Prosecution Insights
Last updated: April 17, 2026
Application No. 18/200,049

Multiple-Device Bluetooth

Non-Final OA §112
Filed
May 22, 2023
Examiner
DEANE JR, WILLIAM J
Art Unit
2693
Tech Center
2600 — Communications
Assignee
unknown
OA Round
1 (Non-Final)
83%
Grant Probability
Favorable
1-2
OA Rounds
3y 1m
To Grant
85%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 83% — above average
83%
Career Allow Rate
705 granted / 853 resolved
+20.6% vs TC avg
Minimal +2% lift
Without
With
+2.0%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
3y 1m
Avg Prosecution
18 currently pending
Career history
871
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
10.1%
-29.9% vs TC avg
§103
43.1%
+3.1% vs TC avg
§102
14.8%
-25.2% vs TC avg
§112
12.3%
-27.7% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 853 resolved cases

Office Action

§112
DETAILED ACTION Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Drawings The drawings are objected to under 37 CFR 1.83(a). The drawings must show every feature of the invention specified in the claims. Therefore, the random generator, handshaking aspect, the separate queue, separate multiplexor circuit, the handheld portable speaker and cell phone must be shown or the feature(s) canceled from the claim(s). No new matter should be entered. Corrected drawing sheets in compliance with 37 CFR 1.121(d) are required in reply to the Office action to avoid abandonment of the application. Any amended replacement drawing sheet should include all of the figures appearing on the immediate prior version of the sheet, even if only one figure is being amended. The figure or figure number of an amended drawing should not be labeled as “amended.” If a drawing figure is to be canceled, the appropriate figure must be removed from the replacement sheet, and where necessary, the remaining figures must be renumbered and appropriate changes made to the brief description of the several views of the drawings for consistency. Additional replacement sheets may be necessary to show the renumbering of the remaining figures. Each drawing sheet submitted after the filing date of an application must be labeled in the top margin as either “Replacement Sheet” or “New Sheet” pursuant to 37 CFR 1.121(d). If the changes are not accepted by the examiner, the applicant will be notified and informed of any required corrective action in the next Office action. The objection to the drawings will not be held in abeyance. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 112 Claims 7 – 9, 11 and 14 – 18 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 112(a) or 35 U.S.C. 112 (pre-AIA ), first paragraph, as failing to comply with the enablement requirement. The claim(s) contains subject matter which was not described in the specification in such a way as to enable one skilled in the art to which it pertains, or with which it is most nearly connected, to make and/or use the invention. Specifically, much subject matter is mentioned in the claims but, such is not found in the specification. Claim 7, mentions, “status of audio files”, but such is not in the specification. Claim 8, mentions, “predetermined criteria”, but such is not in the specification. Claim 9, speaks to, “a random generator” and “predetermined criteria”. Neither of these two subject matters are mentioned in the specification. Claim 11, specification does not speak to “handshake”. In Claim 14, the specification does not mention the sharing of queues or sharing the multiplexor circuit. Claim 15, there is no mention in the specification of, “a separate queue” or “a separate multiplexor circuit”. With respect to Claim 16, the specification does not mention, “a handheld portable speaker”. Claim17, the specification does not mention, “ commercial multiple thousand-watt speaker”. Claim 18, the specification does not mention, “a cell phone”. The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 112(b): (b) CONCLUSION.—The specification shall conclude with one or more claims particularly pointing out and distinctly claiming the subject matter which the inventor or a joint inventor regards as the invention. The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 112 (pre-AIA ), second paragraph: The specification shall conclude with one or more claims particularly pointing out and distinctly claiming the subject matter which the applicant regards as his invention. Claims 1 – 18 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 112(b) or 35 U.S.C. 112 (pre-AIA ), second paragraph, as being indefinite for failing to particularly point out and distinctly claim the subject matter which the inventor or a joint inventor (or for applications subject to pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 112, the applicant), regards as the invention. Specifically, in claim 1, it is unclear as to what the phrase “at a given time” is meant to mean. The phrase appears to be ambiguous. Is this meant to be related to some type of timer or something else? In addition, if the queue mentioned in claim 1 is part of the audio speaker or is the queue part of the individual separate devices like a media player. Because of the multiple problems as shown above a proper search could not be conducted. The examiner knows of a couple of references that appear to be relevant and will include them on the accompanying 892. Conclusion The prior art made of record and not relied upon is considered pertinent to applicant's disclosure. Note the Abstracts and Figs. of the additional references cited on the accompanying 892. Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to William Deane whose telephone number is 571 - 272- 7484. The examiner can normally be reached on Monday - FRIDAY from 9:00 A.M. to 5:00 P.M. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner's supervisor, Ahmad Matar, can be reached on 571-272-7488. The official fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571 -273-8300. However, unofficial faxes can be direct to the examiner's computer at 571 273 -7484. Information regarding the status of an application may be obtained from the Patent Application Information Retrieval (PAIR) system. Status information for published applications may be obtained from either Private PAIR or Public PAIR. Status information for unpublished applications is available through Private PAIR only. For more information about the PAIR system, see https://pair-direct.uspto.gov. Should you have questions on access to the Private PAIR system, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). 18Oct2025 /WILLIAM J DEANE JR/ Primary Examiner, Art Unit 2693
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

May 22, 2023
Application Filed
Oct 18, 2025
Non-Final Rejection — §112 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12603956
Mapping A Contact Center Service Request To A Modality
2y 5m to grant Granted Apr 14, 2026
Patent 12603957
CONFERENCE CALLS
2y 5m to grant Granted Apr 14, 2026
Patent 12603958
SYSTEM AND METHOD OF LARGE-SCALE NETWORKING EXTENDED CASCADED MICROPHONES
2y 5m to grant Granted Apr 14, 2026
Patent 12598407
WEARABLE DEVICE AND WEARABLE MEMBER THEREOF
2y 5m to grant Granted Apr 07, 2026
Patent 12598255
Systems and Methods for Automating Media Optimization Using Call Analytics
2y 5m to grant Granted Apr 07, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

AI Strategy Recommendation

Get an AI-powered prosecution strategy using examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Powered by AI — typically takes 5-10 seconds

Prosecution Projections

1-2
Expected OA Rounds
83%
Grant Probability
85%
With Interview (+2.0%)
3y 1m
Median Time to Grant
Low
PTA Risk
Based on 853 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allow rate.

Sign in for Full Analysis

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month