Prosecution Insights
Last updated: May 29, 2026
Application No. 18/191,114

ELECTROSURGICAL INSTRUMENT WITH PERMANENT TENSIONER

Non-Final OA §102
Filed
Mar 28, 2023
Priority
Mar 31, 2022 — EU 22166100.2
Examiner
DEMIE, TIGIST S
Art Unit
3794
Tech Center
3700 — Mechanical Engineering & Manufacturing
Assignee
Erbe Elektromedizin GmbH
OA Round
1 (Non-Final)
75%
Grant Probability
Favorable
1-2
OA Rounds
0m
Est. Remaining
96%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 75% — above average
75%
Career Allowance Rate
332 granted / 444 resolved
+4.8% vs TC avg
Strong +21% interview lift
Without
With
+20.8%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
3y 2m
Avg Prosecution
18 currently pending
Career history
466
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
0.4%
-39.6% vs TC avg
§103
78.0%
+38.0% vs TC avg
§102
9.4%
-30.6% vs TC avg
§112
5.6%
-34.4% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 444 resolved cases

Office Action

§102
DETAILED ACTION Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Election/Restrictions Applicant’s election without traverse of species C, fig.8-10, Claims 1-8, 10 and 15 in the reply filed on 02/17/2026 is acknowledged. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 102 The following is a quotation of the appropriate paragraphs of 35 U.S.C. 102 that form the basis for the rejections under this section made in this Office action: A person shall be entitled to a patent unless – (a)(1) the claimed invention was patented, described in a printed publication, or in public use, on sale, or otherwise available to the public before the effective filing date of the claimed invention. Claims 1-2, 4-5, 7 and 15 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 102 (a) (1) as being anticipated by Sugita et al. (US 2006/0178669). Regarding claim 1, Sugita discloses an electrosurgical instrument (fig.1; high-frequency treatment tool 100) comprising: an electrode (fig.2; electrode 2); an insulator arrangement (fig.6; capping member 5) having a distal end ([0031]: “The sheath 1 is inserted through an instrument channel (not shown) and formed with an insulated material, for example polytetrafluoroethylene”); an instrument hose (fig.5; see also [0032]) in which a longitudinal thrust element is arranged for defining a position of the electrode relative to the distal end of the insulator arrangement ([0032]: “the sheath 1 is formed to be a multi-lumen tube, which includes a plurality of (for example, two) independent lumens formed in parallel with each other through the entire length of the sheath 1. The operation wire 3 is inserted through one of the two lumens, and the other lumen is used as a water channel.”); a stop (fig.5; 3a); a counter stop (fig.5; 2b) of the electrode and/or the longitudinal thrust element; and an elastically deformable device (fig.5, coiled spring 6), which is arranged and configured to pretension the counter stop in a distal direction against the stop in order to avoid movement of the electrode in a proximal direction relative to the distal end of the insulator arrangement and/or the instrument hose when bending or curving the instrument hose [0040]. Regarding claim 2, Sugita discloses the electrosurgical instrument according to claim 1, wherein the stop is arranged next to a distal end of the instrument hose and/or the insulator arrangement (fig.5). Regarding claim 4, Sugita discloses the electrosurgical instrument according to claim 1, wherein the stop is formed by a stop element (fig.4; 3a), which is positioned in a distal end section of the instrument hose (fig.4) and is held in a form-fit and/or friction-fit manner (fig.4). Regarding claim 5, Sugita discloses the electrosurgical instrument according to claim 1, wherein the counter stop is configured on the electrode (fig.5) and/or the longitudinal thrust element and/or on a counter stop element which is connected with the electrode and/or the longitudinal thrust element (fig.1) Regarding claim 7, Sugita discloses the electrosurgical instrument according to claim 5, wherein the counter stop element comprises an extension that extends up to (fig.4) or distally beyond a distal end surface of a stop element comprising the stop (fig.5). Regarding claim 15, Sugita discloses the electrosurgical instrument according to claim 1, wherein the instrument hose is configured to be guided through a working channel of an endoscope and/or wherein the instrument hose and an additional hose are configured to be moved through a same working channel of an endoscope or through separate working channels ([0005] - [0006]). Claims 1, 2-6, 8 and 10 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 102 (a) (1) as being anticipated by Curley et al. (US 2019/0336729). Regarding claim 1, Curley discloses an electrosurgical instrument comprising: an electrode (fig.2; distal end of needle 512);an insulator arrangement having a distal end [0110]; an instrument hose (fig.5C; inner lumen 511) in which a longitudinal thrust element (408) is arranged for defining a position of the electrode relative to the distal end of the insulator arrangement; a stop (516); a counter stop (518) of the electrode and/or the longitudinal thrust element; and an elastically deformable device (fig.10A; 902, see also [0129]), which is arranged and configured to pretension the counter stop in a distal direction against the stop in order to avoid movement of the electrode in a proximal direction relative to the distal end of the insulator arrangement and/or the instrument hose when bending or curving the instrument hose (see also [0124]-[0125] and [0129]). Regarding claim 2, Curley discloses the electrosurgical instrument according to claim 1, wherein the stop is arranged next to a distal end of the instrument hose and/or the insulator arrangement (fig.6A). Regarding claim 3, Curley discloses the electrosurgical instrument according to claim 1, wherein the elastically deformable device is arranged proximally outside the instrument hose and/or wherein the electrosurgical instrument comprises a handle, wherein the elastically deformable device (fig.9; biasing element 902) is arranged in the handle (fig.10A, see also [0129]). Regarding claim 4, Curley discloses the electrosurgical instrument according to claim 1, wherein the stop is formed by a stop element (flange 516), which is positioned in a distal end section (fig.6A; distal portion 202) of the instrument hose and is held in a form-fit and/or friction-fit manner (fig.6A). Regarding claim 5, Curley discloses the electrosurgical instrument according to claim 1, wherein the counter stop is configured on the electrode and/or the longitudinal thrust element and/or on a counter stop element which is connected with the electrode and/or the longitudinal thrust element (fig.6A). Regarding claim 6, Curley discloses the electrosurgical instrument according to claim 1, wherein the counter stop is formed by a counter stop element (retraction stop 518) which is separate from the electrode and the longitudinal thrust element and is operable to connect the longitudinal thrust element and the electrode (fig.6A). Regarding claim 8, Curley discloses the electrosurgical instrument according to claim 1, wherein the longitudinal thrust element (connecting member 408) is formed by an additional hose, which is arranged inside the instrument hose (fig.6A). Regarding claim 10, Curley discloses the electrosurgical instrument according to claim 8, wherein an electrical conductor, is arranged in or on the additional hose [0115]. Conclusion Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to TIGIST S DEMIE whose telephone number is (571)270-5345. The examiner can normally be reached Monday-Friday 8am-5Pm. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Joseph Stoklosa can be reached at 571-2721213. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /TIGIST S DEMIE/Primary Examiner, Art Unit 3794
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Mar 28, 2023
Application Filed
Feb 24, 2026
Non-Final Rejection mailed — §102 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12636070
HANDLE FOR A SURGICAL INSTRUMENT
3y 10m to grant Granted May 26, 2026
Patent 12636065
MONOPOLAR L-HOOK ELECTRODE WITH VARIED CROSS-SECTIONS
3y 3m to grant Granted May 26, 2026
Patent 12636060
ELECTROSURGICAL INSTRUMENTS, SYSTEMS, AND METHODS INCLUDING USE OF THERMAL CUTTING ELEMENTS
3y 3m to grant Granted May 26, 2026
Patent 12636182
PALM COOLING ASSEMBLY
2y 7m to grant Granted May 26, 2026
Patent 12629201
Multi-Form Catheter
4y 4m to grant Granted May 19, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

Strategy Recommendation AI-generated — please review before filing

Get a prosecution strategy drawn from examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Typically takes 5-10 seconds — AI-generated, attorney review required before filing

Prosecution Projections

1-2
Expected OA Rounds
75%
Grant Probability
96%
With Interview (+20.8%)
3y 2m (~0m remaining)
Median Time to Grant
Low
PTA Risk
Based on 444 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allowance rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month