Prosecution Insights
Last updated: April 19, 2026
Application No. 18/183,466

ALLOY AND COMPOSITE FORMATION BY REACTIVE SYNTHESIS DURING ADDITIVE MANUFACTURING

Non-Final OA §103
Filed
Mar 14, 2023
Examiner
KESSLER, CHRISTOPHER S
Art Unit
1759
Tech Center
1700 — Chemical & Materials Engineering
Assignee
Wisconsin Alumni Research Foundation
OA Round
1 (Non-Final)
59%
Grant Probability
Moderate
1-2
OA Rounds
3y 10m
To Grant
74%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 59% of resolved cases
59%
Career Allow Rate
465 granted / 783 resolved
-5.6% vs TC avg
Moderate +15% lift
Without
With
+15.0%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
3y 10m
Avg Prosecution
61 currently pending
Career history
844
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
1.2%
-38.8% vs TC avg
§103
45.2%
+5.2% vs TC avg
§102
16.2%
-23.8% vs TC avg
§112
27.4%
-12.6% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 783 resolved cases

Office Action

§103
Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Election/Restrictions Applicant’s election without traverse of species 1, Mo5SiB2 refractory metal intermetallic in the reply filed on 2 December 2025 is acknowledged. Claims 8-15 are withdrawn from further consideration pursuant to 37 CFR 1.142(b) as being drawn to a nonelected species, there being no allowable generic or linking claim. Election was made without traverse in the reply filed on 2 December 2025. Drawings The drawings were received on 14 March 2023. These drawings are accepted. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 103 The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 103 which forms the basis for all obviousness rejections set forth in this Office action: A patent for a claimed invention may not be obtained, notwithstanding that the claimed invention is not identically disclosed as set forth in section 102, if the differences between the claimed invention and the prior art are such that the claimed invention as a whole would have been obvious before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to a person having ordinary skill in the art to which the claimed invention pertains. Patentability shall not be negated by the manner in which the invention was made. Claim(s) 1-7 and 16 is/are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over Makineni et al, Synthesis and stabilization of a new phase regime in a Mo-Si-B based alloy by laser-based additive manufacturing (document cited by applicant; hereinafter “Makineni”), in view of US 20090011266 A1 (hereinafter “Cochran”). Regarding claim 1, Makineni teaches a method of making a Mo-Si-B alloy (see title). Makineni teaches that it is desired to form an alloy containing T2 particles (Mo5SiB2) along with a molybdenum phase (see 1. Introduction). Makineni teaches that the additive manufacturing techniques can be used to generate the material (See p. 32). Makineni teaches that the method includes melting pure Mo Si and B powders that have been milled (See 2. Experimental). Makineni teaches that the powder is deposited onto a substrate (see 2.1 Alloy formation by laser melting). Makineni teaches that the additive manufacturing machine is used to melt the powder via laser beam (2.1 Alloy formation by laser melting). Makineni teaches that this forms a molybdenum phase and intermetallic T1 and T2 (see 3.1 Identification of phases by X-ray diffraction (XRD). Makineni does not teach that the process includes a mixture including a nitride or SiC compound. Makineni teaches that the method includes melting pure Mo Si and B powders that have been milled (See 2. Experimental). Cochran teaches a method of forming intermetallic composited (See title). Cochran teaches a molybdenum silicon boride material (see abstract, SUMMARY). Cochran teaches that this includes the T2 phase (See [0010]-[0013] and [0028]). Cochran teaches that the method includes use of a mixed powder including silicon nitride and boron nitride with molybdenum powders by milling (see [0025]). Cochran teaches that the mixture of powders is reacted by subjecting it to a heat source (see [0025]-[0028]). Cochran teaches that this generates a composite of Mo and T2 ([0028]-[0032]). Cochran teaches that the starting nitrides generate nitrogen partial pressure which facilitates the reaction at temperature, and allows for microstructural control over the product ([0032]-[0033]). It would have been an obvious matter to the skilled artisan at time of filing to have used the additive manufacturing approach of Makineni, but to have altered the method as by using the starting powders of Cochran, because Cochran teaches that the starting nitrides generate nitrogen partial pressure which facilitates the reaction at temperature, and allows for microstructural control over the product ([0032]-[0033]). Regarding claims 2-3, Makineni in view of Cochran is applied to the claim as stated above. Cochran teaches to use Si3N4 (see SUMMARY, [0032]-[0033]). Regarding claim 4, Cochran teaches that the starting nitrides generate nitrogen partial pressure which facilitates the reaction at temperature, and allows for microstructural control over the product ([0032]-[0033]). Regarding claim 5-7, Makineni teaches that this forms a molybdenum phase and intermetallic T1 and T2 (see 3.1 Identification of phases by X-ray diffraction (XRD)). Cochran also teaches that the use of the nitride materials generates a composite of Mo and A15 and T2 ([0028]-[0032]). Regarding claim 16, Makineni in view of Cochran is applied to the claim as stated above. Cochran teaches to use Mo, BN, and Si3N4 (see SUMMARY, [0032]-[0033]). Cochran teaches the T2 and A15 phases be generated from this mixture (See [00287]-[0032]). The limitations of the claim would have naturally flowed from following the suggestions of the prior art. Conclusion The prior art made of record and not relied upon is considered pertinent to applicant's disclosure. US 20220016699 A1 and US 10865467 B2 teach manufacturing refractory alloys with additive manufacturing. US 10894290 B1 teaches manufacturing MoSiB composites. US 20200406345 A1 teaches additive manufacturing of MoSiB alloys. US 9994937 B1 teaches to make MoSiB alloys with silicon nitride and boron nitride powders. Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to CHRISTOPHER S KESSLER whose telephone number is (571)272-6510. The examiner can normally be reached 9-5:30. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Curt Mayes can be reached at 571-272-1234. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. CHRISTOPHER S. KESSLER Primary Examiner Art Unit 1734 /CHRISTOPHER S KESSLER/ Examiner, Art Unit 1759
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Mar 14, 2023
Application Filed
Mar 21, 2026
Non-Final Rejection — §103 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12601034
SYSTEM AND METHOD FOR MANUFACTURING A PART
2y 5m to grant Granted Apr 14, 2026
Patent 12578038
PIPING ARTICLES INCORPORATING AN ALLOY OF COPPER, ZINC, AND SILICON
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 17, 2026
Patent 12571072
METHOD FOR THE PRODUCTION OF A SMALL-FRACTION TITANIUM-CONTAINING FILLING FOR A CORED WIRE
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 10, 2026
Patent 12564885
OSCILLATING NOZZLE FOR SINUSOIDAL DIRECT METAL DEPOSITION
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 03, 2026
Patent 12553112
HIGH-STRENGTH BLACKPLATE AND MANUFACTURING METHOD THEREFOR
2y 5m to grant Granted Feb 17, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

AI Strategy Recommendation

Get an AI-powered prosecution strategy using examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Powered by AI — typically takes 5-10 seconds

Prosecution Projections

1-2
Expected OA Rounds
59%
Grant Probability
74%
With Interview (+15.0%)
3y 10m
Median Time to Grant
Low
PTA Risk
Based on 783 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allow rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month