Prosecution Insights
Last updated: October 02, 2026
Application No. 18/199,512

FOOTWEAR HAVING COVERABLE MOTORIZED ADJUSTMENT SYSTEM

Non-Final OA §103
Filed
May 19, 2023
Priority
Apr 15, 2014 — divisional of 9326566 +1 more
Examiner
KANE, KATHARINE GRACZ
Art Unit
3732
Tech Center
3700 — Mechanical Engineering & Manufacturing
Assignee
Nike Inc.
OA Round
5 (Non-Final)
48%
Grant Probability
Moderate
5-6
OA Rounds
0m
Est. Remaining
93%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 48% of resolved cases
48%
Career Allowance Rate
310 granted / 650 resolved
-22.3% vs TC avg
Strong +46% interview lift
Without
With
+45.7%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
3y 3m
Avg Prosecution
32 currently pending
Career history
709
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
1.7%
-38.3% vs TC avg
§103
52.8%
+12.8% vs TC avg
§102
19.6%
-20.4% vs TC avg
§112
19.9%
-20.1% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 650 resolved cases

Office Action

§103
Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Continued Examination Under 37 CFR 1.114 A request for continued examination under 37 CFR 1.114, including the fee set forth in 37 CFR 1.17(e), was filed in this application after final rejection. Since this application is eligible for continued examination under 37 CFR 1.114, and the fee set forth in 37 CFR 1.17(e) has been timely paid, the finality of the previous Office action has been withdrawn pursuant to 37 CFR 1.114. Applicant's submission filed on 7/10/2026 has been entered. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 103 The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 103 which forms the basis for all obviousness rejections set forth in this Office action: A patent for a claimed invention may not be obtained, notwithstanding that the claimed invention is not identically disclosed as set forth in section 102, if the differences between the claimed invention and the prior art are such that the claimed invention as a whole would have been obvious before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to a person having ordinary skill in the art to which the claimed invention pertains. Patentability shall not be negated by the manner in which the invention was made. The factual inquiries for establishing a background for determining obviousness under 35 U.S.C. 103 are summarized as follows: 1. Determining the scope and contents of the prior art. 2. Ascertaining the differences between the prior art and the claims at issue. 3. Resolving the level of ordinary skill in the pertinent art. 4. Considering objective evidence present in the application indicating obviousness or nonobviousness. Claims 2-22 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over Omstead (US 2005/0091884) in view of Faniran (US 2007/0124848). Regarding Claim 2, Omstead discloses an article of footwear customization kit (Figures 1-2, 6A & 6B), the article of footwear including a tongue (150) extending from a midfoot of the article of footwear to an opening to admit a foot of a wearer of the article of footwear (Figure 1), comprising: a first cover (130), configured to be fully removably attachable to the article of footwear proximate the tongue of the article of footwear (Figures 1 & 2), the first cover configured to enclose, at least in part, a first component (Figures 1 & 2, Para. 32) and a second cover (140) configured to be fully removably attachable proximate a heel portion of the article of footwear relative to the first cover (Figures 1 & 2); wherein the second cover is configured to cover a second component (Figures 1 & 2, Para. 31); and wherein the first and second cover are configured to be movable relative to the article of footwear (Figures 1 & 2). Omstead does not specifically disclose the article of footwear including a tongue extending from and secured to a midfoot of the article of footwear to an opening to which tongue is not secured to admit a foot of a wearer of the article of footwear. However, Faniran discloses an article of footwear (Figure 1) including a tongue (tongue at 10) extending from and secured to a midfoot of the article of footwear to an opening to which tongue is not secured to admit a foot of a wearer of the article of footwear (Figure 1). It would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art to modify the footwear to be a sneaker, as taught by Faniran, for the purpose of providing various components on a fully enclosed foot. The claim would have been obvious because the substitution of one shoe for another would have yielded predictable results to one of ordinary skill in the art at the time of the invention. Therefore, as modified, the cover would be proximate