Prosecution Insights
Last updated: April 19, 2026
Application No. 18/183,282

RESIN PARTICLES, TONER, DEVELOPER, TONER HOUSING UNIT, IMAGE FORMING APPARATUS, AND METHOD OF FORMING IMAGE

Final Rejection §103
Filed
Mar 14, 2023
Examiner
KUIPERS, JENNA ANN
Art Unit
1734
Tech Center
1700 — Chemical & Materials Engineering
Assignee
Ricoh Company Ltd.
OA Round
2 (Final)
75%
Grant Probability
Favorable
3-4
OA Rounds
3y 3m
To Grant
99%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 75% — above average
75%
Career Allow Rate
18 granted / 24 resolved
+10.0% vs TC avg
Strong +27% interview lift
Without
With
+27.3%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
3y 3m
Avg Prosecution
41 currently pending
Career history
65
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§103
57.5%
+17.5% vs TC avg
§102
22.5%
-17.5% vs TC avg
§112
15.7%
-24.3% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 24 resolved cases

Office Action

§103
DETAILED ACTION Response to Arguments Applicant’s arguments, see the Response, filed 11/21/2025, with respect to the rejection of claims 1-11 under 35 U.S.C. 102(a)(1) have been fully considered and are persuasive. Therefore, the rejection has been withdrawn. However, upon further consideration, a new ground of rejection is made below. Specification The objection to the specification regarding the prepolymer is withdrawn. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 103 The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 103 which forms the basis for all obviousness rejections set forth in this Office action: A patent for a claimed invention may not be obtained, notwithstanding that the claimed invention is not identically disclosed as set forth in section 102, if the differences between the claimed invention and the prior art are such that the claimed invention as a whole would have been obvious before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to a person having ordinary skill in the art to which the claimed invention pertains. Patentability shall not be negated by the manner in which the invention was made. Claims 1-18 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over Maeda (WIPO Publication No. 2019-107087) in view of Moriya (US PGP 2017-0097581). Maeda teaches resin particles comprising a binder resin containing a polyester resin (a) ([0017]), and a polyester resin (b) ([0059]); wherein polyester resin (b) includes an amorphous polyester resin (b1) and a crystalline polyester resin (C) ([0061]). The gel fraction of the base particles is preferably 9% to 40% ([0057]). Exemplary toner (T-5) contains a gel fraction of 31%, and (T-8) contains a gel fraction of 40% (Table 2). The release agent may be an ester wax ([0081]), and it is contained in an amount of 1% to 20% by weight ([0083]). The resin particles further contain an aggregating agent that is preferably a metal salt, such as magnesium chloride, calcium chloride, aluminum chloride, or aluminum sulfate ([0110]). Exemplary toners (T-1) to (T-15) contain the divalent aggregating agent magnesium chloride ([0170-175]). The resin particles may further comprise a fluidizing agent as an external additive ([0085]). Maeda teaches that the toner may be used with a carrier to form a developer ([0129]). Madea teaches that the resin particles contain a colorant in an amount of 3% to 10% that may include yellow pigments, but is silent regarding the use of isoindoline pigments specifically ([0078]). Moriya teaches a toner containing the coloring agent C.I. Pigment Yellow 185, an isoindoline pigment, a binder resin, and an ester wax (Abstract). This pigment gives the toner excellent color reproducibility and light resistance ([0010],[0020]). Therefore, it would have been obvious to a person of ordinary skill in the art before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to have modified the toner of Maeda to having included the colorant C.I. Pigment Yellow 185 in order to produce a toner having excellent color reproducibility and light resistance. Moriya is silent regarding the percentage of the pigment having an isoindoline skeleton present on the surface layer of the base particle relative to the entire pigment on the cross-section of the base particles. However, based on the components of the modified toner it would be expected to be less than 15%. Paragraph 70 of the specification of the instant application states that the dispersibility of the isoindoline pigment can be controlled by the type of agglomerating agents added in the agglomeration step (line 1-4). Maeda teaches magnesium chloride as the agglomerating agent, which is the same as Examples 2, 4, and 6 of the instant application. The combination of the isoindoline pigment with the agglomerating agent the gel fraction of the resin, and the ester wax would be expected to prevent the pigment from agglomerating at the surface of the toner particle. Maeda teaches that the toner is used for the development of an electrostatic image ([0132]), but is silent regarding the image forming apparatus to create the image. Moriya teaches an image forming apparatus (Figure 1, 1) and method for forming images comprising an electrostatic latent image bearer 12, a latent image forming device 17, a developing device 14, a transfer roller 18, and a fixing device 30 ([0082-90]). The image forming apparatus contains a toner cartridge ([0010]). Conclusion Applicant's amendment necessitated the new ground(s) of rejection presented in this Office action. Accordingly, THIS ACTION IS MADE FINAL. See MPEP § 706.07(a). Applicant is reminded of the extension of time policy as set forth in 37 CFR 1.136(a). A shortened statutory period for reply to this final action is set to expire THREE MONTHS from the mailing date of this action. In the event a first reply is filed within TWO MONTHS of the mailing date of this final action and the advisory action is not mailed until after the end of the THREE-MONTH shortened statutory period, then the shortened statutory period will expire on the date the advisory action is mailed, and any nonprovisional extension fee (37 CFR 1.17(a)) pursuant to 37 CFR 1.136(a) will be calculated from the mailing date of the advisory action. In no event, however, will the statutory period for reply expire later than SIX MONTHS from the mailing date of this final action. Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to Jenna Kuipers whose telephone number is (571)272-0161. The examiner can normally be reached Monday - Friday 8:30 - 5:30 PT. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Jonathan Johnson can be reached at 571-272-1177. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /J.K./Examiner, Art Unit 1734 /PETER L VAJDA/Primary Examiner, Art Unit 1737 02/24/2026
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Mar 14, 2023
Application Filed
Sep 24, 2025
Non-Final Rejection — §103
Nov 21, 2025
Response Filed
Feb 23, 2026
Final Rejection — §103 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12585208
GLITTERING TONER, TONER-STORING UNIT, DEVELOPER, DEVELOPER-STORING UNIT,IMAGE FORMING APPARATUS, AND IMAGE FORMING METHOD
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 24, 2026
Patent 12578666
TONER AND METHOD FOR PRODUCING TONER
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 17, 2026
Patent 12535749
ELECTROSTATIC CHARGE IMAGE DEVELOPING TONER, ELECTROSTATIC CHARGE IMAGE DEVELOPER, TONER CARTRIDGE, PROCESS CARTRIDGE, IMAGE FORMING APPARATUS, AND IMAGE FORMING METHOD
2y 5m to grant Granted Jan 27, 2026
Patent 12535750
TONER
2y 5m to grant Granted Jan 27, 2026
Patent 12529971
PROCESS CARTRIDGE
2y 5m to grant Granted Jan 20, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

AI Strategy Recommendation

Get an AI-powered prosecution strategy using examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Powered by AI — typically takes 5-10 seconds

Prosecution Projections

3-4
Expected OA Rounds
75%
Grant Probability
99%
With Interview (+27.3%)
3y 3m
Median Time to Grant
Moderate
PTA Risk
Based on 24 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allow rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month