Prosecution Insights
Last updated: May 29, 2026
Application No. 18/187,813

MULTILAYER INDUCTOR

Non-Final OA §103
Filed
Mar 22, 2023
Priority
Mar 29, 2022 — JP 2022-053851
Examiner
NGUYEN, TUYEN T
Art Unit
2837
Tech Center
2800 — Semiconductors & Electrical Systems
Assignee
TDK Corporation
OA Round
1 (Non-Final)
82%
Grant Probability
Favorable
1-2
OA Rounds
0m
Est. Remaining
83%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 82% — above average
82%
Career Allowance Rate
1008 granted / 1234 resolved
+13.7% vs TC avg
Minimal +1% lift
Without
With
+0.9%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
2y 6m
Avg Prosecution
52 currently pending
Career history
1294
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
0.5%
-39.5% vs TC avg
§103
82.5%
+42.5% vs TC avg
§102
5.8%
-34.2% vs TC avg
§112
5.5%
-34.5% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 1234 resolved cases

Office Action

§103
DETAILED ACTION Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Election/Restrictions Applicant's election with traverse of Species, Figures 1-12 in the reply filed on 4/22/2026 is acknowledged. The traversal is on the ground(s) that claim 1 is generic to Species 1-2 and claims 1-4 read on elected figures 1-12. This is found persuasive and claims 1-4 will be examined herewith. The requirement is still deemed proper and is therefore made FINAL. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 103 The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 103 which forms the basis for all obviousness rejections set forth in this Office action: A patent for a claimed invention may not be obtained, notwithstanding that the claimed invention is not identically disclosed as set forth in section 102, if the differences between the claimed invention and the prior art are such that the claimed invention as a whole would have been obvious before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to a person having ordinary skill in the art to which the claimed invention pertains. Patentability shall not be negated by the manner in which the invention was made. Claim(s) 1-4 is/are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over Hirukawa et al. [WO 2021/100424 A1] in view of Kuniaki [JP 2013-172241 A]. Regarding claims 1 and 4, Hirukawa et al. discloses a multilayer inductor [3, figure 6] comprising: - an element body having a multilayer structure in which a plurality of insulating layers are laminated and having a mounting surface parallel to the insulating layers [figure 6]; - a pair of terminal electrodes [21, 22] provided on the mounting surface of the element body; and - a coil conductor [figures 6-7] provided in the element body, the coil conductor having a coil axis parallel to the mounting surface and having both end portions exposed from the mounting surface and electrically connected to the pair of terminal electrodes [figures 6-7], wherein the coil conductor includes an outer peripheral coil portions [331, 332, 333, 334] wound or arranged on an outer peripheral side and an inner peripheral coil portions [431, 432, 433, 434] wound or arranged on an inner peripheral side when viewed from an extending direction of the coil axis, and the outer peripheral coil portions and the inner peripheral coil portions are alternately wound in the coil conductor [figures 6-7], wherein the coil conductor includes a plurality of tiers of turn portions [figures 6-7] arranged along the coil axis, and at least some of the tiers of the turn portions are located in a plane perpendicular to the coil axis [figures 6-7] and include a first coil portion constituting a part of the outer peripheral coil portions [331, 332, 333, 334] and a second coil portion constituting a part of the inner peripheral coil portions [431, 432, 433, 434], and wherein the coil conductor further includes a connection portion [lead out ends show in figures 6-7] linearly extending between the end portions of the first coil portions or between the end portions of the second coil portions of adjacent tiers of the turn portions and connecting the end portions to each other [figures 6-7], wherein each of both end portions of the coil conductor extends from the outer peripheral coil portions and reaches the mounting surface [figures 6-7]. Hirukawa et al. disclose the instant claimed invention except for wherein the end portions of the first coil portions and the end portions of the second coil portions of adjacent tiers of the turn portions are shifted from each other in a direction parallel to the mounting surface when viewed from the extending direction of the coil axis. Kuniaki discloses a multilayer device [figures 12-13] comprising: - a body including a plurality of layers [40A-41]; and - a coil structure including inner and outer coil portions [figures 12-13], where the inner and outer coil portions including a plurality of conductors and connecting portions [51H, 52H, 53H, 54H, 51J, 52J, 53J, 54J] with the conductors and the connecting portions arranged at a shifted [or inclined] position [figures 12-13]. It would have been an obvious to one having ordinary skill in the art, before the effective filing date of the claimed invention, to use the shifted arrangement of the conductors in Hirukawa et al., as suggested by Kuniaki, for the purpose of ensuring a desired inductance without increasing the loss and stray capacitance [abstract]. Regarding claim 2, Hirukawa et al. discloses the coil conductor has three or more tiers of turn portions [330, 430 of 301-302-303-304] and has a plurality of connection portions [331, 333, 431, 433] connecting the end portions of the first coil portions or the end portions of the second coil portions of adjacent tiers of the turn portions [figure 7]. Regarding claim 3, the specific shift amount of connecting portions would have been an obvious design consideration for the purpose of facilitating the desire inductance and/or capacitance. Conclusion Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to TUYEN T NGUYEN whose telephone number is (571)272-1996. The examiner can normally be reached Mon - Fri 8:30-5:30. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Shawki Ismail can be reached at 571-272-3985. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /TUYEN T NGUYEN/Primary Examiner, Art Unit 2837
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Mar 22, 2023
Application Filed
May 13, 2026
Non-Final Rejection mailed — §103 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12633447
COIL MODULE
4y 7m to grant Granted May 19, 2026
Patent 12633448
COIL COMPONENT AND METHOD FOR MANUFACTURING COIL COMPONENT
3y 8m to grant Granted May 19, 2026
Patent 12626857
A TRANSFORMER ARRANGEMENT
1y 8m to grant Granted May 12, 2026
Patent 12620519
MULTILAYER ELECTRONIC COMPONENT
3y 8m to grant Granted May 05, 2026
Patent 12620522
MULTILAYER COIL COMPONENT
3y 4m to grant Granted May 05, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

Strategy Recommendation AI-generated — please review before filing

Get a prosecution strategy drawn from examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Typically takes 5-10 seconds — AI-generated, attorney review required before filing

Prosecution Projections

1-2
Expected OA Rounds
82%
Grant Probability
83%
With Interview (+0.9%)
2y 6m (~0m remaining)
Median Time to Grant
Low
PTA Risk
Based on 1234 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allowance rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month