Office Action Predictor
Last updated: April 15, 2026
Application No. 18/186,603

MOBILE TERMINAL TEST SYSTEM AND MOBILE TERMINAL TEST METHOD

Non-Final OA §102
Filed
Mar 20, 2023
Examiner
DEAN, RAYMOND S
Art Unit
2645
Tech Center
2600 — Communications
Assignee
Anritsu Corporation
OA Round
3 (Non-Final)
70%
Grant Probability
Favorable
3-4
OA Rounds
3y 3m
To Grant
85%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 70% — above average
70%
Career Allow Rate
618 granted / 883 resolved
+8.0% vs TC avg
Moderate +15% lift
Without
With
+15.0%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
3y 3m
Avg Prosecution
48 currently pending
Career history
931
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
3.6%
-36.4% vs TC avg
§103
64.2%
+24.2% vs TC avg
§102
19.3%
-20.7% vs TC avg
§112
7.5%
-32.5% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 883 resolved cases

Office Action

§102
DETAILED ACTION Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Continued Examination Under 37 CFR 1.114 A request for continued examination under 37 CFR 1.114, including the fee set forth in 37 CFR 1.17(e), was filed in this application after final rejection. Since this application is eligible for continued examination under 37 CFR 1.114, and the fee set forth in 37 CFR 1.17(e) has been timely paid, the finality of the previous Office action has been withdrawn pursuant to 37 CFR 1.114. Applicant's submission filed on January 21, 2026 has been entered. Response to Arguments Applicant’s arguments, see Applicants’ remarks, filed January 21, 2026, with respect to the rejection(s) of claim(s) 1, 3 under 35 U.S.C. 103 have been fully considered and are persuasive. Therefore, the rejection has been withdrawn. However, upon further consideration, a new ground(s) of rejection is made in view of Shirasaki (JP 2019029741A). Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 102 The following is a quotation of the appropriate paragraphs of 35 U.S.C. 102 that form the basis for the rejections under this section made in this Office action: A person shall be entitled to a patent unless – (a)(1) the claimed invention was patented, described in a printed publication, or in public use, on sale, or otherwise available to the public before the effective filing date of the claimed invention. Claim(s) 1, 3 is/are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 102(a)(1) as being anticipated by Shirasaki (JP 2019029741A) Regarding Claim 1, Shirasaki teaches a mobile terminal test system that executes a test of a test case in a conformance test defined by a 3GPP standard of a mobile terminal, the mobile terminal test system comprising: a test case selection unit that selects a plurality of test cases (Sections 0046, 0047, scenarios for pseudo base stations are the test cases, the entity that facilitates the selection of said scenarios reads on the test case selection); a common parameter extraction unit that extracts common parameters having the same parameter type, among a plurality of parameters included in the plurality of test cases selected by the test case selection unit, as a plurality of common parameters (Section 0051, the values displayed in the primary cell display setting section and the secondary cell display setting session are the common parameters, the entity that facilitates values to be sent for display in the display setting sections reads on the extraction unit); a common parameter display control unit that displays a list of the plurality of common parameters extracted by the common parameter extraction unit on a display unit (Section 0051, the display setting sections); a common parameter change input unit that inputs a change value of a set value of each of the plurality of common parameters (Section 0051, changing contents of primary and secondary display sections, entity that facilitates said changing reads on the common parameter change input unit); a common parameter setting unit that collectively sets the respective change values input by the common parameter change input unit to each of the corresponding common parameters of the plurality of common parameters in each of the selected plurality of test cases (Section 0051, there can be changing of contents of primary and secondary display sections thus rendering a scenario of setting respective values that are input thus there will be an entity that conducts said setting); a test execution unit that executes a test of the plurality of selected test cases, by using the plurality of common parameters set by the common parameter setting unit (Section 0051, there can be changing of contents of primary and secondary display sections thus rendering a scenario of setting respective values that are input thus there will be an entity that conducts said setting, this can be used for testing in the different scenarios (Sections 0046, 0047)), and a test case designation unit that designates, among the plurality of selected test cases, a test case for setting the change value to the common parameter by the common parameter setting unit (Section 0051, there can be changing of contents of primary and secondary display sections thus rendering a scenario of setting respective values that are input thus there will be an entity that conducts said setting, this can