Prosecution Insights
Last updated: July 17, 2026
Application No. 18/181,919

METHOD AND APPARATUS FOR PHYSICAL DOWNLINK SHARED CHANNEL (PDSCH) REPETITION IN WIRELESS COMMUNICATION SYSTEM

Non-Final OA §112
Filed
Mar 10, 2023
Priority
Jan 31, 2023 — RE 10-2023-0012446
Examiner
NGO, RICKY QUOC
Art Unit
2464
Tech Center
2400 — Computer Networks
Assignee
Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd.
OA Round
2 (Non-Final)
41%
Grant Probability
Moderate
2-3
OA Rounds
0m
Est. Remaining
80%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 41% of resolved cases
41%
Career Allowance Rate
12 granted / 29 resolved
-16.6% vs TC avg
Strong +39% interview lift
Without
With
+39.0%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
2y 11m
Avg Prosecution
8 currently pending
Career history
34
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§103
65.9%
+25.9% vs TC avg
§102
28.2%
-11.8% vs TC avg
§112
5.9%
-34.1% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 29 resolved cases

Office Action

§112
Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Continued Examination Under 37 CFR 1.114 A request for continued examination under 37 CFR 1.114, including the fee set forth in 37 CFR 1.17(e), was filed in this application after allowance or after an Office action under Ex Parte Quayle, 25 USPQ 74, 453 O.G. 213 (Comm'r Pat. 1935). Since this application is eligible for continued examination under 37 CFR 1.114, and the fee set forth in 37 CFR 1.17(e) has been timely paid, prosecution in this application has been reopened pursuant to 37 CFR 1.114. Applicant's submission filed on 03/13/2026 has been entered. Information Disclosure Statement The information disclosure statement filed 3/13/2026 fails to comply with 37 CFR 1.98(a)(3)(i) because it does not include a concise explanation of the relevance, as it is presently understood by the individual designated in 37 CFR 1.56(c) most knowledgeable about the content of the information, of each reference listed that is not in the English language. The application record includes the following foreign-language reference cited in the IDS: KR10-2338663 (B1). Please provide a full English translation of the entire reference, as the reference appears material to the present examination under 35 U.S.C. § 102 and/or § 103. The reference has been placed in the application file, but the information referred to therein has not been considered. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 112 The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 112(b): (b) CONCLUSION.—The specification shall conclude with one or more claims particularly pointing out and distinctly claiming the subject matter which the inventor or a joint inventor regards as the invention. The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 112 (pre-AIA ), second paragraph: The specification shall conclude with one or more claims particularly pointing out and distinctly claiming the subject matter which the applicant regards as his invention. Claims 1, 3-6, 8-11, 13-16, & 18-20 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 112(b) or 35 U.S.C. 112 (pre-AIA ), second paragraph, as being indefinite for failing to particularly point out and distinctly claim the subject matter which the inventor or a joint inventor (or for applications subject to pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 112, the applicant), regards as the invention. Regarding claim 1, lines 14, it is unclear when and how the second repetition was scheduled. It is noted that the first repetition was scheduled by the DCI. Claim 11 has a similar issue. Regarding claim 6, lines 13 & 14, the step “identifying a MCS level … based on the information” is unclear. The claim recites HARQ-ACK information, downlink control information, and information identifying a PDSCH as successfully decoded. It is unclear which of these items is being referenced by the term “the information.” The claim also recites “a second PDSCH repetition,” but it is unclear when and how the second PDSCH repetition was scheduled. Claim 16 has similar issues. Allowable Subject Matter Claims 1, 3-6, 8-11, 13-16, & 18-20 would be allowable if rewritten or amended to overcome the rejection(s) under 35 U.S.C. 112(b) as set forth in this Office action, and if the full translation of the foreign reference, KR10-2338663 (B1), as provided by the applicant, does not anticipate or render obvious the claimed invention. Conclusion Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to RICKY QUOC NGO whose telephone number is (571)272-3139. The examiner can normally be reached Monday - Friday, 8:00 AM - 5:00 PM. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /RICKY Q NGO/Supervisory Patent Examiner, Art Unit 2464
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Mar 10, 2023
Application Filed
May 16, 2025
Non-Final Rejection mailed — §112
Aug 13, 2025
Response Filed
Mar 13, 2026
Request for Continued Examination
May 11, 2026
Response after Non-Final Action
May 29, 2026
Non-Final Rejection mailed — §112 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12621051
LEO SATELLITE CONGESTION CONTROL ROUTING METHOD
2y 1m to grant Granted May 05, 2026
Patent 12598659
METHOD FOR ESTABLISHING CONNECTED STATE, TERMINAL, CORE NETWORK FUNCTION, AND ACCESS NETWORK DEVICE
2y 11m to grant Granted Apr 07, 2026
Patent 12587414
Methods and Apparatus Supporting Dynamic Ethernet VLAN Configuration in a Fifth Generation System
2y 3m to grant Granted Mar 24, 2026
Patent 12581540
RANDOM ACCESS TYPE DETERMINATION AND WD CAPABILITY SIGNALING IN NR NTN
3y 3m to grant Granted Mar 17, 2026
Patent 12501350
METHOD AND DEVICE FOR RECEIVING PARTIAL INFORMATION REGARDING OTHER APS WITHIN TRANSMISSION MLD IN WIRELESS LAN SYSTEM
2y 4m to grant Granted Dec 16, 2025
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

Strategy Recommendation AI-generated — please review before filing

Get a prosecution strategy drawn from examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Typically takes 5-10 seconds — AI-generated, attorney review required before filing

Prosecution Projections

2-3
Expected OA Rounds
41%
Grant Probability
80%
With Interview (+39.0%)
2y 11m (~0m remaining)
Median Time to Grant
Moderate
PTA Risk
Based on 29 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allowance rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month