Prosecution Insights
Last updated: April 19, 2026
Application No. 18/193,536

DETECTION SYSTEM FOR SWITCHING ELEMENT SATURATION

Non-Final OA §102
Filed
Mar 30, 2023
Examiner
LEE, JYE-JUNE
Art Unit
2838
Tech Center
2800 — Semiconductors & Electrical Systems
Assignee
Texas Instruments Incorporated
OA Round
1 (Non-Final)
85%
Grant Probability
Favorable
1-2
OA Rounds
2y 4m
To Grant
88%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 85% — above average
85%
Career Allow Rate
378 granted / 446 resolved
+16.8% vs TC avg
Minimal +3% lift
Without
With
+2.7%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
2y 4m
Avg Prosecution
23 currently pending
Career history
469
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
0.7%
-39.3% vs TC avg
§103
46.7%
+6.7% vs TC avg
§102
38.8%
-1.2% vs TC avg
§112
10.2%
-29.8% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 446 resolved cases

Office Action

§102
Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . This action is in response to the RCE filed on 10/23/2025. Continued Examination Under 37 CFR 1.114 A request for continued examination under 37 CFR 1.114, including the fee set forth in 37 CFR 1.17(e), was filed in this application after allowance or after an Office action under Ex Parte Quayle, 25 USPQ 74, 453 O.G. 213 (Comm'r Pat. 1935). Since this application is eligible for continued examination under 37 CFR 1.114, and the fee set forth in 37 CFR 1.17(e) has been timely paid, prosecution in this application has been reopened pursuant to 37 CFR 1.114. Applicant's submission filed on 10/23/2025 has been entered. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 102 In the event the determination of the status of the application as subject to AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103 (or as subject to pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103) is incorrect, any correction of the statutory basis for the rejection will not be considered a new ground of rejection if the prior art relied upon, and the rationale supporting the rejection, would be the same under either status. The following is a quotation of the appropriate paragraphs of 35 U.S.C. 102 that form the basis for the rejections under this section made in this Office action: A person shall be entitled to a patent unless – (a)(1) the claimed invention was patented, described in a printed publication, or in public use, on sale or otherwise available to the public before the effective filing date of the claimed invention. Claims 1-16, 21, and 22 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 102 (a)(1) as being anticipated by Cottell (US Patent Application Publication US 2014/0203843 A1). Regarding claim 1, Cottell discloses (see Fig. 2) an apparatus, comprising: a transistor device (20) coupled between a first terminal (C) and a second terminal (E); a driver circuit (comprising the two transistors connected to GD_V+, GD_V-, and G via Rg) having a power terminal (top-side terminal of the two transistors) coupled to a third terminal (terminal connected to GD_V+) and an output (output coupled to G) coupled to a control terminal of the transistor device (G of 20); and a detection circuit (200) having inputs coupled to the first terminal (input coupled to C via D1, D2) and the third terminal (coupled to GD_V+ via Q1), the detection circuit configurable to provide a signal (signal output at 220) indicative of whether the transistor device is in a particular operation condition (desaturation detection) responsive to voltages of the first and third terminals (see [0035] “The desaturation detection circuit 200 comprises a threshold setting element 202 and a detector element 206. The threshold setting element 202 has an input 208 and an output 210. The input 208 is for connection to the output of a power transistor 20 (e.g. the collector of an IGBT) via the Vce sense diodes D1 and D2. The threshold setting element 202 sets the voltage at the input 208 at which the desaturation detection circuit 200 will provide an output control signal for provision to the desaturation detection input of the IC 10 to trigger a desaturation routine. The threshold setting element 202 provides an output at the output 210 of the threshold setting element 202 when the input voltage is exceeded.”). Regarding claim 2, Cottell discloses (see Fig. 2) wherein, in operation, the third terminal has a higher voltage than the second terminal (GD_V+ has a higher voltage than voltage at E, i.e. VE, as VE is a voltage in between GD_V+ and GD_V-), and a voltage at the second terminal tracks a voltage at the first terminal when the transistor device is turned on by the driver circuit (when 20 is turned on, voltage at C tracks