Prosecution Insights
Last updated: July 17, 2026
Application No. 18/196,262

TUBE SECUREMENT DEVICE AND METHODS

Non-Final OA §102
Filed
May 11, 2023
Priority
May 11, 2022 — provisional 63/340,905 +1 more
Examiner
RITCHIE, HADEN MATTHEW
Art Unit
3783
Tech Center
3700 — Mechanical Engineering & Manufacturing
Assignee
Board of Regents of the University of Texas System
OA Round
1 (Non-Final)
73%
Grant Probability
Favorable
1-2
OA Rounds
5m
Est. Remaining
99%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 73% — above average
73%
Career Allowance Rate
45 granted / 62 resolved
+2.6% vs TC avg
Strong +35% interview lift
Without
With
+34.6%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
3y 7m
Avg Prosecution
22 currently pending
Career history
98
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§103
76.7%
+36.7% vs TC avg
§102
19.9%
-20.1% vs TC avg
§112
3.0%
-37.0% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 62 resolved cases

Office Action

§102
DETAILED ACTION Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Election/Restrictions Claims 10-20 withdrawn from further consideration pursuant to 37 CFR 1.142(b) as being drawn to a nonelected invention, there being no allowable generic or linking claim. Election was made without traverse in the reply filed on 27 May 2026. Applicant’s election of Group I: claims 1-9 in the reply filed on 27 May 2026 is acknowledged. Because applicant did not distinctly and specifically point out the supposed errors in the restriction requirement, the election has been treated as an election without traverse (MPEP § 818.01(a)). Claim Objections Claim 7 objected to because of the following informalities: “;” following “further comprising”. Appropriate correction is required. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 102 The following is a quotation of the appropriate paragraphs of 35 U.S.C. 102 that form the basis for the rejections under this section made in this Office action: A person shall be entitled to a patent unless – (a)(1) the claimed invention was patented, described in a printed publication, or in public use, on sale, or otherwise available to the public before the effective filing date of the claimed invention. Claim(s) 1-9 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 102(a)(1) as being anticipated by Hawkins et al. (US 2022/0117626). Regarding claim 1, Hawkins discloses a device (Fig. 1, 100) operable to secure a surgical tube to a patient (Fig. 1, Abstract), the device comprising: at least one of a first portion (Fig. 2, 200) or a second portion (Fig. 2, 202) having: an opening at a first end (Fig. 2 101), the opening operable to receive the surgical tube and friction-grip the surgical tube (Fig. 3, where 10 is inserted within 101 and is friction gripped by 206), and one or more slits (Fig. 8, 225) formed into a side of at least one of the first portion (Fig. 8, where the first portion grooves are on the side of the part); and an adhesive disposed on a bottom surface (Fig. 1, 102) at a second end of at least one of the first portion (¶[0066], where pad 102 is a bottom surface that includes an adhesive and is below the part 200), the adhesive operable to adhere the bottom surface to skin of the patient substantially surrounding a tube insertion area of the surgical tube into the patient (¶[0066], Fig. 1, where the adhesive adheres to the skin of a patient and the adhesive is designed to encompass the rest of the device and surround the tube insertion portion). Regarding claim 2, Hawkins discloses the device of claim 1, wherein, at least one of the first portion or the second portion are formed of a malleable material (¶[0083], where the polymer or other flexible material can be malleable to create the desired shape). Regarding claim 3, Hawkins discloses the device of claim 1, wherein, the first portion (Fig. 2, 200) is a bottom piece (Fig. 2, where 200 is on the bottom part of the construction and has adhesive 102 below) of the device, and the second portion (Fig. 2, 202) is a top piece of the device that mates with the bottom piece (Fig. 2, where 202 is located above 200 and mates with part 200 when assembled). Regarding claim 4, Hawkins discloses the device of claim 3, further comprising: a first slit (Fig. 8, 225) disposed on the bottom piece (200) and a second slit (Fig. 15, 504) disposed on the top piece (202) configured to align in a different direction than the first slit when the top piece mates with the bottom piece (where 225 and 504 are two different slits that alight with each other in a screw type fashion to how the top and bottom pieces together). Regarding claim 5, Hawkins discloses the device of claim 4, wherein, the first slit is directed 180 or 90 relative to the second slit (Fig. 14 & 15, where the second slit is 180° relative to the first slit as they face opposite directions to create a fit with each other, ¶[0087]). Regarding claim 6, Hawkins discloses the device of claim 1, further including, one or more curved portions (Fig. 15, 320 & 506) include a first curved portion directed concavely (Fig. 15, 320) toward an interior of a base flange (Fig. 11, 204) and forming a transition between a sidewall of the base flange (Fig. 15, where the flange transitions into a curved portion) and a second curved (Fig. 15, 506) portion of the base flange, and one or more surface protrusions (Fig. 16, 514) including an elongated protrusion at the second curved portion (Fig. 17, where 514 protrudes above the curved portion 506). Regarding claim 7, Hawkins discloses the device of claim 1, further comprising; one or more protrusions (Fig. 17, 502) extending from the second portion (202) configured to mate with a side of the first portion (Fig. 15, where 502 mates with portions on 200 to secure the first and second portion together, ¶[0087]). Regarding claim 8, Hawkins discloses the device of claim 1, further including an opening neck (Fig. 14, 206) extending from a planar surface of the second portion (Fig. 14, where 206 is an interior portion that 202 encompasses and 206 extends upwards from the plane 202). Regarding claim 9, Hawkins discloses the device of claim 1, wherein, the device has an upper portion (Fig. 11, 204) including a first opening (Fig. 11, 316), and a lower portion (Fig. 8, 220) including a second opening (Fig. 8, 216), and the first opening is narrower than at least a portion of the second opening (Fig. 8 & 11, where 216 is a wider opening than 316 and 316 is above 216). Conclusion Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to HADEN M RITCHIE whose telephone number is (703)756-1699. The examiner can normally be reached M-F 8am-5:30pm. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Bhisma Mehta can be reached at 571-272-3383. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /HADEN MATTHEW RITCHIE/Examiner, Art Unit 3783 /BHISMA MEHTA/Supervisory Patent Examiner, Art Unit 3783
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

May 11, 2023
Application Filed
Jul 06, 2026
Non-Final Rejection mailed — §102 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12667674
INJECTION SITE DETERMINATION SYSTEMS AND METHODS FOR INJECTION SITE TRACKING AND RECOMMENDING INJECTION SITES
4y 9m to grant Granted Jun 30, 2026
Patent 12661454
AGENT DELIVERY DEVICES AND RELATED METHODS
4y 9m to grant Granted Jun 23, 2026
Patent 12661456
CAP FOR A MEDICAMENT DELIVERY DEVICE
4y 1m to grant Granted Jun 23, 2026
Patent 12605512
DRUG DELIVERY DEVICE
4y 0m to grant Granted Apr 21, 2026
Patent 12562268
LOCATION-BASED RECONFIGURATION OF INFUSION PUMP SETTINGS
4y 8m to grant Granted Feb 24, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

Strategy Recommendation AI-generated — please review before filing

Get a prosecution strategy drawn from examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Typically takes 5-10 seconds — AI-generated, attorney review required before filing

Prosecution Projections

1-2
Expected OA Rounds
73%
Grant Probability
99%
With Interview (+34.6%)
3y 7m (~5m remaining)
Median Time to Grant
Low
PTA Risk
Based on 62 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allowance rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month