Prosecution Insights
Last updated: October 02, 2026
Application No. 18/193,278

INFIELD TEST AND DEBUG

Final Rejection §103
Filed
Mar 30, 2023
Examiner
CHAUDRY, MUJTABA M
Art Unit
2112
Tech Center
2100 — Computer Architecture & Software
Assignee
Intel Corporation
OA Round
2 (Final)
84%
Grant Probability
Favorable
3-4
OA Rounds
0m
Est. Remaining
88%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 84% — above average
84%
Career Allowance Rate
712 granted / 843 resolved
+29.5% vs TC avg
Minimal +4% lift
Without
With
+3.9%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
2y 7m
Avg Prosecution
15 currently pending
Career history
872
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
9.7%
-30.3% vs TC avg
§103
25.7%
-14.3% vs TC avg
§102
5.1%
-34.9% vs TC avg
§112
39.4%
-0.6% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 843 resolved cases

Office Action

§103
DETAILED ACTION Applicants’ response filed 8/24/26 has been considered. The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Claims 1-20 are pending. Prior art rejections are maintained in view of remarks herein. See prior office action for details. No amendments were made to the claims. Application is pending. Response to Arguments Applicants’ arguments filed 8/24/2026 have been fully considered but they are not persuasive. For example, claim 1 recites: PNG media_image1.png 228 642 media_image1.png Greyscale Applicants contend the cited art does not appear to describe, “…a plurality of infield control debug registers to control execution of the test instruction, wherein access to the plurality of infield testing debug registers and the plurality of infield control debug registers is programmable.” The Examiner respectfully disagrees. The claim language has not been amended and the claim limitations are broad. Applicants are reminded that the rejection was presented under 35 USC 103 rationale. In accordance with MPEP 2111, under broadest reasonable interpretations, the claim basically states the following: BIST controller to perform test on a logic Storage to store test instructions Registers to store execution information of test instructions Registers to control execution of test instructions Access to both registers is programmable As stated in the prior office action D1 substantially teaches all of these concepts which are broad and do not add anything meaningful. BIST controller to perform test on a logic (i.e., Figure 1, scan test circuit 160 to test logic 150 and paragraph 0011) Storage to store test instructions (i.e., Figure 1, memory 130 stores test instructions and paragraph 0010) Registers to store execution information of test instructions (i.e., Figure 1 and paragraph 0010; “…the test pattern generator 122 and debug protocol module 124 are modules that are instantiated as executing program code within the processor 120…”) Registers to control execution of test instructions (i.e., Figure 1 and paragraphs 0010-0014), “The processor 120 implements a test pattern generator 122 and a debug protocol 124 to perform various forms of scan testing, functional mode testing and debugging of an integrated circuit. The memory 130 stores various types of data such as scan data 132 and internal register state data 134, which is accessed from the integrated circuit 140 when the integrated circuit 140 is scan tested or debugged using the tester 110.” “…debugging of failure conditions and errors of the integrated circuit 140 can be implemented using the internal registers 180, the debug controller 190, and the debug controller interface 192, in conjunction with the scan test circuitry 160 and the scan control circuitry 170 to verify operability of the integrated circuit 140 during actual use.” Access to both registers is programmable (i.e., Figure 1 and paragraphs 0010-0014), “The processor 120 implements a test pattern generator 122 and a debug protocol 124 to perform various forms of scan testing, functional mode testing and debugging of an integrated circuit.” “… the test pattern generator 122 and debug protocol module 124 are implemented using dedicated logic circuits and firmware, which are part of a special purpose processor designed with the special purpose hardware and/or firmware to perform scan testing and debugging functions.” “…a debug process (which is implemented via the debug protocol 124) provides various debug test signals such as debug test clocks and control signals, as well as debug test data to the integrated circuit 140.” Therefore it is the Examiner’s conclusion that the claims of the present application, as presented, are not patentably novel over the prior arts. Applicants are encouraged to formulate claim language that clearly defines the novelty of the application. Prior rejections are maintained. See prior office action for details. Application is pending. Conclusion THIS ACTION IS MADE FINAL. Applicant is reminded of the extension of time policy as set forth in 37 CFR 1.136(a). A shortened statutory period for reply to this final action is set to expire THREE MONTHS from the mailing date of this action. In the event a first reply is filed within TWO MONTHS of the mailing date of this final action and the advisory action is not mailed until after the end of the THREE-MONTH shortened statutory period, then the shortened statutory period will expire on the date the advisory action is mailed, and any nonprovisional extension fee (37 CFR 1.17(a)) pursuant to 37 CFR 1.136(a) will be calculated from the mailing date of the advisory action. In no event, however, will the statutory period for reply expire later than SIX MONTHS from the mailing date of this final action. Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to MUJTABA M CHAUDRY whose telephone number is (571)272-3817. The examiner can normally be reached Monday-Friday 9am-5:30pm. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Albert DeCady can be reached at 571-272-3819. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. MUJTABA M. CHAUDRY Primary Examiner Art Unit 2112 /MUJTABA M CHAUDRY/Primary Examiner, Art Unit 2112
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Mar 30, 2023
Application Filed
Sep 07, 2023
Response after Non-Final Action
Apr 22, 2026
Non-Final Rejection mailed — §103
Aug 24, 2026
Response Filed
Sep 11, 2026
Final Rejection mailed — §103 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12749552
SYSTEM AND METHOD FOR CONDUCTING BUILT-IN SELF-TEST OF MEMORY MACRO
2y 3m to grant Granted Sep 29, 2026
Patent 12748662
CIRCUIT ARRANGEMENT AND DEVICE WITH COMBINATORIAL CIRCUIT AND MEMORY CIRCUIT, SYSTEM AND METHOD
1y 8m to grant Granted Sep 29, 2026
Patent 12749001
SYSTEM AND METHOD OF DECODING FOR QUANTUM ERROR CORRECTION IN QUANTUM COMPUTING
1y 7m to grant Granted Sep 29, 2026
Patent 12744625
METHOD FOR TRANSMITTING SIGNAL ON BASIS OF HARQ IN WIRELESS COMMUNICATION SYSTEM, AND APPARATUS THEREFOR
2y 8m to grant Granted Sep 22, 2026
Patent 12724563
COMMAND BUS TRAINING FOR MEMORY SYSTEM
2y 4m to grant Granted Sep 01, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

Strategy Recommendation AI-generated — please review before filing

Get a prosecution strategy drawn from examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Typically takes 5-10 seconds — AI-generated, attorney review required before filing

Prosecution Projections

3-4
Expected OA Rounds
84%
Grant Probability
88%
With Interview (+3.9%)
2y 7m (~0m remaining)
Median Time to Grant
Moderate
PTA Risk
Based on 843 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allowance rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month