Prosecution Insights
Last updated: May 29, 2026
Application No. 18/196,527

Process and Apparatus for Xenon and or Krypton Recovery

Non-Final OA §102
Filed
May 12, 2023
Examiner
ZEC, FILIP
Art Unit
3763
Tech Center
3700 — Mechanical Engineering & Manufacturing
Assignee
Air Products and Chemicals, Inc.
OA Round
1 (Non-Final)
65%
Grant Probability
Favorable
1-2
OA Rounds
1m
Est. Remaining
79%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 65% — above average
65%
Career Allowance Rate
657 granted / 1006 resolved
-4.7% vs TC avg
Moderate +14% lift
Without
With
+13.8%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
3y 2m
Avg Prosecution
21 currently pending
Career history
1032
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
0.4%
-39.6% vs TC avg
§103
81.6%
+41.6% vs TC avg
§102
6.0%
-34.0% vs TC avg
§112
2.0%
-38.0% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 1006 resolved cases

Office Action

§102
DETAILED ACTION Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Election/Restrictions Claims 12-20 are withdrawn from further consideration pursuant to 37 CFR 1.142(b) as being drawn to a nonelected invention, there being no allowable generic or linking claim. Election was made without traverse in the reply filed on 10/23/2025. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 102 In the event the determination of the status of the application as subject to AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103 (or as subject to pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103) is incorrect, any correction of the statutory basis (i.e., changing from AIA to pre-AIA ) for the rejection will not be considered a new ground of rejection if the prior art relied upon, and the rationale supporting the rejection, would be the same under either status. The following is a quotation of the appropriate paragraphs of 35 U.S.C. 102 that form the basis for the rejections under this section made in this Office action: A person shall be entitled to a patent unless – (a)(1) the claimed invention was patented, described in a printed publication, or in public use, on sale, or otherwise available to the public before the effective filing date of the claimed invention. Claim(s) 1 and 2-11 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 102(a)(1) as being anticipated by U.S. Patent 8,443,625 to Prosser et al. (Prosser). In reference to claim 1, Prosser teaches a process for xenon (Xe) and/or krypton (Kr) recovery (FIG. 1), comprising superheating (in 30, FIG. 1) a first portion of a purge stream (22, FIG. 1) to form a superheated vapor (42, FIG. 1); feeding the superheated vapor (42, FIG. 1) to a bottom of the purge column (46, FIG. 1); feeding a second portion of the purge stream (40, FIG. 1) or a purge column liquid feed to a top of a purge column or adjacent the top of the purge column (48, FIG. 1); and outputting a Xe and/or Kr recovery feed stream (65, FIG. 1) from the purge column for feeding to an Xe and/or Kr recovery system (67, FIG. 1). In reference to claim 3, Prosser teaches the process as explained in the rejection of claim 1 above, and Prosser additionally teaches outputting a purge vapor stream (106, FIG. 1) from the purge column (46, FIG. 1). In reference to claim 4, Prosser teaches the process as explained in the rejection of claim 1 above, and Prosser additionally teaches wherein an Xe content of the Xe and/or Kr recovery feed stream is between 50 parts per million by volume (ppmv) Xe and 500 ppmv Xe (see table in col 16, at 67). In reference to claim 5, Prosser teaches the process as explained in the rejection of claim 1 above, and Prosser additionally teaches wherein the superheating of the first portion of the purge stream is performed to superheat the first portion to a temperature that is between - 110°C and - -130°C to form the superheated vapor (see table in col 16; at 42). In reference to claim 6, Prosser teaches the process as explained in the rejection of claim 1 above, and Prosser additionally teaches operating the purge column at a pressure of between 6 bar absolute (bara) and 15 bara (see table at 14; col 16). In reference to claim 7, Prosser teaches the process as explained in the rejection of claim 1 above, and Prosser additionally teaches wherein the feeding the second portion of the purge stream (40, FIG. 1) or the purge column liquid feed to the top of the purge column (48, FIG. 1) or adjacent the top of the purge column comprises splitting the purge stream to form the first portion of the purge stream and the second portion of the purge stream; and feeding the second portion of the purge stream to the top of the purge column or adjacent the top of the purge column (FIG. 1). In reference to claim 8, Prosser teaches the process as explained in the rejection of claim 1 above, and Prosser additionally teaches wherein a Kr content of the Xe and/or Kr recovery feed stream is between 100 parts per million by volume (ppmv) Kr and 3,100 ppmv Kr (table, col 16). In reference to claim 9, Prosser teaches the process as explained in the rejection of claim 1 above, and Prosser additionally teaches wherein the superheating of the first portion of the purge stream to form the superheated vapor (42, FIG. 1) is performed via a heater (30, FIG. 1) that is external to the purge column (46, FIG. 1). In reference to 10, Prosser teaches the process as explained in the rejection of claim 9 above, and Prosser additionally teaches wherein the heater is a heat exchanger (30, FIG. 1) and a heating medium of the heat exchanger is ambient air or a process stream output from an air separation unit (ASU) (126, FIG. 1). In reference to claim 11, Prosser teaches the process as explained in the rejection of claim 1 above, and Prosser additionally teaches recovering an Xe product stream and/or a Kr product stream from the Xe and/or Kr recovery feed stream via the Xe and/or Kr recovery system (67, FIG. 1; col 16, lines 1-4). Allowable Subject Matter Claim 2 is objected to as being dependent upon a rejected base claim, but would be allowable if rewritten in independent form including all of the limitations of the base claim and any intervening claims. Conclusion The prior art made of record and not relied upon is considered pertinent to applicant's disclosure. See attached PTO-892 for relevant prior art. Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to FILIP ZEC whose telephone number is (571)270-5846. The examiner can normally be reached Mon - Fri; 9-5. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, JD Fletcher can be reached at 5712705054. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /FILIP ZEC/ Primary Examiner, Art Unit 3763
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

May 12, 2023
Application Filed
Mar 19, 2026
Non-Final Rejection mailed — §102 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12638238
METHOD AND APPARATUS FOR LIQUEFYING A GAS RICH IN CARBON DIOXIDE
2y 6m to grant Granted May 26, 2026
Patent 12638225
ICE MAKING MODULE, AND ICE MAKER AND REFRIGERATOR HAVING THE SAME
1y 11m to grant Granted May 26, 2026
Patent 12631389
HIGH EFFICIENCY COLD FINGER
2y 9m to grant Granted May 19, 2026
Patent 12624867
PORTABLE HEATER AND COOLER
2y 8m to grant Granted May 12, 2026
Patent 12618594
NESTED HEATING SYSTEM
2y 3m to grant Granted May 05, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

Strategy Recommendation AI-generated — please review before filing

Get a prosecution strategy drawn from examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Typically takes 5-10 seconds — AI-generated, attorney review required before filing

Prosecution Projections

1-2
Expected OA Rounds
65%
Grant Probability
79%
With Interview (+13.8%)
3y 2m (~1m remaining)
Median Time to Grant
Low
PTA Risk
Based on 1006 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allowance rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month