Prosecution Insights
Last updated: August 15, 2026
Application No. 18/179,849

CATHETER

Non-Final OA §102§103
Filed
Mar 07, 2023
Priority
Mar 11, 2022 — JP 2022-037879
Examiner
ZIEGLER, ABIGAIL M
Art Unit
3794
Tech Center
3700 — Mechanical Engineering & Manufacturing
Assignee
Japan Lifeline Co. Ltd.
OA Round
3 (Non-Final)
45%
Grant Probability
Moderate
3-4
OA Rounds
6m
Est. Remaining
94%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 45% of resolved cases
45%
Career Allowance Rate
46 granted / 102 resolved
-24.9% vs TC avg
Strong +49% interview lift
Without
With
+48.6%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
4y 0m
Avg Prosecution
28 currently pending
Career history
143
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
0.9%
-39.1% vs TC avg
§103
46.4%
+6.4% vs TC avg
§102
19.1%
-20.9% vs TC avg
§112
31.8%
-8.2% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 102 resolved cases

Office Action

§102 §103
DETAILED ACTION Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Continued Examination Under 37 CFR 1.114 A request for continued examination under 37 CFR 1.114, including the fee set forth in 37 CFR 1.17(e), was filed in this application after final rejection. Since this application is eligible for continued examination under 37 CFR 1.114, and the fee set forth in 37 CFR 1.17(e) has been timely paid, the finality of the previous Office action has been withdrawn pursuant to 37 CFR 1.114. Applicant's submission filed on March 27th, 2026 has been entered. Information Disclosure Statement The information disclosure statement (IDS) submitted January 27th, 2026 has been considered by the Examiner. Response to Arguments Applicant’s arguments, see pages 4-7, filed March 27th, 2026, with respect to the rejection(s) of claim(s) 1-7 under 35 U.S.C. 102 and claims 8-9 under 35 U.S.C. 103 have been fully considered and are persuasive. Therefore, the rejection has been withdrawn. However, upon further consideration, a new ground(s) of rejection is made in view of newly found prior art that teaches the claim limitations. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 103 The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 103 which forms the basis for all obviousness rejections set forth in this Office action: A patent for a claimed invention may not be obtained, notwithstanding that the claimed invention is not identically disclosed as set forth in section 102, if the differences between the claimed invention and the prior art are such that the claimed invention as a whole would have been obvious before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to a person having ordinary skill in the art to which the claimed invention pertains. Patentability shall not be negated by the manner in which the invention was made. Claims 1-7 & 9 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over Mori (WO 2020035919 A1, earliest effective filing date, original & translated documents attached), herein referred to as “Mori” in view of Zhou et al. (U.S. Pub. No. 20190030297, previously cited), herein referred to as “Zhou”. Note that the Mori reference utilizes the English translation such that page numbers are given in reference to copied sections. Regarding claim 1, Mori discloses a catheter (balloon-type electrode catheter 100), comprising: a first shaft (outer tube 10) configured to be inserted into a body (Page 3: The balloon-type electrode catheter 100 of this embodiment is a balloon type electrode catheter that is introduced transvascularly), the first shaft including a first lumen (central lumen 10L) that extends in an axial direction from a proximal end side (Page 3: proximal end side of the outer tube 10) toward a distal end side (Page 3: the distal end portion of the outer tube 10; see Fig. 1); a second member (sublumen 101L; any one of sublumens 101L to 112L, numbering is arbitrary), together with a first member (outer tube 10) that is a main constituent member of the first shaft (wherein the outer tube 10 is a main constituent member of itself), directly forming an inner circumferential surface defining the first lumen (Page 3: an outer tube having a central lumen 10L and sublumens 101L to 112L; Page 4: there are a central lumen 10L and twelve sub-lumens arranged around the same at equal angle (30 degrees) intervals), and a second shaft (shaft of sublumen 102L; Page 4: each of the sublumens 101L to 112L is formed by a lumen tube surrounding the same) including a second lumen (sublumen 102L) extending in the axial direction (see Fig. 4), the second shaft including the second member (sublumens 101L-112L), wherein a portion of an outer circumferential surface of the second shaft forms, together with the first member, the inner circumferential surface defining the first lumen (see Fig. 4; Page 3: an outer tube having a central lumen 10L and sublumens 101L to 112L). But Mori fails to disclose the second member having frictional properties lower than frictional properties of the first member. However, Zhou discloses the second member having frictional properties lower than frictional properties of the first member ([0069]: The outer tubular layer 40, in one implementation, is constructed of a relatively elastic