Office Action Predictor
Last updated: April 15, 2026
Application No. 18/198,017

APPARATUS AND METHOD OF DISPENSING PHARMACEUTICALS AND OTHER MEDICATIONS

Non-Final OA §103
Filed
May 16, 2023
Examiner
COLLINS, MICHAEL
Art Unit
3655
Tech Center
3600 — Transportation & Electronic Commerce
Assignee
Unknown
OA Round
1 (Non-Final)
71%
Grant Probability
Favorable
1-2
OA Rounds
3y 0m
To Grant
91%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 71% — above average
71%
Career Allow Rate
829 granted / 1167 resolved
+19.0% vs TC avg
Strong +20% interview lift
Without
With
+19.8%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
3y 0m
Avg Prosecution
25 currently pending
Career history
1192
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
0.7%
-39.3% vs TC avg
§103
37.3%
-2.7% vs TC avg
§102
35.9%
-4.1% vs TC avg
§112
16.8%
-23.2% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 1167 resolved cases

Office Action

§103
DETAILED ACTION Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Claim Objections Claim 16 is objected to because of the following informalities: the claim has a period on line 18. Appropriate correction is required. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 103 The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 103 which forms the basis for all obviousness rejections set forth in this Office action: A patent for a claimed invention may not be obtained, notwithstanding that the claimed invention is not identically disclosed as set forth in section 102, if the differences between the claimed invention and the prior art are such that the claimed invention as a whole would have been obvious before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to a person having ordinary skill in the art to which the claimed invention pertains. Patentability shall not be negated by the manner in which the invention was made. The factual inquiries for establishing a background for determining obviousness under 35 U.S.C. 103 are summarized as follows: 1. Determining the scope and contents of the prior art. 2. Ascertaining the differences between the prior art and the claims at issue. 3. Resolving the level of ordinary skill in the pertinent art. 4. Considering objective evidence present in the application indicating obviousness or nonobviousness. Claim(s) 1-18 is/are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over PUGSLEY (USPGPUB 2021/0205180) and further in view of Baranowski (USPGPUB 2004/0164088). Regarding claim 1, PUGSLEY discloses a medication dispensing system comprising: a housing (see Figure 1) for at housing at least one medication in bulk, the at least one medication including a plurality of doses of the at least one medication; a dispenser (see Figure 8) for separating a single dose from the at least one medication in bulk, the dispenser moving the single dose of the at least one medication from a position within the housing to a position outside the housing (see paragraph [0133]); an optical verification sensor for verifying the at least one medication is a correct medication (see paragraph [0141]); an interface (see Figure 1) for receiving a plurality of inputs and displaying a plurality of outputs (see paragraph [0105]); a network connection (see Figure 3); and a virtual health advisor module associated with the medication dispensing apparatus which includes an instruction set, which when executed by a processor associated with the medication dispensing apparatus causes the medication dispensing apparatus to produce a prompt at the interface, the prompt seeking an input related to human health (see paragraphs [0087], [0089], [0121], and [0132]); receive at least one input related to human health (see paragraph [0121]); and implement an action in response to the at least one input (see paragraph [0132]). However, they do not disclose a weight verification sensor for verifying the at least one medication is a correct medication. Baranowski discloses a weight verification sensor for verifying the at least one medication is a correct medication (see paragraph [0045] and claim 6). Therefore, it would have been obvious to one having ordinary skill in the art before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to modify the system disclosed by PUGSLEY by including a weight verification sensor for verifying the at least one medication is a correct medication, as disclosed by Baranowski, with a reasonable expectation of success for the purpose of providing one or more sensing units to detect a physical characteristic including weight (see claims 2 and 6) to determine if the measured item is outside a predetermined range for the item (see paragraphs [0045]-[0046]). Regarding claim 2, PUGSLEY discloses the medication dispensing system of claim 1 wherein the at least one input is a prescription input which includes at least one time for dispensing the at least one medication, the medication dispensing apparatus dispensing the at least one medication in response to the at least one time from the prescription input (see paragraphs [0035], [0071], [0084], and [0100]). Regarding claim 3, PUGSLEY discloses the medication dispensing system of claim 1 wherein the network connection is an internet connection (see paragraph [0063]). Regarding claim 4, PUGSLEY discloses the medication dispensing system of claim 1 wherein the network connection is a cloud connection (see paragraph [0003]). Regarding claim 5, PUGSLEY discloses the medication dispensing system of claim 1 wherein the action implemented includes producing more prompts associated with a decision tree (see paragraphs [0068], [0073], [0099]-[0100], [0148], and [0154]). Regarding claim 6, PUGSLEY discloses the medication dispensing system of claim 1 wherein the action implemented includes a determination of a preliminary diagnosis (see “emergency” in paragraph [0114] and paragraph [0127]). Regarding claim 7, PUGSLEY discloses the medication dispensing system of claim 1 wherein caregivers are also connected to the network interface and wherein the action implemented further comprises: a determination of a preliminary diagnosis (see “emergency” in paragraph [0114]); and communication of the preliminary diagnosis to the caregivers (see “alert” in paragraph [0114]). Regarding claim 8, PUGSLEY discloses the medication dispensing system of claim 7 wherein caregivers includes medical personnel (see paragraph [0114]), physicians, and pharmacists. Regarding claim 9, PUGSLEY discloses the medication dispensing system of claim 1 wherein the at least one prompt seeks an input regarding the presence of a patient (see paragraphs [0073], [0102], and [0114]). Regarding claim 10, PUGSLEY discloses the medication dispensing system of claim 1 wherein the at least one prompt seeks an input regarding the general well being of a user (see paragraph [0073]). Regarding claim 11, PUGSLEY discloses the medication dispensing system of claim 1 wherein the at least one input triggers a set of prompts produced by artificial intelligence (see paragraphs [0068], [0099]-[0100] and [0148]). Regarding claim 12, PUGSLEY discloses the medication dispensing system of claim 1 wherein the at least one input is related to the start of a new medication (see paragraphs [0066], [0100], and [0126]). Regarding claim 13, PUGSLEY discloses the medication dispensing system of claim 1 wherein the at least one input is related to the start of a new medication and is delivered at a selected time after the new medication was first taken (see paragraphs [0073] and [0097]). Regarding claim 14, PUGSLEY discloses the medication dispensing apparatus of claim 1 further comprising a report generator that produces a schedule of consumption and holds the schedule of consumption in a memory (see paragraph [0073]). Regarding claim 15, PUGSLEY discloses the medication dispensing apparatus of claim 14 wherein the schedule of consumption can indicate a lack of compliance regarding taking a medication and the lack of compliance is an input to the virtual health advisor (see paragraph [0075]). Regarding claim 16, PUGSLEY discloses a patient care dosing system comprising: a plurality of medication dispensing apparatus (see Figure 3) comprising a housing (see Figure 1) for at housing at least one medication in bulk, the at least one medication including a plurality of doses of the at least one medication; a dispenser (see Figure 8) for separating a single dose from the at least one medication in bulk, the dispenser moving the single dose of the at least one medication from a position within the housing to a position outside the housing (see paragraph [0133]); an optical verification sensor for verifying the at least one medication is a correct medication (see paragraph [0141]); a virtual health advisor module associated with the plurality of medication dispensing apparatus which includes an instruction set, which when executed by a processor associated with the medication dispensing apparatus causes the medication dispensing apparatus to produce a prompt at the interface for a particular user, the prompt seeking an input related to human health (see paragraphs [0087], [0089], [0121], and [0132]); receive at least one input related to human health (see paragraph [0121]); and implement an action in response to the at least one input (see paragraph [0132]). a circuit (see paragraphs [0063], [0065], [0074], [0082], and [0123]) to allow at least one of the plurality of medication dispensing apparatus to be communicatively coupled to another of the plurality of medication dispensing apparatus; a server (see Figure 3) for storing patient information including dosing information (see paragraph [0074]); and a plurality of nursing station devices (see Figure 3) communicatively coupled with the server, and the plurality of medication dispensing apparatus (see paragraph [0123]). However, they do not disclose a weight verification sensor for verifying the at least one medication is a correct medication. Baranowski discloses a weight verification sensor for verifying the at least one medication is a correct medication (see paragraph [0045] and claim 6). Therefore, it would have been obvious to one having ordinary skill in the art before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to modify the system disclosed by PUGSLEY by including a weight verification sensor for verifying the at least one medication is a correct medication, as disclosed by Baranowski, with a reasonable expectation of success for the purpose of providing one or more sensing units to detect a physical characteristic including weight (see claims 2 and 6) to determine if the measured item is outside a predetermined range for the item (see paragraphs [0045]-[0046]). Regarding claim 17, PUGSLEY discloses the patient care dosing system of claim 16 comprising a receiver for a plurality of patient assignments to a specific medication dispensing apparatus (see paragraph [0090]). Regarding claim 18, PUGSLEY discloses the patient care dosing system of claim 16 comprising a dashboard display output for a plurality of patient assignments to a specific medication dispensing apparatus (see paragraph [0128]), the apparatus showing compliance for taking medications over a time frame (see paragraph [0075]). Conclusion The prior art made of record and not relied upon is considered pertinent to applicant's disclosure. Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to MICHAEL COLLINS whose telephone number is (571)272-8970. The examiner can normally be reached Monday-Friday. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Jacob Scott can be reached at (571) 270-3415. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. M.K.C. 10/30/2025 /MICHAEL COLLINS/Primary Examiner, Art Unit 3655
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

