Prosecution Insights
Last updated: October 04, 2026
Application No. 18/190,106

CONTINUOUS FLUID IRRIGATION ASSEMBLY

Non-Final OA §112
Filed
Mar 26, 2023
Priority
Sep 29, 2020 — provisional 63/084,866 +1 more
Examiner
STIGELL, THEODORE J
Art Unit
3783
Tech Center
3700 — Mechanical Engineering & Manufacturing
Assignee
Creative Medical Solutions Inc.
OA Round
3 (Non-Final)
78%
Grant Probability
Favorable
3-4
OA Rounds
0m
Est. Remaining
93%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 78% — above average
78%
Career Allowance Rate
998 granted / 1275 resolved
+8.3% vs TC avg
Moderate +15% lift
Without
With
+14.9%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
3y 2m
Avg Prosecution
51 currently pending
Career history
1309
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
1.3%
-38.7% vs TC avg
§103
33.2%
-6.8% vs TC avg
§102
28.8%
-11.2% vs TC avg
§112
21.2%
-18.8% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 1275 resolved cases

Office Action

§112
DETAILED ACTION Response to Amendment Continued Examination Under 37 CFR 1.114 A request for continued examination under 37 CFR 1.114, including the fee set forth in 37 CFR 1.17(e), was filed in this application after final rejection. Since this application is eligible for continued examination under 37 CFR 1.114, and the fee set forth in 37 CFR 1.17(e) has been timely paid, the finality of the previous Office action has been withdrawn pursuant to 37 CFR 1.114. Applicant's submission filed on 8/9/2026 has been entered. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 112 The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 112(b): (b) CONCLUSION.—The specification shall conclude with one or more claims particularly pointing out and distinctly claiming the subject matter which the inventor or a joint inventor regards as the invention. The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 112 (pre-AIA ), second paragraph: The specification shall conclude with one or more claims particularly pointing out and distinctly claiming the subject matter which the applicant regards as his invention. Claims 1-2,4-12,16 and 34-35 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 112(b) or 35 U.S.C. 112 (pre-AIA ), second paragraph, as being indefinite for failing to particularly point out and distinctly claim the subject matter which the inventor or a joint inventor (or for applications subject to pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 112, the applicant), regards as the invention. In regard to claim 1, the claim is rendered indefinite because “a first ouput signal” and “a second output signal” are recited three different times in the claim. It is unclear if the applicant is trying to refer to the same signals or different signals each time. For the purposes of this action, it is assumed the signals are the same signals. A possible cure to the issue is presented below: 1. (CURRENTLY AMENDED) A continuous fluid irrigation assembly for use with at least a first irrigation bag fluidly attached to a first irrigation tubing and a second irrigation bag fluidly attached to a second irrigation tubing, the continuous fluid irrigation assembly comprising: a first body, the first body comprising: a first switching device comprising: a pair of pinch plates each having an inner face, each of the pinch plates being configured to receive the first and the second irrigation tubing via a pair of tube guides; a pinch arm configured to travel along at least one guide rod, between a first position touching one of the pair of pinch plates, and second position touching the other of the pair of pinch plates; an actuator operably connected to the pinch arm to move the pinch arm between the first position and the second position based on an input signal received from a microcontroller; wherein the first switching device selectively restricts flow through the first and the second irrigation tubing, such that in the first position, free flow is allowed through the first irrigation tubing, and the first switching device is configured to move to the first position in response to a first output signal; in the second position, free flow is allowed through the second irrigation tubing, and the first switching device is configured to move to the second position in response to a second output signal; and the microcontroller in communication with the first switching device, a first bag sensor and a second bag sensor, the microcontroller being configured to: receive at least one of the first and a second output signals; process at least one of the first and the second output signals; and instruct the first switching device to move from the first position to the second position based on processing of the at least one of the first and the second output signals; a first bag sensor operably attached to the first irrigation bag, wherein the first bag sensor generates the first output signal based on the weight of a volume of fluid within the first irrigation bag; and a second bag sensor operably attached to the second irrigation bag, wherein the second bag sensor generates the second output signal based on the weight of a volume of fluid within the second irrigation bag. In regard to claim 4, there is already antecedent basis for “an inner face” of the pair of pinch plates. In further regard to claim 4, the antecedent basis for “the at least one guide rods” should read “the at least one guide rod”. In regard to claim 7, the applicant appears to be reciting structure that is already recited. Applicant is encouraged to delete claim 7 or fix the antecedent basis issues. In regard to claims 8-12, the applicant appears to be reciting structure that is already recited (the switching device). Applicant is encouraged to delete the claims or fix the antecedent basis issues. Any dependent claim not addressed is rejected by virtue of the dependency on rejected claim 1. Allowable Subject Matter Claims 1-2,4-12,16 and 34-35 will be considered allowable upon resolution of the 112 rejections. Response to Arguments Applicant’s arguments, see Remarks, filed 8/9/2026, with respect to the Liberman/Wunsch rejection have been fully considered and are persuasive. The rejection has been withdrawn. Conclusion Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to THEODORE J STIGELL whose telephone number is (571)272-8759. The examiner can normally be reached M-F 9-5:30 EST. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Michael Tsai can be reached at 571-270-5246. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. THEODORE J. STIGELL Primary Examiner Art Unit 3783 /THEODORE J STIGELL/Primary Examiner, Art Unit 3783
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Show 4 earlier events
Jan 27, 2026
Applicant Interview (Telephonic)
Feb 02, 2026
Response Filed
Mar 27, 2026
Examiner Interview Summary
Mar 27, 2026
Examiner Interview (Telephonic)
Apr 09, 2026
Final Rejection mailed — §112
Aug 09, 2026
Request for Continued Examination
Aug 11, 2026
Response after Non-Final Action
Aug 26, 2026
Non-Final Rejection mailed — §112 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12746327
ESTABLISHING AND MAINTAINING VACUUM IN THE RESERVOIR OF A DRUG DELIVERY DEVICE
3y 11m to grant Granted Sep 29, 2026
Patent 12741104
Reuse Prevention Flush Syringe
3y 10m to grant Granted Sep 22, 2026
Patent 12734305
DRUG DELIVERY DEVICE ASSEMBLY AND ACCESSORY FOR DRUG DELIVERY DEVICE
3y 5m to grant Granted Sep 15, 2026
Patent 12733790
BALLOON ASSISTED CONTAINMENT OF INSUFFLATED ROBOTIC/ENDOSCOPIC OPERATIVE FIELD
2y 9m to grant Granted Sep 15, 2026
Patent 12728192
FLUID DRAINAGE OR DELIVERY DEVICE FOR TREATMENT SITE
3y 3m to grant Granted Sep 08, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

Strategy Recommendation AI-generated — please review before filing

Get a prosecution strategy drawn from examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Typically takes 5-10 seconds — AI-generated, attorney review required before filing

Prosecution Projections

3-4
Expected OA Rounds
78%
Grant Probability
93%
With Interview (+14.9%)
3y 2m (~0m remaining)
Median Time to Grant
High
PTA Risk
Based on 1275 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allowance rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month