Prosecution Insights
Last updated: October 04, 2026
Application No. 18/199,454

SUBASSEMBLY FOR A MEANS OF TRANSPORT, AND MEANS OF TRANSPORT

Final Rejection §102
Filed
May 19, 2023
Priority
May 20, 2022 — DE 10 2022 205 050.9
Examiner
CONDO, VERONICA MARIE
Art Unit
3612
Tech Center
3600 — Transportation & Electronic Commerce
Assignee
Continental AG
OA Round
4 (Final)
82%
Grant Probability
Favorable
5-6
OA Rounds
0m
Est. Remaining
89%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 82% — above average
82%
Career Allowance Rate
173 granted / 211 resolved
+30.0% vs TC avg
Moderate +7% lift
Without
With
+6.9%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
2y 3m
Avg Prosecution
23 currently pending
Career history
230
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§103
40.3%
+0.3% vs TC avg
§102
33.8%
-6.2% vs TC avg
§112
23.4%
-16.6% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 211 resolved cases

Office Action

§102
DETAILED ACTION Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 102 In the event the determination of the status of the application as subject to AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103 (or as subject to pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103) is incorrect, any correction of the statutory basis (i.e., changing from AIA to pre-AIA ) for the rejection will not be considered a new ground of rejection if the prior art relied upon, and the rationale supporting the rejection, would be the same under either status. The following is a quotation of the appropriate paragraphs of 35 U.S.C. 102 that form the basis for the rejections under this section made in this Office action: A person shall be entitled to a patent unless – (a)(1) the claimed invention was patented, described in a printed publication, or in public use, on sale, or otherwise available to the public before the effective filing date of the claimed invention. Claims 1-6, 8, 10-11 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 102(a)(1) as being anticipated by Leopold et al. (US Pat 7,685,901). Regarding claim 1, Leopold et al. disclose a subassembly for a transport, comprising: a support element 2 having a rigid support member 9 and a movable support member 17 (see Figures 1-3; Col. 3, line 61-Col. 4, line 30); a fixed component 4 having a first surface arranged on top of and facing the rigid support member 17 and a second surface opposite the first surface (see Figures 1-3; Col. 4, lines 15-30); and a cover element 5 arranged on top of and facing the movable support member 17, such that, in a first position, a surface of the cover element 5 adjoins and is coplanar with the second surface of the component 4, the cover element 5 having a free edge surface that is positioned proximate to and facing an edge surface of the component 4 that connects the first surface to the second surface (see Figure 1; Col. 4, lines 1-30), wherein the support element 2 has a lever mechanism 12 which is configured to raise the cover element 5 and the movable support member 17 from the first position to a second position above the second surface of the component 4 so that the surface of the cover element 5 is not coplanar with the second surface of the component 4 in response to a force acting parallel to the surface of the cover element 5 (see Figures 1-3; Col. 3, line 61-Col. 4, line 14). Regarding claim 2, Leopold et al. disclose the subassembly as claimed in claim 1, wherein the support element 2 has a deformation area 18 (see Figures 1-3; Col. 4, lines 24-30). The deformation area 18 is a hole and creates a stress concentration where deformation would occur when a force is applied. Regarding claim 3, Leopold et al. disclose the subassembly as claimed in claim 1, wherein the cover element 5 is beveled on its underside toward an edge in an area adjoining the component 4 (see Figure 2; Col. 3, lines 21-29). PNG media_image1.png 558 618 media_image1.png Greyscale Regarding claim 4, Leopold et al. disclose the subassembly as claimed in claim 1, wherein the lever mechanism 12 has a long lever arm area 13, a short lever arm area 12, and a linkage area 14 (see Figure 3; Col. 3, line 65-Col. 4, line 14). Regarding claim 5, Leopold et al. disclose the subassembly as claimed in claim 4, wherein the short lever arm area 12 and the linkage area 14 are connected by a connecting area (see Figure 3; Col. 3, line 65-Col. 4, line 14). Regarding claim 6, Leopold et al. disclose the subassembly as claimed in claim 1, wherein the support element 2 is configured as a single piece (see Figures 1-3). Regarding claim 8, Leopold et al. disclose the subassembly as claimed in claim 1, wherein the support element 2 has two or more lever