Prosecution Insights
Last updated: April 19, 2026
Application No. 18/191,817

5GS POLICY FOR EXTENDED REALITY

Non-Final OA §112
Filed
Mar 28, 2023
Examiner
HUYNH, KHOA B
Art Unit
2462
Tech Center
2400 — Computer Networks
Assignee
Nokia Technologies Oy
OA Round
3 (Non-Final)
80%
Grant Probability
Favorable
3-4
OA Rounds
3y 0m
To Grant
90%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 80% — above average
80%
Career Allow Rate
540 granted / 678 resolved
+21.6% vs TC avg
Moderate +10% lift
Without
With
+10.1%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
3y 0m
Avg Prosecution
19 currently pending
Career history
697
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
7.7%
-32.3% vs TC avg
§103
45.5%
+5.5% vs TC avg
§102
18.2%
-21.8% vs TC avg
§112
17.8%
-22.2% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 678 resolved cases

Office Action

§112
DETAILED ACTION Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . This Office Action is in response to the Applicants' amendment received on 01/05/2026. Claim Status Claims 1, 3, 5-9, 11, 13-17, 19-23 are currently presenting for examination. This action has been made NON-FINAL. Response to Arguments Applicants' arguments filed 01/05/2026 have been fully considered but are moot in view of the new ground(s) of rejection. Claim Objections Claim 9 is objected to because of the following reasons: For claim 9, from the claim language, Examiner assumes that it is the at least one processor that perform the functional steps. However, Examiner recommends Applicants to further clarify the claim language by amending the claim language as follow: “cause the [[apparatus]] at least one processor at least to…” Otherwise, if Applicants intends for some other hardware components of the apparatus to perform the steps, then please amend the claims to include those hardware components and clearly indicate that those hardware components perform the steps. If Applicants intends for any unknown hardware components of the apparatus to perform the steps, then please clearly states so on record. However, Applicants are reminded that doing so will raise 112 issues since then the claim language would impose no limits as to a particular structure for performing the claimed invention; hence the claims may cover all devices for/ways for performing the claimed functions. As thus, there is a failure to provide a clear-cut indication of claim scope because the functional language is not sufficiently precise and definite, resulting in no boundaries on the claim limitation. Appropriate correction is required. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 112 The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 112(d): (d) REFERENCE IN DEPENDENT FORMS.—Subject to subsection (e), a claim in dependent form shall contain a reference to a claim previously set forth and then specify a further limitation of the subject matter claimed. A claim in dependent form shall be construed to incorporate by reference all the limitations of the claim to which it refers. The following is a quotation of pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 112, fourth paragraph: Subject to the following paragraph [i.e., the fifth paragraph of pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 112], a claim in dependent form shall contain a reference to a claim previously set forth and then specify a further limitation of the subject matter claimed. A claim in dependent form shall be construed to incorporate by reference all the limitations of the claim to which it refers. Claims 3, 11, 19 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 112(d) or pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 112, 4th paragraph, as being of improper dependent form since they do not contain a reference to a valid claim. Claim 3 depends on cancelled claim 2. Claim 11 depends on cancelled claim 10. Claim 19 depends on cancelled claim 18. Applicant may cancel the claim(s), amend the claim(s) to place the claim(s) in proper dependent form, rewrite the claim(s) in independent form, or present a sufficient showing that the dependent claim(s) complies with the statutory requirements. Allowable Subject Matter Claims 1, 5-9, 13-17, 20-23 are allowed. (Please also resolve claim objections issues indicated above where appropriate) Conclusion Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to KHOA B HUYNH whose telephone number is (571)270-7185. The examiner can normally be reached Monday - Friday 1:00 PM - 9:35 PM. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Yemane Mesfin can be reached at (571) 272-3927. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /KHOA HUYNH/Primary Examiner, Art Unit 2462
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Mar 28, 2023
Application Filed
May 15, 2025
Non-Final Rejection — §112
Sep 17, 2025
Response Filed
Oct 03, 2025
Final Rejection — §112
Jan 05, 2026
Response after Non-Final Action
Jan 12, 2026
Non-Final Rejection — §112
Apr 07, 2026
Applicant Interview (Telephonic)
Apr 07, 2026
Examiner Interview Summary

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12598518
CELL RE-SELECTION METHOD, TERMINAL, AND COMPUTER-READABLE STORAGE MEDIUM
2y 5m to grant Granted Apr 07, 2026
Patent 12593326
AUTONOMOUS CONFIGURED GRANT SCHEDULING
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 31, 2026
Patent 12581526
RADIO RESOURCE ALLOCATION PATTERN
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 17, 2026
Patent 12574927
IMPLICIT USER EQUIPMENT PROCESSING TIME INDICATION AND DETERMINATION FOR SUPPORT OF DIFFERENT PROCESSING TIMES IN ULTRA-RELIABLE LOW-LATENCY COMMUNICATION (URLLC)
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 10, 2026
Patent 12520192
METHOD AND APPARATUS FOR SCHEDULING AIR RESOURCE OF VIRTUAL DISTRIBUTED UNIT IN WIRELESS COMMUNICATION SYSTEM
2y 5m to grant Granted Jan 06, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

AI Strategy Recommendation

Get an AI-powered prosecution strategy using examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Powered by AI — typically takes 5-10 seconds

Prosecution Projections

3-4
Expected OA Rounds
80%
Grant Probability
90%
With Interview (+10.1%)
3y 0m
Median Time to Grant
High
PTA Risk
Based on 678 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allow rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month