material. An exemplary material includes NEUSOFT. NEUSOFT is a translucent polyether urethane based material; [0085]: longitudinal rods 60 are comprised of relatively high stiffness materials such as HDPE, fluropolymer and PTFE; see Fig. 5; wherein in view of paragraph [0040] of the instant application's specification: "The first member (main constituent member of the outer shaft 10) is formed of, for example, nylon or urethane, and the second member (each sub-shaft 101 to 112) is formed of, for example, a fluororesin such as polytetrafluoroethylene (PTFE) or perfluoroalkoxy alkane (PFA)", Zhou teaches the claimed frictional properties). Therefore, it would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to modify the frictional properties of the first and second members of Mori to the frictional properties taught by Zhou for the purpose of mediating friction between inner and outer tubular layers thereby reducing the push force needed (Zhou: Abstract, [0010], [0072]). Regarding claim 2, Mori discloses wherein the second member extends in the axial direction (see Fig. 4; Page 4: the sublumens 101L to 105L … supply fluid to the inside of the balloon 30). Regarding claim 3, Mori discloses wherein the second member extends in the axial direction from a proximal end toward a distal end of the first shaft (see Fig. 4; Page 4: the sublumens 101L to 105L … supply fluid to the inside of the balloon 30). Regarding claim 4, Mori discloses wherein a plurality of the second members are disposed along a circumferential direction of the inner circumferential surface (Page 3: an outer tube having a central lumen 10L and sublumens 101L to 112L; Page 4: there are a central lumen 10L and twelve sub-lumens arranged around the same at equal angle (30 degrees) intervals; see Fig. 4 where the sublumens are formed along an inner circumference of outer tube 10). Regarding claim 5, Mori discloses wherein intervals in the circumferential direction between the plurality of second members are substantially constant (see Fig. 4; Page 4: there are a central lumen 10L and twelve sub-lumens arranged around the same at equal angle (30 degrees) intervals). Regarding claim 6, Mori discloses wherein the second member projects into the first lumen from the first member (Page 3: an outer tube having a central lumen 10L and sublumens 101L to 112L). Regarding claim 7, Mori in view of Zhou discloses wherein the second member includes a fluororesin (Zhou: [0085]: longitudinal rods 60 are comprised of relatively high stiffness materials such as HDPE, fluropolymer and PTFE). Regarding claim 9, Mori discloses a balloon (balloon 30) attached to the distal end side of the first shaft (page 3: a balloon 30 connected to the distal end side of the outer tube 30), the balloon configured to be inflatable by a fluid supplied from a proximal end side of the second shaft into the second lumen (page 4: each of the sublumens 191L to 105L is in communication with the fluid supply connector 22 … as a result, the sublumens 101L to 105L (five of the twelve sub-lumens formed in the outer tube 10) supply fluid to the inside of the balloon 30 (expansion portion 31). Conclusion Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to Abigail M Ziegler whose telephone number is (571)272-1991. The examiner can normally be reached M-F 8:30 a.m. - 5 p.m. EST. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Joanne Rodden can be reached at (303) 297-4276. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /ABIGAIL M ZIEGLER/Examiner, Art Unit 3794 /BEVERLY M FLANAGAN/Primary Examiner, Art Unit 3794
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Mar 07, 2023
Application Filed
Aug 12, 2025
Non-Final Rejection mailed — §102, §103
Oct 27, 2025
Response Filed
Jan 27, 2026
Final Rejection mailed — §102, §103
Mar 27, 2026
Request for Continued Examination
Apr 17, 2026
Response after Non-Final Action
Jul 16, 2026
Non-Final Rejection mailed — §102, §103 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12697160
TREATMENT PORTION OF MEDICAL ENERGY DEVICE, MANUFACTURING METHOD THEREFOR, AND MEDICAL ENERGY DEVICE
3y 1m to grant Granted Aug 04, 2026
Patent 12685584
INSTRUMENT PORT FOR EPICARDIAL ABLATION WITH ANATOMICAL EPICARDIAL STRUCTURES AND REAL-TIME LESION IMAGE PROCESSOR
5y 8m to grant Granted Jul 21, 2026
Patent 12582463
ABLATION CATHETER TIP WITH FLEXIBLE ELECTRONIC CIRCUITRY
5y 11m to grant Granted Mar 24, 2026
Patent 12551269
Displaying Indications of Mutual Distances Among Electrodes of a Flexible Ablation Catheter
4y 5m to grant Granted Feb 17, 2026
Patent 12533180
MEDICAL DEVICE
5y 4m to grant Granted Jan 27, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

Strategy Recommendation AI-generated — please review before filing

Get a prosecution strategy drawn from examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Typically takes 5-10 seconds — AI-generated, attorney review required before filing

Prosecution Projections

3-4
Expected OA Rounds
45%
Grant Probability
94%
With Interview (+48.6%)
4y 0m (~6m remaining)
Median Time to Grant
High
PTA Risk
Based on 102 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allowance rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month