Prosecution Insights
Last updated: April 19, 2026
Application No. 18/184,358

BATTERY CHARGING METHOD AND DEVICE AND ELECTRONIC APPARATUS

Non-Final OA §102
Filed
Mar 15, 2023
Examiner
ZHOU, ZIXUAN
Art Unit
2859
Tech Center
2800 — Semiconductors & Electrical Systems
Assignee
Lenovo (Beijing) Limited
OA Round
1 (Non-Final)
76%
Grant Probability
Favorable
1-2
OA Rounds
2y 9m
To Grant
94%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 76% — above average
76%
Career Allow Rate
463 granted / 605 resolved
+8.5% vs TC avg
Strong +17% interview lift
Without
With
+17.2%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
2y 9m
Avg Prosecution
30 currently pending
Career history
635
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
2.1%
-37.9% vs TC avg
§103
55.7%
+15.7% vs TC avg
§102
23.0%
-17.0% vs TC avg
§112
13.1%
-26.9% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 605 resolved cases

Office Action

§102
DETAILED ACTION Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Priority Receipt is acknowledged of certified copies of papers required by 37 CFR 1.55. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 102 In the event the determination of the status of the application as subject to AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103 (or as subject to pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103) is incorrect, any correction of the statutory basis (i.e., changing from AIA to pre-AIA ) for the rejection will not be considered a new ground of rejection if the prior art relied upon, and the rationale supporting the rejection, would be the same under either status. The following is a quotation of the appropriate paragraphs of 35 U.S.C. 102 that form the basis for the rejections under this section made in this Office action: A person shall be entitled to a patent unless – (a)(1) the claimed invention was patented, described in a printed publication, or in public use, on sale, or otherwise available to the public before the effective filing date of the claimed invention. Claim(s) 1-18 is/are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 102(a)(1) as being anticipated by Kristjansson (US 2019/0214837). Regarding claims 1, 7 and 13, Krisjansson discloses a battery charging method, comprising: obtaining an external charging power supply (fig. 1, element 108; charger); charging a main battery according to a reference strategy based on the external charging power supply (¶ 0017; the charger control circuitry can dynamically identify a charge rate that is optimal for the first battery at a given point in time and alter settings of the adjustable constant current limiter and/or the charger 108 to ensure that the first battery 104 is provided a constant level of charge at the identified charge rate); and charging a backup battery according to a follow strategy based on the external charging power supply to maintain a target parameter of the backup battery in a charging process based on the external charging power supply (¶ 0017; the charge control circuitry also adjusts a total output setting of the charger 108 when altering the reference setting of the adjustable constant current limiter 114. This ensures that the charge output of the charger 109 remains the sum of a predetermined charge rate for the second battery 106 and the updated charge rate for the first battery) and a target parameter of the main battery in the charging process (by sampling the information form the first battery, and… ensure the first battery is provided a constant level of charge at the identified charge rate) based on the external charging power supply in a target range (¶¶ 0017-0018), the backup battery and the main battery being connected in parallel (¶ 0013; 1st battery and 2nd battery arranged in parallel), and the target parameter (¶¶ 0017-0020; charging the battery at an identified charge rate) representing battery power (C-rate = Current/Capacity; where Current = Power/Voltage). Regarding claims 2, 8 and 14, Krisjansson discloses wherein charging the backup battery according to the follow strategy based on the external charging power supply includes: obtaining a target charging current (fig. 5, step 502 and ¶ 0050; determines target charge rates for the first battery and the second battery); in response to a current value of the target charging current being larger than zero, charging the backup battery with the current value of the target charging current (¶ 0018; the charge output of the charger 108 remains the sum of a predetermined charge rate for the second battery 106); and in response to the current value of the target charging current being equal to zero, stopping charging the backup battery with the current value of the target charging current (¶ 0028; the adjustable constant current limiter 230 limits current flows to the second battery). Regarding claims 3, 9 and 15, Krisjansson discloses wherein obtaining the target charging current includes: obtaining a first target charging current and a second target charging current (fig. 5, step 502); and determining a minimum value of the first target charging current and the second target charging current as the target charging current to satisfy a charging balance of the main battery and the backup battery (¶ 0024 and claim 16; enabling battery charge-balancing). Regarding claims 4, 10 and 16, Krisjansson discloses wherein obtaining the target charging current includes: obtaining a first target charging current and a second target charging current (fig. 5, step 502); and determining a maximum value of the first target charging current and the second target charging current as the target charging current to satisfy charging efficiency of the backup battery (¶ 0018; remains the sum of a predetermined charge rate for the second battery 106 and the updated charge rate for the first battery). Regarding claims 5, 11 and 17, Krisjansson discloses the battery charging method further comprising: periodically obtaining power and voltage of the main battery and power and voltage of the backup battery (¶ 0017; dynamically-assess battery parameters and use such parameters for dynamically adjusting the charge rate of the first battery); wherein: the first target charging current is a charging current determined based on a difference between the power of the backup battery and the power of the main battery in a same period (¶ 0023; facilitating independent charging of the two batteries at different charge rates); the second target charging current is a charging current determined based on a difference between the voltage of the backup battery and the voltage of the main battery in the same period (¶ 0018; the charge control electronics can identify and select a new charge rate that corresponds to the changed battery parameters); and the first target charging current and the second target charging current belong to the same period (¶ 0018; a predetermined charge rate for the second battery and the updated charge rate for the first battery). Regarding claims 6, 12 and 18, Krisjansson discloses wherein: the difference between the power of the backup battery and the power of the main battery corresponds to different power difference ranges, and the different power difference ranges correspond to different charging currents (¶ 0026; different capacities); and the difference between the voltage of the backup battery and the voltage of the main battery corresponds to different voltage difference ranges (¶ 0029; different SOC), and the different voltage difference ranges correspond to the different charging currents (¶ 0050; different charge rates). Conclusion The prior art made of record and not relied upon is considered pertinent to applicant's disclosure. Kabasawa et al. US 2012/0038320 Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to ZIXUAN ZHOU whose telephone number is (571)272-6739. The examiner can normally be reached 9:00 am to 5:00 pm. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Taelor Kim can be reached at 571-270-7166. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /ZIXUAN ZHOU/Primary Examiner, Art Unit 2859 01/04/2026
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Mar 15, 2023
Application Filed
Jan 06, 2026
Non-Final Rejection — §102 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12603800
TERMINATING RESISTANCE SETTING CIRCUIT AND BATTERY MANAGEMENT SYSTEM INCLUDING SAME
2y 5m to grant Granted Apr 14, 2026
Patent 12594850
SYSTEMS AND METHODS FOR PRIORITIZING VEHICLE CHARGING USING ENERGY FROM RENEWABLE OR LOW CARBON EMISSION SOURCES
2y 5m to grant Granted Apr 07, 2026
Patent 12573858
POWER SUPPLY SYSTEM
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 10, 2026
Patent 12573886
LAMINAR COIL ARRAY IN A MULTI-DEVICE WIRELESS CHARGER
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 10, 2026
Patent 12558982
INTELLIGENT BREADCRUMB NAVIGATION
2y 5m to grant Granted Feb 24, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

AI Strategy Recommendation

Get an AI-powered prosecution strategy using examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Powered by AI — typically takes 5-10 seconds

Prosecution Projections

1-2
Expected OA Rounds
76%
Grant Probability
94%
With Interview (+17.2%)
2y 9m
Median Time to Grant
Low
PTA Risk
Based on 605 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allow rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month