Prosecution Insights
Last updated: April 19, 2026
Application No. 18/182,505

STRUCTURAL ANALYSIS SYSTEM AND SUPPORT PLATFORM MADE USING INFORMATION GENERATED BY SAME

Non-Final OA §112
Filed
Mar 13, 2023
Examiner
RASTOVSKI, CATHERINE T
Art Unit
2857
Tech Center
2800 — Semiconductors & Electrical Systems
Assignee
Astro Technology Group, LLC
OA Round
2 (Non-Final)
68%
Grant Probability
Favorable
2-3
OA Rounds
3y 7m
To Grant
98%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 68% — above average
68%
Career Allow Rate
205 granted / 302 resolved
At TC average
Strong +30% interview lift
Without
With
+30.3%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
3y 7m
Avg Prosecution
11 currently pending
Career history
313
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
27.7%
-12.3% vs TC avg
§103
32.6%
-7.4% vs TC avg
§102
11.0%
-29.0% vs TC avg
§112
25.9%
-14.1% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 302 resolved cases

Office Action

§112
DETAILED ACTION Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Response to Arguments Claims 1-4, 7-10, 14-17, 19, 21-23 are pending. Claims 1-3, 7-10, 14-16, 19, 21-23 are amended. Claims 5-6, 11-13, 18, 20, and 24-26 are cancelled. Regarding the rejection of Claims 1-4, 7-10, 14-17, 19, 21-23 under 35 U.S.C. 103, as best understood by the examiner Applicant’s arguments are persuasive and the rejection is withdrawn. New rejections under 35 U.S.C. 112(b) are applied to the claims. Claim Objections Claim 8, 10, 15, 19, and 23 are objected to because of the following informalities: “the support member is attached directly opposing exterior sidewalls of the buoyancy tank” should be -the support member is attached directly to opposing exterior sidewalls of the buoyancy tank- Appropriate correction is required. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 112 The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 112(b): (b) CONCLUSION.—The specification shall conclude with one or more claims particularly pointing out and distinctly claiming the subject matter which the inventor or a joint inventor regards as the invention. The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 112 (pre-AIA ), second paragraph: The specification shall conclude with one or more claims particularly pointing out and distinctly claiming the subject matter which the applicant regards as his invention. Claims 1-4, 7-10, 14-17, 19, 21-23 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 112(b) or 35 U.S.C. 112 (pre-AIA ), second paragraph, as being indefinite for failing to particularly point out and distinctly claim the subject matter which the inventor or a joint inventor (or for applications subject to pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 112, the applicant), regards as the invention. Claims 1, 9, 14, and 22 recite “a (the) respective generalized direction” relative to a vertical reference axis. It is unclear what direction qualifies as a “respective generalized” direction. It the direction parallel to the vertical reference axis? Perpendicular? At some defined range of angles from the axis? Therefore claims 1, 9, 14, 22 and further dependent claims 2-4, 7-8, 10, 15-17, 19, 21, and 23 are indefinite. The term “approximately” in claims 7, 9, and 22 is a relative term which renders the claim indefinite. The term “approximately” is not defined by the claim, the specification does not provide a standard for ascertaining the requisite degree, and one of ordinary skill in the art would not be reasonably apprised of the scope of the invention. Therefore claims 7, 9, and 22 and further dependent claims 8, 10, and 23 are indefinite. Allowable Subject Matter Claims 1-4, 7-10, 14-17, 19, 21-23 would be allowable if rewritten or amended to overcome the rejection(s) under 35 U.S.C. 112(b) or 35 U.S.C. 112 (pre-AIA ), 2nd paragraph, set forth in this Office action. As applicant noted in the arguments of 11/11/2025, the prior art alone or in combination fails to teach use of finite element structural analysis for determining sensor placement of fiber optic strain gauges for offshore buoyancy tanks. Conclusion Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to CATHERINE T RASTOVSKI whose telephone number is (571)270-0349. The examiner can normally be reached Mon-Fri 8:00am-4:00pm. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Allana Lewin Bidder can be reached at 571-272-5560. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /Catherine T. Rastovski/Supervisory Primary Examiner, Art Unit 2857
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Mar 13, 2023
Application Filed
Sep 05, 2025
Non-Final Rejection — §112
Nov 11, 2025
Response Filed
Mar 22, 2026
Non-Final Rejection — §112 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12598722
SYSTEMS AND METHODS FOR LEAKAGE DETECTION IN A LIQUID COOLING SYSTEM
2y 5m to grant Granted Apr 07, 2026
Patent 12568345
POPULATION ESTIMATION DEVICE
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 03, 2026
Patent 12554016
Method of Detecting Presense of an Object Using a Time of Flight Sensor
2y 5m to grant Granted Feb 17, 2026
Patent 12482118
LANDMARK PERCEPTION FOR LOCALIZATION IN AUTONOMOUS SYSTEMS AND APPLICATIONS
2y 5m to grant Granted Nov 25, 2025
Patent 12472469
METHOD AND SYSTEM TO MONITOR AND CONTROL CONTINUOUS ULTRAFILTRATION PROCESS UNITS
2y 5m to grant Granted Nov 18, 2025
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

AI Strategy Recommendation

Get an AI-powered prosecution strategy using examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Powered by AI — typically takes 5-10 seconds

Prosecution Projections

2-3
Expected OA Rounds
68%
Grant Probability
98%
With Interview (+30.3%)
3y 7m
Median Time to Grant
Moderate
PTA Risk
Based on 302 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allow rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month