Office Action Predictor
Last updated: April 15, 2026
Application No. 18/196,265

METHOD AND APPARATUS FOR DOOR FRAME INSTALLATION

Non-Final OA §102§103
Filed
May 11, 2023
Examiner
GLESSNER, BRIAN E
Art Unit
3633
Tech Center
3600 — Transportation & Electronic Commerce
Assignee
Kmh Industries INC.
OA Round
1 (Non-Final)
32%
Grant Probability
At Risk
1-2
OA Rounds
3y 1m
To Grant
46%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants only 32% of cases
32%
Career Allow Rate
43 granted / 136 resolved
-20.4% vs TC avg
Moderate +14% lift
Without
With
+14.1%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
3y 1m
Avg Prosecution
42 currently pending
Career history
178
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
0.1%
-39.9% vs TC avg
§103
46.3%
+6.3% vs TC avg
§102
21.3%
-18.7% vs TC avg
§112
23.9%
-16.1% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 136 resolved cases

Office Action

§102 §103
DETAILED ACTION Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 102 The following is a quotation of the appropriate paragraphs of 35 U.S.C. 102 that form the basis for the rejections under this section made in this Office action: A person shall be entitled to a patent unless – (a)(1) the claimed invention was patented, described in a printed publication, or in public use, on sale, or otherwise available to the public before the effective filing date of the claimed invention. Claim(s) 1, 4-5 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 102(a)(1) as being anticipated by DiMascio et al. (US Patent No. 4,014,146). For claim 1, DiMascio et al. a door framing assembly (fig. 9) for installation to a rough door opening in a wall, comprising: a plurality of trim pieces (82) for overlying said wall to conceal edges of said rough opening; a frame comprising: a plurality of brackets (83) positioned along an axis of said trim pieces and holding said trim pieces in opposed, spaced apart relationship defining a pocket for reception of a jamb, said each of said brackets having a hole (hole that receives 22) sized for receiving a shaft of a fastener; flanges (54, 55) received in corresponding slots of said trim pieces, such that each of said trim pieces is retained to said frame and pivotable around said flanges toward said wall. For claim 4, DiMascio et al. discloses that the flanges are slidable in the slots along a length of the trim pieces (fig. 9). For claim 5, DiMascio et al. discloses a jamb (16) sized for an interference fit in said pocket between said trim pieces, such that said jamb urges said trim pieces to pivot toward said wall. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 103 The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 103 which forms the basis for all obviousness rejections set forth in this Office action: A patent for a claimed invention may not be obtained, notwithstanding that the claimed invention is not identically disclosed as set forth in section 102, if the differences between the claimed invention and the prior art are such that the claimed invention as a whole would have been obvious before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to a person having ordinary skill in the art to which the claimed invention pertains. Patentability shall not be negated by the manner in which the invention was made. Claim(s) 2-3, 15-17 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over DiMascio et al. (US Patent No. 4,014,146) in view of Barker (US Patent No. 4,993,764). For claim 2, DiMascio et al. does not disclose that the frame further comprises a pair of axially extending posts, and said flanges are part of the posts. Barker discloses the obviousness of making the frame (fig. 1, 10) of a door framing assembly axially extending. It would have been obvious to one having ordinary skill in the art before the effective filing date of the application to make the frame of DiMascio et al. comprise a pair of axially extending posts as made obvious by Barker to increase the strength of the attachment between the trim pieces and the jamb. For claim 3, the combination discloses that the posts will extend along a length of the trim pieces (Barker fig. 1, 10). For claim 15, the combination discloses the obviousness of providing a header section and a jamb section (Barker fig. 3, 56, 58, also inherent) and it would be obvious to one having ordinary skill in the art to add a frame to both the header and the jamb section. For claim 16, it would be obvious to add a trim piece with a slot to the header section of the combination to receive a frame of the jamb section since this is well known practice to provide a complete door opening that is trimmed. For claim 17, the combination discloses that each bracket comprises a plurality of horizontally-offset holes (fig. 4, holes present in bracket) ‘for receiving a plurality of fasteners, wherein said plurality of fasteners can be driven into or retracted from said wall to square said brackets’ (intended use recitation treated in accordance with MPEP 2114). Claim(s) 6 is rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over DiMascio et al. (US Patent No. 4,014,146). For claim 6, DiMascio et al. discloses the obviousness of tapering some elements of the door frame (col. 1 lines 49-50) and it would be obvious to one having ordinary skill in the art to taper the jamb for ease of assembly. Allowable Subject Matter Claims 7-14 are objected to as being dependent upon a rejected base claim, but would be allowable if rewritten in independent form including all of the limitations of the base claim and any intervening claims. The following is a statement of reasons for the indication of allowable subject matter: The prior art of record neither anticipates or makes obvious a door framing assembly having all the limitations set forth in claim 1 and further requiring a retainer selectively deployable to cover said hole to hold a head of a fastener captive between a bracket and a retainer such that said bracket can be pulled toward an edge of said rough opening by driving said fastener into said wall or pulled away from an edge of said rough opening by retracting said fastener from said wall, to level said door assembly. Conclusion Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to JOSHUA K IHEZIE whose telephone number is (571)270-5347. The examiner can normally be reached M-F 9-5pm. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Brian Glessner can be reached at 571-272-6754. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /JOSHUA K IHEZIE/Primary Examiner, Art Unit 3633
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

May 11, 2023
Application Filed
Sep 20, 2025
Non-Final Rejection — §102, §103
Mar 24, 2026
Response Filed

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12601169
MID-WALL VENT AND SYSTEMS INCORPORATING THE SAME
2y 5m to grant Granted Apr 14, 2026
Patent 12569076
FOLDABLE STRUCTURE FOR CHILD PLAY AREA
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 10, 2026
Patent 12571174
DEVICE AND METHOD FOR USE IN REPAIRING CABLE HIGHWAY GUARDRAILS
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 10, 2026
Patent 12522475
Construction Elevator Device
2y 5m to grant Granted Jan 13, 2026
Patent 12496495
CLIMBING STICKS
2y 5m to grant Granted Dec 16, 2025
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

AI Strategy Recommendation

Get an AI-powered prosecution strategy using examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Powered by AI — typically takes 5-10 seconds

Prosecution Projections

1-2
Expected OA Rounds
32%
Grant Probability
46%
With Interview (+14.1%)
3y 1m
Median Time to Grant
Low
PTA Risk
Based on 136 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allow rate.

Sign in for Full Analysis

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month