Prosecution Insights
Last updated: May 29, 2026
Application No. 18/193,924

FOLDABLE HEATING APPARATUS

Non-Final OA §102§103
Filed
Mar 31, 2023
Examiner
NGUYEN, PHUONG T
Art Unit
3761
Tech Center
3700 — Mechanical Engineering & Manufacturing
Assignee
Rivian Ip Holdings LLC
OA Round
1 (Non-Final)
74%
Grant Probability
Favorable
1-2
OA Rounds
1m
Est. Remaining
99%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 74% — above average
74%
Career Allowance Rate
599 granted / 812 resolved
+3.8% vs TC avg
Strong +37% interview lift
Without
With
+36.7%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
3y 3m
Avg Prosecution
43 currently pending
Career history
848
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
1.5%
-38.5% vs TC avg
§103
73.9%
+33.9% vs TC avg
§102
10.0%
-30.0% vs TC avg
§112
2.2%
-37.8% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 812 resolved cases

Office Action

§102 §103
DETAILED ACTION Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Response for Election/Restrictions Applicant's election with traverse of Group I (claims 1-12) in the reply filed on 03/11/2026is acknowledged. Non-elected Group II (claims 13-18) and Group III (claims 19-20). The applicant’s argued: “…This traversal is on the grounds that the Office Action does not set forth a serious search burden amongst each Group…”. The examiner’s response: the applicant’s argument is not persuasive, because there would be a search burden. The apparatus claims 1 and 13 would require searching at least in class F24C7/083 or F24C15/103, but the method claim 19 would require searching at least class B60N3/16. Additionally, claims 1 and 13 would require searching for the claimed structure while claim 19 would require searching for the claimed steps and the respective search terms and strategies would be different for the apparatus and method. Furthermore, the apparatus as claimed in claim 1 would require searching different strategies with respect to the electric vehicle as claimed in claim 13. The requirement is still deemed proper and is therefore made FINAL. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 102 The following is a quotation of the appropriate paragraphs of 35 U.S.C. 102 that form the basis for the rejections under this section made in this Office action: A person shall be entitled to a patent unless – (a)(1) the claimed invention was patented, described in a printed publication, or in public use, on sale or otherwise available to the public before the effective filing date of the claimed invention. Claims 1-2, 8, 10, and 12 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 102(a)(1) as being anticipated by Washington et al. (US 20150173480 A1). Regarding claim 1, Washington discloses An apparatus (appliance 1, fig.1), comprising: a heating surface (second inner face 6, fig.4) configured to electrically couple with a power source (electrical cable 16, fig.4); a configurable surface (first inner face 5, fig.4); and a hinge (hinge 17, fig.4) coupled with the heating surface (second inner face 6) and the configurable surface (first inner face 5). PNG media_image1.png 393 570 media_image1.png Greyscale Regarding claim 2, Washington discloses the hinge (hinge 17, fig.4) configured to fold the heating surface (second inner face 6, fig.4) with the configurable surface (first inner face 5, fig.4). Regarding claim 8, Washington discloses the heating surface (second inner face 6, fig.4) including: a heating element (heating element 9, fig.5) configured to heat at least a portion of the heating surface (second inner face 6); an input device (temperature control, Par.0072) configured to adjust an amount of heat produced by the heating element (heating element 9); and the input device (temperature control) including an optical indicator (temperature control inherently has an indicator), the optical indicator (indicator) configured to provide an indication of a temperature of the heating surface (second inner face 6). Regarding claim 10, Washington discloses the heating surface (second inner face 6, fig.4) produces heat by at least one of induction heat, conduction heat, convection heat or radiant heat [Par.0070 cited: “…heating element 9 is a resistive heating element…”]. Regarding claim 12, Washington discloses a first configuration (appliance 1, fig.1, is opened position), wherein the heating surface (second inner face 6, fig.4) is accessible with the apparatus (appliance 1, fig.1) in the first configuration (opened position); and a second configuration (appliance 1, fig.1, is closed position), wherein the apparatus (appliance 1, fig.1) is placed in the second configuration (closed position) responsive to the hinge (hinge 17, fig.4) folding the heating surface (second inner face 6) with the configurable surface (first inner face 5); and the apparatus (appliance 1) configured to stow in a vehicle with the apparatus (appliance 1) in the second configuration (closed position) [appliance 1, fig.1, can be stowed in the vehicle]. Claims 1-9 and 12 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 102(a)(1) as being anticipated by Roise et al. (US 11648880 B1). Regarding claim 1, Roise discloses An apparatus (grill 101, fig.4), comprising: a heating surface (grate 170, fig.8) configured to electrically couple with a power source [Col.1, lines 52-55 cited: “…system includes a battery pack for electrically powering the cooking device and/or receiving power