Prosecution Insights
Last updated: April 19, 2026
Application No. 18/186,868

BATTERY MONITORING MODULE AND FLEXIBLE PRINTED WIRING BOARD

Final Rejection §103
Filed
Mar 20, 2023
Examiner
AL-TAWEEL, MUAAMAR QAHTAN
Art Unit
2838
Tech Center
2800 — Semiconductors & Electrical Systems
Assignee
Mektec Corporation
OA Round
2 (Final)
89%
Grant Probability
Favorable
3-4
OA Rounds
2y 6m
To Grant
99%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 89% — above average
89%
Career Allow Rate
39 granted / 44 resolved
+20.6% vs TC avg
Strong +15% interview lift
Without
With
+15.2%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
2y 6m
Avg Prosecution
58 currently pending
Career history
102
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§103
51.6%
+11.6% vs TC avg
§102
46.5%
+6.5% vs TC avg
§112
1.8%
-38.2% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 44 resolved cases

Office Action

§103
DETAILED ACTION Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Response to Arguments Applicant’s arguments filed on 01/29/2026 with respect to claim 1 have been considered but are moot because the new ground of rejection does not rely on any reference applied in the prior rejection of record for any teaching or matter specifically challenged in the argument. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 103 In the event the determination of the status of the application as subject to AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103 (or as subject to pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103) is incorrect, any correction of the statutory basis (i.e., changing from AIA to pre-AIA ) for the rejection will not be considered a new ground of rejection if the prior art relied upon, and the rationale supporting the rejection, would be the same under either status. The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 103 which forms the basis for all obviousness rejections set forth in this Office action: A patent for a claimed invention may not be obtained, notwithstanding that the claimed invention is not identically disclosed as set forth in section 102, if the differences between the claimed invention and the prior art are such that the claimed invention as a whole would have been obvious before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to a person having ordinary skill in the art to which the claimed invention pertains. Patentability shall not be negated by the manner in which the invention was made. Claims 1-15 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over Nishihara et al (US Publication No. 20110024205) in view of Tanaka et al (US Publication No. 20140131071). Regarding claim 1, Nishihara discloses (100, fig. 2, shown below, para. [0077]- [0085]); a flexible printed wiring board (50) attached to a battery (10), comprising: a trunk portion (TP); a first branch portion (1STBP); a second branch portion (2NDBP); a bent portion (BP); and multiple lines (i.e., 40, 40a wire leads; see for example fig. 8, para. [0119]- [0140]), wherein the multiple lines (i.e., 40, 40a wire leads; see for example fig. 8, para. [0119]- [0140]) are provided only on one surface (i.e., such as the plurality of bus bars 40 and the FPC board 50 arranged on the side of the other side surface of the battery module 100 are covered with the other cover 80; see for example fig. 5, para. [0095]) of the flexible printed wiring board (50), and include a first line group (1STLG), a second line group (2NDLG), and a third line group (3RDLG), the first line group (1STLG) is arranged over the trunk portion (TP), the first branch portion (1STBP), and the bent portion (BP), the second line group (2NDLG) is arranged (i.e., wires layouts; see for example fig. 14, para. [0168]- [0176]) over the trunk portion (TP) and the second branch portion (2NDBP), the third line group (3RDLG) is arranged at the trunk portion (TP), one end (END1) of each line of the first line group (1STLG) is connected (i.e., wires configurations; see for example fig. 8, para. [0119]- [0140]) to a corresponding one of multiple terminals (40s, 40as) of the battery (10s), and the other end of each line of the first line group (1STLG) is arranged (i.e., wires layouts; see for example fig. 14, para. [0168]- [0176]) in the bent portion (BP), one end of each line of the second line group (2NDLG) is connected (i.e., wires configurations; see for example fig. 8, para. [0119]- [0140]) to a corresponding one of the multiple terminals (40s, 40as) of the battery (10s), and the other