Prosecution Insights
Last updated: April 19, 2026
Application No. 18/183,986

APPARATUS AND METHOD FOR CALIBRATING DISTORTION OF POLYGONAL MIRROR ROTATING LiDAR SENSOR

Non-Final OA §103
Filed
Mar 15, 2023
Examiner
BAGHDASARYAN, HOVHANNES
Art Unit
3645
Tech Center
3600 — Transportation & Electronic Commerce
Assignee
HL Klemove Corp.
OA Round
1 (Non-Final)
78%
Grant Probability
Favorable
1-2
OA Rounds
3y 1m
To Grant
94%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 78% — above average
78%
Career Allow Rate
759 granted / 971 resolved
+26.2% vs TC avg
Strong +16% interview lift
Without
With
+16.1%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
3y 1m
Avg Prosecution
85 currently pending
Career history
1056
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
2.6%
-37.4% vs TC avg
§103
45.7%
+5.7% vs TC avg
§102
21.5%
-18.5% vs TC avg
§112
23.9%
-16.1% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 971 resolved cases

Office Action

§103
DETAILED ACTION Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 103 The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 103 which forms the basis for all obviousness rejections set forth in this Office action: A patent for a claimed invention may not be obtained, notwithstanding that the claimed invention is not identically disclosed as set forth in section 102, if the differences between the claimed invention and the prior art are such that the claimed invention as a whole would have been obvious before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to a person having ordinary skill in the art to which the claimed invention pertains. Patentability shall not be negated by the manner in which the invention was made. Claim(s) 1 and claims bellow are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over D1 US 20200094677 A1 in view of D2 US 20220260686 A1. Regarding claims bellow D1 teaches 1,5, 6, 7, 9, 12 , 17 A calibration apparatus comprising: a calibration reference model(32) with a vertical pillar(fig. 4 fig. 7); and and ranging (LiDAR) sensor configured to obtain pieces of scan data including the vertical pillar of the calibration reference model[0017], and calibrate positions of the vertical pillar in pieces of scan data on the basis of a position of the vertical pillar in a specific piece of scan data among the obtained pieces of scan data.[0003][0030-0031] determining reference scan data among the pieces of scan data, and calculating degrees to which the vertical pillar is shifted laterally in other pieces of scan data on the basis of a position of the vertical pillar in the reference scan data;(fig. 7) but does not teach while D2 teaches a polygonal mirror rotating light wave detection[0004] a polygonal mirror rotating light wave detection and ranging (LiDAR) sensor fixedly installed at a predetermined position and replaceable([0004] implicit car lidar components are replaceable); and polygonal mirror rotating LiDAR sensor comprises a controller configured to obtain n pieces of scan data using n polygonal mirrors(fig. 8 implicit) calibrate positions of the lidar in pieces of scan data on the basis of position data of the vertical pillar in a specific piece of scan data among the n pieces of scan data, wherein n is an integer greater than or equal to 2.[0075] (FOV is calibrated in such way that FOV maintains the pixel registration/alignment and hence virtual vertical alignment of the pixels of the same column is calibrated) 17. A calibration method comprising: a) obtaining n pieces of scan data by scanning a calibration reference model, which includes a vertical points, while rotating n polygonal mirrors, wherein n is an integer greater than or equal to 2;[0075]( FOV and maintain pixel registration/alignment;) b) calculating degrees to which the vertical points are shifted laterally in n-1 pieces of scan data on the basis of location data or the vertical pillar in specific scan data among the n pieces of scan data; and(implicit when setting up the FOV the vertical points of the same column should be aligned ) c) controlling pulse timing of transmission light to compensate for the calculated degrees so as to control location data of the vertical pillar to be included at the same position in all the n pieces of scan data.[0075] It would be obvious to one of ordinary skills in the art at the time of filing to modify teachings by D1 with teaching by D2 in order to set up square FOV which is limited by the calibration window frame and then scan the FOV. 2. The calibration apparatus of claim 1, wherein the polygonal mirror rotating LiDAR sensor and the calibration reference model are fixedly installed at predetermined positions.(D1 fig. 2 and D2 obvious vehicle lidar system is fixed) 3. The calibration apparatus of claim 2, wherein the polygonal mirror rotating LiDAR sensor is replaceable. (D2 implicit vehicle lidar system is fixed and replaceable ) It would be obvious to one of ordinary skills in the art at the time of filing to modify teachings by D1 with teaching by D2 in order to replace lidar system in case of damage. 4. The calibration apparatus of claim 1, wherein the polygonal mirror rotating LiDAR sensor comprises: a transmitter(D2 310) configured to transmit laser light;(D2 fig. 3) a receiver(D2 330) configured to receive reflected light of the laser light from the transmitter; a polygonal mirror(D2 340) configured to be rotated to reflect the laser light from the transmitter to the calibration reference model and cause laser light reflected from the calibration reference model(D1 fig. 2) to the receiver; and a controller configured to control laser light output timing of the transmitter and calculate a distance to the calibration reference model by calculating a difference between time when light is output from the transmitter and time when the light is received by the receiver.