Prosecution Insights
Last updated: May 29, 2026
Application No. 18/184,949

INTRAVENOUS CATHETER CLAMPS

Final Rejection §102§103
Filed
Mar 16, 2023
Priority
Mar 29, 2022 — provisional 63/324,964
Examiner
NGUYEN, ANDREW H
Art Unit
3741
Tech Center
3700 — Mechanical Engineering & Manufacturing
Assignee
Carefusion 303 Inc.
OA Round
2 (Final)
75%
Grant Probability
Favorable
3-4
OA Rounds
2m
Est. Remaining
99%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 75% — above average
75%
Career Allowance Rate
665 granted / 885 resolved
+5.1% vs TC avg
Strong +42% interview lift
Without
With
+42.5%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
3y 5m
Avg Prosecution
21 currently pending
Career history
910
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
0.1%
-39.9% vs TC avg
§103
88.0%
+48.0% vs TC avg
§102
4.5%
-35.5% vs TC avg
§112
4.8%
-35.2% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 885 resolved cases

Office Action

§102 §103
Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . DETAILED ACTION Election/Restrictions Applicant’s election without traverse of Species 1 and Group I without traverse in the reply filed on 11/29/25 is acknowledged. There is a serious search and/or examination burden for the reasons provided in the restriction, including searching valve elements inside the rotating body versus outside the rotating body; or searching valve elements at one location on the tube versus on two locations on the tube; and the prior art applicable to one invention would not likely be applicable to another invention (for example, prior art showing a valve elements at one location on the tube is not likely applicable to the species having two sets of valve elements). Drawings The drawings are objected to under 37 CFR 1.83(a). The drawings must show every feature of the invention specified in the claims. Therefore, the “the rotating body defines a ramp surface, and the ramp surface is configured to contact and advance the valve extension portion of the first and second valve element toward each other” (claim 3 and 20) and “an end of the rotating body is configured to contact and advance the valve extension portion of at least one of the first and second valve elements toward each other” (cl 4) must be shown or the feature(s) canceled from the claim(s). No new matter should be entered. The “valve extension portion” has been defined as element 132 [0037, Fig 5]. The ramp surface is 118 [0041]. The drawing fails to show the rotating body having a ramp surface or an “end” of the rotating body configured to contact the valve extension portion. Corrected drawing sheets in compliance with 37 CFR 1.121(d) are required in reply to the Office action to avoid abandonment of the application. Any amended replacement drawing sheet should include all of the figures appearing on the immediate prior version of the sheet, even if only one figure is being amended. The figure or figure number of an amended drawing should not be labeled as “amended.” If a drawing figure is to be canceled, the appropriate figure must be removed from the replacement sheet, and where necessary, the remaining figures must be renumbered and appropriate changes made to the brief description of the several views of the drawings for consistency. Additional replacement sheets may be necessary to show the renumbering of the remaining figures. Each drawing sheet submitted after the filing date of an application must be labeled in the top margin as either “Replacement Sheet” or “New Sheet” pursuant to 37 CFR 1.121(d). If the changes are not accepted by the examiner, the applicant will be notified and informed of any required corrective action in the next Office action. The objection to the drawings will not be held in abeyance. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 102 The following is a quotation of the appropriate paragraphs of 35 U.S.C. 102 that form the basis for the rejections under this section made in this Office action: A person shall be entitled to a patent unless – (a)(1) the claimed invention was patented, described in a printed publication, or in public use, on sale, or otherwise available to the public before the effective filing date of the claimed invention. Claim(s) 1-5, 19-20 is/are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 102(a)(1) as being anticipated by US 3544060 (Stoltz). Regarding claim 1-5, 19-20, Stoltz teaches a fluid clamp (Fig 7-11), comprising: a clamp body comprising a first and second valve element (annotated below), wherein each valve element comprises: a valve extension portion (annotated below); and a valve end portion extending from the valve extension portion (annotated below); wherein the valve end portion of the first and second valve elements are disposed opposite to each other to allow a tubing to pass between the valve end portion of the first and second valve elements (Fig 10-11; tubing 11 between the end portions); and a rotating body rotatably coupled to the clamp body (rotating body 51, 55), wherein rotation of the rotating body moves the valve end portion of at least one of the first and second valve elements inward to compress the tubing and reduce the flow rate through the tubing and outward to release the tubing and increase the flow rate through the tubing (col 3 l. 66-col 4 l. 20; rotation in one direction would constrict the tubing and rotation in the other direction would open the tubing, thereby adjusting the flow rate through the tubing), the rotating body is in threaded coupling with the clamp body (via threading 57, 65), the rotating body defines a ramp surface, and the ramp surface is configured to contact and advance the valve extension portion of the first and second valve element toward each other (annotated below; ramp surface 59), wherein an end of the rotating body is configured to contact and advance the valve extension portion