May 16, 2023
Application Filed
Oct 30, 2025
Non-Final Rejection — §103
Mar 10, 2026
Interview Requested
Mar 26, 2026
Examiner Interview Summary
Mar 30, 2026
Examiner Interview Summary
Mar 30, 2026
Applicant Interview (Telephonic)
Apr 02, 2026
Response Filed

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12589464
PUSHER, TRANSFER DEVICE, AND SUBSTRATE PROCESSING APPARATUS
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 31, 2026
Patent 12592134
Systems And Methods For Tool Activation And Display Cabinet Locking
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 31, 2026
Patent 12583688
ARTICLE CONVEYANCE SORTING APPARATUS, ARTICLE SORTING SYSTEM, AND CONTROL SERVER
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 24, 2026
Patent 12583678
APPARATUS AND METHOD FOR REPLACING POWER SUPPLY DEVICE IN A UAV
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 24, 2026
Patent 12578697
Conveyor System
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 17, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

AI Strategy Recommendation

Get an AI-powered prosecution strategy using examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Powered by AI — typically takes 5-10 seconds

Prosecution Projections

1-2
Expected OA Rounds
71%
Grant Probability
91%
With Interview (+19.8%)
3y 0m
Median Time to Grant
Low
PTA Risk
Based on 1167 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allow rate.

Sign in for Full Analysis

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month