voltage at E ). Regarding claim 3, Cottell discloses (see Fig. 2) wherein the transistor device is a first transistor device, and the detection circuit includes a second transistor device (Q1) and a third transistor device (Q2). Regarding claim 4, Cottell discloses (see Fig. 2) wherein the detection circuit includes a resistor (R6) coupled between the third terminal and the second transistor device (R6 is coupled between GD_V+ and gate of Q1). Regarding claim 5, Cottell discloses (see Fig. 2) wherein a control terminal of the second transistor device (gate of Q1) is coupled to a control terminal of the third transistor device (gate of Q2) (gate of Q1 is coupled to gate of Q2 via R7, D5, R9, and R4). Regarding claim 6, Cottell discloses (see Fig. 2) wherein the third transistor device is coupled between the first terminal and the second transistor device (Q2 is coupled between Q1 and C via D5, R9, and R4). Regarding claim 7, Cottell discloses (see Fig. 2) wherein a control terminal of the second transistor device (gate of Q1) and a control terminal of the third transistor device (gate of Q2) are each coupled to the third terminal (gate of Q1 is coupled to GD_V+ via R6, gate of Q2 is coupled to GD_V+ via R4, R9, D5, R7, and R6). Regarding claim 8, Cottell discloses (see Fig. 2) further comprising a logic circuit (10) coupled to an output of the detection circuit (220), the logic circuit configurable to turn off the transistor device responsive to the signal (see [0052] “When the IGBT is pulled out of saturation due to a short circuit fault and into desaturation, Q1 and Q2 turn off quickly, which then allows the Desat input (pin 14) of the IC to charge to its internally set threshold trip level via R1 and a soft turn-off is then initiated by the IC.”). Regarding claim 9, Cottell discloses (see Fig. 2) an apparatus, comprising: an input voltage rail (voltage at C of 20); a bootstrapped voltage rail (GD_V+); a switch (20) coupled between the input voltage rail and a switching terminal (terminal of E of 20), the switch including a transistor device (IGBT of 20): and a detection circuit (200) having inputs coupled to the bootstrapped voltage rail and the input voltage rail (input coupled to GD_V+ via top-side of Q1, and input coupled to voltage at C of 20 via D1, D2), the detection circuit configurable to provide a signal indicative of whether the transistor device is in a particular operation mode (see [0035] “The desaturation detection circuit 200 comprises a threshold setting element 202 and a detector element 206. The threshold setting element 202 has an input 208 and an output 210. The input 208 is for connection to the output of a power transistor 20 (e.g. the collector of an IGBT) via the Vce sense diodes D1 and D2. The threshold setting element 202 sets the voltage at the input 208 at which the desaturation detection circuit 200 will provide an output control signal for provision to the desaturation detection input of the IC 10 to trigger a desaturation routine. The threshold setting element 202 provides an output at the output 210 of the threshold setting element 202 when the input voltage is exceeded.”). Regarding claim 10, Cottell discloses (see Fig. 2) wherein in operation, the bootstrapped voltage rail has a higher voltage than the input voltage rail (GD_V+ has a higher voltage than voltage at E, i.e. VE, as VE is a voltage in between GD_V+ and GD_V-). Regarding claim 11, Cottell discloses (see Fig. 2) further comprising: a driver circuit (comprising the two transistors connected to GD_V+, GD_V-, and G via Rg) having a power terminal (top-side terminal of the two transistors) coupled to the bootstrapped voltage rail and an output (output coupled to G) coupled to a control terminal of the switch (G of 20) and a capacitor coupled between the bootstrapped voltage rail and the switching terminal (see capacitor coupled between GD_V+ and terminal of E). Regarding claim 12, Cottell discloses (see Fig. 2) wherein the transistor device is a first transistor device, and the detection circuit includes a second transistor device (Q1) and a third transistor device (Q2). Regarding claim 13, Cottell discloses (see Fig. 2) wherein the detection circuit includes a resistor (R6) coupled between the bootstrapped voltage rail and the second transistor device (R6 is coupled between GD_V+ and gate of Q1). Regarding claim 14, Cottell discloses (see Fig. 2) wherein a control terminal of the second transistor device (gate of Q1) is coupled to a control terminal of the third transistor device (gate of Q2) (gate of Q1 is coupled to gate of Q2 via R7, D5, R9, and R4). Regarding claim 15, Cottell discloses (see Fig. 2) wherein the third transistor device is