Office Action Predictor
Last updated: April 15, 2026
Application No. 18/188,128

ADJUSTABLE INLAY FOR CONCRETE FORM LINER FOR CAST CONCRETE TEXTURES

Non-Final OA §102
Filed
Mar 22, 2023
Examiner
BUCKLE JR, JAMES J
Art Unit
3633
Tech Center
3600 — Transportation & Electronic Commerce
Assignee
Innovative Brick, LLC
OA Round
1 (Non-Final)
65%
Grant Probability
Favorable
1-2
OA Rounds
2y 4m
To Grant
77%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 65% — above average
65%
Career Allow Rate
621 granted / 952 resolved
+13.2% vs TC avg
Moderate +12% lift
Without
With
+12.2%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
2y 4m
Avg Prosecution
17 currently pending
Career history
969
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
0.1%
-39.9% vs TC avg
§103
40.7%
+0.7% vs TC avg
§102
33.4%
-6.6% vs TC avg
§112
19.5%
-20.5% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 952 resolved cases

Office Action

§102
DETAILED ACTION Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Election/Restrictions Applicant’s election without traverse of Invention I in the reply filed on 6/23/2025 is acknowledged. Claims 16-20 have been withdrawn. Claims 1-15 are pending and examined below. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 102 The following is a quotation of the appropriate paragraphs of 35 U.S.C. 102 that form the basis for the rejections under this section made in this Office action: A person shall be entitled to a patent unless – (a)(1) the claimed invention was patented, described in a printed publication, or in public use, on sale, or otherwise available to the public before the effective filing date of the claimed invention. Claim(s) 1-3 and 10-15 is/are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 102(a)(1) as being anticipated by Scott et al. (U.S. Publication No. 2006/0180731). Regarding claim 1, Scott et al. discloses an adjustable joint inlay (44, Figs. 2 and 5-7) comprising a first end (68, Fig. 5) that contacts a first protrusion (42, Figs. 5-6) of a liner (20) a second end (68 opposite first end, Fig. 5) that contacts a second protrusion (42) of the liner, the contacts with the first protrusion and second protrusion hold the adjustable joint inlay in position in the liner; and an adjustable protrusion (approximate 62) extending from a first face (surface approximate 40, Fig. 3) of the adjustable joint inlay. Regarding claims 2 and 12, Scott et al. discloses the adjustable protrusion (approximate 62) having a contour at a distal end of the adjustable protrusion, the contour creates an apparent masonry joint with concrete is poured over the liner (Figs. 2 and 5-7). Regarding claim 3, Scott et al. discloses a first side and a second side (sides abutting the brick). Regarding claim 4, Scott et al. discloses a first tab extending from a first side and a second tab extending from the second side. Regarding claim 5, Scott et al. discloses the first tab and/or second tab are removable. Regarding claim 10, Scott et al. discloses the adjustable joint inlay (40) is slidable along a gap (approximate 46) formed between the first protrusion (42) and second protrusion (42). Regarding claim 11, Scott et al. discloses a liner (20) comprising a liner first end (72, Fig 2); a liner second end (76, Fig. 2); a liner first side (74); a liner second side (78); a liner first face (approximate 40, Fig. 2); a liner second face (opposite 40); a first protrusion (42a, Figs. 2-4) extending outward from the liner first face and located from the liner first end (72) to the liner second end (76); a second protrusion (42b) extending outward from the liner first face (approximate 40) and located from the liner first end (72) to the liner second end (76), the second protrusion substantially parallel to the first protrusion and forming a gap (approximate 46) between the first protrusion and the second protrusion; an adjustable joint inlay (44, Figs. 5-7) comprising a first end (68) that contacts the first protrusion of the liner; a second end (68) that contacts the second protrusion of the liner, the contacts with the first protrusion and second protrusion hold the adjustable joint inlay in position in the liner; and an adjustable protrusion (approximate 62) extending from a first face (approximate 40) of the adjustable joint inlay. Regarding claim 13, Scott et al. discloses the first end (68) having an end profile that substantially matches a protrusion profile of the first protrusion (42, Figs. 5-6). Regarding claim 14, Scott et al. discloses a mating of the end profile and the protrusion profile hold the adjustable joint inlay in the position in the liner (Figs. 5-7). Regarding claim 15, Scott et al. discloses the adjustable joint inlay (44) is slidable along the gap (46) formed between the first protrusion (42a) and second protrusion (42b). Allowable Subject Matter Claims 4-9 are objected to as being dependent upon a rejected base claim, but would be allowable if rewritten in independent form including all of the limitations of the base claim and any intervening claims. The following is a statement of reasons for the indication of allowable subject matter: The prior art of record fails to teach or suggest an adjustable joint inlay comprising a first end that contacts a first protrusion of a liner, a second end that contacts a second protrusion of the liner, an adjustable protrusion extended from a first face of the adjustable joint inlay. Wherein a first tab extends from a first side and a second tab extends from the second side as recited in claim 4 in combination with claims 1-3 in its entirety. Conclusion The prior art made of record and not relied upon is considered pertinent to applicant's disclosure. Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to JAMES J BUCKLE JR whose telephone number is (571)270-3739. The examiner can normally be reached Monday-Thursday, 8:00 am to 6:30pm EST. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Brian Glessner can be reached at 5712726754. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /JAMES J BUCKLE JR/Examiner, Art Unit 3633
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Mar 22, 2023
Application Filed
Sep 24, 2025
Non-Final Rejection — §102
Mar 31, 2026
Response after Non-Final Action

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12595650
OUTDOOR TO INDOOR SWIMMING POOL APPARATUS
2y 5m to grant Granted Apr 07, 2026
Patent 12595675
INFLATABLE STABILIZED ENCLOSURE
2y 5m to grant Granted Apr 07, 2026
Patent 12590454
SYSTEM FOR BUILDING PREFABRICATED MODULAR, SEALED, AND PRESSURIZED HABITATS
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 31, 2026
Patent 12587126
SNAP-IN MOUNTING SYSTEMS FOR LAMINATE SOLAR PANELS
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 24, 2026
Patent 12546106
Drywall Hanger
2y 5m to grant Granted Feb 10, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

AI Strategy Recommendation

Get an AI-powered prosecution strategy using examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Powered by AI — typically takes 5-10 seconds

Prosecution Projections

1-2
Expected OA Rounds
65%
Grant Probability
77%
With Interview (+12.2%)
2y 4m
Median Time to Grant
Low
PTA Risk
Based on 952 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allow rate.

Sign in for Full Analysis

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month