of at least one of the first and second valve elements toward each other (annotated below; an “end of the rotating body” is construed as including the ramp surface), an outer surface of the rotating body defines one or more grooves (gripping portion 55 comprises grooves in between each of the protrusions). PNG media_image1.png 752 577 media_image1.png Greyscale Claim(s) 1, 6-7, 19 is/are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 102(a)(1) as being anticipated by US 2010/0168682 (Braga). Regarding claim 1, 6-7, 19, Braga teaches a fluid clamp (Fig 5-7), comprising: a clamp body comprising a first and second valve element (annotated below), wherein each valve element comprises: a valve extension portion (annotated below); and a valve end portion extending from the valve extension portion (annotated below); wherein the valve end portion of the first and second valve elements are disposed opposite to each other to allow a tubing to pass between the valve end portion of the first and second valve elements (Fig 6-7; tubing 410 between the end portions); and a rotating body rotatably coupled to the clamp body (rotating body 436), wherein rotation of the rotating body moves the valve end portion of at least one of the first and second valve elements inward to compress the tubing and reduce the flow rate through the tubing and outward to release the tubing and increase the flow rate through the tubing (para 49-50; rotation in one direction moves element 404 and would constrict the tubing and rotation in the other direction would open the tubing, thereby adjusting the flow rate through the tubing), the clamp body further comprises a shroud disposed at least partially around the rotating body (shroud is the portion of 406 around the rotating body) the shroud defines a circumferential opening (annotated below). PNG media_image2.png 723 622 media_image2.png Greyscale Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 103 The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 103 which forms the basis for all obviousness rejections set forth in this Office action: A patent for a claimed invention may not be obtained, notwithstanding that the claimed invention is not identically disclosed as set forth in section 102, if the differences between the claimed invention and the prior art are such that the claimed invention as a whole would have been obvious before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to a person having ordinary skill in the art to which the claimed invention pertains. Patentability shall not be negated by the manner in which the invention was made. Claim(s) 6-7 is/are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over US 3544060 (Stoltz) in view of US 2011/0048540 (Stroup). Regarding claim 6-7, Stoltz fails to teach the clamp body further comprises a shroud disposed at least partially around the rotating body, the shroud defines a circumferential opening. However, Stroup teaches a shroud disposed at least partially around a rotating body, the shroud defining a circumferential opening (Fig 65A-66B, para 363-364; shroud 1780’’ comprising a circumferential opening, annotated below; disposed around a rotating body 1740’’). It would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art at the time of the invention to provide a shroud disposed at least partially around the rotating body, the shroud defines a circumferential opening, as taught by Stroup. It has been held that combining or simple substitution of prior art elements according to known methods to yield predictable results renders the limitation obvious (see MPEP 2141 (III)). In this case, providing a shroud disposed at least partially around the rotating body, the shroud defines a circumferential opening, yields predictable results (protecting the rotating body). PNG media_image3.png 267 322 media_image3.png Greyscale Conclusion The prior art made of record and not relied upon is considered pertinent to applicant's disclosure. US 4687176 teaches a fluid clamp with a rotating body and first and second valve elements, wherein rotation of the rotating body adjusts flow through the tubing. Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to ANDREW NGUYEN whose telephone number is (571)270-5063. The examiner can normally be reached 8 am - 4 pm, Monday-Friday. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Phutthiwat (Pat) Wongwian can be reached at 571-270-5426. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /ANDREW H NGUYEN/Primary Examiner, Art Unit 3741
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Mar 16, 2023
Application Filed
Jan 16, 2026
Non-Final Rejection mailed — §102, §103
Apr 01, 2026
Response Filed
May 26, 2026
Final Rejection mailed — §102, §103 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12630298
LOCKING SYSTEM FOR AN AIRCRAFT NACELLE
2y 4m to grant Granted May 19, 2026
Patent 12618380
VARIABLE AREA NOZZLE FOR AN AIRCRAFT ENGINE
2y 3m to grant Granted May 05, 2026
Patent 12595774
THREE SERVOVALVE THRUST REVERSER ACTUATOR SYSTEM
3y 1m to grant Granted Apr 07, 2026
Patent 12576982
EXHAUST NOZZLE ASSEMBLY FOR AIRCRAFT PROPULSION SYSTEM
1y 6m to grant Granted Mar 17, 2026
Patent 12571539
TURBINE ENGINE HAVING A COMBUSTION SECTION WITH A FUEL NOZZLE
2y 3m to grant Granted Mar 10, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

Strategy Recommendation AI-generated — please review before filing

Get a prosecution strategy drawn from examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Typically takes 5-10 seconds — AI-generated, attorney review required before filing

Prosecution Projections

3-4
Expected OA Rounds
75%
Grant Probability
99%
With Interview (+42.5%)
3y 5m (~2m remaining)
Median Time to Grant
Moderate
PTA Risk
Based on 885 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allowance rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month