Office Action Predictor
Last updated: April 15, 2026
Application No. 18/193,348

POLYMER COMPOSITE COMPRISING OILSEED MEAL

Non-Final OA §102
Filed
Mar 30, 2023
Examiner
KOLB, KATARZYNA I
Art Unit
1767
Tech Center
1700 — Chemical & Materials Engineering
Assignee
Coda Intellectual Property B.V.
OA Round
1 (Non-Final)
42%
Grant Probability
Moderate
1-2
OA Rounds
3y 10m
To Grant
51%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 42% of resolved cases
42%
Career Allow Rate
77 granted / 181 resolved
-22.5% vs TC avg
Moderate +9% lift
Without
With
+8.8%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
3y 10m
Avg Prosecution
73 currently pending
Career history
254
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
0.6%
-39.4% vs TC avg
§103
48.6%
+8.6% vs TC avg
§102
23.8%
-16.2% vs TC avg
§112
14.9%
-25.1% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 181 resolved cases

Office Action

§102
1-Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Claim Interpretation Instant claims are directed to a composition comprising milled oil seed meal. Milled oil seed meal is interpreted as the solid residue remaining after oil has been extracted from oil seeds such as soybean or canola. As such when prior art teaches seeds that are defatted such seed will mee the definition of seed oil meal. Meal inherently means that the seeds have to be milled. In the event the determination of the status of the application as subject to AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103 (or as subject to pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103) is incorrect, any correction of the statutory basis (i.e., changing from AIA to pre-AIA ) for the rejection will not be considered a new ground of rejection if the prior art relied upon, and the rationale supporting the rejection, would be the same under either status. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 102 The following is a quotation of the appropriate paragraphs of 35 U.S.C. 102 that form the basis for the rejections under this section made in this Office action: A person shall be entitled to a patent unless – (a)(2) the claimed invention was described in a patent issued under section 151, or in an application for patent published or deemed published under section 122(b), in which the patent or application, as the case may be, names another inventor and was effectively filed before the effective filing date of the claimed invention. Claims 1-3, 5-16, 18, 19 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 102(a)(2) as being anticipated by Zhang (US 6,632,925) in view of evidence in US 5,710,190). With respect to claim 1, 3, 6-8, 15, 18, Zhang teaches biodegradable plant protein composites. According to claims 1 of Zhang the composition comprises 5-95% by weight of PLA and 95-5% by weight of plant protein. The plant protein commercial product used (see 2nd Table in col. 4) is ADM defatted mean, which will automatically mean that the fats (oils) are removed from the meal. According to table in col. 6, plasticizer is utilized in the amount of 0-10% by weight. Plasticizers polyols and higher molecular weight alcohols such as polyvinyl alcohol which has a melting point of 180-190oC (col. 5, 22—30) which also meets limitation of instant claim 7. With respect to claim 2, in addition to PLA other polymers include polycaprolactone (2nd Table in col. 4). With respect to claims 5, 9, 10 and 19, Zhang indicated that additives and fillers that can be utilized are disclosed in US 5,710,190 incorporating the disclosure into his teachings. According to ‘190 fillers are utilized in amount of 5-20 parts by weight(col. 4, l. 15-62) and include other proteins such as grains (wheat, corn) beans and the like, cellulose. With respect to claim 11, Zhang utilizes compatibilizers (see tables) other additives include coloring agents, lubricants and the like (col. 8, lines 31-35) further relying on ‘190 to supplement types of additives. With respect to claim 12 and 16, Zhang processes the composition using twin screw extruder at a temperature range of 75-155oC (depending on the zone) (col. 8, l. 40-53) and pelletized. Pellets are injection molded into a mold that is maintained at 23oC which will inherently cool the composite into desired shape. With respect to claim 13, the screws of the twin screw extruder inherently create shearing effect. With respect to claim 14, protein soy protein are first extruded into pellets and dried (intermediate) then are mixed with polyester to achieve better compatibility (col. 9, l. 1-9). With respect to claim 17, articles formed from the composition of Zhang include packaging materials such as clam shell containers (single serve packaging), dishware, utensils. Allowable Subject Matter Claim 4 is objected to as being dependent upon a rejected base claim, but would be allowable if rewritten in independent form including all of the limitations of the base claim and any intervening claims. Claim 4 lists very specific milled oil seed meal which includes: milled borage meal, milled rose hip meal, milled ahi flower meal, milled evening primrose meal, milled black currant meal and mixtures thereof. Any references found discloses using oils of these seeds but not milled solid residue. Correspondence Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to KATARZYNA I KOLB whose telephone number is (571)272-1127. The examiner can normally be reached M-F. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Mark Eashoo can be reached at 5712701046. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /KATARZYNA I KOLB/Primary Examiner, Art Unit 1767 July 31, 2025
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Mar 30, 2023
Application Filed
Jul 31, 2025
Non-Final Rejection — §102
Apr 03, 2026
Response after Non-Final Action

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12590202
ACETYL CITRATE-BASED PLASTICIZER COMPOSITION AND RESIN COMPOSITION COMPRISING THE SAME
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 31, 2026
Patent 12584005
RESIN COMPOSITION FOR SLIDING MEMBER, AND SLIDING MEMBER
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 24, 2026
Patent 12583968
FLUORINE-CONTAINING ETHER COMPOUND AND PRODUCTION METHOD THEREFOR, COMPOUND AND PRODUCTION METHOD THEREFOR, FLUORINE-CONTAINING ETHER COMPOSITION, COATING LIQUID, AND ARTICLE AND PRODUCTION METHOD THEREFOR
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 24, 2026
Patent 12577370
Non-Dust Blend
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 17, 2026
Patent 12577410
RHEOLOGY CONTROL AGENTS FOR WATER-BASED RESINS AND WATER-BASED PAINT COMPOSITIONS
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 17, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

AI Strategy Recommendation

Get an AI-powered prosecution strategy using examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Powered by AI — typically takes 5-10 seconds

Prosecution Projections

1-2
Expected OA Rounds
42%
Grant Probability
51%
With Interview (+8.8%)
3y 10m
Median Time to Grant
Low
PTA Risk
Based on 181 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allow rate.

Sign in for Full Analysis

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month