[0031] It would be obvious to one of ordinary skills in the art at the time of filing to modify teachings by D1 with teaching by D2 in order to perform calibration of the scanning lidar . 8. The calibration apparatus of claim 7, wherein the controller converts the degrees to which the vertical pillar is shifted laterally into rotation angles of the polygonal mirror, and controls the output pulse timing of the transmitter on the basis of the rotation angles.(D2 [0075] obvious to one of ordinary skills in the art in order to create square scan pattern with individual column corresponding to single 360 degree rotation of the polygon mirror )(it is important to note that there are limited possibilities how to calibrate the system to set up FOV in such a way that columns are aligned and therefore pattern consist of parallel lines and all possibilities are predictable and consist of calibrating emission timing, rotation speed of mirror, repetition rate of pulses) 10, 18 The calibration apparatus of claim 9, wherein the controller calculates degrees to which the vertical pillar is shifted laterally in n-1 pieces of scan data on the basis of a position of the vertical pillar in reference scan data among the n pieces of scan data, and control output pulse timing of a transmitter to calibrate the degrees to which the vertical pillar is shifted.(D1 fig. 7 in combination with the specifics of the D2 polygon mirror) 11. The calibration apparatus of claim 10, wherein the controller converts the degrees to which the vertical pillar is shifted laterally into rotation angles of the polygonal mirrors, and controls the output pulse timing of the transmitter on the basis of the rotation angles.(obvious as shift can be as from mechanical misalignment similarly it can be cased by the initial miscalibration of the FOV as described in D2 [0075]) 13. The calibration method of claim 12, wherein a number of the pieces of scan data is equal to that of the plurality of mirrors.(obvious modification if number of points in one column corresponds to number of the mirrors ) 14. The calibration method of claim 12, wherein information about the degrees to which the vertical pillars are shifted laterally in the other pieces of scan data comprise directionality information of the vertical pillar in the reference scan data.(D1 fig. 7) 15. The calibration method of claim 12, wherein the calibrating of the degrees to which the vertical pillar is shifted laterally comprises adjusting pulse timing of transmission light.(obvious over D2 [0075] the motivation for claim 1) 16, 19 The calibration method of claim 15, wherein the adjusting of the pulse timing of the transmission light comprises: converting the degrees to which the vertical pillar is shifted laterally into rotation angles of a polygonal mirror; and controlling output pulse timing of the transmission light on the basis of the rotation angles.(obvious over D2 [0075] the points of the scan need to be aligned in order to create square FOV See motivation above) Conclusion Some explanation to rejection above D1 teaches Scanning FOV and then aligning it with 32 as show in fig bellow PNG media_image1.png 246 448 media_image1.png Greyscale D2 teaches using the polygon mirror to scan points in FOV. Initially if the pulse timing is misaligned with movement of the mirror the pattern will be like PNG media_image2.png 246 448 media_image2.png Greyscale Where black points correspond to mirror of 6 sides rotating 360 degree and therefore in order to align the FOV with square sides of 32 and then align all that with the box of FOV one has to inherently either adjust timing of the emission or rotation speed. Inherently time of emission is correlated to the rotation speed and only after that adjustment one can achieve adjustment as bellow. PNG media_image3.png 246 448 media_image3.png Greyscale Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to HOVHANNES BAGHDASARYAN whose telephone number is (571)272-7845. The examiner can normally be reached Mon-Fri 7am - 5 pm. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Isam Alsomiri can be reached at 5712726970. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /HOVHANNES BAGHDASARYAN/Examiner, Art Unit 3645
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Mar 15, 2023
Application Filed
Feb 09, 2026
Non-Final Rejection — §103 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12591059
OPTICAL RANGING DEVICE AND OPTICAL RANGING METHOD
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 31, 2026
Patent 12591047
OPTICAL SYSTEM FOR LIGHT DETECTION AND RANGING
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 31, 2026
Patent 12585000
RECEIVING DEVICE FOR AN OPTICAL MEASUREMENT APPARATUS FOR CAPTURING OBJECTS, LIGHT SIGNAL REDIRECTION DEVICE, MEASUREMENT APPARATUS AND METHOD FOR OPERATING A RECEIVING DEVICE
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 24, 2026
Patent 12569880
CMOS ULTRASONIC TRANSDUCERS AND RELATED APPARATUS AND METHODS
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 10, 2026
Patent 12560721
SPAD LIDAR SYSTEM WITH BINNED PIXELS
2y 5m to grant Granted Feb 24, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

AI Strategy Recommendation

Get an AI-powered prosecution strategy using examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Powered by AI — typically takes 5-10 seconds

Prosecution Projections

1-2
Expected OA Rounds
78%
Grant Probability
94%
With Interview (+16.1%)
3y 1m
Median Time to Grant
Low
PTA Risk
Based on 971 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allow rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month