Prosecution Insights
Last updated: May 29, 2026
Application No. 18/201,360

ELECTRONIC DEVICE GENERATING 3D MODEL OF HUMAN AND ITS OPERATION METHOD

Non-Final OA §112
Filed
May 24, 2023
Priority
May 26, 2022 — RE 10-2022-0064794 +2 more
Examiner
MINKO, DENIS VASILIY
Art Unit
2612
Tech Center
2600 — Communications
Assignee
ELECTRONICS AND TELECOMMUNICATIONS RESEARCH INSTITUTE
OA Round
3 (Non-Final)
65%
Grant Probability
Favorable
3-4
OA Rounds
0m
Est. Remaining
58%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 65% — above average
65%
Career Allowance Rate
13 granted / 20 resolved
+3.0% vs TC avg
Minimal -7% lift
Without
With
+-6.7%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
2y 5m
Avg Prosecution
13 currently pending
Career history
42
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
1.5%
-38.5% vs TC avg
§103
91.0%
+51.0% vs TC avg
§102
6.0%
-34.0% vs TC avg
§112
1.5%
-38.5% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 20 resolved cases

Office Action

§112
DETAILED ACTION Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Continued Examination Under 37 CFR 1.114 A request for continued examination under 37 CFR 1.114, including the fee set forth in 37 CFR 1.17(e), was filed in this application after final rejection. Since this application is eligible for continued examination under 37 CFR 1.114, and the fee set forth in 37 CFR 1.17(e) has been timely paid, the finality of the previous Office action has been withdrawn pursuant to 37 CFR 1.114. Applicant's submission filed on 12/26/2025 has been entered. STATUS OF CLAIMS Claims 1-20 are pending. Claims 1, 12, 13, and 14 are amended. Claim 11 is canceled. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 112 The following is a quotation of the first paragraph of 35 U.S.C. 112(a): (a) IN GENERAL.—The specification shall contain a written description of the invention, and of the manner and process of making and using it, in such full, clear, concise, and exact terms as to enable any person skilled in the art to which it pertains, or with which it is most nearly connected, to make and use the same, and shall set forth the best mode contemplated by the inventor or joint inventor of carrying out the invention. The following is a quotation of the first paragraph of pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 112: The specification shall contain a written description of the invention, and of the manner and process of making and using it, in such full, clear, concise, and exact terms as to enable any person skilled in the art to which it pertains, or with which it is most nearly connected, to make and use the same, and shall set forth the best mode contemplated by the inventor of carrying out his invention. Claim 1-20 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 112(a) or 35 U.S.C. 112 (pre-AIA ), first paragraph, as failing to comply with the written description requirement. The claims contains subject matter which was not described in the specification in such a way as to reasonably convey to one skilled in the relevant art that the inventor or a joint inventor, or for applications subject to pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 112, the inventor(s), at the time the application was filed, had possession of the claimed invention. Claims 1, 13, and 14 recite “determining a weight related to the degree of synthesis for each of the whole-body rendered image” but the specification fails to mention a “degree of synthesis.” Therefore claims 1-20 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 112(a) for claiming subject matter which was not described in the applicant’s originally filed specification. Response to Arguments Applicant’s arguments with respect to claim(s) 1-20 have been considered but are moot because the new ground of rejection does not rely on any reference applied in the prior rejection of record for any teaching or matter specifically challenged in the argument. The 35 U.S.C. 103 rejection has been withdrawn. However, claims 1-20 are now rejected under 35 U.S.C. 112(a). Conclusion Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to DENIS VASILIY MINKO whose telephone number is (571)270-5226. The examiner can normally be reached Monday-Thursday 8:30-6:00 EST. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Said Broome can be reached at 571-272-2931. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /DENIS VASILIY MINKO/Examiner, Art Unit 2612 /Said Broome/Supervisory Patent Examiner, Art Unit 2612
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

May 24, 2023
Application Filed
May 21, 2025
Non-Final Rejection mailed — §112
Aug 13, 2025
Response Filed
Oct 28, 2025
Final Rejection mailed — §112
Dec 26, 2025
Request for Continued Examination
Jan 17, 2026
Response after Non-Final Action
Feb 27, 2026
Non-Final Rejection mailed — §112 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12639942
ARTIFACT PROCESSING IN VIDEO USING TEXTURE INFORMATION
2y 0m to grant Granted May 26, 2026
Patent 12622757
USER INTERFACE FOR THREE DIMENSIONAL IMAGING AND TREATMENT
3y 3m to grant Granted May 12, 2026
Patent 12608854
SYSTEMS AND METHODS FOR TEETH WHITENING SIMULATION
2y 7m to grant Granted Apr 21, 2026
Patent 12597195
METHOD FOR GENERATING PHOTOGRAPHED IMAGE DATA USING VIRTUAL ORGANOID
2y 0m to grant Granted Apr 07, 2026
Patent 12579732
Face-Oriented Geometry Streaming
2y 11m to grant Granted Mar 17, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

Strategy Recommendation AI-generated — please review before filing

Get a prosecution strategy drawn from examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Typically takes 5-10 seconds — AI-generated, attorney review required before filing

Prosecution Projections

3-4
Expected OA Rounds
65%
Grant Probability
58%
With Interview (-6.7%)
2y 5m (~0m remaining)
Median Time to Grant
High
PTA Risk
Based on 20 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allowance rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month