from the vehicle electrical system…”]; a configurable surface (bottom surface of cover 120, fig.8); and a hinge (hinge brackets 157a, 157b, 157c, fig.8) coupled with the heating surface (grate 170) and the configurable surface (bottom surface of cover 120). Regarding claim 2, Roise discloses the hinge (hinge brackets 157a, 157b, 157c, fig.8) configured to fold the heating surface (grate 170, fig.8) with the configurable surface (bottom surface of cover 120, fig.8). PNG media_image2.png 502 507 media_image2.png Greyscale Regarding claim 3, Roise discloses the power source including a battery (battery of pickup truck, fig.3) of an electric vehicle (pickup truck, fig.3); a cooking module (housing of grill 101, fig.8) configured to couple with the electric vehicle (pickup truck) and the cooking module (housing of grill 101) configured to decouple from the electric vehicle (pickup truck), and the cooking module (housing of grill 101) configured to electrically couple with the battery (battery of pickup truck) of the electric vehicle (pickup truck) and the cooking module (housing of grill 101) configured to electrically decouple from the battery (battery of pickup truck) of the electric vehicle (pickup truck); the cooking module (housing of grill 101) configured to house at least one of the heating surface (grate 170, fig.8) or the configurable surface (bottom surface of cover 120, fig.8); and the heating surface (grate 170) configured to operate with the cooking module (housing of grill 101) decoupled from the electric vehicle (pickup truck). Regarding claim 4, Roise discloses a handle (handle 121, fig.8), coupled with the heating surface (grate 170, fig.8) [handle 121, fig.8, indirectly coupled to the grate 170], the handle (handle 121) configured to adjust from a stowed position disposed within the heating surface (grate 170, fig.8) to a deployed position disposed external to the heating surface (grate 170); and the handle (handle 121) configured to hold an object. Regarding claim 5, Roise discloses a supporting module (support flange 116, fig.8) configured to rest on a door of an electric vehicle (intended use); and the supporting module (support flange 116) configured to support at least a portion of the apparatus (barbeque grill 101, fig.8). Regarding claim 6, Roise discloses a latch configured to couple the heating surface (grate 170, fig.8) with the configurable surface (bottom surface of cover 120, fig.8) responsive to the hinge (hinge brackets 157a, 157b, 157c, fig.8) folding the heating surface (grate 170) with the configurable surface (bottom surface of cover 120). Regarding claim 7, Roise discloses a compartment (grill body 140, fig.9) configured to store a component (burners 180, 181, 182, fig.9); and the compartment including a railing (hinge bar 156, fig.9), the railing (hinge bar 156) configured to adjust the compartment (grill body 140) from a first position (closed position) to a second position (opened position), wherein the compartment (grill body 140) is disposed beneath the configurable surface (bottom surface of cover 120, fig.8) with the compartment (grill body 140) in the first position (closed position) and wherein at least a portion of the compartment (grill body 140) extends beyond the configurable surface (bottom surface of cover 120) with the compartment (grill body 140) in the second position (opened position); wherein the component (burners 180, 181, 182) is accessible with the compartment (grill body 140) in the second position (opened position). Regarding claim 8, Roise discloses the heating surface (grate 170, fig.8) including: a heating element (burners 180, 181, 182, fig.9) configured to heat at least a portion of the heating surface (grate 170); an input device (burner controls 151, 152, 153, fig.5) configured to adjust an amount of heat produced by the heating element (burners 180, 181, 182); and the input device (burner controls 151, 152, 153) including an optical indicator [burner controls 151, 152, 153, has indicators, fig.5], the optical indicator (indicators) configured to provide an indication of a temperature of the heating surface (grate 170). Regarding claim 9, Roise discloses a hook (docking plate 110, fig.5), the hook (docking plate 110) configured to couple the apparatus (barbeque grill 101, fig.8) with an electric vehicle responsive to the hook (docking plate 110) engaging with a latch of the electric vehicle (intended use); and the latch disposed within a door of the electric vehicle (intended use). Regarding claim 12, Roise discloses a first configuration (barbeque grill 101, fig.8, opened position), wherein the heating surface (grate 170, fig.8) is accessible with the apparatus (barbeque grill 101) in the first configuration (opened position); and a second configuration (barbeque grill 101, fig.8, closed position), wherein the apparatus (barbeque grill 101) is placed in the second configuration (closed position) responsive to the hinge (hinge brackets 157a, 157b, 157c, fig.8) folding the heating surface (grate 170) with the configurable surface (bottom surface of cover 120); and the apparatus (barbeque grill 101) configured to stow in a vehicle with the apparatus (barbeque grill 101) in the second configuration (closed position). Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 103 The following is a quotation of AIA 35 U.S.C. 103 which forms the basis for all obviousness rejections set forth in this Office action: A patent may not be obtained though the invention is not identically disclosed or described as set forth in section 102 of this title, if the differences between the subject matter sought to be patented and the prior art are such that the subject matter as a whole would have been obvious at the time the invention was made to a person having ordinary skill in the art to which said subject matter pertains. Patentability shall not be negatived by the manner in which the invention was made. The factual inquiries set forth in Graham v. John Deere Co., 383 U.S. 1, 148 USPQ 459 (1966), that are applied for establishing a background for determining obviousness under 35 U.S.C. 103 are summarized as follows: 1. Determining the scope and contents of the prior art. 2. Ascertaining the differences between the prior art and the claims at issue. 3. Resolving the level of ordinary skill in the pertinent art. 4. Considering objective evidence present in the application indicating obviousness or nonobviousness. This application currently names joint inventors. In considering patentability of the claims the examiner presumes that the subject matter of the various claims was commonly owned as of the effective filing date of the claimed invention(s) absent any evidence to the contrary. Applicant is advised of the obligation under 37 CFR 1.56 to point out the inventor and effective filing dates of each claim that was not commonly owned as of the effective filing date of the later invention in order for the examiner to consider the applicability of 35 U.S.C. 102(b)(2)(C) for any potential 35 U.S.C. 102(a)(2) prior art against the later invention. Claims 10-11 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over Roise et al. (US 11648880 B1) in view of Jung et al. (US 20210068582 A1). Regarding claim 10, Roise discloses substantially all the features as set forth above but does not disclose the heating surface produces heat by at least one of induction heat, conduction heat, convection heat or radiant heat. Jung discloses an apparatus (cooking device 100, fig.1) comprising: heating surface (heating surface of cooker 150, fig.2) produces heat by at least one of induction heat, conduction heat, convection heat or radiant heat [Par.0067 cited: “…cooker 150 may be a heating device for baking a food material, a steamer used in the cooking process of the food material, or the like…”]. It would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art at before the effective filling date of the invention to replace burners of Roise, by including induction heat, conduction heat, convection heat or radiant heat, as taught by Jung, in order to provide an automatic electrical heating. PNG media_image3.png 358 501 media_image3.png Greyscale Regarding claim 11, Roise discloses substantially all the features as set forth above but does not disclose a data processing system, the data processing system comprising at least one processor, coupled with memory. Jung discloses an apparatus (cooking device 100, fig.1) comprising: a data processing system (processor 130, memory 140, fig.2), the data processing system (processor 130, memory 140), comprising at least one processor (processor 130), coupled with memory (memory 140). It would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art at before the effective filling date of the invention to modify an apparatus of Roise, by including a data processing system, the data processing system comprising at least one processor, coupled with memory, as taught by Jung, in order detect, via a graphical user interface, an indication to adjust a temperature of the heating surface; and adjust, responsive to the indication, the temperature of the heating surface Conclusion Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to PHUONG T NGUYEN whose telephone number is (571)270-1834. The examiner can normally be reached 9.00am-5.00pm. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Steven Crabb can be reached on 571-270-5095. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /PHUONG T NGUYEN/Primary Examiner, Art Unit 3761 04/05/2026
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Mar 31, 2023
Application Filed
Apr 13, 2026
Non-Final Rejection mailed — §102, §103
May 12, 2026
Interview Requested

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12635825
FOOD PROCESSOR INCLUDING POTATO PEELING DISC SYSTEM AND METHOD
3y 11m to grant Granted May 26, 2026
Patent 12641685
APPARATUS FOR A RESONANCE CIRCUIT
2y 9m to grant Granted May 26, 2026
Patent 12628977
BEVERAGE MACHINE USER INTERFACE
4y 2m to grant Granted May 19, 2026
Patent 12628262
ELECTRODE ARRANGEMENT
3y 4m to grant Granted May 12, 2026
Patent 12628600
BATCH PROCESSING APPARATUS, SYSTEMS, AND RELATED METHODS AND STRUCTURES FOR EPITAXIAL DEPOSITION OPERATIONS
3y 5m to grant Granted May 12, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

Strategy Recommendation AI-generated — please review before filing

Get a prosecution strategy drawn from examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Typically takes 5-10 seconds — AI-generated, attorney review required before filing

Prosecution Projections

1-2
Expected OA Rounds
74%
Grant Probability
99%
With Interview (+36.7%)
3y 3m (~1m remaining)
Median Time to Grant
Low
PTA Risk
Based on 812 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allowance rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month