end of each line of the second line group (2NDLG) is arranged (i.e., wires layouts; see for example fig. 14, para. [0168]- [0176]) at an end portion (END2) of the trunk portion (TP) in a longitudinal direction (X-axis) of the flexible printed wiring board (50), one end of each line of the third line group (3RDLG) is arranged (i.e., wires layouts; see for example fig. 14, para. [0168]- [0176]) at the end portion (END2) of the trunk portion (TP), and the other end of each line of the third line group (3RDLG) is arranged (i.e., wires layouts; see for example fig. 14, para. [0168]- [0176]) in the trunk portion (TP), and the bent portion (BP) is bent (i.e., wires layouts; see for example fig. 14, para. [0168]- [0176]) such that the other end of each line of the first line group (1STLG) arranged (i.e., wires layouts; see for example fig. 14, para. [0168]- [0176]) in the bent portion (BP) and the other end of each line of the third line group (3RDLG) arranged (i.e., wires layouts; see for example fig. 14, para. [0168]-[0176]) in the trunk portion (TP) are connected (i.e., wires configurations; see for example fig. 8, para. [0119]- [0140]) to each other. PNG media_image1.png 561 825 media_image1.png Greyscale Nishihara does not explicitly disclose the first branch portion and the second branch portion are branched from the trunk portion. Tanaka discloses a wiring material method (i.e., wiring material 1; see for example fig. 1, para. [0058]- [0065]); wherein the first branch portion (i.e., such as the first branch portion 22; see for example fig. 1, para. [0058]- [0065]) and the second branch portion (i.e., such as the second branch portion 22; see for example fig. 1, para. [0058]- [0065]) are branched (i.e., such as fabricated/branched; see for example fig. 1, para. [0058]- [0065]) from the trunk portion (i.e., such as the trunk portion 21; see for example fig. 1, para. [0058]- [0065]). Therefore, it would have been obvious to a person of ordinary skill in the art before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to have optionally included the wire fabrication in Nishihara, as taught by Tanaka, as it provides the advantage of optimizing the circuit wiring design. Regarding claim 2, Nishihara in view of Tanaka and the teachings of Nishihara as modified by Tanaka have been discussed above. Nishihara further discloses (100, fig. 2, shown above, para. [0077]- [0085]); the flexible printed wiring board (50), wherein in a case (i.e., such as each of the battery modules 100 includes a plurality of (eighteen in this example) battery cells 10, a plurality of (five in this example) thermistors 11, and a detecting circuit 20, see for example fig. 1, para. [0068]- [0076]) where potentials of the multiple terminals (40s, 40as) increase in an order of V(0), V(l), V(2), V(3), ... , V(2n - 3), V(2n - 2), V(2n - 1), and V(2n) (n is an integer) (i.e., such as the lower branch starts with 10a and ends with 10b; see for example fig. 3, para. [0086]- [0093]), the one end (END1) of each line of the first line group (1STLG) is connected (i.e., wires configurations; see for example fig. 8, para. [0119]- [0140]) to a corresponding one of the multiple terminals (40s, 40as) of which potentials are V (0), V (2), ..., V (2n - 2), and V(2n) (i.e., such as the upper branch starts with 10a-b and ends with 10a-b; see for example fig. 3, para. [0086]- [0093]), the one end (END1) of each line of the second line group (2NDLG) is connected (i.e., wires configurations; see for example fig. 8, para. [0119]- [0140]) to a corresponding one of the multiple terminals (40s, 40as) of which potentials are V(l), V (3), ..., V (2n - 3), and V (2n - 1) (i.e., such as the lower branch starts with 10a and ends with 10b; see for example fig. 3, para. [0086]- [0093]), and potentials of the multiple lines (i.e., 40, 40a wire leads; see for example fig. 8, para. [0119]- [0140]) arranged (i.e., wires layouts; see for example fig. 14, para. [0168]- [0176]) at the end portion (END2) of the trunk portion (TP) are arranged (i.e., wires layouts; see for example fig. 14, para. [0168]- [0176]) in an order of V (0), V(l), V (2), V (3), ..., V (2n - 3), V (2n - 2), V (2n - 1), and V(2n) (i.e., such as the upper branch starts with 10a-b and ends with 10a-b; see for example fig. 3, para. [0086]- [0093]). Regarding claim 3, Nishihara in view of Tanaka and the teachings of Nishihara as modified by Tanaka have been discussed above. Nishihara further discloses (100, fig. 2, shown above, para. [0077]- [0085]); the