Prosecution Insights
Last updated: May 29, 2026
Application No. 18/200,258

MANUFACTURING DEVICE FOR ASSEMBLED BATTERY

Non-Final OA §102§103
Filed
May 22, 2023
Priority
Jul 27, 2022 — JP 2022-119576
Examiner
ZEMUI, NATHANAEL T
Art Unit
1727
Tech Center
1700 — Chemical & Materials Engineering
Assignee
Toyota Jidosha Kabushiki Kaisha
OA Round
1 (Non-Final)
56%
Grant Probability
Moderate
1-2
OA Rounds
7m
Est. Remaining
81%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 56% of resolved cases
56%
Career Allowance Rate
262 granted / 466 resolved
-8.8% vs TC avg
Strong +25% interview lift
Without
With
+24.8%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
3y 7m
Avg Prosecution
36 currently pending
Career history
525
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
0.4%
-39.6% vs TC avg
§103
89.5%
+49.5% vs TC avg
§102
6.1%
-33.9% vs TC avg
§112
2.1%
-37.9% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 466 resolved cases

Office Action

§102 §103
DETAILED ACTION Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Status of Claims Claims 1-5 are currently pending for examination. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 102 In the event the determination of the status of the application as subject to AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103 (or as subject to pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103) is incorrect, any correction of the statutory basis (i.e., changing from AIA to pre-AIA ) for the rejection will not be considered a new ground of rejection if the prior art relied upon, and the rationale supporting the rejection, would be the same under either status. The following is a quotation of the appropriate paragraphs of 35 U.S.C. 102 that form the basis for the rejections under this section made in this Office action: A person shall be entitled to a patent unless – (a)(1) the claimed invention was patented, described in a printed publication, or in public use, on sale, or otherwise available to the public before the effective filing date of the claimed invention. Claims 1-3 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 102(a)(1) as being anticipated by Kim (US 2020/0365863 A1). Regarding claims 1-2, Kim teaches a manufacturing device for an assembled battery including a plurality of battery cells (110a…110d) stacked in a first direction (i.e left/right direction in fig. 5), wherein each battery cell includes a terminal (111a) on a surface facing a second direction (i.e up/down direction in fig. 5) that intersects the first direction, and a busbar (130) welded to the terminal (figs. 4-10), the manufacturing device comprising: a plurality of pressing pieces (241b/242b) arranged along the first direction, a tip of each of the pressing pieces in the second direction facing the respective terminal with the busbar interposed between the pressing piece and the terminal (figs. 4-10; [0067]-[0068]); a rotor including a shaft (243) that extends along the first direction and that is rotated by an actuator (211) and a plurality of contact pieces (241a/242a) engaged with the shaft such that each of the contact pieces is in contact with the corresponding one of the pressing pieces (241b/242b), wherein the rotor is configured to press the pressing pieces against the busbars when rotated about an axis (figs. 4-10; [0053]-[0054], [0066] & [0091]); and a welder that welds the busbars and the terminals, wherein the welder welds the busbars to the terminals while the rotor presses the busbars against the terminals (figs. 4-10; [0079]-[0081]). Regarding claim 3, Kim teaches engagement point between the contact pieces and the shaft being dispersed around the shaft when viewed from the first direction (figs. 6-7). Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 103 In the event the determination of the status of the application as subject to AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103 (or as subject to pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103) is incorrect, any correction of the statutory basis (i.e., changing from AIA to pre-AIA ) for the rejection will not be considered a new ground of rejection if the prior art relied upon, and the rationale supporting the rejection, would be the same under either status. The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 103 which forms the basis for all obviousness rejections set forth in this Office action: A patent for a claimed invention may not be obtained, notwithstanding that the claimed invention is not identically disclosed as set forth in section 102, if the differences between the claimed invention and the prior art are such that the claimed invention as a whole would have been obvious before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to a person having ordinary skill in the art to which the claimed invention pertains. Patentability shall not be negated by the manner in which the invention was made. Claim 4 is rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over Kim (US 2020/0365863 A1) in view of Reingruber (US 2023/0035654 A1). Regarding claim 4, Kim teaches the manufacturing device of claim 2 but is silent as to a spring having elasticity in a circumferential direction of the shaft being interposed between the shaft and each of the contact pieces. Reingruber teaches a manufacturing device for an assembled battery, comprising a spring having elasticity for engaging a plurality of contact pieces with corresponding pressing pieces to connect a busbar with terminals of the assembled battery ([0028]-[0038] & [0047]-[0051]). It would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art, before the effective filing date of the present invention, to provide a spring as described above in order to elastically tension the pressing pieces against the battery cells and prevent excessive contact pressure from being exerted on the cells while allowing different lengths of cells to be processed better as taught by Reingruber ([0047]-[0049]). Allowable Subject Matter Claim 5 is objected to as being dependent upon a rejected base claim, but would be allowable if rewritten in independent form including all of the limitations of the base claim and any intervening claims. The following is a statement of reasons for the indication of allowable subject matter: The closest prior art of record, Kim (as cited above), does not fairly teach or suggest the contact piece being a pinion gear and the pressing piece being provided with a rack gear that engages with the pinion gear. Contact Information Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to NATHANAEL T ZEMUI whose telephone number is (571)272-4894. The examiner can normally be reached M-F 8am-5pm (EST). Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, BARBARA GILLIAM can be reached at (571)272-1330. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /NATHANAEL T ZEMUI/Examiner, Art Unit 1727
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

May 22, 2023
Application Filed
Apr 17, 2026
Non-Final Rejection mailed — §102, §103 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12633531
POSITIVE ELECTRODE AND NONAQUEOUS ELECTROLYTE SECONDARY BATTERY USING THE SAME
3y 5m to grant Granted May 19, 2026
Patent 12597636
SOLID-STATE COMPOSITE POLYMER ELECTROLYTE MEMBRANE AND ALL-SOLID-STATE LITHIUM ION BATTERY INCLUDING THE SAME
3y 0m to grant Granted Apr 07, 2026
Patent 12586875
METHOD FOR PRODUCING LITHIUM-ION BATTERIES, IN PARTICULAR HIGH-POWER BATTERIES, AND BATTERY OBTAINED BY THIS METHOD
3y 9m to grant Granted Mar 24, 2026
Patent 12573657
SOLID-STATE BATTERY
4y 4m to grant Granted Mar 10, 2026
Patent 12573665
METHOD FOR MANUFACTURING ALL SOLID-STATE LITHIUM BATTERY
3y 1m to grant Granted Mar 10, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

Strategy Recommendation AI-generated — please review before filing

Get a prosecution strategy drawn from examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Typically takes 5-10 seconds — AI-generated, attorney review required before filing

Prosecution Projections

1-2
Expected OA Rounds
56%
Grant Probability
81%
With Interview (+24.8%)
3y 7m (~7m remaining)
Median Time to Grant
Low
PTA Risk
Based on 466 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allowance rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month