mechanisms 12 (see Figure 3; Col. 3, lines 61-67). Regarding claim 10, Leopold et al. disclose a transport (see Col. 3, lines 11-12), comprising: a subassembly, comprising: a support element 2 having a rigid support member 9 and a movable support member 17 (see Figures 1-3; Col. 3, line 61-Col. 4, line 30); a fixed component 4 having a first surface arranged on top of and facing the rigid support member 17 and a second surface opposite the first surface (see Figures 1-3; Col. 4, lines 15-30); and a cover element 5 arranged on top of and facing the movable support member 17, such that, in a first position, a surface of the cover element 5 adjoins and is coplanar with the second surface of the component 4, the cover element 5 having a free edge surface that is positioned proximate to and facing an edge surface of the component 4 that connects the first surface to the second surface (see Figure 1; Col. 4, lines 1-30), wherein the support element 2 has a lever mechanism 12 which is configured to raise the cover element 5 and the movable support member 17 from the first position to a second position above the second surface of the component 4 so that the surface of the cover element 5 is not coplanar with the second surface of the component 4 in response to a force acting parallel to the surface of the cover element 5 (see Figures 1-3; Col. 3, line 61-Col. 4, line 14). Regarding claim 11, Leopold et al. disclose the subassembly of claim 1, wherein the cover element 5 further comprises a second free edge surface disposed opposite the free edge surface (see Figures 1-3; Col. 3, lines 21-24). Allowable Subject Matter Claims 7 and 9 are objected to as being dependent upon a rejected base claim, but would be allowable if rewritten in independent form including all of the limitations of the base claim and any intervening claims. The following is a statement of reasons for the indication of allowable subject matter: Claim 7 recites a subassembly for a transport, comprising: a support element having a rigid support member and a movable support member; a fixed component having a first surface arranged on top of and facing the rigid support member and a second surface opposite the first surface; and a cover element arranged on top of and facing the movable support member, such that, in a first position, a surface of the cover element adjoins and is coplanar with the second surface of the component, the cover element having a free edge surface that is positioned proximate to and facing an edge surface of the component that connects the first surface to the second surface, wherein the support element has a lever mechanism which is configured to raise the cover element and the movable support member from the first position to a second position above the second surface of the component so that the surface of the cover element is not coplanar with the second surface of the component in response to a force acting parallel to the surface of the cover element. The support element is configured as a single piece and the lever mechanism is formed by cutouts of the support element. Leopold et al. disclose a subassembly for a transport having a support element formed of a single piece having a rigid support member and a movable support member, a fixed component, a cover element, and a lever mechanism to raise the cover element and the movable support member; however, Leopold et al. fail to disclose the lever mechanism is formed by cutouts of the support mechanism. Cressoni (US Pat 4,818,008) disclose a subassembly for a transport having a support element with a rigid support member and a movable support member, a fixed component, a cover element, and a lever mechanism formed from cutouts of the support element; however, Cressoni fails to disclose that the fixed component has a first surface facing the rigid support member that is not coplanar with the cover element in a second position. Logsdon et al. (US Pat 4,112,718) disclose a subassembly for a transport having a support element, a fixed component, a cover element, and a lever mechanism; however, Logsdon et al. fail to disclose the support element comprises a rigid support member and a movable support member. Staines (US Pat 9,834,254) disclose a subassembly for a transport having a support element, a fixed component, a cover element, and a lever mechanism; however, Staines fails to disclose the support element comprises a rigid support member and a movable support member. Longo et al. (US PG Pub 2022/0136539) disclose a subassembly for a transport having a support element, a fixed component, a cover element, and a lever mechanism; however, Longo et al. fail to disclose the support element comprises