Prosecution Insights
Last updated: August 16, 2026
Application No. 18/191,577

DRIVING MECHANISM AND DRIVING MODULE

Non-Final OA §102
Filed
Mar 28, 2023
Priority
Jan 31, 2023 — CN 202320143818.3
Examiner
GORDON, BRYAN P
Art Unit
2837
Tech Center
2800 — Semiconductors & Electrical Systems
Assignee
Actutek Corporation
OA Round
1 (Non-Final)
77%
Grant Probability
Favorable
1-2
OA Rounds
0m
Est. Remaining
91%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 77% — above average
77%
Career Allowance Rate
756 granted / 982 resolved
+9.0% vs TC avg
Moderate +14% lift
Without
With
+14.2%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
2y 11m
Avg Prosecution
23 currently pending
Career history
999
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
0.4%
-39.6% vs TC avg
§103
60.1%
+20.1% vs TC avg
§102
29.1%
-10.9% vs TC avg
§112
8.2%
-31.8% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 982 resolved cases

Office Action

§102
DETAILED ACTION Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Election/Restrictions Applicant's election with traverse of Group I in the reply filed on 01 July 2026 is acknowledged. The traversal is on the ground(s) that there would be no undue burden on the Examiner. This is not found persuasive because since Group II has a second piezoelectric element which would require a further search. The requirement is still deemed proper and is therefore made FINAL. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 102 The following is a quotation of the appropriate paragraphs of 35 U.S.C. 102 that form the basis for the rejections under this section made in this Office action: A person shall be entitled to a patent unless – (a)(1) the claimed invention was patented, described in a printed publication, or in public use, on sale, or otherwise available to the public before the effective filing date of the claimed invention. Claim(s) 1-3 and 7-11 is/are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 102(a)(1) as being anticipated by Shimada (PG Pub 20230031311). Considering claim 1, Shimada (Figure 1) teaches a driving mechanism, comprising: a fixed assembly (14 + paragraph 0037); a movable part (8 + paragraph 0041), configured to move relative to the fixed assembly; a driving module (4 + 3a + 3b + paragraphs 0037-0042), configured to drive the movable part to move relative to the fixed assembly; wherein when viewed along a first axis, the driving module (4 + 3a + 3b + paragraphs 0037-0042) is disposed between the fixed assembly (14 + paragraph 0037) and the movable part (8 + paragraph 0041). Considering claim 2, Shimada (Figure 1) teaches the fixed assembly includes a base (14 + paragraph 0037); the driving mechanism further includes a guiding assembly (10 + 12 + paragraph 0028); the guiding assembly (10 + paragraph 0035) is configured to guide the movable part to move along the first axis relative to the fixed assembly (paragraph 0035); the driving module (4 + 3a + 3b + paragraphs 0037-0042) is connected to the base; the guiding assembly includes a first guiding member (12 + paragraph 0036) and a second guiding member (10 + paragraph 0036); the first guiding member (12 + paragraph 0036) is fixedly connected to the movable part (8 + paragraph 0041); the second guiding member (10 + paragraph 0036) is fixedly connected to the base; the driving module is configured to drive the first guiding member to move relative to the second guiding member, so as to drive the movable part to move along the first axis (paragraph 0035). Considering claim 3, Shimada (Figure 1) teaches wherein when viewed along a second axis, the second guiding member, the first guiding member and the driving module are arranged in sequence along a third axis; the second axis is perpendicular to the first axis; the third axis is perpendicular to the second axis and the first axis (paragraphs 0035-0042). Considering claim 7, Shimada (Figure 1) teaches wherein when viewed along the first axis, the movable part has an L-shaped structure (14a-14d + paragraph 0037); the movable part has an upper covering plate and a side covering plate (14d + paragraph 0037); when viewed along the first axis, the upper covering plate extends along the third axis; when viewed along the first axis, the side covering plate extends along the second axis (paragraph 0037). Considering claim 8, Shimada (Figure 1) teaches wherein the guiding assembly further includes a plurality of first rolling members (11 + paragraph 0036) disposed between the first guiding member (12 + paragraph 0036) and the second guiding member (10 + paragraph 0036); the first guiding member is movable relative to the second guiding member through the first rolling members (paragraphs 0035-0037); the guiding assembly further includes a plurality of second rolling members (11 + paragraph 0036) disposed between the side covering plate and the base; the movable part (8 + paragraph 0035) is movable