Prosecution Insights
Last updated: April 19, 2026
Application No. 18/189,615

IMMOBOLIZED ORGANOMETALLIC CATALYST AND APPLICATION OF SAME

Non-Final OA §102
Filed
Mar 24, 2023
Examiner
FIGUEROA, JOHN J
Art Unit
1763
Tech Center
1700 — Chemical & Materials Engineering
Assignee
Aramco Services Company
OA Round
1 (Non-Final)
83%
Grant Probability
Favorable
1-2
OA Rounds
2y 11m
To Grant
92%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 83% — above average
83%
Career Allow Rate
902 granted / 1087 resolved
+18.0% vs TC avg
Moderate +9% lift
Without
With
+8.7%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
2y 11m
Avg Prosecution
24 currently pending
Career history
1111
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
0.6%
-39.4% vs TC avg
§103
36.6%
-3.4% vs TC avg
§102
31.9%
-8.1% vs TC avg
§112
13.8%
-26.2% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 1087 resolved cases

Office Action

§102
DETAILED ACTION Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Election/Restriction Applicant’s election, without traverse, of Group I (claims 1-10) in the reply filed on Oct. 9, 2025, to the restriction requirement dated Aug. 15, 2025, is hereby acknowledged. The election of the species “organometallic” is also acknowledged. Accordingly, claims 1-10 have been examined in the instant Office action, whereas claims 11-18 of Group II, have been withdrawn from consideration but remain pending in the present application. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 102 The following is a quotation of the appropriate paragraphs of 35 U.S.C. 102 that form the basis for the rejections under this section made in this Office action: A person shall be entitled to a patent unless – (a)(1) the claimed invention was patented, described in a printed publication, or in public use, on sale or otherwise available to the public before the effective filing date of the claimed invention. Claims 16-26 and 31-33 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. §102(a)(1) as anticipated by Zhao (US 2013/0101516 A1 to Zhao, published April 25, 2013). Zhao discloses surface-crosslinked micelle (SCM) particles, and methods of making/using them wherein the SCM particles can be used to prepare metal nanoparticles or used in catalytic reactions, wherein the micelles are prepared from amphiphiles that can self-assemble through hydrophobic interactions among the hydrophobic groups, wherein the particles can be formed so that the amphiphiles encapsulate cargo molecules, such as a catalyst (abstract; [0003]; [0010]; [0013]; [0128]; and [0132] of Zhao). An organic particle can be prepared that comprises surface crosslinked non-polymeric organic amphiphiles, wherein polar head groups of the amphiphiles are covalently crosslinked to each other at the surface of the particle through functional groups, and tail groups of the amphiphiles are arranged toward the interior of the particle (encapsulated); and wherein the particle can be water-soluble ([0010 to [0013] of Zhao). The amphiphiles can further comprise alkenyl or thiol functional groups ([0014] of Zhao). Zhao further discloses that the catalyst can contain an organometallic compound such as palladium, copper or rhodium (Figures 12, 13 and 19; [0037]; [0096]; [0120]; [0127]; [0143]; [0144]; and [0146] of Zhao). The hydrophobic organometallic catalyst can be entrapped (encapsulated) within the crosslinked micelles/particles ([0293]; and [0300] to [0307] of Zhao). The “cargo molecules can contain a palladium catalyst ([0120]; and [0307] of Zhao). As to dependent claims 9 and 10, these claims recite an intended future use of the catalyst of parent claim 1. A recitation of an intended future use of the claimed invention must result in a structural difference between the claimed invention and the prior art to patentably distinguish the claimed invention from the prior art. If the prior art structure is capable of performing the intended use, then it meets the claim. Thus, the instant claims are anticipated by Zhao. Allowable Subject Matter Claims 5-8 are objected to as dependent upon rejected base claim 1 but would be allowable if rewritten in independent form including all the limitations of the base claim and any intervening claims. Zhao does not teach or suggest the organometallic component of its catalyst/particles containing dimethyl palladium (II) and a nitrogen ligand, in accordance with present dependent claim 5. Nor does Zhao disclose its catalyst containing the functionalized amphiphile compound (1) depicted in dependent claim 7 or the non-polar tail of the structure chemical formulas (2) and (3) as depicted in dependent claim 8. Conclusion The prior art made of record and not relied upon is considered pertinent to applicant's disclosure. Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to JOHN J FIGUEROA whose telephone number is (571)272-8916. The examiner can normally be reached on 8:30 am -6:00 pm. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, JOSEPH DEL SOLE can be reached on 571-272-1130. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. Information regarding the status of an application may be obtained from the Patent Application Information Retrieval (PAIR) system. Status information for published applications may be obtained from either Private PAIR or Public PAIR. Status information for unpublished applications is available through Private PAIR only. For more information about the PAIR system, see http://pair-direct.uspto.gov. Should you have questions on access to the Private PAIR system, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative or access to the automated information system, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /JOHN J FIGUEROA/Primary Examiner, Art Unit 1763 January 24, 2026
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Mar 24, 2023
Application Filed
Jan 24, 2026
Non-Final Rejection — §102 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12599800
PROCESSES FOR REMOVING PERFLUOROALKYL SUBSTANCES AND REGENERATING AN ADSORBENT USED WITH SAME
2y 5m to grant Granted Apr 14, 2026
Patent 12599867
Fully Automated Direct Air Capture Carbon Dioxide Processing System
2y 5m to grant Granted Apr 14, 2026
Patent 12595186
Method for Preparing Cuprous Chloride by High-value Utilization of Chloride Ion-containing Wasterwater
2y 5m to grant Granted Apr 07, 2026
Patent 12590241
MODIFIED SILICA NANOPARTICLE AND METHODS OF SYNTHESIS
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 31, 2026
Patent 12583742
Hydrogen Production and Carbon Sequestration via High Temperature Cracking of Natural Gas In An Inductively Heated Fluidized Carbon Particle Bed
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 24, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

AI Strategy Recommendation

Get an AI-powered prosecution strategy using examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Powered by AI — typically takes 5-10 seconds

Prosecution Projections

1-2
Expected OA Rounds
83%
Grant Probability
92%
With Interview (+8.7%)
2y 11m
Median Time to Grant
Low
PTA Risk
Based on 1087 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allow rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month