flexible printed wiring board (50), wherein the bent portion (i.e., portion R12 at bending line Bl in fig. 9 a-c, e; see para. [0141]- [0148]) includes only one bent portion (R12). Regarding claim 4, Nishihara in view of Tanaka and the teachings of Nishihara as modified by Tanaka have been discussed above. Nishihara further discloses (100, fig. 2, shown above, para. [0077]- [0085]); the flexible printed wiring board (50), wherein the first branch portion (1STBP) includes multiple first branch portions (i.e., such as FPC boards S0a to S0h described below may be employed instead of the above-described FPC board 50, see for example para. [0149]) and the bent portion (i.e., portion R12 at bending line Bl in fig. 9 a-c, e; see para. [0141]- [0148]) includes multiple bent portions (i.e., such as R11, R12, R13 at multiple bending lines Bl, B12, Bl3, etc., for S0b; see for example fig. 14, para. [0168]) each corresponding to the multiple first branch portions (S0a- S0h). Regarding claim 5, Nishihara in view of Tanaka and the teachings of Nishihara as modified by Tanaka have been discussed above. Nishihara further discloses (100, fig. 2, shown above, para. [0077]- [0085]); the flexible printed wiring board (50), wherein the bent portion (i.e., portion R12 at bending line Bl in fig. 9 a-c, e; see para. [0141]- [0148]) is bent once (i.e., one bent in different angles examples a-c and e in fig. 9) at one bending line (B1). Regarding claim 6, Nishihara in view of Tanaka and the teachings of Nishihara as modified by Tanaka have been discussed above. Nishihara further discloses (100, fig. 2, shown above, para. [0077]- [0085]); the flexible printed wiring board (50), wherein the bent portion (i.e., portion R12 at bending lines B1, Blain fig. 9(d); see para. [0141]- [0148]) is bent twice (i.e., first bent 90° angle in +Z-axis at Bl; second bent 90° angle in - Y-axis at B1a, example (d) in fig. 9) at two bending lines (B1, B1a). Regarding claim 7, Nishihara in view of Tanaka and the teachings of Nishihara as modified by Tanaka have been discussed above. Nishihara further discloses (100, fig. 2, shown above, para. [0077]- [0085]); a battery monitoring module (100) comprising: the flexible printed wiring board (50); and a connector (i.e., 20; such as the detecting circuit 20 is electrically connected to each of the bus bars 40, 40a via a positive temperature coefficient (PTC) element 60; see for example para. [0072]), wherein the connector (20) is attached (i.e., such as a rigid printed circuit board (hereinafter abbreviated as a printed circuit board) 21 is attached to an outer surface of one of the end surface frames 92 with a predetermined distance therebetween, the detecting circuit 20 is provided on the printed circuit board 21, see for example para. [0082]) to the end portion (END2) of the trunk portion (TP) of the flexible printed wiring board (50). Regarding claim 8, Nishihara in view of Tanaka and the teachings of Nishihara as modified by Tanaka have been discussed above. Nishihara further discloses (100, fig. 2, shown above, para. [0077]- [0085]); wherein the bent portion (BP) is positioned between the first branch portion (1STBP) and the second branch portion (2NDBP), and extends on an opposite side of the end (i.e., such as the end of TP at numeral 92, as the TP is the head/neck that has two arms, the left arm is the 1STBP and the right arm is the 2NDBP; see for example fig. 2, as shown above, para. [0077]- [0085]) of the trunk portion (i.e., such as the TP/trunk portion has two ends; one end at END2 at numeral 20 (neck/head) and the other end at numeral 92 (neck/arms); see for example fig. 2, as shown above, para. [0077]- [0085]). Regarding claim 9, Nishihara in view of Tanaka and the teachings of Nishihara as modified by Tanaka have been discussed above. Nishihara further discloses (100, fig. 2, shown above, para. [0077]- [0085]); wherein the bent portion (BP) is positioned between the first branch portion (1STBP) and the second branch portion (2NDBP), and extends on an opposite side of the end (i.e., such as the end of TP at numeral 92, as the TP is the head/neck that has two arms, the left arm is the 1STBP and the right arm is the 2NDBP; see for example fig. 2, as shown above, para. [0077]- [0085]) of the trunk portion (i.e., such as the TP/trunk portion has two ends; one end at END2 at numeral 20 (neck/head) and the other end at numeral 92 (neck/arms); see for example fig. 2, as shown above, para. [0077]- [0085]). As for the rest of the