Prosecution Insights
Last updated: April 17, 2026
Application No. 18/195,775

SYSTEMS AND METHODS FOR SHARING VIDEO DATA VIA SOCIAL MEDIA

Non-Final OA §103
Filed
May 10, 2023
Examiner
LANGHNOJA, KUNAL N
Art Unit
2425
Tech Center
2400 — Computer Networks
Assignee
unknown
OA Round
4 (Non-Final)
43%
Grant Probability
Moderate
4-5
OA Rounds
3y 2m
To Grant
68%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 43% of resolved cases
43%
Career Allow Rate
171 granted / 394 resolved
-14.6% vs TC avg
Strong +24% interview lift
Without
With
+24.2%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
3y 2m
Avg Prosecution
20 currently pending
Career history
414
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
6.5%
-33.5% vs TC avg
§103
52.1%
+12.1% vs TC avg
§102
15.5%
-24.5% vs TC avg
§112
16.6%
-23.4% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 394 resolved cases

Office Action

§103
DETAILED ACTION Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Continued Examination Under 37 CFR 1.114 A request for continued examination under 37 CFR 1.114, including the fee set forth in 37 CFR 1.17(e), was filed in this application after final rejection. Since this application is eligible for continued examination under 37 CFR 1.114, and the fee set forth in 37 CFR 1.17(e) has been timely paid, the finality of the previous Office action has been withdrawn pursuant to 37 CFR 1.114. Applicant's submission filed on 01/02/2026 has been entered. Response to Arguments Applicant’s arguments with respect to claim(s) have been considered but are moot because the new ground of rejection does not rely on any reference applied in the prior rejection of record for any teaching or matter specifically challenged in the argument. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 103 The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 103 which forms the basis for all obviousness rejections set forth in this Office action: A patent for a claimed invention may not be obtained, notwithstanding that the claimed invention is not identically disclosed as set forth in section 102, if the differences between the claimed invention and the prior art are such that the claimed invention as a whole would have been obvious before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to a person having ordinary skill in the art to which the claimed invention pertains. Patentability shall not be negated by the manner in which the invention was made. Claim(s) 1, 3-7 and 14 is/are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over Dickenson et al (US PG Pub No. 2015/0347827), in view of Bonhomme et al (US PG Pub No. 2014/0363141). Regarding claim 1, Dickenson et al teaches a system for sharing video images via social media (Abstract), the system comprising: (a) a first electronic device (i.e. servers in cloud system 1604) that identifies an image on display screen that is located at a live venue [104, 1602] (i.e. some or complete image processing), wherein the first electronic device linked to the display screen and configured to communicate with a third electronic device (server(s) in cloud system 1604 configured to communicate with 1602, 1607 and/or 102) (Figure 16; Para. 0153); (b) the first electronic device captures an image on the display screen to form a captured image while the display screen provides the captured image with a unique identifier (i.e. the images can be labeled and/or assigned to a specific grid by the cloud system 1604 upon uploading the images to the cloud system 1604) (Figure 16; Para. 0153); (c) the third electronic device communicates with the first electronic device by downloading and installing an application, wherein the third electronic device is a peripheral device (Figures 16 and 27; Para. 0153); (d) creating, with the third electronic device, a user account via the application by providing information comprising a name, email address, password, date of birth, address, nationality or any combination thereof and at least one of a sports teams, entertainment events other than sports, desired venues, merchandise types typically purchased, whether the user ever uses coupons and what kind if answered yes, whether the system can forward coupons to the user, whether the system can forward targeted emails to the user, whether the system can forward advertisements to the user, and/or user billing information (Figure 27; Para. 0113, 0132, 0164, 0167); (e) the first electronic device communicates the captured image with the unique identifier to the third electronic device (a specific image or images associated with the user’s location (e.g., photo position) can be distributed to the user based on the specific gridded processed image 1605 to be provided on the user’s requesting device, e.g., user mobile device 102 or user computer device 1607) (Figure 16; Para. 0153); and (f) the third electronic device is configured to selectively share the captured image of step (e) via social media (Figure 30). The reference is unclear with respect to a processor in a first electronic device and the first electronic device includes a transmitting device and an oversized display screen. In similar field of endeavor, Bonhomme et al teaches a processor in a first electronic device and the first electronic device includes a transmitting device(Figure 1B-C) and an oversized display screen (Figure 8; Para. 0157). Therefore, it would’ve been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art to modify the reference before the effectively filing date of the claimed invention for the common knowledge purpose of allowing device to capture information and communicate with other devices to easily share desired information. Claim 3 is rejected wherein additional digital content is added to the captured video image of (b) or (e) (Dickinson: Figure 30). Regarding claim 4, Dickinson and Bonhomme, the combination teaches limitations of claim 3. The combination is unclear with the respect to the additional digital content is at least one advertisement embedded within the captured image provided by a licensed third party vendor. However, the examiner takes official notice that both concepts and advantages are well known and expected in the art. It would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art to modify the combination by the additional digital content is at least one advertisement embedded within the captured image provided by a licensed third party vendor before the effectively filing date of the claimed invention for the common knowledge purpose of incorporating data that can be adjusted according to the users data, the event the image was taken at, the moment the image was of and the time the image was shared to provide most relevant information by advertisers. Regarding claim 5, Dickinson et al teaches wherein additional digital content is added in real time to the captured video image of (b) or (e) (Para. 0184). Claim 6 is rejected wherein the third electronic device is a smartphone (Dickinson: Figure 16). Regarding claim 7, Dickinson and Bonhomme, the combination limitations discussed with respect to claim 6. The combination is unclear with respect to wherein the system determines geolocation of the third electronic device relative to the transmitting device of the first electronic device by a global positioning system in operable communication with the first and third electronic devices, and selectively determines the advertisement to be embedded based on geolocation of the third electronic device. However, the examiner takes official notice that both concepts and advantages are well known and expected in the art. It would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art to modify the combination by the system that determines geolocation of the third electronic device relative to the transmitting device of the first electronic device by a global positioning system in operable communication with the first and third electronic devices, and selectively determines the advertisement to be embedded based on geolocation of the third electronic device before the effectively filing date of the claimed invention for the common knowledge purpose of incorporating data that can be adjusted according to the users data, the event the image was taken at, the moment the image was of and the time the image was shared to provide most relevant information. Claim 14 corresponds to claim 1. Claim(s) 2 is/are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over Dickerson et al, in view of Bonhomme et al, further in view of Lau et al (US PG Pub No. 2014/0282001). Regarding claim 2, Dickenson and Bonhomme, the combination teaches limitations of claim 1 including and the oversized display screen, as discussed above. The combination is unclear with respect to wherein the third electronic device shares the captured image of (e) with a fourth electronic device that shares the image via social media in real time, at a later date, or a combination thereof, wherein the fourth electronic device is different than the first and third electronic devices. In similar field of endeavor, Lau discloses wherein the third electronic device shares the captured image of (e) with a fourth electronic device that shares the image via social media in real time, at a later date, or a combination thereof, wherein the fourth electronic device is different than the first, second, and third electronic devices (par. [45], using either email or messaging the user may send the clip to a different user, the other user is free to share the clip using the social media). Therefore, it would’ve been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art to modify the combination before the effectively filing date of the claimed invention for the common knowledge purpose of easily allowing friends and/or family to share content of their experience with each other. Conclusion Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to KUNAL LANGHNOJA whose telephone number is (571)270-3583. The examiner can normally be reached M-F: 9:00AM - 5:00PM ET. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Brian Pendleton can be reached at (571) 272-7527. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /KUNAL LANGHNOJA/Primary Examiner, Art Unit 2425
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

