Prosecution Insights
Last updated: April 19, 2026
Application No. 18/196,496

DEVICE AND METHOD FOR CONTROLLING AMMONIA ESCAPE IN AMMONIA-BASED DECARBONIZATION SYSTEM

Non-Final OA §112
Filed
May 12, 2023
Examiner
GITMAN, GABRIEL E
Art Unit
1772
Tech Center
1700 — Chemical & Materials Engineering
Assignee
Jiangnan Environmental Protection Group Inc.
OA Round
1 (Non-Final)
76%
Grant Probability
Favorable
1-2
OA Rounds
2y 8m
To Grant
96%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 76% — above average
76%
Career Allow Rate
337 granted / 442 resolved
+11.2% vs TC avg
Strong +20% interview lift
Without
With
+19.6%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
2y 8m
Avg Prosecution
23 currently pending
Career history
465
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
1.1%
-38.9% vs TC avg
§103
40.5%
+0.5% vs TC avg
§102
12.0%
-28.0% vs TC avg
§112
37.9%
-2.1% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 442 resolved cases

Office Action

§112
DETAILED ACTION Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Election/Restrictions Claims 1-18 are withdrawn from further consideration pursuant to 37 CFR 1.142(b) as being drawn to a nonelected invention, there being no allowable generic or linking claim. Election was made without traverse in the reply filed on 11 November 2025. Claims 19-30 are pending. Claim Objections Claims 21-22 and 28 are objected to because of the following informalities: Claims 21-22: In line 6, Applicant is respectfully advised to amend “toan absorption circulating section” since this feature does not appear to be an obviously inherent feature of an “ammonia-based desulfurization device” (claim 21) or an “ammonia-based decarbonization device” (claim 22), nothing that these are different terms from the “ammonia-based desulfurization zone” or the “ammonia-based decarbonization zone” as is recited in claim 19. Claim 28: In lines 4-5, “the ammonia-based decarbonization device” appears to be a misstatement of “the ammonia-based decarbonization zone” (claim 25, line 4). Appropriate correction is required. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 112 The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 112(b): (b) CONCLUSION.—The specification shall conclude with one or more claims particularly pointing out and distinctly claiming the subject matter which the inventor or a joint inventor regards as the invention. The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 112 (pre-AIA ), second paragraph: The specification shall conclude with one or more claims particularly pointing out and distinctly claiming the subject matter which the applicant regards as his invention. Claims 24 and 30 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 112(b) or 35 U.S.C. 112 (pre-AIA ), second paragraph, as being indefinite for failing to particularly point out and distinctly claim the subject matter which the inventor or a joint inventor (or for applications subject to pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 112, the applicant), regards as the invention. Claim 24: The claim recites, “wherein the particle control section of the ammonia-based desulfurization zone is configured to provide cooling that is performed by the cooling section of the ammonia-based decarbonization zone.” It is unclear what is meant by a feature (the particle control section of the ammonia-based desulfurization zone) that is configured to “provide” cooling that is “performed” by another feature (the cooling section of the ammonia-based decarbonization zone). In other words, since both “that is performed” and “is configured to provide” apparently indicate functional language (providing/performing cooling) for further defining the structure of the device, it is unclear how that functional language can be understood to be the same for each feature, wherein the features each perform the same “cooling.” Consequently, the functional language leaves unclear the metes and bounds of the implicit structures/capabilities of each feature. Referring to the specification for an interpretation for the purposes of examination only, [85] recites, “[t]he particle control section 2-3 of the ammonia-based desulfurization functional zone performed the cooling function of the ammonia-based decarbonization.” This text does not clarify the issue because, as with the claim, it is unclear how the cooling can be the function of one feature despite the fact that the cooling is performed by a different feature. Claim 30 is rejected upon the same basis as claim 24, as “wherein the particle control section of the ammonia-based desulfurization zone is configured to provide cooling that is performed by the cooling section of the ammonia-based decarbonization zone” is unclear because of the language “is configured to provide cooling that is performed by,” as “is configured to provide” and “is performed by” appear to be inconsistent with each other with respect to the cooling. Allowable Subject Matter The following is a statement of reasons for the indication of allowable subject matter: A thorough search for pertinent prior art did not locate any prior art that discloses or suggests the invention recited in claims 19-30. The concept of a device for controlling ammonia escape in an ammonia-based desulfurization and decarbonization system, the device comprises: an ammonia-based desulfurization zone; an ammonia-based decarbonization zone; and an ammonia escape control zone, wherein the ammonia-based desulfurization zone includes: a washing cooling section; an absorption circulating section; and a particle control section; the ammonia-based decarbonization zone includes: a cooling section; and an absorption circulating section; the ammonia escape control zone includes an ammonia escape control