Prosecution Insights
Last updated: October 04, 2026
Application No. 18/189,700

SILICON-CARBON COMPOSITE FIBER

Final Rejection §DOUBLEPATENT
Filed
Mar 24, 2023
Priority
Mar 21, 2022 — provisional 63/269,652 +1 more
Examiner
LE, HOA T
Art Unit
1788
Tech Center
1700 — Chemical & Materials Engineering
Assignee
Unifrax I LLC
OA Round
2 (Final)
73%
Grant Probability
Favorable
3-4
OA Rounds
0m
Est. Remaining
85%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 73% — above average
73%
Career Allowance Rate
798 granted / 1097 resolved
+7.7% vs TC avg
Moderate +12% lift
Without
With
+12.2%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
2y 11m
Avg Prosecution
28 currently pending
Career history
1140
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
0.7%
-39.3% vs TC avg
§103
42.4%
+2.4% vs TC avg
§102
27.2%
-12.8% vs TC avg
§112
24.2%
-15.8% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 1097 resolved cases

Office Action

§DOUBLEPATENT
DETAILED ACTION The text of those sections of Title 35, U.S. Code not included in this action can be found in a prior Office action. Double Patenting Claims 1-3. 5-7 and 16-20 stand provisionally rejected on the ground of nonstatutory double patenting as being unpatentable over claims 1-5, 8-10 and 19-20 of copending Application No. 17/906,770 (reference application). Although the claims at issue are not identical, they are not patentably distinct from each other because the instant claims and the reference claims are directed to the same subject matter, which is a composite fiber comprising a porous silicon phase and a carbon phase wherein the silicon phase and the carbon phase form an intertwined network structure in the composite fiber such that each of the silicon phase and the carbon phase is interconnected and continuous throughout the composite fibers and wherein the silicon phase and the carbon phase together constitute at least 50 wt% of the composite fiber, and wherein the composite has an aspect ratio of at least 3. This is a provisional nonstatutory double patenting rejection because the patentably indistinct claims have not in fact been patented; however, a Notice of Allowance has been issued in the reference application on August 2026. Response to Arguments Applicant alleges that the claim feature, “an aspect ratio of at least 3”, which has been added into the independent claim 1 would effectively overcome the double patenting rejection over the reference application, 17/906,770. This is not so because such claim feature is also presented in the independent claim of the reference application. The Double Patenting rejection is therefore hereby maintained. The amendment filed May 13, 2026 has overcome the prior art-based rejection over the Sakshaug reference (US 2020/0152983) because Sakshaug fails to teach composite fiber having an aspect ratio of at least 3. The composite of Sakshaug appears to be in particle form as the only dimension disclosed in the reference is the diameter of the composite. Other Prior-Art References The references cited in the IDS filed May 13, 2026 have been considered. Costantino (US 2020/0020935) fail to teach a composite fibers having an aspect ratio of at least 3, but rather Constantino teaches composite particles; and Wolf (J. of Power Sources, Elsevier, Amsterdam, NL, Vol. 190, No. 1, May 2009) fails to teach a composite fiber comprising an intertwined network structure of porous silicon phase and porous carbon phase as require in the instant claims; rather Wolf teach coating of silicon material over a porous carbon fiber substrate, no description of the silicon phase infiltrating the pores of the porous carbon phase. Conclusion THIS ACTION IS MADE FINAL. Applicant is reminded of the extension of time policy as set forth in 37 CFR 1.136(a). A shortened statutory period for reply to this final action is set to expire THREE MONTHS from the mailing date of this action. In the event a first reply is filed within TWO MONTHS of the mailing date of this final action and the advisory action is not mailed until after the end of the THREE-MONTH shortened statutory period, then the shortened statutory period will expire on the date the advisory action is mailed, and any nonprovisional extension fee (37 CFR 1.17(a)) pursuant to 37 CFR 1.136(a) will be calculated from the mailing date of the advisory action. In no event, however, will the statutory period for reply expire later than SIX MONTHS from the mailing date of this final action. Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to HOA (Holly) LE whose telephone number is (571)272-1511. The examiner can normally be reached Monday to Friday, 10:00 am to 7:00 pm. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Alicia Chevalier can be reached at 571-272-1490. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. HOA (Holly) LE Primary Examiner Art Unit 1788 /HOA (Holly) LE/Primary Examiner, Art Unit 1788
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Mar 24, 2023
Application Filed
Feb 18, 2026
Non-Final Rejection mailed — §DOUBLEPATENT
May 13, 2026
Response Filed
Sep 10, 2026
Final Rejection mailed — §DOUBLEPATENT (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12741450
REFLECTIVE FILM, METHOD FOR PRODUCING LAMINATED GLASS, AND LAMINATED GLASS
3y 9m to grant Granted Sep 22, 2026
Patent 12742101
PHOTOCURABLE PRESSURE-SENSITIVE ADHESIVE COMPOSITION FOR ELECTRICAL COMPONENTS WITH THREE-DIMENSIONAL STRUCTURE
3y 1m to grant Granted Sep 22, 2026
Patent 12726151
ULTRA STABLE CEMENTITIOUS MATERIAL FORMULATION, PROCESS FOR ITS MAKING, AND ULTRA STABLE TILE BACKER BOARD FORMULATION AND PROCESSES FOR ITS MAKING
3y 0m to grant Granted Sep 01, 2026
Patent 12709086
RESIN LAYER, OPTICAL FILM, AND IMAGE DISPLAYING DEVICE
3y 11m to grant Granted Aug 18, 2026
Patent 12679776
HIGH TEMPERATURE BRAZING OF METALS AND CERAMICS TO CARBON SUBSTRATES
3y 8m to grant Granted Jul 14, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

Strategy Recommendation AI-generated — please review before filing

Get a prosecution strategy drawn from examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Typically takes 5-10 seconds — AI-generated, attorney review required before filing

Prosecution Projections

3-4
Expected OA Rounds
73%
Grant Probability
85%
With Interview (+12.2%)
2y 11m (~0m remaining)
Median Time to Grant
Moderate
PTA Risk
Based on 1097 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allowance rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month