May 10, 2023
Application Filed
Dec 28, 2023
Non-Final Rejection — §103
Jul 03, 2024
Response Filed
Oct 23, 2024
Non-Final Rejection — §103
Apr 27, 2025
Response Filed
Jun 27, 2025
Final Rejection — §103
Jan 02, 2026
Request for Continued Examination
Jan 06, 2026
Response after Non-Final Action
Jan 08, 2026
Non-Final Rejection — §103 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12604063
SYSTEMS AND METHODS FOR CUSTOMIZING A MEDIA PROFILE PAGE
2y 5m to grant Granted Apr 14, 2026
Patent 12593086
SERVER, INFORMATION PROCESSING SYSTEM, STORAGE MEDIUM, AND TRANSMISSION METHOD
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 31, 2026
Patent 12587696
PROCESSING A VIDEO SUBMISSION PACKAGE FOR GOING LIVE ON A MEDIA PLATFORM
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 24, 2026
Patent 12568263
DYNAMIC SCHEDULING AND CHANNEL CREATION BASED ON EXTERNAL DATA
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 03, 2026
Patent 12556775
DISPLAY APPARATUS
2y 5m to grant Granted Feb 17, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

AI Strategy Recommendation

Get an AI-powered prosecution strategy using examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Powered by AI — typically takes 5-10 seconds

Prosecution Projections

4-5
Expected OA Rounds
43%
Grant Probability
68%
With Interview (+24.2%)
3y 2m
Median Time to Grant
High
PTA Risk
Based on 394 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allow rate.

Sign in for Full Analysis

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month