Prosecution Insights
Last updated: April 19, 2026
Application No. 18/200,164

ANTIMICROBIAL POLYMER COATINGS ON TEXTILES

Non-Final OA §103
Filed
May 22, 2023
Examiner
ELHILO, EISA B
Art Unit
1761
Tech Center
1700 — Chemical & Materials Engineering
Assignee
Microban Products Company
OA Round
1 (Non-Final)
83%
Grant Probability
Favorable
1-2
OA Rounds
1y 11m
To Grant
99%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 83% — above average
83%
Career Allow Rate
1184 granted / 1425 resolved
+18.1% vs TC avg
Strong +16% interview lift
Without
With
+15.9%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Fast prosecutor
1y 11m
Avg Prosecution
33 currently pending
Career history
1458
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
0.1%
-39.9% vs TC avg
§103
37.5%
-2.5% vs TC avg
§102
19.2%
-20.8% vs TC avg
§112
25.1%
-14.9% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 1425 resolved cases

Office Action

§103
Claims 1-25 are pending in this application. DETAILED ACTION 1 This action is responsive to the applicant’s election received by the office on February 06, 2026. Election of claims 1-5 is acknowledged. Claims 6-25 are withdrawn from further consideration by the examiner, 37 CFR 1.142(b), as being drawn to a non-elected invention. Therefore, claims 1-5 are pending in this application. Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status 2 The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 103 4 In the event the determination of the status of the application as subject to AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103 (or as subject to pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103) is incorrect, any correction of the statutory basis (i.e., changing from AIA to pre-AIA ) for the rejection will not be considered a new ground of rejection if the prior art relied upon, and the rationale supporting the rejection, would be the same under either status. 5 The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 103 which forms the basis for all obviousness rejections set forth in this Office action: A patent for a claimed invention may not be obtained, notwithstanding that the claimed invention is not identically disclosed as set forth in section 102, if the differences between the claimed invention and the prior art are such that the claimed invention as a whole would have been obvious before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to a person having ordinary skill in the art to which the claimed invention pertains. Patentability shall not be negated by the manner in which the invention was made. Claims 1-5 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over Foster et al. (US 20170051234 A1) as evidence by Waterhouse et al. (US 2008/0287426 A1). Foster et al. (US’ 234 A1) teaches antimicrobial composition (see page 25, 0269) comprising pyrithione derivatives in the amount of 1-7% by wt., which is overlapped the claimed range, and wherein the pyrithione derivatives include sodium pyrithione (see page 7, paragraph, 0060), and wherein the antimicrobial composition comprises fatty oleyl glycerol sulfate (sulfated fatty alcohol) anionic surfactant (softener) in the amount of about 10 wt., % to about 30 wt., % as claimed in claims 2 and 5 (see page 19, paragraph, 0204 and page 20, paragraph, 0218), wherein the antimicrobial composition also comprises 20 to 30% wt., of reverse EO PO block copolymer as a binder (see Waterhouse et al. US’ 426 A1, paragraph, 0117) and water as claimed in claim 1 (see page 5, Table 7), and wherein the binders also include acrylic acid polymer (polyacrylic) as claimed in claim 4 (see page 5, Table 7) and wherein the antimicrobial composition is free from heavy metal as claimed in claim 3 (see page 5, Table 7). The teaching of Foster et al. (US’ 234 A1) differs the instant claims by teaching an antimicrobial composition comprising ingredients in the percentage amounts that overlapped with the claimed percentage amounts. However, it would have been obvious to one having ordinary skill in the art before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to optimize the amounts of the ingredients in the antimicrobial composition in order to get the maximum effective amount of these ingredients, and, thus, the person of the ordinary skill in the art would expect such amicrobial composition to have similar property to those claimed, absent unexpected result. Conclusion Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to EISA B ELHILO whose telephone number is (571)272-1315. The examiner can normally be reached Monday-Friday, 7:00 AM to 3:30 PM. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Angela Brown-Pettigrew can be reached at (571)272-2817. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /EISA B ELHILO/Primary Examiner, Art Unit 1761
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

May 22, 2023
Application Filed
Mar 10, 2026
Non-Final Rejection — §103 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12600929
PROCESS FOR MAKING A PARTICULATE LAUNDRY DETERGENT COMPOSITION
2y 5m to grant Granted Apr 14, 2026
Patent 12589063
COMPOSITION COMPRISING A COMBINATION OF TWO PARTICULAR OXIDATION DYE PRECURSORS, AN AMPHOTERIC OR ZWITTERIONIC SURFACTANT AND A SOLID FATTY SUBSTANCE
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 31, 2026
Patent 12584079
Fabric Softening Compositions
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 24, 2026
Patent 12577506
USE OF ENCAPSULATED NATURAL COLORS
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 17, 2026
Patent 12577505
GRANULES COMPRISING PROTONATED TRIAZACYCLIC COMPOUNDS AND BLEACHING AGENT AND CLEANING AGENT COMPRISING THE SAME
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 17, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

AI Strategy Recommendation

Get an AI-powered prosecution strategy using examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Powered by AI — typically takes 5-10 seconds

Prosecution Projections

1-2
Expected OA Rounds
83%
Grant Probability
99%
With Interview (+15.9%)
1y 11m
Median Time to Grant
Low
PTA Risk
Based on 1425 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allow rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month