Prosecution Insights
Last updated: April 19, 2026
Application No. 18/181,521

COMPRESSIBLE SHUNT IMPLANT

Non-Final OA §102
Filed
Mar 09, 2023
Examiner
GANESAN, SUBA
Art Unit
3774
Tech Center
3700 — Mechanical Engineering & Manufacturing
Assignee
Edwards Lifesciences Corporation
OA Round
1 (Non-Final)
74%
Grant Probability
Favorable
1-2
OA Rounds
3y 2m
To Grant
88%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 74% — above average
74%
Career Allow Rate
491 granted / 667 resolved
+3.6% vs TC avg
Moderate +14% lift
Without
With
+14.0%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
3y 2m
Avg Prosecution
30 currently pending
Career history
697
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
0.6%
-39.4% vs TC avg
§103
45.5%
+5.5% vs TC avg
§102
26.6%
-13.4% vs TC avg
§112
19.3%
-20.7% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 667 resolved cases

Office Action

§102
DETAILED ACTION Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Election/Restrictions Applicant’s election without traverse of Group II, claims 12-16 in the reply filed on 12/11/2025 is acknowledged. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 102 The following is a quotation of the appropriate paragraphs of 35 U.S.C. 102 that form the basis for the rejections under this section made in this Office action: A person shall be entitled to a patent unless – (a)(1) the claimed invention was patented, described in a printed publication, or in public use, on sale, or otherwise available to the public before the effective filing date of the claimed invention. Claims 12-16, 21-35 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 102(a)(1) as being anticipated by Taft et al. (Pub. No.: US 2017/0106176). Taft et al. (hereinafter, Taft) discloses a method comprising: crimping a medical implant 150 to reduce a profile of the medical implant (e.g., fig. 3N), the medical implant comprising a network of struts forming two or more cells (e.g., fig. 3P), wherein crimping the medical implant causes at least some struts of the network of struts to bend (e.g., fig. 3N, 3O); inserting the medical implant into a catheter (e.g., fig. 3N, 3O); delivering the catheter to a treatment location within a human body (e.g., fig. 3N); and removing the medical implant from the catheter (e.g., fig. 3P-3V). For claim 13, Taft discloses the method of claim 12, wherein the medical implant further comprises a first set of anchoring arms 152a, 154b (e.g., fig. 3V) and a second set of anchoring arms 152a, 154b (e.g., fig. 3V). For claim 14, Taft discloses the method of claim 13, wherein the two or more cells are arranged linearly from the first set of anchoring arms to the second set of anchoring arms (e.g., fig. 3V). For claim 15, Taft discloses the method of claim 14, wherein removing the medical implant from the catheter causes expansion of the medical implant to an expanded profile and a width of the medical implant in the expanded profile exceeds a width of the catheter (e.g., fig. 3N-3V). For claim 16, Taft discloses the method of claim 15, wherein the medical implant is at least partially composed of Nitinol (e.g., para. 55) For claim 21, Taft discloses the method of claim 12, wherein bending of the at least some struts of the network of struts causes the two or more cells to increase in length and decrease in width (compare fig. 4D with 4B and 4C). For claim 22, Taft discloses the method of claim 12, wherein the medical implant comprises a central flow portion including the network of struts (e.g., fig. 3V at arrow for 150), and wherein bending of the at least some struts of the network of struts causes the central flow portion to increase in length and reduce in diameter (compare fig. 4D with 4A-4C). For claim 23, Taft discloses a method of shunting through a tissue wall, the method comprising: creating an opening in the tissue wall (e.g., fig. 3D-3J); advancing a medical implant 150 via a catheter to the opening in the tissue wall (e.g., fig. 3M-3N), the medical implant comprising a central flow portion having a first network of struts forming two or more cells (e.g., fig. 3V), the medical implant further comprising a first set of anchoring arms (152a and 154a, fig. 3V) and a second set of anchoring arms (152b and 154b, fig. 3V), wherein the two or more cells are arranged linearly and extend from the first set of anchoring arms to the second set of anchoring arms (e.g., fig. 3V); removing the medical implant from the catheter to cause expansion of the medical implant (e.g., fig. 3N-3V); and anchoring the medical implant at least partially within the opening (e.g., fig. 3V). For claim 24, Taft discloses the method