section that includes: an acidic ammonium sulfate solution washing system; and an acidic water washing system; the absorption circulating section of the ammonia-based desulfurization zone is connected to the acidic ammonium sulfate solution washing system of the ammonia escape control zone through pipes; and the particle control section of the ammonia-based desulfurization zone is connected to the acidic water washing system of the ammonia escape control zone through pipes (claim 19) is considered to define patentable subject matter over the prior art. Likewise, the concept of device for controlling ammonia escape in an ammonia-based desulfurization and decarbonization system, the device comprises: an ammonia-based desulfurization zone; an ammonia-based decarbonization zone; and an ammonia escape control zone, wherein: the ammonia-based desulfurization zone includes: a washing cooling section; an absorption circulating section; a particle control section; the ammonia-based decarbonization zone includes: a cooling section; and an absorption circulating section; the ammonia escape control zone includes an ammonia escape control section that includes: an acidic ammonium sulfate solution washing system; and an acidic water washing system; the absorption circulating section of the ammonia-based desulfurization zone is connected to the acidic ammonium sulfate solution washing system of the ammonia escape control zone through pipes; and the cooling section of the ammonia-based decarbonization zone is connected to the acidic water washing system of the ammonia escape control zone through pipes (claim 25) is considered to define patentable subject matter over the prior art. The closest prior art is Neumann et al. (WO 2010/036436 A1), which discloses a multi-contaminant removal system (Fig. 31) comprising a high efficiency gas liquid contactor 2160 for contacting flue gas with aqueous ammonia and dissolved ammonium salts to capture SOx ([0196]) (i.e., an ammonia-based desulfurization zone), another high efficiency gas liquid contactor 2260 for absorbing CO2 using ammonia ([0198]) (i.e., an ammonia-based decarbonization zone), and a third high efficiency contactor 2330 to strip out any ammonia ([0199]) (i.e., an ammonia escape control zone). However, Neumann does not recite the component sections/systems of these contactors as claimed, with the contactor 2330 contacting only with water (Fig. 31; [0199]). Luo et al. (US 2021/0197117 A1) discloses an absorption tower 1 (Fig. 1; [0263]) that includes a pre-wash zone 4, an absorption zone 5, and a fine particle control zone 6 ([0263]) and that treats a process/flue gas 9 with a liquid containing ammonium sulfite and ammonium sulfate ([0258]), wherein the pre-wash zone cools the flue gas and the absorption zone 5 desulfurizes the gas ([0274]) (i.e., an ammonia-based desulfurization zone that includes: a washing cooling section; an absorption circulating section; a particle control section). However, neither reference suggests a decarbonization zone that includes a cooling section and an absorption circulating section; or an ammonia escape control section that includes an acidic ammonium sulfate solution washing system and an acidic water washing system; or piping that connects the sections of these units as claimed. Other related prior art is Duncan et al. (US 2010/0089110 A1), which discloses an apparatus (Fig. 1) for removing SO2 using ammonia 102 ([0010]), an apparatus for CO2 scrubbing with ammonium carbonate solution 104 ([0011]), and apparatuses 106 and 108 for ammonia vapor recovery ([0012], [0013]). However, Duncan cannot cure the deficiencies of Neumann or Luo. Claims 24 and 30 would be allowable if rewritten to overcome the rejection(s) under 35 U.S.C. 112(b) or 35 U.S.C. 112 (pre-AIA ), 2nd paragraph, set forth in this Office action and to include all of the limitations of the base claim and any intervening claims. The above-cited prior arts, whether alone or in combination, provide no teaching or suggestion that would have led the skilled practitioner to arrive at the claimed configuration. Conclusion Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to GABRIEL E GITMAN whose telephone number is (571)272-7934. The examiner can normally be reached M-Th 7:15-5:45pm. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, In Suk Bullock can be reached at 571-272-3471. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /GABRIEL E GITMAN/Primary Examiner, Art Unit 1772
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

May 12, 2023
Application Filed
Jan 26, 2026
Non-Final Rejection — §112 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12599864
AIR TREATMENT SYSTEM, METHOD, VEHICLE AND FLEET FOR TREATING ENVIRONMENT AIR
2y 5m to grant Granted Apr 14, 2026
Patent 12582936
BIOGAS PROCESSING SYSTEMS AND METHODS
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 24, 2026
Patent 12582933
POWER TOOL INCLUDING AN AIR FILTER AND DEBRIS COLLECTOR
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 24, 2026
Patent 12575062
VAPOR RECOVERY SYSTEM FOR IMMERSION COOLED DATA CENTERS
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 10, 2026
Patent 12570528
Hydrogen Purification By Adsorption
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 10, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

AI Strategy Recommendation

Get an AI-powered prosecution strategy using examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Powered by AI — typically takes 5-10 seconds

Prosecution Projections

1-2
Expected OA Rounds
76%
Grant Probability
96%
With Interview (+19.6%)
2y 8m
Median Time to Grant
Low
PTA Risk
Based on 442 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allow rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month