coupled between the input voltage rail and the second transistor device (Q2 is coupled between Q1 and C via D5, R9, and R4). Regarding claim 16, Cottell discloses (see Fig. 2) wherein a control terminal of the second transistor device (gate of Q1) and a control terminal of the third transistor device (gate of Q2) are each coupled to the bootstrapped voltage rail (gate of Q1 is coupled to GD_V+ via R6, gate of Q2 is coupled to GD_V+ via R4, R9, D5, R7, and R6). Regarding claim 21, Cottell discloses (see Fig. 2) wherein the particular operation condition is a saturation operation condition (see [0052] “When the IGBT is pulled out of saturation due to a short circuit fault and into desaturation, Q1 and Q2 turn off quickly, which then allows the Desat input (pin 14) of the IC to charge to its internally set threshold trip level via R1 and a soft turn-off is then initiated by the IC.”).. Regarding claim 22, Cottell discloses (see Fig. 2) wherein the second and third transistor devices are of opposite types (Q1 is a PNP transistor and Q2 is a PNP transistor). Allowable Subject Matter Claims 17-20 are allowed. The following is a statement of reasons for the indication of allowable subject matter: Regarding Claim 17, none of the cited prior art alone or in combination disclose or teach the claimed inventions in which “a first field effect transistor (FET) device coupled between an input voltage rail and a first voltage terminal; a second FET device having a drain terminal, a source terminal, and a gate terminal, the gate terminal coupled to a second voltage terminal; a third FET device having a drain terminal coupled to the input voltage rail, a source terminal coupled to the source terminal of the second FET device, and a gate terminal coupled to the second voltage terminal; and a fourth FET device having a gate terminal coupled to the drain terminal of the second FET device and having a source terminal coupled to the second voltage terminal.”. Conclusion The prior art made of record and not relied upon is considered pertinent to applicant's disclosure: US Patent Application Publication 2009/0153223 A1 discloses an IGBT-driver circuit for desaturated turn-off with high desaturation level. US Patent Application Publication 2014/0118874 A1 discloses a gate driver with desaturation detection. US Patent Application Publication 2018/0183228 A1 discloses a gate driver with desaturation detection. Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to JYE-JUNE LEE whose telephone number is (571)270-7726. The examiner can normally be reached on M-F 9 AM - 5 PM. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Monica Lewis can be reached on 5712721838. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of an application may be obtained from the Patent Application Information Retrieval (PAIR) system. Status information for published applications may be obtained from either Private PAIR or Public PAIR. Status information for unpublished applications is available through Private PAIR only. For more information about the PAIR system, see http://pair-direct.uspto.gov. Should you have questions on access to the Private PAIR system, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative or access to the automated information system, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /JYE-JUNE LEE/Examiner, Art Unit 2838 /JUE ZHANG/Primary Examiner, Art Unit 2838
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Mar 30, 2023
Application Filed
Oct 23, 2025
Request for Continued Examination
Oct 30, 2025
Response after Non-Final Action
Jan 07, 2026
Non-Final Rejection — §102 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12603566
REVERSE RECOVERY CHARGE REDUCTION CIRCUIT
2y 5m to grant Granted Apr 14, 2026
Patent 12597853
INPUT TRANSIENT PROTECTION AND REVERSE PROTECTION FOR INVERTERS
2y 5m to grant Granted Apr 07, 2026
Patent 12597856
SYSTEMS AND METHODS FOR POWERING DRIVER CIRCUITRY
2y 5m to grant Granted Apr 07, 2026
Patent 12597848
VOLTAGE CONTROLLER USING VOLTAGE FEEDBACK AND POWER FEED-FORWARD
2y 5m to grant Granted Apr 07, 2026
Patent 12592651
RECTIFIER CIRCUIT AND POWER SUPPLY USING SAME
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 31, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

AI Strategy Recommendation

Get an AI-powered prosecution strategy using examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Powered by AI — typically takes 5-10 seconds

Prosecution Projections

1-2
Expected OA Rounds
85%
Grant Probability
88%
With Interview (+2.7%)
2y 4m
Median Time to Grant
Low
PTA Risk
Based on 446 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allow rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month