a rigid support member and a movable support member. Bruegl et al. (US PG Pub 2021/0162931) disclose a subassembly for a transport having a support element with a rigid support member and a movable support member, a fixed component, and a lever mechanism; however, Bruegl et al. fail to disclose a cover element arranged on top of and facing the movable support member. Hessheimer (US Pat 10,967,807) discloses a subassembly for a transport having a support element with a rigid support member and a movable support member, a fixed component, a cover element, and a lever mechanism; however, Hessheimer fails to disclose the cover element is arranged on top of the movable support member. Welschholz et al. (US Pat 7,469,951) disclose a subassembly for a transport having a support element, a fixed component, a cover element, and a lever mechanism; however, Welschholz et al. fail to disclose the support element has a rigid support member. Hipshier et al. (US Pat 9,573,529) disclose a subassembly for a transport having a rigid support element with a rigid support member and a movable support member, a fixed component, and a cover element; however, Hipshier et al. fail to disclose a lever mechanism. Maierholzner (US Pat 6,890,012) discloses a subassembly for a transport having a support element with a rigid support member and a movable support member, a fixed component, a cover element, and a lever mechanism; however, Maierholzner fails to disclose that the cover element is coplanar with the component in a first position and not coplanar with the component in a second position. The prior art does not properly teach or suggest the recited configuration, making claim 7 allowable. Claim 9 recites a subassembly for a transport, comprising: a support element having a rigid support member and a movable support member; a fixed component having a first surface arranged on top of and facing the rigid support member and a second surface opposite the first surface; and a cover element arranged on top of and facing the movable support member, such that, in a first position, a surface of the cover element adjoins and is coplanar with the second surface of the component, the cover element having a free edge surface that is positioned proximate to and facing an edge surface of the component that connects the first surface to the second surface, wherein the support element has a lever mechanism which is configured to raise the cover element and the movable support member from the first position to a second position above the second surface of the component so that the surface of the cover element is not coplanar with the second surface of the component in response to a force acting parallel to the surface of the cover element. The surface of the cover element and the surface of the component merge essentially seamlessly into each other. Leopold et al. disclose a subassembly for a transport having a support element formed of a single piece having a rigid support member and a movable support member, a fixed component, a cover element, and a lever mechanism to raise the cover element and the movable support member; however, Leopold et al. fail to disclose the surface of the cover element and the surface of the component merge essentially seamlessly into each other. Cressoni (US Pat 4,818,008) disclose a subassembly for a transport having a support element with a rigid support member and a movable support member, a fixed component, a cover element, and a lever mechanism formed from cutouts of the support element; however, Cressoni fails to disclose that the fixed component has a first surface facing the rigid support member that is not coplanar with the cover element in a second position. Logsdon et al. (US Pat 4,112,718) disclose a subassembly for a transport having a support element, a fixed component, a cover element, and a lever mechanism; however, Logsdon et al. fail to disclose the support element comprises a rigid support member and a movable support member. Staines (US Pat 9,834,354) disclose a subassembly for a transport having a support element, a fixed component, a cover element, and a lever mechanism; however, Staines fails to disclose the support element comprises a rigid support member and a movable support member. Longo et al. (US PG Pub 2022/0136539) disclose a subassembly for a transport having a support element, a fixed component, a cover element, and a lever mechanism; however, Longo et al. fail to disclose the support element comprises a rigid support member and a movable support member. Bruegl et al. (US PG Pub 2021/0162931) disclose a subassembly for a transport having a support element with a rigid support member and a movable