be used for testing in the different scenarios (Sections 0046, 0047) and thus designated for the different scenarios). Regarding Claim 3, Shirasaki teaches a mobile terminal test method of executing a test of a test case in a conformance test defined by a 3GPP standard of a mobile terminal, the method comprising: a test case selection step of selecting a plurality of test cases (Sections 0046, 0047, scenarios for pseudo base stations are the test cases, there will be a step that facilitates the selection of said scenarios); a common parameter extraction step of extracting common parameters having the same type, among a plurality of parameters included in the plurality of test cases selected in the test case selection step, as a plurality of common parameters (Section 0051, the values displayed in the primary cell display setting section and the secondary cell display setting session are the common parameters, there will be a step that facilitates values to be sent for display in the display setting sections); a common parameter display step of displaying a list of the plurality of common parameters extracted in the common parameter extraction step on a display unit (Section 0051, the display setting sections); a common parameter change input step of inputting a change value of a set value of each of the plurality of common parameters (Section 0051, changing contents of primary and secondary display sections, there will be a step that facilitates said changing); a common parameter setting step of collectively setting the respective change values input in the common parameter change input step to each of the corresponding common parameters of the plurality of common parameters in each of the selected plurality of test cases (Section 0051, there can be changing of contents of primary and secondary display sections thus rendering a scenario of setting respective values that are input thus there will be a step that conducts said setting); and a test execution step of executing a test of the plurality of selected test cases, by using the plurality of common parameters set in the common parameter setting step (Section 0051, there can be changing of contents of primary and secondary display sections thus rendering a scenario of setting respective values that are input thus there will be a step that conducts said setting, this can be used for testing in the different scenarios (Sections 0046, 0047)), wherein the common parameter setting step further includes a step of designating, among the plurality of selected test cases, a test case for setting the change value to the common parameter (Section 0051, there can be changing of contents of primary and secondary display sections thus rendering a scenario of setting respective values that are input thus there will be a step that conducts said setting, this can be used for testing in the different scenarios (Sections 0046, 0047) and thus designated for the different scenarios). Conclusion Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to RAYMOND S DEAN whose telephone number is (571)272-7877. The examiner can normally be reached Monday-Friday, 6:00-2:30, EST. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Anthony S Addy can be reached at 571-272-7795. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /RAYMOND S DEAN/ Primary Examiner, Art Unit 2645 Raymond S. Dean February 10, 2026
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Mar 20, 2023
Application Filed
May 16, 2025
Non-Final Rejection — §102
Jul 16, 2025
Applicant Interview (Telephonic)
Jul 16, 2025
Examiner Interview Summary
Aug 14, 2025
Response Filed
Oct 23, 2025
Final Rejection — §102
Dec 11, 2025
Interview Requested
Dec 18, 2025
Applicant Interview (Telephonic)
Dec 18, 2025
Examiner Interview Summary
Jan 21, 2026
Request for Continued Examination
Jan 28, 2026
Response after Non-Final Action
Feb 10, 2026
Non-Final Rejection — §102
Apr 06, 2026
Response Filed

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12587977
Physical Channel Processing Capability for Multiple Transmission Reception Points
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 24, 2026
Patent 12581419
Parameter resetting method and device, and parameter information receiving method and device
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 17, 2026
Patent 12581427
SYSTEMS AND METHODS OF POWER STATE AWARE DYNAMIC SPECIFIC ABSORPTION RATE MANAGEMENT
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 17, 2026
Patent 12574856
UPLINK POWER CONTROL FOR DATA AND CONTROL CHANNELS
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 10, 2026
Patent 12574074
RECONFIGURABLE INTELLIGENT SURFACE INCLUDING MULTIPLE UNIT CELLS
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 10, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

AI Strategy Recommendation

Get an AI-powered prosecution strategy using examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Powered by AI — typically takes 5-10 seconds

Prosecution Projections

3-4
Expected OA Rounds
70%
Grant Probability
85%
With Interview (+15.0%)
3y 3m
Median Time to Grant
High
PTA Risk
Based on 883 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allow rate.

Sign in for Full Analysis

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month