limitations/features in claim 9 is rejected for the same reasons that have already been stated/discussed above in rejected claim 1. {See rejection of claim 1} Regarding claim 10, Nishihara in view of Tanaka and the teachings of Nishihara as modified by Tanaka have been discussed above; and is rejected for the same reasons that have already been stated/discussed above in rejected claim 2. {See rejection of claim 2} Regarding claim 11, Nishihara in view of Tanaka and the teachings of Nishihara as modified by Tanaka have been discussed above; and is rejected for the same reasons that have already been stated/discussed above in rejected claim 3. {See rejection of claim 3} Regarding claim 12, Nishihara in view of Tanaka and the teachings of Nishihara as modified by Tanaka have been discussed above; and is rejected for the same reasons that have already been stated/discussed above in rejected claim 4. {See rejection of claim 4} Regarding claim 13, Nishihara in view of Tanaka and the teachings of Nishihara as modified by Tanaka have been discussed above; and is rejected for the same reasons that have already been stated/discussed above in rejected claim 5. {See rejection of claim 5} Regarding claim 14, Nishihara in view of Tanaka and the teachings of Nishihara as modified by Tanaka have been discussed above; and is rejected for the same reasons that have already been stated/discussed above in rejected claim 6. {See rejection of claim 6} Regarding claim 15, Nishihara in view of Tanaka and the teachings of Nishihara as modified by Tanaka have been discussed above; and is rejected for the same reasons that have already been stated/discussed above in rejected claim 7. {See rejection of claim 7} Conclusion Applicant's amendment necessitated the new ground(s) of rejection presented in this Office action. Accordingly, THIS ACTION IS MADE FINAL. See MPEP § 706.07(a). Applicant is reminded of the extension of time policy as set forth in 37 CFR 1.136(a). A shortened statutory period for reply to this final action is set to expire THREE MONTHS from the mailing date of this action. In the event a first reply is filed within TWO MONTHS of the mailing date of this final action and the advisory action is not mailed until after the end of the THREE-MONTH shortened statutory period, then the shortened statutory period will expire on the date the advisory action is mailed, and any nonprovisional extension fee (37 CFR 1.17(a)) pursuant to 37 CFR 1.136(a) will be calculated from the mailing date of the advisory action. In no event, however, will the statutory period for reply expire later than SIX MONTHS from the mailing date of this final action. Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to MUAAMAR Q AL-TAWEEL whose telephone number is (571)270-0339. The examiner can normally be reached 0730-1700. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Thienvu V Tran can be reached at (571) 270- 1276. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /MUAAMAR QAHTAN AL-TAWEEL/Examiner, Art Unit 2838 /THIENVU V TRAN/ Supervisory Patent Examiner, Art Unit 2838
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Mar 20, 2023
Application Filed
Sep 22, 2025
Non-Final Rejection — §103
Jan 14, 2026
Examiner Interview Summary
Jan 14, 2026
Applicant Interview (Telephonic)
Jan 29, 2026
Response Filed
Feb 08, 2026
Final Rejection — §103 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12604533
ADAPTABLE ELECTROSTATIC DISCHARGE CLAMP TRIGGER CIRCUIT
2y 5m to grant Granted Apr 14, 2026
Patent 12604383
CURRENT SOURCE DEVICE FOR ELECTROSTATIC DISCHARGE AND DISPLAY DEVICE INCLUDING THE SAME
2y 5m to grant Granted Apr 14, 2026
Patent 12597770
VOLTAGE LIMITER FOR ELECTROSTATIC SIGNAL RECEIVER
2y 5m to grant Granted Apr 07, 2026
Patent 12597872
ELECTROSTATIC CHUCK AND METHOD OF MANUFACTURING THE SAME
2y 5m to grant Granted Apr 07, 2026
Patent 12586737
SELF-PASSIVATING METAL CIRCUIT DEVICES FOR USE IN A SUBMERGED AMBIENT ENVIRONMENT
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 24, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

AI Strategy Recommendation

Get an AI-powered prosecution strategy using examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Powered by AI — typically takes 5-10 seconds

Prosecution Projections

3-4
Expected OA Rounds
89%
Grant Probability
99%
With Interview (+15.2%)
2y 6m
Median Time to Grant
Moderate
PTA Risk
Based on 44 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allow rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month