support member, a fixed component, and a lever mechanism; however, Bruegl et al. fail to disclose a cover element arranged on top of and facing the movable support member. Hessheimer (US Pat 10,967,807) discloses a subassembly for a transport having a support element with a rigid support member and a movable support member, a fixed component, a cover element, and a lever mechanism; however, Hessheimer fails to disclose the cover element is arranged on top of the movable support member. Welschholz et al. (US Pat 7,469,951) disclose a subassembly for a transport having a support element, a fixed component, a cover element, and a lever mechanism; however, Welschholz et al. fail to disclose the support element has a rigid support member. Hipshier et al. (US Pat 9,573,529) disclose a subassembly for a transport having a rigid support element with a rigid support member and a movable support member, a fixed component, and a cover element; however, Hipshier et al. fail to disclose a lever mechanism. Maierholzner (US Pat 6,890,012) discloses a subassembly for a transport having a support element with a rigid support member and a movable support member, a fixed component, a cover element, and a lever mechanism; however, Maierholzner fails to disclose that the cover element is coplanar with the component in a first position and not coplanar with the component in a second position. The prior art does not properly teach or suggest the recited configuration, making claim 9 allowable. Response to Arguments Applicant’s arguments, see Remarks, filed July 17, 2026, with respect to the rejections of claims 1-11 under 35 USC 102(a)(1) and 35 USC 103 have been fully considered and are persuasive. Therefore, the rejection has been withdrawn. However, upon further consideration, a new ground of rejection is made in view of Leopold et al. (US Pat 7,685,901). Conclusion Applicant's amendment necessitated the new ground(s) of rejection presented in this Office action. Accordingly, THIS ACTION IS MADE FINAL. See MPEP § 706.07(a). Applicant is reminded of the extension of time policy as set forth in 37 CFR 1.136(a). A shortened statutory period for reply to this final action is set to expire THREE MONTHS from the mailing date of this action. In the event a first reply is filed within TWO MONTHS of the mailing date of this final action and the advisory action is not mailed until after the end of the THREE-MONTH shortened statutory period, then the shortened statutory period will expire on the date the advisory action is mailed, and any nonprovisional extension fee (37 CFR 1.17(a)) pursuant to 37 CFR 1.136(a) will be calculated from the mailing date of the advisory action. In no event, however, will the statutory period for reply expire later than SIX MONTHS from the mailing date of this final action. Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to VERONICA M CONDO whose telephone number is (571)272-9415. The examiner can normally be reached Mon-Fri 8am-3pm EST. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Amy Weisberg can be reached at (571) 270-5500. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /VERONICA M CONDO/Examiner, Art Unit 3612 /AMY R WEISBERG/Supervisory Patent Examiner, Art Unit 3612
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Show 2 earlier events
Oct 28, 2025
Response Filed
Jan 16, 2026
Final Rejection mailed — §102
Mar 30, 2026
Response after Non-Final Action
Apr 09, 2026
Request for Continued Examination
Apr 21, 2026
Response after Non-Final Action
May 07, 2026
Non-Final Rejection mailed — §102
Jul 17, 2026
Response Filed
Sep 25, 2026
Final Rejection mailed — §102 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12734884
DISPLAY DEVICE, DASHBOARD AND TRANSPORTATION MEANS
3y 4m to grant Granted Sep 15, 2026
Patent 12722531
LOWER BODY STRUCTURE OF VEHICLE
3y 5m to grant Granted Sep 01, 2026
Patent 12722801
AIRCRAFT BOARDING VEHICLE AND METHODS OF USE
2y 11m to grant Granted Sep 01, 2026
Patent 12722730
COWLING STRUCTURE
2y 8m to grant Granted Sep 01, 2026
Patent 12722708
FRAME FOR A UTILITY VEHICLE
2y 6m to grant Granted Sep 01, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

Strategy Recommendation AI-generated — please review before filing

Get a prosecution strategy drawn from examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Typically takes 5-10 seconds — AI-generated, attorney review required before filing

Prosecution Projections

5-6
Expected OA Rounds
82%
Grant Probability
89%
With Interview (+6.9%)
2y 3m (~0m remaining)
Median Time to Grant
High
PTA Risk
Based on 211 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allowance rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month