Prosecution Insights
Last updated: July 17, 2026
Application No. 18/196,068

CONTROL FLOW ANALYSIS OF A MICROSERVICE-BASED APPLICATION USING A COMMON CPU HARDWARE TELEMETRY FORMAT

Non-Final OA §112
Filed
May 11, 2023
Examiner
MACASIANO, JOANNE GONZALES
Art Unit
2197
Tech Center
2100 — Computer Architecture & Software
Assignee
Cisco Technology Inc.
OA Round
3 (Non-Final)
67%
Grant Probability
Favorable
3-4
OA Rounds
4m
Est. Remaining
99%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 67% — above average
67%
Career Allowance Rate
208 granted / 311 resolved
+11.9% vs TC avg
Strong +42% interview lift
Without
With
+41.5%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
3y 6m
Avg Prosecution
26 currently pending
Career history
347
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
2.2%
-37.8% vs TC avg
§103
83.7%
+43.7% vs TC avg
§102
12.1%
-27.9% vs TC avg
§112
1.8%
-38.2% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 311 resolved cases

Office Action

§112
DETAILED ACTION Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Continued Examination Under 37 CFR 1.114 A request for continued examination under 37 CFR 1.114, including the fee set forth in 37 CFR 1.17(e), was filed in this application after final rejection. Since this application is eligible for continued examination under 37 CFR 1.114, and the fee set forth in 37 CFR 1.17(e) has been timely paid, the finality of the previous Office action has been withdrawn pursuant to 37 CFR 1.114. Applicant's submission filed on April 13, 2026 has been entered. Response to Amendment With respect to Applicant’s amendment of Claims 1, 11 and 20 with regards to 35 U.S.C. 101, the claim rejections with respect to the same have been withdrawn. With respect to Applicant’s amendment of Claims 1, 11 and 20 with regards to 35 U.S.C. 103, the claim rejections with respect to the same have been withdrawn. Claim Objections Claims 1-20 are objected to because of the following informalities: Claims 1, 11 and 20 recite on Lines 3, 9 and 6, respectively: “CPUs” which the Office believes should be “central processing units (CPUs)”. Claims 2-10 and 12-19 are also objected to since they depend from objected Claims 1 and 11 respectively, and as such inherit the same deficiencies. Appropriate correction is required. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 112 The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 112(b): (b) CONCLUSION.—The specification shall conclude with one or more claims particularly pointing out and distinctly claiming the subject matter which the inventor or a joint inventor regards as the invention. The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 112 (pre-AIA ), second paragraph: The specification shall conclude with one or more claims particularly pointing out and distinctly claiming the subject matter which the applicant regards as his invention. Claims 14 and 17 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 112(b) or 35 U.S.C. 112 (pre-AIA ), second paragraph, as being indefinite for failing to particularly point out and distinctly claim the subject matter which the inventor or a joint inventor (or for applications subject to pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 112, the applicant), regards as the invention. Claims 14 and 17 recites the limitation "the processor hardware" in Lines 1 and 2, respectively. There is insufficient antecedent basis for this limitation in the claim. The Office notes that “processor hardware” was previously recited in Independent Claim 11, although it was removed in the most recent amendment. Conclusion The prior art made of record and not relied upon is considered pertinent to applicant's disclosure is as follows: Ohkawa et al. (US PGPUB 2024/0069941) discloses an information processing apparatus including a control plane and a processing function performing a microservice, wherein communications are sent regarding the start and end of processing of a microservice. Millet et al. (US PGUB 2013/0042155) discloses a system and method for writing trace data to storage, wherein trace data is captured from processors and written to a trace buffer and further wherein the trace data includes instruction metrics. Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to Joanne G. Macasiano whose telephone number is (571)270-7749. The examiner can normally be reached Monday to Thursday, 10:30 AM to 6:00 PM Eastern Standard Time. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Bradley Teets can be reached at (571) 272-3338. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /JOANNE G MACASIANO/Examiner, Art Unit 2197
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Show 5 earlier events
Oct 07, 2025
Applicant Interview (Telephonic)
Oct 14, 2025
Response Filed
Jan 13, 2026
Final Rejection mailed — §112
Apr 13, 2026
Request for Continued Examination
Apr 18, 2026
Response after Non-Final Action
Apr 22, 2026
Examiner Interview Summary
Apr 22, 2026
Applicant Interview (Telephonic)
Jun 17, 2026
Non-Final Rejection mailed — §112 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12657119
SELF-CONTAINED MOBILE APPLICATION PROCESSING AND INTEGRATION
3y 9m to grant Granted Jun 16, 2026
Patent 12657076
SYSTEM AND METHOD FOR PROCESSING DATA OF ANY EXTERNAL SERVICES THROUGH API CONTROLLED UNIVERSAL COMPUTING ELEMENTS
2y 2m to grant Granted Jun 16, 2026
Patent 12650682
INDUSTRIAL AUTOMATION PROJECT DESIGN TELEMETRY
4y 8m to grant Granted Jun 09, 2026
Patent 12639193
SYSTEMS AND METHODS FOR RETRIEVAL-AUGMENTED PATCH GENERATION FOR AUTOMATIC PROGRAM REPAIR
3y 9m to grant Granted May 26, 2026
Patent 12613689
ELECTRONIC CONTROL DEVICE, REPROGRAM EXECUTION METHOD, AND NON-TRANSITORY COMPUTER READABLE STORAGE MEDIUM
3y 0m to grant Granted Apr 28, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

Strategy Recommendation AI-generated — please review before filing

Get a prosecution strategy drawn from examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Typically takes 5-10 seconds — AI-generated, attorney review required before filing

Prosecution Projections

3-4
Expected OA Rounds
67%
Grant Probability
99%
With Interview (+41.5%)
3y 6m (~4m remaining)
Median Time to Grant
High
PTA Risk
Based on 311 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allowance rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month