to the tongue, as claimed. Regarding Claim 3, Omstead discloses wherein the second component is a power source (Para. 31) and the second cover further covers a motor (Figures 6A & 6B, Para. 41-44), operatively coupled to the power source, configured to upper relative to the second cover (Figures 1, 2 6A & 6B). Regarding Claim 4, Omstead discloses at least one of, the first cover and the second cover are configured to be physically attached to one another other with a removable attachment mechanisms (Figures 1 & 2). Regarding Claim 5, Omstead discloses the first cover is configurable to provide customized decoration by a user of the article of footwear customization kit (Para. 32). Regarding Claim 6, Omstead discloses the first cover forms a concave inner surface of the first cover (Figures 1 & 2). Regarding Claim 7, Omstead discloses the concave inner surface is configured to cover a device of the article of footwear when the first cover is attached to the article of footwear (Figures 1 & 2). Regarding Claim 8, Omstead discloses edges of the first cover are configured to mate with a contoured portion of on outer surface of the article of footwear (Figures 1 & 2). Regarding Claim 9, Omstead discloses a method of making an article of footwear customization kit (Figures 1-2, 6A & 6B), the article of footwear including a tongue (150) extending from a midfoot of the article of footwear to an opening to admit a foot of a wearer of the article of footwear (Figure 1), comprising: configuring a first cover (130) to be fully removably attachable attached to the article of footwear proximate the tongue of the article of footwear (Figures 1 & 2), the first cover configured to enclose, at least in part, a first component (Para. 32), and configuring a second cover (140) to be fully removably attachable proximate a heel portion of the article of footwear relative to the first cover (Figures 1 & 2); wherein the second cover is configured to cover a second component (Figures 1 & 2, Para. 31); and wherein the first and second cover are configured to be movable relative to the article of footwear (Figures 1 & 2). Omstead does not specifically disclose the article of footwear including a tongue extending from and secured to a midfoot of the article of footwear to an opening to which tongue is not secured to admit a foot of a wearer of the article of footwear. However, Faniran discloses an article of footwear (Figure 1) including a tongue (tongue at 10) extending from and secured to a midfoot of the article of footwear to an opening to which tongue is not secured to admit a foot of a wearer of the article of footwear (Figure 1). It would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art to modify the footwear to be a sneaker, as taught by Faniran, for the purpose of providing various components on a fully enclosed foot. The claim would have been obvious because the substitution of one shoe for another would have yielded predictable results to one of ordinary skill in the art at the time of the invention. Therefore Regarding Claim 10, Omstead discloses wherein the second component is a power source (Para. 31) and the second cover further covers a motor (Figures 6A & 6B, Para. 41-44), operatively coupled to the power source, configured to upper relative to the second cover (Figures 1, 2, 6A & 6B). Regarding Claim 11, Omstead discloses at least one the first cover and the second cover are configured to be physically attached to one another other with a removable attachment mechanisms (Figures 1 & 2). Regarding Claim 12, Omstead discloses the first cover is configurable to provide customized decoration by a user of the article of footwear customization kit (Para. 32). Regarding Claim 13, Omstead discloses the first cover forms a concave inner surface of the first cover (Figures 1 & 2). Regarding Claim 14, Omstead discloses the concave inner surface is configured to cover a device of the article of footwear when the first cover is attached to the article of footwear (Figures 1 & 2). Regarding Claim 15, Omstead discloses edges of the first cover are configured to mate with a contoured portion of on outer surface of the article of footwear (Figures 1 & 2). Regarding Claim 16, Omstead discloses an article of footwear (Figures 1, 2, 6A & 6B), comprising: an upper (150) having an outer surface (Figure 1); a tongue (area of 15) extending from a midfoot of the article of footwear to an opening to admit a foot of a wearer of the article of footwear (Figure 1), a first cover (130) to be fully removably attachable to the outer surface of the upper proximate the tongue of the article of footwear (Figures 1 & 2), the first cover configured to enclose, at