relative to the bae through the second rolling members (11 + paragraph 0036). Considering claim 9, Shimada (Figure 1) teaches wherein a first groove (12a + paragraph 0036) is formed on the side covering plate and is configured to accommodate the second rolling members (11 + paragraph 0036); a second groove (10a + paragraph 0036) is formed on the base and is configured to accommodate the second rolling members (11 + paragraph 0036); when viewed along the first axis, the first groove has a V-shaped structure; when viewed along the first axis, the second groove has a V-shaped structure (paragraph 0036). Considering claim 10, Shimada (Figures 1 + 2D) teaches wherein the base forms a trench (area between 14d see Figure 2D) extending along the first axis; the base further has a first top surface, a second top surface and a bottom surface; the trench is formed between the first top surface and the second top surface (see Figure 2D). Considering claim 11, Shimada (Figure 2D) teaches wherein a shortest distance between the first top surface (14d + left side + paragraph 0037) and the bottom surface (bottom side of 14d left side + paragraph 0037) is different from a shortest distance between the second top surface and the bottom surface; the shortest distance between the first top surface and the bottom surface is greater than the shortest distance between the second top surface and the bottom surface (see Figure 2D). Allowable Subject Matter Claims 4-6 and 12-15 are objected to as being dependent upon a rejected base claim, but would be allowable if rewritten in independent form including all of the limitations of the base claim and any intervening claims. Considering claim 4, the prior art does not teach the base includes a main body and a connecting block; the main body forms an accommodating opening configured to accommodate the connecting block; the base further includes a first cantilever and a second cantilever in combination with the rest of the applicant’s claimed limitations. Furthermore, claims 5-6, which depends upon claim 4, would also be allowed if it depended an independent and allowable claim. Considering claim 12, the prior art does not teach wherein when viewed along the third axis, the first top surface overlaps the first guiding member; the trench has a first surface corresponding to a second surface of the first guiding member; when viewed along the second axis, the first surface overlaps the second surface in combination with the rest of the applicant’s claimed limitations. Furthermore, claim 13, which depends upon claim 12, would also be allowed if it depended an independent and allowable claim. Considering claim 14, the prior art does not teach wherein the base further has a first top surface which faces the upper covering plate; the base further has a protrusion extending from the first top surface toward the upper covering plate; a first accommodating groove is formed on the side covering plate in combination with the rest of the applicant’s claimed limitations. Furthermore, claim 15, which depends upon claim 14, would also be allowed if it depended an independent and allowable claim. Conclusion Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to BRYAN P GORDON whose telephone number is (571)272-5394. The examiner can normally be reached M-F 8 a.m. - 4:30 p.m.. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Dedei K Hammond can be reached at 571-270-7938. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /BRYAN P GORDON/Primary Examiner, Art Unit 2837
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Mar 28, 2023
Application Filed
Aug 07, 2026
Non-Final Rejection mailed — §102 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12706589
PIEZOELECTRIC VIBRATING SUBSTRATE AND PIEZOELECTRIC VIBRATING ELEMENT
4y 1m to grant Granted Aug 11, 2026
Patent 12696686
PIEZOELECTRIC ACTUATOR AND MICROFLUIDIC DEVICE
4y 7m to grant Granted Jul 28, 2026
Patent 12677597
PIEZOELECTRIC LAMINATE AND PIEZOELECTRIC ELEMENT
3y 10m to grant Granted Jul 07, 2026
Patent 12665566
LITHIUM NIOBATE OR LITHIUM TANTALATE FBAR STRUCTURE AND FABRICATING METHOD THEREOF
4y 7m to grant Granted Jun 23, 2026
Patent 12666873
SYSTEM INCLUDING PIEZOELECTRIC CAPACITOR ASSEMBLY HAVING FORCE-MEASURING, TOUCH-SENSING, AND HAPTIC FUNCTIONALITIES
2y 1m to grant Granted Jun 23, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

Strategy Recommendation AI-generated — please review before filing

Get a prosecution strategy drawn from examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Typically takes 5-10 seconds — AI-generated, attorney review required before filing

Prosecution Projections

1-2
Expected OA Rounds
77%
Grant Probability
91%
With Interview (+14.2%)
2y 11m (~0m remaining)
Median Time to Grant
Low
PTA Risk
Based on 982 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allowance rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month