Prosecution Insights
Last updated: April 19, 2026
Application No. 18/179,277

METHOD AND APPARATUS FOR AN SRS PROCEDURE

Non-Final OA §102§103
Filed
Mar 06, 2023
Examiner
LO, DIANE LEE
Art Unit
2466
Tech Center
2400 — Computer Networks
Assignee
Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd.
OA Round
3 (Non-Final)
90%
Grant Probability
Favorable
3-4
OA Rounds
2y 3m
To Grant
98%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 90% — above average
90%
Career Allow Rate
842 granted / 941 resolved
+31.5% vs TC avg
Moderate +8% lift
Without
With
+8.5%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
2y 3m
Avg Prosecution
25 currently pending
Career history
966
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
3.7%
-36.3% vs TC avg
§103
50.4%
+10.4% vs TC avg
§102
32.8%
-7.2% vs TC avg
§112
3.0%
-37.0% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 941 resolved cases

Office Action

§102 §103
Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Continued Examination Under 37 CFR 1.114 A request for continued examination under 37 CFR 1.114, including the fee set forth in 37 CFR 1.17(e), was filed in this application after final rejection. Since this application is eligible for continued examination under 37 CFR 1.114, and the fee set forth in 37 CFR 1.17(e) has been timely paid, the finality of the previous Office action has been withdrawn pursuant to 37 CFR 1.114. Applicant's submission filed on 12/10/2025 has been entered. Claims 1-5, 9-14 and 17-21 have been amended. Response to Arguments Applicant's arguments with respect to claims 1-5, 9-14 and 17-21 have been considered but are moot in view of the new ground(s) of rejection. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 102 In the event the determination of the status of the application as subject to AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103 (or as subject to pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103) is incorrect, any correction of the statutory basis (i.e., changing from AIA to pre-AIA ) for the rejection will not be considered a new ground of rejection if the prior art relied upon, and the rationale supporting the rejection, would be the same under either status. The following is a quotation of the appropriate paragraphs of 35 U.S.C. 102 that form the basis for the rejections under this section made in this Office action: A person shall be entitled to a patent unless – (a)(2) the claimed invention was described in a patent issued under section 151, or in an application for patent published or deemed published under section 122(b), in which the patent or application, as the case may be, names another inventor and was effectively filed before the effective filing date of the claimed invention. Claims 1-3, 5, 9-11, 13, 17-19 and 21 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 102(a)(2) as being anticipated by Gao (US 2025/0175301 A1). 1. Regarding claims 1 and 17, Gao teaches a user equipment (UE) and method performed by a user equipment (Figures 2 and 14, Paragraphs [0057] and [0066] to [0070]) comprising: a transceiver configured to receive, from a base station, a configuration on one or more sounding reference signal (SRS) resources (Figure 2 receiving configuration information of an SRS resource); and a processor operably coupled to the transceiver, the processor configured to identify, based on the configuration, information on 8 antenna ports related with the one or more SRS resources (Figure 2, the SRS resource including 8 antenna ports), wherein the transceiver is further configured to perform an SRS transmission based on the information on the 8 antenna ports (Figure 2, mapping SRS corresponding to at least two antenna port groups to physical resources corresponding to different transmission combs), and wherein the information includes a cyclic shift and a transmission comb offset for the 8 antenna ports (Paragraph [0048] configuration includes transmission comb parameter and cyclic shift parameter). wherein the 8 antenna ports include a plurality of antenna groups (Paragraph [0045] at least two antenna port groups are obtained based on grouping the 8 antenna ports), wherein each of the antenna groups is associated with a respective cyclic shift and a same set of transmission comb offsets (Paragraphs [0057] and [0066] to [0068] each antenna port group corresponds to one transmission comb; maximum value of cyclic shift parameter of the transmission comb), and wherein each antenna within each of the antenna groups is associated with a respective transmission comb offset (Paragraphs [0057] and [0066] to [0070] each antenna port group corresponds to one transmission comb; calculates the cyclic shift parameter corresponding to all antenna ports within the group). 2. Regarding claim 9, Gao teaches a base station (BS) (Figure 15) comprising: a processor configured to generate a configuration on one or more sounding reference signal (SRS) resources, wherein the configuration includes information on 8 transmit antenna ports related with the one or more SRS resources (Fig. 11, 1010 sending configuration information of an SRS resource); and a transceiver operably coupled to the processor, the transceiver configured to: transmit, to a user equipment (UE), the information on 8 antenna ports configuration (Fig. 11, 1020 sending configuration information of an SRS resource including 8 antenna ports); and receive an SRS transmission on the one or more SRS resources based on the information on 8 antenna ports (Fig. 11 receiving SRSs corresponding to at least two antenna port groups), wherein the information includes a cyclic shift and a transmission comb offset for the 8 antenna ports (Paragraphs [0057] and [0066] to [0068] each antenna port group corresponds to one transmission comb; maximum value of cyclic shift parameter of the transmission comb), wherein the 8 antenna ports include a plurality of antenna groups (Paragraph [0045] at least two antenna port groups are obtained based on grouping the 8 antenna ports), wherein each of the antenna groups is associated with a respective cyclic shift and a same set of transmission comb offsets (Paragraphs [0057] and [0066] to [0068] each antenna port group corresponds to one transmission comb; maximum value of cyclic shift parameter of the transmission comb), and wherein each antenna within each of the antenna groups is associated with a respective transmission comb offset (Paragraphs [0057] and [0066] to [0070] each antenna port group corresponds to one transmission comb; calculates the cyclic shift parameter corresponding to all antenna ports within the group). 3. Regarding claims 2, 10 and 18, Gao teaches wherein a maximum number of cyclic shifts = 8 (Fig. 2, Paragraphs [0057] and [0067] each antenna port group corresponds to one transmission comb; maximum number of cyclic shift parameters is 8, calculates the cyclic shift parameter corresponding to all antenna ports within the group). 4. Regarding claims 3, 11 and 19, Gao teaches wherein a maximum number of cyclic shifts = 12, and each antenna within each of the antenna groups is associated with a respective cyclic shift (Fig. 2, Paragraphs [0057] and [0068] each antenna port group corresponds to one transmission comb; maximum number of cyclic shift parameters is 12, calculates the cyclic shift parameter corresponding to all antenna ports within the group). 5. Regarding claims 5, 13 and 21, Gao teaches wherein each antenna within each of the antenna groups is associated with a respective cyclic shift (Fig. 2, Paragraphs [0057] and [0067] each antenna port group corresponds to one transmission comb; maximum number of cyclic shift parameters is 8, calculates the cyclic shift parameter corresponding to all antenna ports within the group). Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 103 The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 103 which forms the basis for all obviousness rejections set forth in this Office action: A patent for a claimed invention may not be obtained, notwithstanding that the claimed invention is not identically disclosed as set forth in section 102, if the differences between the claimed invention and the prior art are such that the claimed invention as a whole would have been obvious before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to a person having ordinary skill in the art to which the claimed invention pertains. Patentability shall not be negated by the manner in which the invention was made. Claims 4, 12 and 20 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over Gao (US 2025/0175301 A1) in view of Jacobsson et al. (US 2024/0187188 A1) 6. Regarding claims 4, 12 and 20, Gao does not explicitly disclose wherein a maximum number of cyclic shifts = 6. Jacobsson teaches a maximum number of cyclic shifts = 6 (Figure 15, Paragraph [0039] and [0170] max number of cyclic shifts is 6; transmission comb 8). It would have been obvious to a person having ordinary skill in the art before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to provide a maximum number of cyclic shifts = 6, as taught by Jacobsson in the system of Gao for improving the NR Rel-16 framework for determining cyclic shifts see Paragraph [0042] of Jacobsson. Conclusion The prior art made of record and not relied upon is considered pertinent to applicant’s disclosure: Gao (US 2025/0192946 A1) Paragraphs [0088] and [0092] Gao (US 2025/0141628 A1) Paragraphs [0316] and [0451] Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to DIANE LEE LO whose telephone number is (571)270-1952. The examiner can normally be reached Monday - Friday 8 am - 5 pm. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Faruk Hamza can be reached at (571)272-7969. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /DIANE L LO/Primary Examiner, Art Unit 2466
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Mar 06, 2023
Application Filed
May 01, 2025
Non-Final Rejection — §102, §103
Aug 04, 2025
Response Filed
Sep 15, 2025
Final Rejection — §102, §103
Nov 14, 2025
Response after Non-Final Action
Dec 10, 2025
Request for Continued Examination
Dec 19, 2025
Response after Non-Final Action
Jan 07, 2026
Non-Final Rejection — §102, §103 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12598517
COMMUNICATION METHOD AND APPARATUS
2y 5m to grant Granted Apr 07, 2026
Patent 12593343
APPARATUS AND METHOD FOR PROCESSING SIDELINK RESOURCE REQUIRED FOR SIDELINK DRX OPERATION IN WIRELESS COMMUNICATION SYSTEM
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 31, 2026
Patent 12592797
WAKE-UP SIGNAL WAVEFORM DESIGN
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 31, 2026
Patent 12587872
USING ORCHESTRATORS FOR FALSE POSITIVE DETECTION AND ROOT CAUSE ANALYSIS
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 24, 2026
Patent 12580710
METHOD AND APPARATUS FOR RESOURCE ALLOCATION
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 17, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

AI Strategy Recommendation

Get an AI-powered prosecution strategy using examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Powered by AI — typically takes 5-10 seconds

Prosecution Projections

3-4
Expected OA Rounds
90%
Grant Probability
98%
With Interview (+8.5%)
2y 3m
Median Time to Grant
High
PTA Risk
Based on 941 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allow rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month