Prosecution Insights
Last updated: April 19, 2026
Application No. 18/196,876

JOINT HARQ-ACK AND UNUSED TRANSMISSION PUSCH OCCASION UPLINK CONTROL INFORMATION (UTO-UCI) REPORTING FOR CG WITH MULTIPLE PUSCH OCCASIONS

Final Rejection §103
Filed
May 12, 2023
Examiner
ZHU, BO HUI ALVIN
Art Unit
2465
Tech Center
2400 — Computer Networks
Assignee
Sharp Kabushiki Kaisha
OA Round
2 (Final)
80%
Grant Probability
Favorable
3-4
OA Rounds
3y 3m
To Grant
96%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 80% — above average
80%
Career Allow Rate
627 granted / 780 resolved
+22.4% vs TC avg
Strong +16% interview lift
Without
With
+16.1%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
3y 3m
Avg Prosecution
24 currently pending
Career history
804
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
3.4%
-36.6% vs TC avg
§103
45.7%
+5.7% vs TC avg
§102
29.4%
-10.6% vs TC avg
§112
17.7%
-22.3% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 780 resolved cases

Office Action

§103
DETAILED ACTION Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Response to Amendment The reply with claim amendment filed on 12/03/2025 has been entered. Claims 1, 10, and 15 are now pending. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 103 In the event the determination of the status of the application as subject to AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103 (or as subject to pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103) is incorrect, any correction of the statutory basis (i.e., changing from AIA to pre-AIA ) for the rejection will not be considered a new ground of rejection if the prior art relied upon, and the rationale supporting the rejection, would be the same under either status. The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 103 which forms the basis for all obviousness rejections set forth in this Office action: A patent for a claimed invention may not be obtained, notwithstanding that the claimed invention is not identically disclosed as set forth in section 102, if the differences between the claimed invention and the prior art are such that the claimed invention as a whole would have been obvious before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to a person having ordinary skill in the art to which the claimed invention pertains. Patentability shall not be negated by the manner in which the invention was made. Claims 1, 10, and 15 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over Zhang et al. (US 2024/0089973 A1, “Zhang”) in view of Singh et al. (WO 2024/099921, “Singh”). Regarding claim 1: Zhang discloses a user equipment (UE) (e.g., Fig. 3, 300), comprising: receiving circuitry (e.g., Fig. 3, 316) configured to determine a physical uplink control channel (PUCCH) with a hybrid automatic repeat request-acknowledgement (HARQ-ACK) overlaps with a configured grant (CG) physical uplink shared channel (PUSCH) with UCI; transmitting circuitry (e.g., Fig. 3, 316) configured to encode a joint sequence with the UCI and the HARQ-ACK by appending bits for the HARQ-ACK to bits of the UCI, and multiplex the joint sequence on the CG PUSCH, in a case that priority of the HARQ-ACK is the same as the UCI, wherein the priority of the UCI is the same as the CG PUSCH (e.g., [0062], [0073], [0076], [0077], Fig. 4A, 4B, 6A, 6B). Zhang is silent regarding unused transmission PUSCH occasion uplink control information (UTO-UCI). Singh teaches a CG-PUSCH with unused transmission PUSCH occasion uplink control information (UTO-UCI) ([0038]-[0048], [0052]-[0054], Fig. 4 and 5). It would have been obvious to one having ordinary skill in the art before the effective filing date of the invention to modify the system of Zhang based on Singh so that the UCI is unused transmission PUSCH occasion uplink control information (UTO-UCI), in order to improve resource efficiency of the system with unused allocated uplink resources. Regarding claim 10: Singh discloses a base station (gNB) (e.g., 2, 200), comprising: transmitting circuitry (e.g., Fig. 2, 208) to determine a physical uplink control channel (PUCCH) with a hybrid automatic repeat request-acknowledgement (HARQ-ACK) overlaps with a configured grant (CG) physical uplink shared channel (PUSCH) with UCI; and receiving circuitry (e.g., Fig. 2, 208) configured to decode a joint sequence with the UCI and the HARQ-ACK by appending bits for the HARQ-ACK to bits of the UCI, and the joint sequence on the CG PUSCH is multiplexed, in a case that priority of the HARQ-ACK is the same as the UCI, wherein the priority of the UCI is the same as the CG PUSCH (e.g., [0062], [0073], [0076], [0077], Fig. 4A, 4B, 6A, 6B). Zhang is silent regarding unused transmission PUSCH occasion uplink control information (UTO-UCI). Singh