of claim 23, further comprising expanding the opening prior to placing the medical implant within the opening (e.g., fig. 3J). For claim 25, Taft discloses the method of claim 23, wherein the tissue wall is between a left atrium and a coronary sinus, the method further comprising advancing the medical implant to the tissue wall via the coronary sinus (e.g., fig. 3A-N). For claim 26, Taft discloses the method of claim 23, further comprising crimping the medical implant to fit the medical implant into the catheter, wherein crimping the medical implant causes bending of the first network of struts and causes the two or more cells to increase in length and decrease in width (e.g., fig. 3M-3N; compare fig. 4D with 4A-4C for effect on cell dimensions). For claim 27, Taft discloses the method of claim 23, wherein the first set of anchoring arms has a second network of struts forming cells (e.g., fig. 6A). For claim 28, Taft discloses the method of claim 23, wherein the first set of anchoring arms form a pincer grasp (e.g., fig. 3V). For claim 29, Taft discloses the method of claim 23, wherein the central flow portion comprises a single row of two or more cells (e.g., fig. 3V). For claim 30, Taft discloses a method of shunting through a tissue wall, the method comprising: crimping a medical implant 150 to fit the medical implant into a catheter (e.g., fig. 3N), the medical implant comprising a central flow portion having a first network of struts forming a single row of two or more cells being arranged linearly (e.g., fig. 3V), the central flow portion further comprising a first set of anchoring arms (152a and 154a, fig. 3V) and a second set of anchoring arms (152b and 154b, fig. 3V), wherein the two or more cells extend from the first set of anchoring arms to the second set of anchoring arms (e.g., fig. 3V); creating an opening in the tissue wall (e.g., fig. 3D-3J); advancing the medical implant 150 via the catheter to the opening in the tissue wall (e.g., fig. 3M-3N); removing the medical implant from the catheter to cause expansion of the medical implant (e.g., fig. 3N-3V); and anchoring the medical implant at least partially within the opening (e.g., fig. 3V). For claim 31, Taft discloses the method of claim 30, further comprising expanding the opening prior to placing the medical implant within the opening (e.g., fig. 3J). For claim 32, Taft discloses the method of claim 30, wherein the tissue wall is between a left atrium and a coronary sinus, the method further comprising advancing the medical implant to the tissue wall via the coronary sinus (e.g., fig. 3A-N). For claim 33, Taft discloses the method of claim 30, wherein the first set of anchoring arms has a second network of struts forming cells (e.g., fig. 6A). For claim 34, Taft discloses the method of claim 33, wherein the first set of anchoring arms comprises four interconnected cells (e.g., fig. 6A). For claim 35, Taft discloses the method of claim 33, wherein crimping the medical implant causes the two or more cells to increase in length and decrease in width (compare fig. 4D with 4A-4C). Conclusion Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to SUBA GANESAN whose telephone number is (571)272-3243. The examiner can normally be reached Monday-Friday, 8 AM - 5 PM Mountain Time. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Jerrah Edwards can be reached at (408) 918-7557. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /SUBA GANESAN/Primary Examiner, Art Unit 3774
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Mar 09, 2023
Application Filed
Jan 06, 2026
Non-Final Rejection — §102 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12594160
PROSTHETIC HEART VALVE
2y 5m to grant Granted Apr 07, 2026
Patent 12588988
IMPLANT DELIVERY
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 31, 2026
Patent 12588989
IMPLANT DELIVERY
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 31, 2026
Patent 12582520
IMPLANT DELIVERY
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 24, 2026
Patent 12575928
Devices, Systems, and Methods for an Implantable Heart-Valve Adapter
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 17, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

AI Strategy Recommendation

Get an AI-powered prosecution strategy using examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Powered by AI — typically takes 5-10 seconds

Prosecution Projections

1-2
Expected OA Rounds
74%
Grant Probability
88%
With Interview (+14.0%)
3y 2m
Median Time to Grant
Low
PTA Risk
Based on 667 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allow rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month