9%
+10.9% vs TC avg
§102
24.3%
-15.7% vs TC avg
§112
14.1%
-25.9% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 592 resolved cases

Office Action

§102
DETAILED ACTION Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Election/Restrictions Applicant’s election of Invention I, claims 1-15 in the reply filed on 02/18/2026 is acknowledged. Because applicant did not distinctly and specifically point out the supposed errors in the restriction requirement, the election has been treated as an election without traverse (MPEP § 818.01(a)). Claims 16-20 withdrawn from further consideration pursuant to 37 CFR 1.142(b) as being drawn to a nonelected traction battery pack, there being no allowable generic or linking claim. Election was made without traverse in the reply filed on 02/18/2026. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 102 In the event the determination of the status of the application as subject to AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103 (or as subject to pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103) is incorrect, any correction of the statutory basis (i.e., changing from AIA to pre-AIA ) for the rejection will not be considered a new ground of rejection if the prior art relied upon, and the rationale supporting the rejection, would be the same under either status. The following is a quotation of the appropriate paragraphs of 35 U.S.C. 102 that form the basis for the rejections under this section made in this Office action: A person shall be entitled to a patent unless – (a)(1) the claimed invention was patented, described in a printed publication, or in public use, on sale, or otherwise available to the public before the effective filing date of the claimed invention. Claims 1, 10 and 11 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 102(a)(1) as being anticipated by An (KR20210001334 (see attached Machine Translation)). Considering Claim 1, An discloses a traction battery pack (battery case and mounting for a vehicle [Abstract, 0001]), comprising: a cell stack (stack and assembly of battery cells 20 [0003, 0028, Figure 1]) comprising: a first cross-member beam (one of multiple cross members 25 spaced apart within internal space of battery case [0029, Figures 1 and 3]); a battery cell supported by the first-cross member beam (cross members rigidly reinforce cells within internal space of battery case [0029]); and a thermal barrier assembly connected to the first cross-member beam by a tongue-and-groove connection (side seal 10 has a receiving groove 13 that corresponds to a protrusion 26 of cross member 25 [0034, Figures 2 and 6], side seal may be made of various materials such as aluminum or steel [0026], and such materials are within the scope of thermal barrier materials of the claimed invention [0059 PGPub version]). Considering Claim 10, An discloses wherein the thermal barrier assembly includes an upper interfacing structure configured to interface with an upper enclosure structure of the traction battery pack (side seal interfaces with front facing vehicle component [Figure 1]). Considering Claim 11, An discloses that the upper interfacing structure includes a basin configured to receive an adhesive (spaced opening at front of vehicle that would be configured to receive adhesive without requirement of adhesive itself [Figure 1]). Allowable Subject Matter Claims 2-9 and 12-15 objected to as being dependent upon a rejected base claim, but would be allowable if rewritten in independent form including all of the limitations of the base claim and any intervening claims. The following is a statement of reasons for the indication of allowable subject matter: regarding claim 2, the cross members 25 are used for support on one side of the whole battery assembly 20 [Figures 1 and 3] while they are specifically inserted into the cover 22 portion [0044] so as to provide overall rigidity [0045], so there is no teaching or suggestion of a cell being supported between a first cross-member beam and a second cross-member beam as required by the claim. Regarding claim 5, the protrusion 26 of the cross member 25 is inserted (male) into a receiving groove 13 (female) of the side seal 10 [0034, Figures 2 and 6], so there is no teaching or suggestion of a female portion of the first cross-member beam and a male portion of the thermal barrier of the tongue-and-groove connection as required by the claim. Regarding claims 12 and 15, the cross member 25 and the side sill (seal) 10 are directly connected and used to be integrated into the skeletal structure of the vehicle body for the purpose of dynamic rigidity performance for the vehicle body [0047, Figure 1]. The interface of the seal 10 is with the cross members [Figure 1] for the general connection to the battery assembly [0025] so there is no teaching or suggestion of a lower interfacing structure configured to interface with a heat exchanger plate, nor a side interfacing structure configured to interface with a bus bar of the cell stack as required by the claims. Conclusion Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to CHRISTOPHER P DOMONE whose telephone number is (571)270-7582. The examiner can normally be reached M-F 8:00-4:30 PM. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Basia Ridley can be reached at (571)272-1453. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /CHRISTOPHER P DOMONE/Primary Patent Examiner Art Unit 1725
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Mar 01, 2023
Application Filed
Mar 27, 2026
Examiner Interview (Telephonic)
Apr 02, 2026
Non-Final Rejection — §102 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12600858
ION SELECTIVE MEMBRANES FOR ORGANIC ELECTROCHEMICAL PROCESSES
2y 5m to grant Granted Apr 14, 2026
Patent 12603340
ENERGY STORAGE SYSTEM
2y 5m to grant Granted Apr 14, 2026
Patent 12603405
SECONDARY BATTERY
2y 5m to grant Granted Apr 14, 2026
Patent 12586801
COMPRESSOR AND COMPRESSOR CONTROL METHOD
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 24, 2026
Patent 12580278
BATTERY CELL AND ELECTRIC APPARATUS
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 17, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

AI Strategy Recommendation

Get an AI-powered prosecution strategy using examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Powered by AI — typically takes 5-10 seconds

Prosecution Projections

1-2
Expected OA Rounds
84%
Grant Probability
99%
With Interview (+21.7%)
2y 8m
Median Time to Grant
Low
PTA Risk
Based on 592 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allow rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month