teaches a CG-PUSCH with unused transmission PUSCH occasion uplink control information (UTO-UCI) ([0038]-[0048], [0052]-[0054], Fig. 4 and 5). It would have been obvious to one having ordinary skill in the art before the effective filing date of the inventio to modify the system of Zhang based on Singh so that the UCI is unused transmission PUSCH occasion uplink control information (UTO-UCI), in order to improve resource efficiency of the system with unused allocated uplink resources. Regarding claim 15: Singh discloses a method by a user equipment (UE) (e.g., Fig. 10, UE QQ200,) comprising: determining a physical uplink control channel (PUCCH) with a hybrid automatic repeat request-acknowledgement (HARQ-ACK) overlaps with a configured grant (CG) physical uplink shared channel (PUSCH) with UCI; encoding a joint sequence with the UCI and the HARQ-ACK by appending bits for the HARQ-ACK to bits of the UCI, and multiplex the joint sequence on the CG PUSCH, in a case that priority of the HARQ-ACK is the same as the UCI, wherein the priority of the UCI is the same as the CG PUSCH (e.g., [0062], [0073], [0076], [0077], Fig. 4A, 4B, 6A, 6B). Zhang is silent regarding unused transmission PUSCH occasion uplink control information (UTO-UCI). Singh teaches a CG-PUSCH with unused transmission PUSCH occasion uplink control information (UTO-UCI) ([0038]-[0048], [0052]-[0054], Fig. 4 and 5). It would have been obvious to one having ordinary skill in the art before the effective filing date of the invention to modify the system of Zhang based on Singh so that the UCI is unused transmission PUSCH occasion uplink control information (UTO-UCI), in order to improve resource efficiency of the system with unused allocated uplink resources. Response to Arguments Rejection under 35 U.S.C. 102 over Singh Applicant’s arguments with respect to independent claims 1, 10, and 15 have been considered but are moot in view of a new ground of rejection under 35 U.S.C. 103 over Zhang and Singh. Conclusion Applicant's amendment necessitated the new ground(s) of rejection presented in this Office action. Accordingly, THIS ACTION IS MADE FINAL. See MPEP § 706.07(a). Applicant is reminded of the extension of time policy as set forth in 37 CFR 1.136(a). A shortened statutory period for reply to this final action is set to expire THREE MONTHS from the mailing date of this action. In the event a first reply is filed within TWO MONTHS of the mailing date of this final action and the advisory action is not mailed until after the end of the THREE-MONTH shortened statutory period, then the shortened statutory period will expire on the date the advisory action is mailed, and any nonprovisional extension fee (37 CFR 1.17(a)) pursuant to 37 CFR 1.136(a) will be calculated from the mailing date of the advisory action. In no event, however, will the statutory period for reply expire later than SIX MONTHS from the mailing date of this final action. Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to Alvin ZHU whose telephone number is (571)270-1086. The examiner can normally be reached Mon-Fri 6am-9am and 2pm-7pm. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Gary Mui can be reached at 571-270-1420. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /BO HUI A ZHU/Primary Examiner, Art Unit 2465
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

May 12, 2023
Application Filed
Sep 01, 2025
Non-Final Rejection — §103
Dec 03, 2025
Response Filed
Feb 27, 2026
Final Rejection — §103 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12598611
INFORMATION SENDING METHOD AND APPARATUS, AND INFORMATION RECEIVING METHOD AND APPARATUS
2y 5m to grant Granted Apr 07, 2026
Patent 12593335
LOGICAL CHANNELS AND SCHEDULING REQUEST CONFIGURATIONS FOR FULL-DUPLEX MODES AND HALF-DUPLEX MODES
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 31, 2026
Patent 12588028
Restriction of Configured Grant Resource Occasion
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 24, 2026
Patent 12580693
Hybrid Automatic Repeat Request Acknowledgment Scheduling
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 17, 2026
Patent 12574182
METHOD PERFORMED BY USER EQUIPMENT, AND USER EQUIPMENT
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 10, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

AI Strategy Recommendation

Get an AI-powered prosecution strategy using examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Powered by AI — typically takes 5-10 seconds

Prosecution Projections

3-4
Expected OA Rounds
80%
Grant Probability
96%
With Interview (+16.1%)
3y 3m
Median Time to Grant
Moderate
PTA Risk
Based on 780 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allow rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month