Prosecution Insights
Last updated: April 19, 2026
Application No. 18/197,053

Method of implementing Blockchain network utilizing always connected Internet Gateways (Routers) as nodes for offering the decentralized secured storage and other services.

Final Rejection §112
Filed
May 13, 2023
Examiner
WANG, LIANG CHE A
Art Unit
2447
Tech Center
2400 — Computer Networks
Assignee
Gryphon Online Safety Inc.
OA Round
2 (Final)
86%
Grant Probability
Favorable
3-4
OA Rounds
2y 8m
To Grant
96%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 86% — above average
86%
Career Allow Rate
641 granted / 745 resolved
+28.0% vs TC avg
Moderate +10% lift
Without
With
+9.7%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
2y 8m
Avg Prosecution
14 currently pending
Career history
759
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
10.0%
-30.0% vs TC avg
§103
35.2%
-4.8% vs TC avg
§102
26.7%
-13.3% vs TC avg
§112
18.3%
-21.7% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 745 resolved cases

Office Action

§112
Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . DETAILED ACTION Claims 1-14 are presented for examination. This action is in response to amendment filed on 9/22/25. The New Grounds of Rejection Applicant’s amendment and argument with respect to claims 1-12, and new claims 13-14 filed on 9/22/25 have been fully considered but they are deemed to be moot in views of the new grounds of rejection. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 112 The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 112(b): (b) CONCLUSION.—The specification shall conclude with one or more claims particularly pointing out and distinctly claiming the subject matter which the inventor or a joint inventor regards as the invention. The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 112 (pre-AIA ), second paragraph: The specification shall conclude with one or more claims particularly pointing out and distinctly claiming the subject matter which the applicant regards as his invention. Claims 1-14 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 112(b) or 35 U.S.C. 112 (pre-AIA ), second paragraph, as being indefinite for failing to particularly point out and distinctly claim the subject matter which the inventor or a joint inventor (or for applications subject to pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 112, the applicant), regards as the invention. Referring to claim 1, the amended claim recites the limitation “wherein, the computer processor in the router executes the machine instructions to perform validation tasks that use verifiable random function (VRF) and verifiable delay function (VDF); wherein the router contributes computing, network and storage resources and stakes tokens to generate both a proof-of-storage and a proof-of-bandwidth; the persistent storage medium in the router is used to store the proof-of-storage and the proof-of-bandwidth on the Blockchain network; and the router is compensated with utility tokens proportional to contributed resources and staked tokens.” renders the claim vague and indefinite. The claim is describing a router to 1. performs the validation task; 2. contributes computing, network and storage resources and stakes tokens to generate both a proof-of-storage and a proof-of-bandwidth; 3. store the proof-of-storage and the proof-of-bandwidth on the Blockchain network; and 4. the router is compensated with utility tokens proportional to contributed resources and staked tokens. Steps 1, 2, 3 are performed individually, and the conclusive step 4 seems to only vaguely connected to the information contributed and staked in step 2 without the connection and the relations to steps 1 and 4. Also it is unclear how the proportional compensation to the router in step 4 is achieved with contributed resources and staked token. Furthermore, it is also unclear that if the contributed resources are the contributed computing, network and storage resources and also what is the utility token and how is related to the staked token. The claim is vague and indefinite to allow a person with skill in the art to reason the recited steps 1-3 to achieve the conclusive step 4 in order to establish the scope of the claimed invention. Clarification is required. Referring claim 5, the amended claims recited steps (a) to (g), however, similar to the steps recited in claim 1, steps (a) to (g) appears to be performed without linkage to one another, and only slight proof of linkage appears to be the term “validated contribution” in step (g), however the validating step (e) does not recite any contribution being validated. The claim is vague and indefinite to allow a person with skill in the art to reason the recited steps (a)-(f) to achieve the conclusive step (g) in order to establish the scope of the claimed invention. Clarification is required. All dependent claims are rejected to as having the same deficiencies as the claims they depend from. Conclusion Applicant's amendment necessitated the new ground(s) of rejection presented in this Office action. Accordingly, THIS ACTION IS MADE FINAL. See MPEP § 706.07(a). Applicant is reminded of the extension of time policy as set forth in 37 CFR 1.136(a). A shortened statutory period for reply to this final action is set to expire THREE MONTHS from the mailing date of this action. In the event a first reply is filed within TWO MONTHS of the mailing date of this final action and the advisory action is not mailed until after the end of the THREE-MONTH shortened statutory period, then the shortened statutory period will expire on the date the advisory action is mailed, and any extension fee pursuant to 37 CFR 1.136(a) will be calculated from the mailing date of the advisory action. In no event, however, will the statutory period for reply expire later than SIX MONTHS from the mailing date of this final action. Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to LIANGCHE A WANG whose telephone number is (571)272-3992. The examiner can normally be reached M-F 10:00am to 6:30pm. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Joon H Hwang can be reached on 571-272-4036. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. Liang-che Alex Wang December 15, 2025 /LIANG CHE A WANG/Primary Examiner, Art Unit 2447
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

May 13, 2023
Application Filed
May 20, 2025
Non-Final Rejection — §112
Sep 22, 2025
Response Filed
Dec 15, 2025
Final Rejection — §112 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12598190
UNIFIED SECURE ACCESS CONTROL TO SOFTWARE SERVICES AND APPLICATIONS
2y 5m to grant Granted Apr 07, 2026
Patent 12592927
DYNAMIC VIRTUAL IDENTIFIER GENERATION FOR USER INTERACTION AUTHORIZATION VERIFICATION AND LOGGING
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 31, 2026
Patent 12585446
Consent-Driven Access Management For Cloud Resources
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 24, 2026
Patent 12563085
APPROACHES TO LEARNING BEHAVIORAL NORMS THROUGH AN ANALYSIS OF DIGITAL ACTIVITIES PERFORMED ACROSS DIFFERENT SERVICES AND USING THE SAME FOR DETECTING THREATS
2y 5m to grant Granted Feb 24, 2026
Patent 12563003
AUTOMATED MARKING OF MESSAGES AND MESSAGE DELETION BY ANALYZING KEYWORDS AND SEMANTIC SITUATIONS
2y 5m to grant Granted Feb 24, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

AI Strategy Recommendation

Get an AI-powered prosecution strategy using examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Powered by AI — typically takes 5-10 seconds

Prosecution Projections

3-4
Expected OA Rounds
86%
Grant Probability
96%
With Interview (+9.7%)
2y 8m
Median Time to Grant
Moderate
PTA Risk
Based on 745 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allow rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month