least in part, a first component (Para. 32); and a second cover (140) to be fully removably attachable proximate a heel portion of the article of footwear relative to the first cover (Figures 1 & 2); wherein the second cover is configured to cover a second component (Figures 1 & 2, Para. 31); and wherein the first and second cover are configured to be movable relative to the article of footwear (Figures 1 & 2). Omstead does not specifically disclose the article of footwear including a tongue extending from and secured to a midfoot of the article of footwear to an opening to which tongue is not secured to admit a foot of a wearer of the article of footwear. However, Faniran discloses an article of footwear (Figure 1) including a tongue (tongue at 10) extending from and secured to a midfoot of the article of footwear to an opening to which tongue is not secured to admit a foot of a wearer of the article of footwear (Figure 1). It would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art to modify the footwear to be a sneaker, as taught by Faniran, for the purpose of providing various components on a fully enclosed foot. The claim would have been obvious because the substitution of one shoe for another would have yielded predictable results to one of ordinary skill in the art at the time of the invention. Therefore Regarding Claim 17, Omstead discloses the second component is a power source (Para. 31) and the second cover further covers a motor (Figures 6A & 6B, Para. 41-44), operatively coupled to the power source, configured to upper relative to the second cover (Figures 1, 2 6A & 6B). Regarding Claim 18, Omstead discloses at least one of, the first cover and the second cover are configured to be physically attached to one another other with a removable attachment mechanisms (Figures 1 & 2). Regarding Claim 19, Omstead discloses the first cover is configurable to provide customized decoration by a user of the article of footwear customization kit (Para. 32). Regarding Claim 20, Omstead discloses the first cover forms a concave inner surface of the first cover (Figures 1 & 2). Regarding Claim 21, Omstead discloses the concave inner surface is configured to cover a device of the article of footwear when the first cover is attached to the article of footwear (Figures 1 & 2). Regarding Claim 22, Omstead discloses edges of the first cover are configured to mate with a contoured portion of on outer surface of the article of footwear (Figures 1 & 2). Response to Amendment Applicant’s arguments with respect to the amended claims have been fully considered but are moot in view of the new grounds of rejection as discussed supra. Conclusion The prior art made of record and not relied upon is considered pertinent to applicant's disclosure. Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to KATHARINE KANE whose telephone number is (571)272-3398. The examiner can normally be reached Mon-Fri 9am-6pm EST. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, KHOA HUYNH can be reached at 571-272-4888. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /KATHARINE G KANE/Primary Examiner, Art Unit 3732
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Show 6 earlier events
Jun 26, 2025
Request for Continued Examination
Jun 30, 2025
Response after Non-Final Action
Jul 15, 2025
Non-Final Rejection mailed — §103
Jan 14, 2026
Response Filed
Feb 10, 2026
Final Rejection mailed — §103
Jul 10, 2026
Request for Continued Examination
Jul 17, 2026
Response after Non-Final Action
Aug 10, 2026
Non-Final Rejection mailed — §103 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12727639
FOOTWEAR
2y 9m to grant Granted Sep 08, 2026
Patent 12721405
GOLF SHOES WITH LACE TIGHTENING SYSTEM FOR CLOSURE AND COMFORTABLE FIT
2y 0m to grant Granted Sep 01, 2026
Patent 12708176
Foot Support Systems Including Fluid Movement Controllers And Adjustable Foot Support Pressure
2y 2m to grant Granted Aug 18, 2026
Patent 12709822
INDUSTRIAL FABRIC
1y 9m to grant Granted Aug 18, 2026
Patent 12685369
AUTOLACING FOOTWEAR MOTOR HAVING FORCE-DIRECTING SUPPORTS
2y 8m to grant Granted Jul 21, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

Strategy Recommendation AI-generated — please review before filing

Get a prosecution strategy drawn from examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Typically takes 5-10 seconds — AI-generated, attorney review required before filing

Prosecution Projections

5-6
Expected OA Rounds
48%
Grant Probability
93%
With Interview (+45.7%)
3y 3m (~0m remaining)
Median Time to Grant
High
PTA Risk
Based on 650 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allowance rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month