Prosecution Insights
Last updated: April 19, 2026
Application No. 18/187,106

AQUEOUS INKJET INK FOR TEXTILE PRINTING AND METHOD FOR PRODUCING PRINTED TEXTILE ITEM

Non-Final OA §103
Filed
Mar 21, 2023
Examiner
LEE, DORIS L
Art Unit
1764
Tech Center
1700 — Chemical & Materials Engineering
Assignee
Riso Kagaku Corporation
OA Round
1 (Non-Final)
58%
Grant Probability
Moderate
1-2
OA Rounds
3y 2m
To Grant
67%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 58% of resolved cases
58%
Career Allow Rate
609 granted / 1045 resolved
-6.7% vs TC avg
Moderate +9% lift
Without
With
+8.7%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
3y 2m
Avg Prosecution
58 currently pending
Career history
1103
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
0.7%
-39.3% vs TC avg
§103
55.4%
+15.4% vs TC avg
§102
15.1%
-24.9% vs TC avg
§112
14.2%
-25.8% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 1045 resolved cases

Office Action

§103
DETAILED ACTION Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Election/Restrictions Applicant’s election without traverse of Group I (Claims 1-4) in the reply filed on October 15, 2025 is acknowledged. Claims 5-8 are withdrawn from further consideration pursuant to 37 CFR 1.142(b) as being drawn to a nonelected invention, there being no allowable generic or linking claim. The requirement is still deemed proper and is therefore made FINAL. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 103 The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 103 which forms the basis for all obviousness rejections set forth in this Office action: A patent for a claimed invention may not be obtained, notwithstanding that the claimed invention is not identically disclosed as set forth in section 102, if the differences between the claimed invention and the prior art are such that the claimed invention as a whole would have been obvious before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to a person having ordinary skill in the art to which the claimed invention pertains. Patentability shall not be negated by the manner in which the invention was made. Claim(s) 1-3 is/are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over Yamazaki et al (US 2019/0352528). Regarding claims 1-3, Yamazaki teaches an aqueous ink for textile printing (Abstract) comprising: a water, a water-dispersible resin (Abstract), a water-soluble organic solvent ([0064]), an amino alcohol ([0071]) and a pigment ([0051]). Yamazaki teaches that the solids in the ink are the water-dispersible resins and pigment. The water-dispersible resins are present in the amount from 2 to 18% by weight of the ink ([0046]-[0047]) and the pigment is present in the amount from 0.1 to 30 % by mass ([0045]). Therefore, the total amount of the solids can be calculated to range from 2.1 to 48 % by weight. Yamazaki teaches that the water-soluble organic solvent is present in the amount from 1 to 80 % by mass ([0067]) and can be glycerol (BP: 290C) or triethylene glycol (BP 288 C) ([065]). Given that the glycerol or triethylene glycol can be the only water-soluble organic solvent in the ink, then the amount of the water-soluble compound/total amount of the water-soluble organic solvent (without the amino alcohol) is 1. The amino alcohol is present in the amount from 0.01 to 5 % by weight of the ink ([0073]). Given the recited amounts of the solids, the amino alcohol is present in an amount for at least 0.01 parts per 1 part of the total amount of the solids. Yamazaki fails to specifically exemplify the exact recited inkjet ink. However, Yamazaki discloses each of the components of the ink (water, water-soluble organic solvent, amino alcohol, water-dispersible resin and pigment) and each component in an amount which overlaps the claimed ranges, and teaches that they are all suitable for use in said ink. It is within the ordinary level of skill in the art to make any of the inks suggested by a reference, including selecting materials from a list in a reference. Therefore, a person of ordinary skill would have been motivated to prepare any of the inks suggested by Yamazaki, including the claimed inkjet ink. In view of this, it would have been obvious to a person of ordinary skill in the art at the time of the present invention to use the teachings of the components and the amounts of each of these components to arrive at the presently claimed invention. It would have been nothing more than using known compounds in a typical manner to achieve predictable results. KSR v. Teleflex, 550 U.S. _, 82 USPQ2d 1385 (2007). Claim(s) 4 is/are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over Yamazaki et al (US 2019/0352528) in view of Mheidle (US 6,443,569). The discussion regarding Yamazaki in paragraph 4 above is incorporated here by reference. Regarding claim 4, Yamazaki teaches that the water-soluble organic solvent can be a mixture ([0066]) of glycerol (bp: 290C) and diethylene glycol (bp: 244 C). However, it fails to teach the relative amounts of each of these two organic solvents. Mheidle teaches an aqueous ink for textile printing (Abstract) which incorporates diethylene glycol and glycerol in a ratio of 10:1 and 1:10 (col 8, lines 35-40). Given these ratios, the amounts of the glycerol and the diethylene glycol will read on the recited amounts. It would have been obvious to a person of ordinary skill in the art before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to use the glycerol and diethylene glycol of Yamazaki in the ratios as recited by Mheidle. One would have been motivated to do so because Mheidle teaches that that ratio is of special interest for water-soluble solvents acting as humectants (Mheidle, col. 8, lines 25-40). Conclusion Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to DORIS L LEE whose telephone number is (571)270-3872. The examiner can normally be reached M-F 8 am - 5 pm. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Arrie Lanee Reuther can be reached at 571-270-7026. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. DORIS L. LEE Primary Examiner Art Unit 1764 /DORIS L LEE/Primary Examiner, Art Unit 1764
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Mar 21, 2023
Application Filed
Nov 10, 2025
Non-Final Rejection — §103
Feb 09, 2026
Applicant Interview (Telephonic)
Feb 10, 2026
Examiner Interview Summary

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12600881
COMPOSITION FOR FORMING HARD COATING LAYER, HARD COATING LAYER USING THE COMPOSITION, AND LAMINATE COMPRISING THE HARD COATING LAYER
2y 5m to grant Granted Apr 14, 2026
Patent 12600873
PIGMENT COMPOSITION, PRINTING INK, AND METHOD FOR MANUFACTURING PIGMENT COMPOSITION
2y 5m to grant Granted Apr 14, 2026
Patent 12590033
FINELY GROUND PORTLAND CEMENT CLINKER IN A CEMENTITIOUS MULTI-COMPONENT MORTAR SYSTEM FOR USE AS AN INORGANIC CHEMICAL FASTENING SYSTEM
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 31, 2026
Patent 12577331
RESIN COMPOSITION
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 17, 2026
Patent 12570577
METHODS AND COMPOSITIONS FOR INHIBITING FREEZE-THAW DAMAGE IN CONCRETE AND CEMENT PASTE
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 10, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

AI Strategy Recommendation

Get an AI-powered prosecution strategy using examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Powered by AI — typically takes 5-10 seconds

Prosecution Projections

1-2
Expected OA Rounds
58%
Grant Probability
67%
With Interview (+8.7%)
3y 2m
Median Time to Grant
Low
PTA Risk
Based on 1045 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allow rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month